Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T04:10:10.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A global reference for black shale geochemistry and the T-OAE revisited: upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) chemostratigraphy in the Cleveland Basin, England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Ian Jarvis*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Kingston University London, Kingston upon Thames, UK
Elizabeth Atar
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
Darren R. Gröcke
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
Liam G. Herringshaw
Affiliation:
Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of York, York, UK
João P. Trabucho-Alexandre
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK Department of Earth Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Ian Jarvis; Email: i.jarvis@kingston.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Pliensbachian–Toarcian succession of North Yorkshire provides a global reference for the interval incorporating the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (T-OAE, ∼183 Ma). Major and trace element, carbon stable-isotope (δ13Corg) and total organic carbon (TOC) data for the Dove’s Nest core, drilled close to the classic outcrop sections of the Yorkshire coast, demonstrate geochemical, mineralogical and grain-size trends linked to sea level and climate change in the Cleveland Basin. High-resolution correlation between the core and outcrop enables the integration of data to generate a comprehensive chemostratigraphic record. Palaeoredox proxies (Mo, U, V, TOC/P, DOP and Fe speciation) show a progressive shift from oxic bottom waters in the late Pliensbachian through dysoxic–anoxic conditions in the earliest Toarcian to euxinia during the T-OAE. Anoxia–dysoxia persisted into the middle Toarcian. Elemental and isotope data (Re, Re/Mo, δ34SCAS, δ98Mo and ε205Tl) from the coastal sections evidence global expansion of anoxic and euxinic seafloor area driving drawdown of redox-sensitive metals and sulfate from seawater leading to severe depletion in early Toarcian ocean water. The record of anoxia–euxinia in the Cleveland Basin largely reflects global-scale changes in ocean oxygenation, although metal depletion was temporarily enhanced by periods of local basin restriction. Osmium and Sr isotopes demonstrate a pulse of accelerated weathering accompanying the early Toarcian hyperthermal, coincident with the T-OAE. The combined core and outcrop records evidence local and global environmental change accompanying one of the largest perturbations in the global carbon cycle during the last 200 Ma and a period of major biotic turnover.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Early Jurassic palaeogeography, regional setting and location of the Dove’s Nest study core in the Cleveland Basin. (a) Palaeogeographic reconstruction of Europe showing the location of the basin on the European epicontinental shelf; interpreted bottom-water redox conditions associated with the T-OAE are based on geological data and ocean circulation modelling (Ruvalcaba Baroni et al., 2018). (b) Global palaeogeography of the Early Jurassic showing continent configuration, major ocean basins and location of the Karoo–Ferrar Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) that were emplaced during the early – middle Toarcian (Heimdal et al., 2021; Gaynor et al., 2022). Yellow box shows the location of the Europe map. Palaeogeographic base maps in (a) and (b) modified from Blakey (2012, 2016); palaeolatitude in (a) revised based on the online palaeolatitude calculator of van Hinsbergen et al. (2015) at 183 Ma (https://paleolatitude.org) with the palaeomagnetic reference frame of Vaes et al. (2023). (c) Map of eastern North Yorkshire showing the geographic distribution of Jurassic sediments in the Cleveland Basin, isopachs for the Lias and location of the Dove’s Nest borehole. Redrawn after Kent (1980) and Rawson & Wright (2000).