Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T03:01:22.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lafayette's Impossible Princess: On (Not) Making Literary History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Nicholas Paige
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The branch of literary history occupied with generic evolution customarily views masterworks as the drivers of formal change: their success causes later writers to follow their innovations. This article considers the case of the comtesse de Lafayette's La princesse de Clèves, which broke from received Aristotelian ideas on the use of history by focusing on an invented heroine; because the princess was invented, she blocked traditional reading strategies and allowed instead for readerly identification. It is tempting to conclude from this that the novel's innovations made it a harbinger of the future, an ancestor of the nineteenth-century novel. Yet writers of Lafayette's time did not follow her cue, and no trail leads from the princesse de Clèves to later fictive protagonists. Theories of literary evolution must take into account that in many cases there may be no reassuring causal relation between masterworks and broader literary practice.

Information

Type
Literary History, Literary Revision, Literary Performance
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 1061 - 1077
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Mark, Bannister. Privileged Mortals: The French Heroic Novel, 1630–1660. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Chrystelle, Barbillon. “La représentation des larmes dans l'œuvre fictionnelle de Mme de Lafayette.” Littératures classiques 62 (2007): 109–21. Print.Google Scholar
Beasley, Faith E. Revising Memory: Women's Fiction and Memoirs in Seventeenth-Century France. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
Bombart, Mathilde, and Escola, Marc, eds. Lectures à clés. Spec. issue of Littératures classiques 54 (2005): 1–295. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille, seigneur de. Œuvres complètes. Ed. Lalanne, Ludovic. 11 vols. Paris: Renouard, 1864–82. Print.Google Scholar
Calle-Gruber, Mireille. L'effet-fiction de l'illusion romanesque. Paris: Nizet, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
John, Campbell. “La ‘modernité‘ de La princesse de Clèves.” Seventeenth-Century French Studies 29 (2007): 63–72. Print.Google Scholar
Chamard, H., and Rudler, G. “Les sources historiques de La princesse de Clèves.” Revue du seizième siècle 2 (1914): 92–131, 289–321. Print.Google Scholar
Ross, Chambers. “Gossip and the Novel: Knowing Narrative and Narrative Knowing in Balzac, Mme de Lafayette and Proust.” Australian Journal of French Studies 23.2 (1986): 212–33. Print.Google Scholar
Charnes, Jean-Antoine de. Conversations sur la critique de La princesse de Clèves. 1679. Ed. François Weil et al. Tours: Groupe d'Étude du XVIIe Siècle de l'U François-Rabelais, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Roger, Chartier. “Richardson, Diderot et la lectrice impatiente.” MLN 114.4 (1999): 647–66. Print.Google Scholar
Dorrit, Cohn. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Jonathan, Culler. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Robert, Darnton. The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. 1984. New York: Vintage, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
DeJean, Joan. Ancients against Moderns: Culture Wars and the Making of a Fin de Siècle. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
DeJean, Joan. “Lafayette's Ellipses: The Privileges of Anonymity.” PMLA 99.5 (1984): 884–902. Print.Google Scholar
Philippe, Desan. “The Economy of Love in La princesse de Clèves.” An Inimitable Example: The Case for the Princesse de Clèves. Ed. Patrick Henry. Washington: Catholic U of Amer. P, 1992. 104–24. Print.Google Scholar
Duchêne, Roger. Madame de Lafayette. 2nd ed. Paris: Fayard, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Marc, Escola, ed. Nouvelles galantes du XVIIe siècle. Paris: Flammarion, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Camille, Esmein. Poétiques du roman: Scudéry, Huet, Du Plaisir et autres textes théoriques et critiques du XVIIe siècle sur le genre romanesque. Paris: Champion, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Barbara, Foley. Telling the Truth: The Theory and Practice of Documentary Fiction. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Michel, Fournier. Généalogie du roman: Émergence d'une formation culturelle au XVIIe siècle en France. [Quebec]: P de l'U Laval, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Catherine, Gallagher. Nobody's Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820. Berkeley: U of California P, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Catherine, Gallagher. “The Rise of Fictionality.” The Novel. Ed. Moretti, Franco. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. 336–63. Print.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Figures II. Paris: Seuil, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
