This paper describes the methodology and key results from the first three years of delivery of ‘Flight Handling Qualities’ (FHQ), a problem-based-learning core module for fourth year Master of Engineering (MEng) undergraduates in Aerospace Engineering and optional module for the Systems Engineering MSc Programme, at the University of Liverpool. The module aim is to equip students with the skills and knowledge required to tackle aircraft handling qualities (HQs) and related ‘whole aircraft’ problems. Students are presented with the theory of handling qualities engineering in a series of interactive lectures. The students work in teams of four or five and undertake a number of team-building exercises throughout the first semester. Teams are presented with the idea that the aircraft with its handling qualities is the focus for knowledge acquisition and skills development. Each team is given the task of assessing and quantifying the HQs of a particular aircraft in a particular role, and then developing fixes to any handling deficiencies they identify; the current aircraft include the Wright Flyer, Grob 115, Black Hawk, Bo-105 and XV-15. Teams write an interim report at the end of the first term and a final report at the end of the second term, showing how they have assessed the aircraft, developed solutions to the problems and made recommendations concerning the aircraft’s suitability in the defined role. The reports also address the technical feasibility and economic viability of the proposed upgrades. The teams present their work to mock ‘customers’ (group of staff, another student team, visiting Industrialists) with the objective of demonstrating that the aircraft is now fit for the role. Each individual student maintains a ‘personal learning journal’, in which they document the development of their understanding of handling qualities and, more general, transferable skills. The module is designed to enable students to engage in all elements of the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) cycle.

A methodology referred to as the continuation design framework is developed for application to nonlinear flight control problems. This forms the basis of a systematic approach to control system design for aircraft operating in highly nonlinear regions of the flight envelope. The essence of the continuation design framework is to combine bifurcation analysis with modern control methods such as eigenstructure assignment. Theoretical and practical issues of the approach are discussed with particular reference to the problems posed by agile fighter aircraft. The proposed methodology is applied to a fifth order hypothetical aircraft model and is shown to provide a visible, flexible and logical approach to nonlinear aircraft control law design.

The paper describes a key risk area threatening the widespread deployment of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs), that of attaining high levels of autonomy. Autonomy is loosely defined in the context of UAVs and the meaning of ‘level of autonomy’ discussed. The paper argues that the achievement of high levels of autonomy is not merely a function of increasing machine intelligence but also of maintaining the human operator’s engagement with the decision making process and retaining human authority. An assumption is that a human being in the loop will be a requirement for safety, flight clearance and legal reasons on early systems. Therefore, developers of highly autonomous systems are presented with a paradox. It will be argued that the human must be placed at the centre of the design process and consequently human factors, the human machine interface and the system architecture become critical to achieving high levels of autonomy. This quality impacts on the entire knowledge acquisition and design cycle and broadens what is meant by that term placing it as a discipline firmly in the systems design community. The paper concludes by outlining the key barriers to the successful development of highly autonomous UAVs.

Human factors certification criteria are being developed for large civil aircraft with the objective of reducing the incidence of design-induced error on the flight deck. Many formal error identification techniques currently exist which have been developed in non-aviation contexts but none have been validated for use to this end. This paper describes a new human error identification technique (HET – human error template) designed specifically as a diagnostic tool for the identification of design-induced error on the flight deck. HET is benchmarked against three existing techniques (SHERPA – systematic human error reduction and prediction approach; human error HAZOP – hazard and operability study; and HEIST – human error In systems tool). HET outperforms all three existing techniques in a validation study comparing predicted errors to actual errors reported during an approach and landing task in a modern, highly automated commercial aircraft. It is concluded that HET should provide a useful tool as a adjunct to the proposed human factors certification process.

Experimental studies often use several blades, joined on the centreline, to generate a vortex in a wind tunnel. The circulation profile of this vortex is non-trivial, and a rapid prediction method will facilitate the design of such devices. Prompted by an experiment of Beninati and Marshall, such a model was derived. It assumes a large number of narrow blades and small turning angles, and rests on a balance of angular momentum and on simple aerofoil function. It is claimed to be valid even close to the centreline, can be completed analytically, contains no adjustable constants, and agrees well with two experiments although the turning angle reached 16° and the devices only had two or four blades. With typical geometries, the interference between blades makes the circulation profile quite different from that behind an elliptically-loaded wing, prompting some doubt over the relevance of such a vortex to those trailing real wings.

BAE Systems and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) have recently formed a partnership to invest in strategic research in aerospace and defence. The framework which has been developed as part of this new alliance places a strong emphasis on collaboration. This contrasts with the conventional approach to industry led research which is normally based on the establishment of ‘centres of excellence’ in specific subject areas. By using a collaborative approach, the funding partners aim to benefit from inter-disciplinary collaboration which will take place during the project, giving rise to a more effective use of the invested funds.

The objective of the research programme is to develop technologies which would support the design of low cost (both to acquire and operate) flapless unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This work includes fundamental aerodynamic research to provide control forces without the use of conventional flaps, coupled with developments in the areas of control systems, manufacturing engineering, structural engineering, the electromagnetic behaviour of these structures and design optimisation. The output from the research has been extended to include the design, manufacture, assembly and flight of a demonstrator vehicle, which will provide the research teams with a platform on which to evaluate the performance of their technology in a realistic flight environment. A total of fourteen research groups at ten universities are involved in the five year programme, which has a total value of £6·5M (€9·75M).