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Stratigraphic log of the studied section of the Dove’s Nest core and correlation to a composite outcrop section along the North Yorkshire coast between Hawsker Bottoms and Port Mulgrave. Organic carbon isotopes (δ13Corg) and whole-rock total organic carbon (TOCWR) profiles are shown with their correlation (modified from Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022). Organic-rich facies associated with the large negative δ13Corg excursion of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (T-OAE; Jenkyns, 1985) together with the negative δ13Corg excursion defining the Pliensbachian – Toarcian Boundary Event (Littler et al., 2010) provide prominent tie points. The δ13Corg maximum of the A. gibbosus Subzone is equated to the Late Pliensbachian Event positive excursion of Korte & Hesselbo (2011), De Lena et al. (2019) and Hollaar et al. (2023). Grain size scale: fm, fine mudstone; mm, medium mudstone; cm, coarse mudstone; and fs, very fine sandstone. Yorkshire coast ‘bed’ numbers and named marker beds from Hawsker Bottoms (Fig. 1) for the Pliensbachian (Howarth, 1955) and Whitby composite section for the Toarcian (Howarth, 1962, 1973, 1992). Dove’s Nest data from Trabucho-Alexandre et al. (2022) and this study. Yorkshire coast δ13Corg data from Hawsker Bottoms: orange, Littler et al. (2010); turquoise, Cohen et al. (2004); and pink, DB Kemp et al. (2005). Port Mulgrave: dark blue, DB Kemp et al. (2005); turquoise, Cohen et al. (2004). Saltwick Bay: turquoise, Cohen et al. (2004). TOC data for the Yorkshire coast are composite section values from Kemp et al. (2011; thin green high-resolution curve), Ruvalcaba Baroni et al. (2018; green-filled triangles) and McArthur (2019; green-filled circles). Thick green line shows the trend of the two low-resolution datasets. Vertical dotted lines and numbers are the δ13Corg reference value for average Phanerozoic black shale (Meyers, 2014) and the TOCWR content of average shale (Law, 1999) and average black shale (Vine & Tourtelot, 1970). SB2 and SB3 are the middle and upper Sulphur Bands of the basal lower Toarcian (Salem, 2013; McArthur, 2019). Abbreviations of biostratigraphic zonation: H. bifrons = Hildoceras bifrons; H. serpentinum = Harpoceras serpentinum; D. tenui. = Dactylioceras tenuicostatum; P. spin. = Pleuroceras spinatum; A. margaritatus = Amaltheus margaritatus; D. commune = Dactylioceras commune; H. falciferum = Harpoceras falciferum; C. exa. = Cleviceras exaratum; Ds = Dactylioceras semicelatum; * = Dactylioceras tenuicostatum; † = Dactylioceras clevelandicum; Pp = Protogrammoceras paltum; Ph = Pleuroceras hawskerense; Pa = Pleuroceras apyrenum; A. gib. = Amaltheus gibbosus; As = Amaltheus subnodosus; A. stokesi = Amaltheus stokesi. Ages after GTS2020 (Gradstein et al., 2020) with revisions of Al-Suwaidi et al. (2022). Chemostratigraphic units modified from Remírez & Algeo (2020) and defined by multi-element proxies (see text); note that a – d, to the left of the TOCWR profile for the Yorkshire coast, are subunits of Unit III, the T-OAE.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Carbon isotope correlation of selected European Pliensbachian – Toarcian successions. The map (bottom right) shows the palaeogeographic location of the sites (see Fig. 1 for details). Cleveland Basin δ13Corg profiles from this study (Dove’s Nest = black, coast composite = grey; see Fig. 2 for sources). The top of the D. commune Subzone lies ∼16 m above the top of the Hard Shales on the Yorkshire coast (Hesselbo & Jenkyns, 1995). Mochras δ13Corg data from Xu et al. (2018) and Storm et al. (2020); δ13Ccarb after Ullmann et al. (2022). CIEs as Figure 2 with Stokesi Event of Peti et al. (2017) and Storm et al. (2020). Sancerre δ13Corg data from Hermoso et al. (2013) and Peti et al. (2021); δ13Ccarb after Hermoso et al. (2009a, 2009b; 2013) and Peti et al. (2021). Pliensbachian biostratigraphy follows Peti et al. (2017, 2021) and Zhang et al. (2023). Peniche δ13Corg profile from Fantasia et al. (2019). Peniche Pliensbachian δ13Ccarb values after Oliveira et al. (2006) with stratigraphic revisions and additional data from Silva et al. (2011); Pliensbachian – Toarcian boundary and Toarcian δ13Ccarb after Hesselbo et al. (2007). Yorkshire stratigraphy follows Figure 2. Other abbreviations: PlToBE = Pliensbachian – Toarcian Boundary Event; H. falcif. = Harpoceras falciferum; Dc = Dactylioceras commune; Pf = Peronoceras fibulatum; Cc = Catacoeloceras crissum; D. ten. = Dactylioceras tenuicostatum; Ast. = Amaltheus stokesi; Ps = Pleuroceras spinatum; Dp = Dactylioceras polymorphum; H. levisoni = Hildaites levisoni.