Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T20:40:36.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2013

KAZUYA SAITO
KAZUYA SAITO*
Affiliation:
Waseda University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Kazuya Saito, Waseda University, School of Commerce, 1-6-1 Nishi Waseda, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan. E-mail: kazuya.saito@waseda.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study examines in depth how two types of form-focused instruction (FFI), which are FFI with and without corrective feedback (CF), can facilitate second language speech perception and production of /ɹ/ by 49 Japanese learners in English as a Foreign Langage settings. FFI effectiveness was assessed via three outcome measures (perception, controlled production, and spontaneous production) and also according to two lexical contexts (trained and untrained items). Two experimental groups received 4 hr of FFI treatment to notice and practice the target feature of /ɹ/ (but without any explicit instruction) in meaningful discourse. A control group (n = 14) received comparable instruction in the absence of FFI. During FFI, the instructors provided CF only to students in the FFI + CF group (n = 18) by recasting their mispronunciations of /ɹ/, while no CF was provided to those in the FFI-only group (n = 17). Analyses of pre- and posttests showed that FFI itself can sufficiently promote the development of speech perception and production of /ɹ/ and the acquisitional value of CF in second language speech learning remains unclear. The results suggest that the beginner learners without much phonetic knowledge on how to repair their mispronunciation of /ɹ/ should be encouraged to learn the target sound only through FFI in a receptive mode without much pressure for modified output.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 377 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.Google Scholar
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns. In Hansen, J. & Zampini, M. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A., & Pisoni, D. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074–2085.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A., Pisoni, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2011a). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2011b). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., Goodwin, J., & Griner, B. (2010). Teaching pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2011). The compleat lexical tutor. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Broersma, M. (2005). Phonetic precision in listening. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Beck, J. Mackenzie (Eds.), A figure of speech: A festschrift for John Laver (pp. 63–91). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research–based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379–397.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 257–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espy-Wilson, C., Boyce, S., Jackson, M., Narayanan, S., & Alwan, A. (2000). Acoustic modeling of American English /ɹ/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 343–356.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1995). Second language speech learning. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A. & Schiller, N. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Frieda, E., Walley, A., & Randazza, L. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second-language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155–188.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults learn to produce English /ɹ/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J., Ahahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2725.Google Scholar
Han, Z., Park, E., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibility. Applied Linguistics, 29, 597–618.Google Scholar
Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English /ɹ/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469–479.Google Scholar
Imai, S., Walley, A., & Flege, J. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Acoustical Society of America, 117, 896–907.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /ɹ/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., et al. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, 847–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 57, 1–33.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850–11857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10, 110–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9096–9101.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 367–377.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. (2003). Interphonology variability: Sociolinguistic factors affecting L2 simplification strategies. Applied Linguistics, 24, 439–464.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /ɹ/ and /l/: III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076–2087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, J., Lively, S., & Pisoni, D. (1992). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /ɹ/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.Google Scholar
Major, R. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In Edwards, J. Hansen & Zampini, M. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McCandliss, B., Fiez, J., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. (2002). Teaching the [ɹ]–[l] discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 657–662.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1998). The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 139–154.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second-language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85–110.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accents in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In DeKeyser, R. (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, D., Chang, A., & Tarone, E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59, 581–621.Google Scholar
Riney, T., Takada, M., & Ota, M. (2000). Segmentals and global foreign accent: The Japanese flap in EFL. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 711–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (Eds). (2002). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2012). Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 842–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K. (2013). Re-examining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development: The role of explicit phonetic information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 1–29.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (in press). Recasts in instructed L2 speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Brajot, F. (in press). Scrutinizing the role of length of residence and age of acquisition in the interlanguage pronunciation development of English /ɹ/ by late Japanese bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595–633.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2008). State of the art: Instructed second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 73–87.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.Google Scholar
Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62, 1231–1258.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., Cardoso, W., White, J., & Horst, M. (2012). A frequency-based approach to L2 phonological learning: Teacher input and student output in an intensive ESL context. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 176–186.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 519–535.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 56, 431–462.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243.Google Scholar
Walley, A. (2007). Speech learning, lexical reorganization, and the development of word recognition by native and non-native English speakers. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 315–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.Google Scholar