Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T22:21:26.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender-informed psycho-educational programme to promote respectful relationships and reduce postpartum common mental disorders among primiparous women: long-term follow-up of participants in a community-based cluster randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Jane Fisher*
Affiliation:
Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Thach Tran
Affiliation:
Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Karen Wynter
Affiliation:
Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Harriet Hiscock
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Victoria, Australia Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jordana Bayer
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
Heather Rowe
Affiliation:
Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor Jane Fisher, Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne 3004, Australia. (Email: jane.fisher@monash.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

What Were We Thinking (WWWT) is a gender-informed, psychoeducational programme to promote respectful relationships and skilled management of unsettled infant behaviours and thereby reduce postpartum common mental disorders. It comprises a highly structured seminar for couples and babies, usual primary care from a WWWT-trained nurse and take-home print materials. The aim was to assess long-term outcomes after a cluster randomised controlled trial of WWWT.

Method

Trial participants who consented completed a computer-assisted telephone interview 18 months postpartum. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Impacts of baseline characteristics and trial arm on changes in scores from baseline to follow-up were calculated using Conditional Latent Growth Curve Models adjusting for prognostic indicators and controlling for clustering effects.

Results

Overall, 314/400 (78.5%) women contributed data at baseline (6 weeks postpartum), trial endline (26 weeks postpartum) and follow-up (12 months after trial endline). In intention-to-treat analyses, there was a significantly greater improvement in adjusted GAD-7 scores [regression coefficient (RC) −0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.94 to −0.17] and non-significant improvement (RC −0.27; 95% CI −0.63 to 0.08) in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow-up in the intervention than the control arm. In a per-protocol analysis, the proportion with GAD-7 scores ⩽4 (asymptomatic) improved 24.1% (55.7% baseline to 79.8% follow-up, p = 0.043) among women who received the full WWWT programme, which included the seminar, compared with 2.4% (77.1–79.5%, p = 0.706) among those who received the partial intervention (usual care from WWWT-trained nurse and print materials).

Conclusions

The WWWT programme has a significant sustained beneficial impact on postnatal generalised anxiety among primiparous women compared with usual care. The in-person seminar is the most influential component of the intervention. Psycho-educational programmes integrated into primary care appear promising as a strategy to reduce postpartum common mental disorders.

Information

Type
Original Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study profile.

Figure 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of women who provided complete and incomplete data

Figure 2

Table 2. Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model of women's GAD-7 scores from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum

Figure 3

Table 3. Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model of women's PHQ-9 scores from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum

Figure 4

Table 4. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 314 women (152 in the control arm and 162 in the intervention arm) who provided complete data

Figure 5

Table 5. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 162 women in the intervention arm who provided complete data and received with the partial (83 women) or full (79 women) intervention

Supplementary material: File

Fisher et al. supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Fisher et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.6 KB