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Geochemical profiles for lithofacies proxies Al2O3 (aluminosilicates, principally clay minerals), CaCO3e (carbonates; calcite, siderite) and TOCWR (organic fraction) through the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of the Dove’s Nest core, with selected detrital proxies. ‘Bed’ numbers, names and biostratigraphy are derived from chemostratigraphic correlation to Hawsker Bottoms for the Pliensbachian (Howarth, 1955) and a Whitby composite section for the Toarcian (Howarth, 1962, 1973, 1992): red, sideritic beds; blue, limestones; and black other beds (see Fig. 2). Vertical dotted lines and numbers are reference values for Post-Archean Average Shale (PASS; = average mud of Taylor & McLennan, 2001). Prominent limestone ‘bed’ 35 (Whale Stones) and ‘beds’ 39 – 40 (Top Jet Dogger and Millstones) are clearly expressed by their high CaCO3e contents. Significant shifts in the elemental (Figs S1, S2) and element-ratio profiles (Figs 4, 5) combined with coincident changes in δ13Corg and TOC (Fig. 2) are used to define the chemostratigraphic units (see text), modified from the scheme of Remírez & Algeo (2020). LPlE = Late Pliensbachian Event; other abbreviations as Figure 2. Detrital proxies show multiple stacked CU cycles superimposed on a longer-term fining-upward trend through the top Staithes Sandstone to mid-Cleveland Ironstone, followed by a marked upward increase in grain size comprising 3 stacked CU cycles (cf. Macquaker & Taylor, 1996). Cycle 3 is most prominent and coincides with an interval of high δ13Corg and TOCWR values ascribed to the LPlE. The base of the Whitby Mudstone is a sharp facies break to clay-mineral dominated sediments illustrated by a steep rise in K/Al, Rb/Al and Cs/Al (not plotted) ratios. The T-OAE is expressed by a sharp increase and peak in TOCWR (maximum 9.2%), although elevated organic matter contents continue upward through the Whitby Mudstone. Upward-coarsening, 405 ka cycles in the Jet Rock (Si/Al profile) derived from cycle analysis of the coastal section by Thibault et al. (2018, fig. 2) are also displayed in the Dove’s Nest record.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Geochemical profiles for redox and productivity proxies through the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of the Dove’s Nest core. Stratigraphic framework as in Figure 4. SB2 – SB3 are the middle and upper Sulphur Bands, consisting of laminated pyritic carbonaceous mudstones.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Field photograph of the lower cliff face immediately west of the old harbour of Port Mulgrave (Fig. 1) annotated with the TOC, CaCO3 and δ13Corg data of DB Kemp et al. (2005) and Kemp et al. (2011) and the stratigraphic framework of Howarth (1962). The five distinctive concretionary horizons in the Jet Rock, extinction level iii of Caswell et al. (2009) and chemostratigraphic units (IIIa – IVa) with key intervals of change are indicated. D. semi. = Dactylioceras semicelatum; C. exaratum = Cleviceras exaratum; H.f. = H. falciferum. Chemostratigraphic correlation to Dove’s Nest is illustrated in Figure 7. Note that the shore platform in the foreground occurs at the level of the base Jet Rock (‘bed’ 33). The sedimentary log and geochemical profiles below this (‘bed’ 32) represent variations in the subsurface at this site.