Gevrey, Françoise. “Lectures à clés de La princesse de Clèves au XVIIIe siècle.” Bombart and Escola 191–203. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathalie, Grande. Stratégies de romancières: De Clélie à La princesse de Clèves (1654–1678). Paris: Champion, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Timothy, Hampton. Writing from History: The Rhetoric of Exemplarity in Renaissance Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Erica, Harth. Ideology and Culture in Seventeenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Hénin, Emmanuelle. Ut pictura theatrum: Théâtre et peinture, de la renaissance italienne au classicisme français. Geneva: Droz, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Hipp, Marie-Thérèse. Mythes et réalités: Enquête sur le roman et les mémoires, 1660–1700. Paris: Klincksieck, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Louise K. “Truly Inimitable? Repetition in La princesse de Clèves.” Approaches to Teaching Lafayette's The Princess of Clèves. Ed. Faith E. Beasley and Katherine Ann Jensen. New York: MLA, 1998. 120–26. Print.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keymer. Sterne, the Moderns, and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Lafayette, Marie-Madeleine Pioche de La Vergne, comtesse de. Romans et nouvelles. Ed. Niderst, Alain. Paris: Garnier, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Maurice, Laugaa. Lectures de Mme de Lafayette. Paris: Colin, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Maurice, Laugaa. “Réception des romans et nouvelles de Madame de Lafayette au dix-huitième siècle (en France) (1700–1789).” Œuvres et critiques 12.1 (1987): 121–32. Print.Google Scholar
Lyons, John D. Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Pierre, Malandain. “Écriture de l'histoire dans La princesse de Clèves.” Littérature 36 (1979): 19–36. Print.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. Jane Austen; or, The Secret of Style. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. “Emphasis Added: Plots and Plausibility in Women's Fiction.” PMLA 96.1 (1981): 36–48. Print.Google Scholar
Christine, Montalbetti. “Présentation.” Valincour 15–30.Google Scholar
Franco, Moretti. “The End of the Beginning: A Reply to Christopher Prendergast.” New Left Review 41 (2006): 71–86. Print.Google Scholar
Franco, Moretti. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
William, Nelson. Fact or Fiction: The Dilemma of the Renaissance Storyteller. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Picard, Raymond, and Lafond, Jean, eds. Nouvelles du XVIIe siècle. Paris: Pléiade-Gallimard, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Christopher, Prendergast. “Evolution and Literary History: A Response to Franco Moretti.” New Left Review 34 (2005): 40–62. Print.Google Scholar
Gerald, Prince. Narrative as Theme: Studies in French Fiction. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
William, Ray. Story and History: Narrative Authority and Social Identity in the Eighteenth-Century French and English Novel. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Ritter, Eugène. “La Philothée de Saint François de Sales et la maison de Clèves.” Revue savoisienne 49 (1908): 85–91. Print.Google Scholar
Philip, Stewart. Imitation and Illusion in the French Memoir Novel, 1700–1750. New Haven: Yale UP, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
Harriet, Stone. “Exemplary Teaching in La princesse de Clèves.” French Review 62.2 (1988): 248–58. Print.Google Scholar
Valincour, Jean-Baptiste de. Lettres à Madame la Marquise ∗∗∗ sur le sujet de La princesse de Clèves. 1678. Ed. Christine Montalbetti. Paris: Flammarion, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Van der Schueren, Eric. “Le portrait dans La princesse de Clèves: Lectures pascaliennes.” Littératures 40 (1999): 95–134. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent-Buffault, Anne. Histoire des larmes, XVIIIe–XIXe siècles. Paris: Rivages, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian P. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. Berkeley: U of California P, 1957. Print.Google Scholar