Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T15:02:43.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of an intervention programme on knowledge, attitudes and practices of population regarding severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in endemic areas of Lu'an, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Y. LYU
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
C.-Y. HU
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
L. SUN
Affiliation:
Fuyang City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuyang, China
W. QIN
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
P.-P. XU
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
J. SUN
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
J.-Y. HU
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
Y. YANG
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
F.-L. LI
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
H.-W. CHANG
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
X.-D. LI
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
S.-Y. XIE
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
K.-C. LI
Affiliation:
Lu'an City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lu'an, China
X.-X. HUANG
Affiliation:
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
F. DING
Affiliation:
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
X.-J. ZHANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
*
*Author for correspondence: X.-J. Zhang, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China. (Email: zxj731024@126.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of the population regarding severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in endemic areas of Lu'an in China were assessed before and after an intervention programme. The pre-intervention phase was conducted using a sample of 425 participants from the 12 selected villages with the highest rates of endemic SFTS infection. A predesigned interview questionnaire was used to assess KAP. Subsequently, an intervention programme was designed and applied in the selected villages. KAP was re-assessed for each population in the selected villages using the same interview questionnaire. Following 2 months of the programme, 339 participants had completed the re-assessed survey. The impact of the intervention programme was evaluated using suitable statistical methods. A significant increase in the KAP and total KAP scores was noted following the intervention programme, whereas the proportion of correct knowledge, the positive attitudes and the effective practices toward SFTS of respondents increased significantly. The intervention programme was effective in improving KAP level of SFTS in populations that were resident in endemic areas.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sampling diagram of the study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample socio-demographic characteristics from the two study phases (pre-intervention phase and post-intervention phase)

Figure 2

Table 2. Differences in knowledge, attitude, practice and total (overall) (shown as median (interquartile range)) scores in pre-intervention phase and post-intervention phase

Figure 3

Table 3. Differences in knowledge in pre-intervention phase and post-intervention phase

Figure 4

Table 4. Differences in attitudes in pre-intervention phase and post-intervention phase

Figure 5

Table 5. Differences in practices in pre-intervention phase and post-intervention phase