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Chemostratigraphic correlation of the T-OAE interval in the Yorkshire coastal outcrop reference sections with the Dove’s Nest core. Stratigraphy after Howarth (1962, 1973, 1992) and Howarth (in Cope et al., 1980). Dt = Dactylioceras tenuicostatum Subzone. Lithological log is based on the Hawsker Bottoms and Port Mulgrave sections from DB Kemp et al. (2005): lithologies are dark-grey laminated mudrocks (dark-grey shading), medium-grey mudrocks (pale-grey shading) and carbonate bands and nodules (brick pattern). Major carbonate markers – ‘Stone’ bands and ‘Doggers’ – are indicated. Sample heights of Hesselbo et al. (2000, fig. 3) were recalculated based on the positions of major bed contacts. Data sources: Hesselbo et al. (2000); DB Kemp et al. (2005); Kemp et al. (2011); Thibault et al. (2018); Trabucho-Alexandre et al. (2022); this study. Si/Al and Ti/Al ratios for the coastal sections were recalculated by Thibault et al. (2018 supplementary data) after correction for analytical bias. Shaded intervals a – d represent subdivisions of chemostratigraphic Unit III. This unit corresponds to the interval displaying the large negative carbon-isotope excursion that characterizes the T-OAE. Dashed horizontal grey lines show the correlation of major bed bases; dotted horizontal grey lines correlate significant chemostratigraphic tie points. Cyclostratigraphic filtered output for carbon isotopes (orange curve) and the detrital fraction (yellow curve, derived from Zr/Rb data) are plotted after Thibault et al. (2018). Vertical dotted lines indicate: the δ13Corg value of average Phanerozoic black shales (grey; Meyers, 2014); the oxic–anoxic- and anoxic–euxinic-facies boundaries defined by TOC content (green, 2.5% and 10%) proposed by Algeo & Maynard (2004).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Box plot summary of stratigraphic trends in major- and trace-element contents and Al-ratio data of chemostratigraphic units through the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of the Dove’s Nest core. Boxes represent 25–75% quartiles with median values shown by the vertical line inside the box. Whiskers are drawn from the top of the box up to the largest data point less than 1.5 times the box height from the box (the ‘upper inner fence’) and similarly below the box (Hammer et al., 2001). Outlier values outside the inner fences are shown as circles, values further than 3 times the box height from the box (the ‘outer fences’) are shown as stars.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Principal component analysis biplot of PC1 vs PC2 for geochemical data from the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of the Dove’s Nest core. Compositional data for samples (n = 96) having a full major- and trace-element dataset were transformed using a Centre Log-Ratio to remove closure effects prior to PCA. The first two principal components account for 48.4% and 22.9% of the variance, respectively (Table S4).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Ti/Al and K/Al ratio profiles from Dove’s Nest compared to quartz grain size, proportion of silt, illite content, CIA, and Os isotopes. Quartz grain size and illite content (peak-area integration with height ratios method) after de Vos (2017). Silt percentage was determined from Port Mulgrave (Ghadeer, 2011). CIA = Chemical Index of Alteration (Nesbitt & Young, 1982); CIA = [AI2O3/(Al2O3 + CaO* + Na2O + K2O)] × 100 (molecular proportions). CaO* moles assumed to be equivalent to Na2O (filled blue circles) with additional values derived from CaO determinations (open blue circles), where a number of moles was less than that of Na2O (McLennan, 1993). Osmium isotope plot from Cohen et al. (2004, fig. 1), with composite data from 3 coastal sections: Hawsker Bottoms; Port Mulgrave; Saltwick Bay. Cleveland Basin relative sea-level curve (Hesselbo, 2008) replotted relative to biostratigraphic zones interpreted for the Dove’s Nest core. 187Os/188Os ratio of early Toarcian ocean water (0.377 ± 0.065) after van Acken et al. (2019). Cycles are based principally on the Ti/Al profile.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Geochemical cross-plots for selected detrital proxies and grain size in the Dove’s Nest core. (a) Si/ Al vs Ti/Al. (b) Na/Al vs K/Al. (c) Ti/Al vs quartz mean grain size (de Vos, 2017). Mineral reference compositions from webmineral.com, average shale (PAAS) after Taylor & McLennan (2001). Plotted regression lines are (a) ordinary least square and (b, c) reduced major axis, with 95% confidence envelope in (c). Grey shading in (b) represents the field of the Subunit IIIb illite and weathering pulse including Whale Stones ‘bed’ 35, characterized by anomalous low CIA values (Fig. 10).

Figure 11

Figure 12. Ternary diagram of Al2O3–(CaO*+Na2O)–K2O in Dove’s Nest rock samples. Values are molecular proportions. (a) CIA = Chemical Index of Alteration (Nesbitt & Young, 1982) with CaO* moles assumed to be equivalent to Na2O (McLennan, 1993; see text). Tonalite, granodiorite and granite compositions after Condie (1993). (b) Enlargement of plotted data in the top sector of the diagram (red outline in a) with selected sample details. Grey shading represents the field of the Subunit IIIb illite and weathering pulse with high K/Al and anomalous low CIA values.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Ternary plot of iron and carbonate-associated elements Fe+Mn–Ca–Mg in Dove’s Nest rock samples compared to constituent mineral compositions. Stars are electron microprobe determinations of mineral fractions from the Cleveland Ironstone of Staithes (Aggett, 1990). Open triangles are calculated pure mineral values (webmineral.com). Average shale (PASS) composition after Taylor & McLennan (2001). Plot is scaled based on the maximum and minimum values of the three components (cf. de Lange et al., 1987).

Figure 13

Figure 14. Correlation of TOC/PT, DOPT, FeEF, MnEF and PEF between the Dove’s Nest core and Yorkshire coastal outcrop sections. Coast geochemical profiles from McArthur et al. (2008), McArthur (2019) and Remírez & Algeo (2020) with additional high-resolution data (Thibault et al., 2018); Yorkshire chemostratigraphic Units I – V modified from Remírez & Algeo (2020). Stratigraphy as in Figs 2, 4. WS = Whale Stones (‘bed’ 35’); TJD = Top Jet Dogger (‘bed’ 39). Enrichment factors (EF) are calculated relative to PASS. Data of Thibault et al. (2018) are recalibrated relative to McArthur et al. (2008) and McArthur (2019): stratigraphic heights are increased by 1.1 m; Al values are increased by 20% to remove analytical bias. Vertical grey dotted lines are EF values of 1. Vertical green dotted lines indicate the Redfield ratio, a TOC/P ratio of ∼106:1, typical of marine plankton biomass (Redfield et al., 1963). Values of >106 indicate P-release from the sediment under reducing conditions. Vertical dotted lines on the TOC/PT and DOPT plots mark the positions of redox boundaries typically associated with values of 50 and 0.25 (red, oxic/suboxic), 106 and 0.5 (green, dysoxic/anoxic) respectively, following Algeo & Ingall (2007) and Algeo & Maynard (2004). More conservative threshold DOP values of <0.45 for oxic or dysoxic depositional environments and >0.75 for a euxinic environment (gold vertical dotted line) have been proposed by Raiswell et al. (2018).

Figure 14

Figure 15. Bottom-water redox proxy interpretation for the upper Pliensbachian – lower Toarcian of the Cleveland Basin derived from TOC, TOC/P, DOP and Fe speciation. δ13Corg profile for Dove’s Nest (Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022, black) rescaled to match coast composite data (see Fig. 2 for sources). Rescaled whole-rock TOC profile for Dove’s Nest (Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022, dark green) with coast composite data of Kemp et al. (2011; thin yellow-green high-resolution curve) and trend of the low-resolution coast datasets of Ruvalcaba Baroni et al. (2018, open triangles) and McArthur (2019) (thin pale green low-resolution curve; see Fig. 2). Average shale and black shale values as in Figure 2; ‘anoxic threshold’ of TOCWR = 2.5 wt% follows Algeo & Maynard (2004). Low-resolution TOC/PT (dark green) and DOPT (dark orange) curves from McArthur et al. (2008) and Remírez & Algeo (2020) with high-resolution data (thin pale curves) from Thibault et al. (2018); see Figure 14 for further information. Iron speciation data from Salem (2013, cream-filled circles) and Houben et al. (2021, yellow-filled circles) with redox field boundaries after Raiswell et al. (2018). Extinction levels (i)– (iii) after Caswell et al. (2009). Pliensb. = Pliensbachian; Bitumin. Sh. = Bituminous Shales; D. semic. = Dactylioceras semicelatum; Dt = D. tenuicostatum; Dc = D. clevelandicum; P. hawk. = Pleuroceras hawskerense; Pa = P. apyrenum.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Correlation of Mo, TOC, V and U between the Dove’s Nest core and Yorkshire coastal outcrop sections. Dove’s Nest data this study. Yorkshire coast Mo and Mo/TOC and TOC plots from McArthur (2019) with additional high-resolution TOC (thin black line, see Fig. 2), Mo and Mo/TOC curves (thin dark red lines; Thibault et al., 2018). Yorkshire VEF data were calculated from Ruvalcaba Baroni et al. (2018) with MoEF, U and UEF data after Remírez & Algeo (2020). Stratigraphy as in Figures 2, 4. WS = Whale Stones (‘bed’ 35’); TJD = Top Jet Dogger (‘bed’ 39). Enrichment factors (Section 6.d), e.g. MoEF, are calculated relative to PASS. Vertical grey dotted lines are EF values of 1. Vertical green dotted lines indicate the ‘intermittent euxinia’ boundary of 25 ppm Mo (Scott & Lyons, 2012) and the ‘anoxic threshold’ of TOC = 2.5 wt% (Algeo & Maynard, 2004). Consistent enrichment in authigenic uranium (UEF >1) characterizing Units III and IV is also well displayed in spectral gamma-ray logs of the coastal sections (Myers & Wignall, 1987; Parkinson, 1996).

Figure 16

Figure 17. Cross-plots for key redox-sensitive trace metals. (a) Mo vs Al. Mo shows no clear relationship with Al. (b) Mo vs TOC. The steep upper regression line (small grey dots) for Units IV and V (left) derived from the Dove’s Nest data, displaying a positive correlation between Mo and TOC, contrasts to the shallow lines (small grey dots) derived for T-OAE Unit III (right – upper line and statistics is for Dove’s Nest samples, lower line is for Yorkshire coast samples of McArthur et al. 2008). Regression lines from selected modern anoxic silled basins representing increasing deep water renewal times of <10 – 650 ka (Algeo & Rowe, 2012) are Mo/TOC (ppm/%) ∼45 Saanich Inlet (purple); ∼25 Cariaco Basin (green); ∼9 Framvaren Fjord (red); ∼4.5 Black Sea (blue). Bottom water restriction trends after Algeo & Lyons (2006). (c) U vs Al. Lower regression line is for Pliensbachian Subunits Ia–c; upper line is for Toarcian Units IV and V (all samples ≥3 ppm U). (d) U vs TOC. Lower regression line (left) for Subunits Ia–c; upper regression line (right) for Units IV and V. (e) V vs Al. Regression line is for Pliensbachian Subunits Ia–c, excluding the three Fe-rich flyers. (f) V vs TOC. Regression lines are for Pliensbachian Subunits Ia–c (left, Dove’s Nest) and Toarcian Units II–V (right, coast samples; Ruvalcaba Baroni et al., 2018). TOC-based anoxic (2.5%, vertical dashed green line marking boundary between oxic and anoxic non-sulfidic conditions) and euxinic (10%, upper limit of x-axis) thresholds after Algeo & Maynard (2004). Solid symbols are from the Dove’s Nest core (this study), faded symbols are for Yorkshire coastal outcrop samples (McArthur et al., 2008; Ruvalcaba Baroni et al., 2018; McArthur, 2019; Remírez & Algeo, 2020). Dove’s Nest TOC data are whole-rock values. Average shale (PASS) composition after Taylor & McLennan (2001). Note that samples with 10 – 20% TOC reported from Unit III of the coastal outcrops fall outside the plot area of (B), (D) and (F) but lie on the trends of the regression lines shown.

Figure 17

Figure 18. MoEF vs UEF cross-plot for stratigraphic units comprising the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of Dove’s Nest core. The three diagonal lines represent multiples (0.3, 1, 3) of the Mo:U ratio of present-day seawater (SW) converted to an average weight ratio of 3.1 for the purpose of comparison with sediment Mo:U weight ratios (Tribovillard et al., 2012). General patterns of MoEF vs UEF covariation in modern marine environments modified from Tribovillard et al. (2012) and Yano et al. (2020): unrestricted open ocean field based on the eastern tropical Pacific; particulate shuttle field based on the Cariaco Basin and Saanich Inlet. Trend lines show deoxygenation trends in modern marine environments (Tribovillard et al., 2012) with positions based on data from restricted basins and coastal settings (Paul et al., 2023). The anomalous high EF values of Whale Stones sample 167.89, interpreted as sampling a carbonate concretion, are likely an artifact of the high carbonate content (81%).

Figure 18

Figure 19. Stratigraphic variation in selected isotope geochemistry in the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of Yorkshire. δ13Corg profile for Dove’s Nest (Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022, black) rescaled to coastal succession, with compiled high-resolution coast curve (grey, see Fig. 2; Cohen et al., 2004; DB Kemp et al., 2005; Littler et al., 2010). Stratigraphic framework as in Figure 2. Rescaled whole-rock TOC profile for Dove’s Nest (Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022, dark green) with coast composite data of Kemp et al. (2011; thin yellow-green high-resolution curve), McArthur (2019; thin pale green low-resolution curve) and Ruvalcaba Baroni et al. (2018; green-filled triangles). Yorkshire coast Mo profile of McArthur (2019; thick pink line) with elemental results for Mo-isotope samples of Pearce et al. (2008; red filled triangles) and high-resolution data of Thibault et al. (2018; thin dark red line, see Fig. 16). δ98/95Mo coast profile from Pearce et al. (2008). Details of the Mo concentration and isotope curves within Unit III (T-OAE) are presented in Figure 20. Belemnite carbonate-associated sulfur isotope profile (δ34SCAS) from Gill et al. (2011; white filled squares) incorporating the data of Newton et al. (2011; orange squares). Belemnite 87Sr/86Sr coast curve after McArthur et al. (2000). 187Os/188Osi profile of Cohen et al. (1999; 2004). Belemnite carbonate oxygen-isotope (δ18O, blue dots) and Mg/Ca ratios (blue circles) after McArthur et al. (2000).

Figure 19

Figure 20. Stratigraphic profiles of δ13Corg, TOC and selected trace-metal isotopes within Unit III, the T-OAE interval of the Yorkshire coast. Stratigraphy as in Figures 6, 7. Bulk rock δ13Corg and TOC profiles of the composite section from Hesselbo et al. (2000, pale coloured lines) and DB Kemp et al. (2005, dark lines), Kemp et al. (2011, dark lines) – see Figure 7. Shaded grey bands indicate Unit III Subunits a – c (see Section 8.c); shaded blue band is the interval of the carbonate maximum, Subunit IIId. A – D mark coincident sharp falls in δ13Corg (after DB Kemp et al., 2005; Cohen et al., 2007) and δ98Mo, with increased Mo, as noted by Kemp et al. (2011). Biotic extinction levels ii and iii after Caswell et al. (2009); base of trace fossil absent interval follows Caswell & Herringshaw (2023). Thallium isotopes (ε205Tl) from Nielsen et al. (2011). Rhenium, Mo, Re/Mo and δ98Mo profiles from Pearce et al. (2008). Note that Nielsen et al.’s (2011, fig. 5) comparison figure of ε205Tl vs δ98Mo at Port Mulgrave incorrectly plotted the position of the Mo dataset relative to the stratigraphy, as presented by Pearce et al. (2008, fig. 2). The replotted data in our figure do not support an anti-correlation between these two isotope systems, as proposed by Nielsen et al. (2011) and modelled by Owens et al. (2017).

Figure 20

Figure 21. Stratigraphic profiles of δ13Corg, δ13Cn-alkanes, isorenieratane, AOM, TOC and δ15Ntot within Unit III, the T-OAE interval of the Yorkshire coast. Bulk rock δ13Corg and TOC profiles of the composite section from Hesselbo et al. (2000, pale coloured lines) and DB Kemp et al. (2005, dark lines), Kemp et al. (2011, dark lines) – see Figure 7; ‘anoxic threshold’ of TOCWR = 2.5 wt% follows Algeo & Maynard (2004). δ13C data for terrestrial wood (Hesselbo et al., 2000, brown squares) are offset but track the bulk sediment δ13Corg curve. Carbon isotope values from Hawsker Bottoms of representative long-chain n-alkane biomarkers (δ13Cn-alkane) derived from terrestrial plants (n-C27, n-C29) also display the negative excursion of the T-OAE (French et al., 2014). Short-chain n-alkanes (n-C17n-C19) attributed to marine plants follow an identical δ13C trend (French et al., 2014, fig. 7). The isorenieratane profile, a biomarker for anaerobic phototrophic green sulfur bacteria, provides evidence of reducing conditions developing during the initial phase of the T-OAE, peaking at the time of deposition of ‘bed’ 40 (Millstones); chlorobactane and okenane (not shown) display identical patterns (French et al., 2014, fig. 5). Amorphous organic matter (AOM) and algal cysts dominate (50 – >90%) the palynological assemblages (after Slater et al., 2019) of the high-TOC anoxic – euxinic facies. Peak species richness of calcareous nannofossils, preserved as carbonate and external moulds in organic matter throughout the section (Slater et al., 2022), occurs in Whale Stones ‘bed’ 35, together with a pulse of prasinophyte algae and dense granular organic matter (Houben et al., 2021). Nitrogen isotopes (δ15Ntot) display low values attributable to enhanced N2 fixation by cyanobacteria in a strongly redox-stratified marine environment (Wang et al., 2021). Toarcian open ocean seawater field derived from Tethyan sections (Section 16.a.1). The δ15Ntot profile (Jenkyns et al., 2001) broadly follows TOC. A – D mark coincident sharp falls in δ13Corg (after DB Kemp et al., 2005; Cohen et al., 2007) and δ98Mo, as noted by Kemp et al. (2011) – see Figure 20. Biotic extinction levels ii and iii after Caswell et al. (2009); base of trace fossil absent interval follows Caswell & Herringshaw (2023).

Figure 21

Figure 22. TOC, biotic trends, extinction levels and palaeoredox change through the upper Pliensbachian – middle Toarcian of the Cleveland Basin. Yorkshire coast stratigraphy as in Figure 2. Rescaled whole-rock TOC profile for Dove’s Nest (Trabucho-Alexandre et al., 2022, dark green) with coast composite data of Kemp et al. (2011; thin yellow-green high-resolution curve) and trend of the low-resolution coast datasets of Ruvalcaba Baroni et al. (2018) and McArthur (2019) (thin pale green low-resolution curve; see Fig. 2). Ranges of low-oxygen specialist bivalve taxa compiled from Little (1995) and Caswell et al. (2009). Trace-fossil taxonomic richness from Caswell & Frid (2017), Caswell & Dawn (2019) and Caswell & Herringshaw (2023). Macrofaunal diversity after Danise et al. (2013,2015). Profiles rescaled to reference stratigraphy (Fig. 2) using subzone and marker bed datum levels. Extinction levels (i) – (iii) from Caswell et al. (2009). The boundary between pre-extinction and post-extinction survival intervals of Atkinson et al. (2023) lies at the base of the C. exaratum Subzone (level iii). The top of the ‘survival interval’, the base of recovery phase 1, occurs in the lower H. bifrons Zone above the top of our study interval. Geochemical palaeoredox interpretations from this study (see text). Climate interpretation incorporates palynological interpretation of Slater et al. (2019) with oxygen isotope and Mg/Ca trends from belemnites (Fig. 21).

Supplementary material: File

Jarvis et al. supplementary material 1

Jarvis et al. supplementary material
Download Jarvis et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Jarvis et al. supplementary material 2

Jarvis et al. supplementary material
Download Jarvis et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 235.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Jarvis et al. supplementary material 3

Jarvis et al. supplementary material
Download Jarvis et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 34 KB