Introduction

Other than the pioneering work by Reference NapadenskyNapadensky (1964), there has been very little significant laboratory work on plastic shock waves in snow. Other work includes studies on shock waves in wet snow by Reference Wakahama and SatōWakahama and Satō (1977). Brown (1979[a], [b], [c]) has made theoretical studies of steady and non-steady waves in snow, and the results appear reasonable when compared to what little experimental evidence is available for stress waves.

In order to improve on the quantity and quality of shock-wave data, an electromagnetic stress-wave generator has been constructed, and this instrument is described in detail here. Other methods of generating shock waves could have been used. For instance, explosives can be used to produce a wide range of wave amplitudes, although wave frequency is not an easily controlled parameter, and explosives also usually have a great deal of experimental scatter. The electromagnetic generator was chosen, since it appeared to provide an optimum combination of pressure and frequency capability. In addition it has negligible experimental scatter and is easy to use. One drawback is the danger associated with high voltages, and such a system must have incorporated into it safety features to minimize this aspect of the system. However the use of explosives also requires implementation of safety features.

Description of Stress-Wave Generator

Figure 1 shows the assembled system, and Figure 2 illustrates the circuitry. Basically, the electromagnetic generator consists of a 20 kV capacitor with a capacitance of 30 µF, a triggering unit, a spark-gap trigger, and a system of conducting plates and load strips. The generator works on the principle that when two high-energy electric currents are conducted in opposite directions along adjacent parallel strips, a strong repulsive electromagnetic force is generated to force the two strips apart.

Fig. 1.

Assembled electromagnetic stress-wave generator.

Fig. 2.

Schematic diagram of circuitry for stress-wave generator.

The capacitor and high-voltage side of the trigger are both completely submerged in a tank filled with transformer oil, thereby insulating components and reducing any corona effects that might occur during charging of the capacitor. A 20 kV regulated power supply is used to charge the capacitor, and charging time generally is less than 5 min. The capacitor voltage can be read from either a gauge on the instrument panel or from a digital voltmeter if more accuracy is required. A 400 MΩ dropping resistor is used to drop the voltage to the gauge. The digital voltmeter is connected to opposite ends of a 0.4 MΩ resistor in series with the dropping resistor, so that a 1 V output on the digital meter corresponds to a 1000 V charge in the capacitor. The digital voltmeter is connected remotely to the generator, so that charge voltage can be monitored from outside the cold room in which the testing is done.

As can be seen in Figure 2, the electrical circuitry consists of three separate components: (1) the trigger control system; (2) the power supply, capacitor, and conducting elements; and (3) the monitoring instruments. While these three separate systems are interconnected, they serve different purposes.

The trigger control unit outlined in Figure 2 serves several purposes. First it controls power to the entire system. Second, when the power is switched on, an electromagnet activates a high-voltage switch to close the charging circuit to allow the capacitor to be charged. If the system is turned off or a power failure occurs, the switch automatically opens to allow a limiting resistor to discharge the capacitor. In addition, a 100 MΩ bleed resistor is also permanently installed in the circuit to bleed the capacitor down in case the H.V. switch for the other resistor should fail. The control unit also controls the power to the high-voltage power supply and contains the trigger module which, by means of a transformer, pulses the spark gap with a 25 kV pulse. This ionizes the gases in the trigger which closes the circuit and allows the current to be conducted across the spark gap, through a control coil to the load strip and to the ground side. The coil is used to make the inductance of the complete system large enough so that the current will not exceed the maximum allowable current for the spark gap.

Electromagnetic Theory

The generator is a LRC circuit, and the system performance is determined by the differential equation

(1)

where Q is the instantaneous capacitor charge, L is the circuit inductance, R is the total circuit resistance, and C is the capacitance. In the underdamped mode, the solution to Equation (1) is

(2)

where

(3)

(4)

The instantaneous current i(t) can be shown to be

(5)

The current is exponentially damped, and if T is the period of the oscillating current, the full-cycle peak-to-peak ratio of the current amplitude is

(6)

where A ₁ and A ₃ are the peak current values of two successive complete cycles. The values of L and C may then be solved for in terms of C, T, and A ₃/A ₁. This yields Reference Snell, Snell, Mackallor and Guernsly(Snell and others, 1973)

(7)

(8)

The pressure p produced between the two conducting strips varies with the current as

(9)

where w is the strip width, and µ is the magnetic permeability of the material separating the strips, which, in this case is 0.254 mm thick Mylar. Equation (9) is valid so long as the strip width w is large compared to the separation of the conducting plates.

Assessment of Generator Performance

In its present form, the generator has about 6000 J of energy when charged to 20 kV. Maximum current with this configuration is about 160 kA. The spark gap, however, is designed for a maximum current of about 100 kA, so the maximum voltage used to date is about 15 kV. This level of current and voltage was however found to be sufficient to produce high-pressure shock waves in snow.

When the system was originally completed and first tested, the resistance and inductance were found to be 3.75 mΩ and 85 nH, respectively, and a capacitor voltage of 15 kV resulted in currents of about 275 kA, which, after about 20 shots, destroyed the spark gap. After that, the control coil shown in Figures 1 and 2 was placed in series between the capacitor and load strips to raise L and R to values of 650 nH and 19 mΩ, which keeps the maximum current below 100 kA when the capacitor voltage is less than 15 kV. This is significantly lower than the potential system output (450 kA at 20 kV) when the control coil is removed, but to date a spark gap to handle these current levels has not been constructed for the stress-wave generator.

The current in the circuit is monitored by a Rogowski coil that is encircled by the conducting strips near the end of the load strips, as can be seen in Figure 2. This coil is simply a length of insulated wire that is looped and twisted tightly into a shorter length. When this is placed adjacent to the conducting strip (in this case, at a point near the load strip), the electromagnetic field set up by the large current produces a voltage across the leads to the Rogowski coil. Actually it makes little difference if the coil encircles the strip as indicated in Figure 2 or is encircled by the strip itself, as was done in our case. The electromagnetic field produces a voltage across the coil leads in either case. The voltage across the leads from the Rogowski coil Reference Snell, Snell, Mackallor and Guernsly(Snell and others, 1973) is proportional to the instantaneous voltage in the capacitor. The output from a typical oscilloscope trace of the coil output is shown in Figure 3. Reference Snell, Snell, Mackallor and GuernslySnell and others (1973) have shown that the maximum current can be determined from the period T of the Rogowski output and the full-cycle peak-to-peak ratio A ₃/A ₁ of the voltage generated across the coil. This relation is

(10)

Fig. 3.

Rogowski coil output, horizontal scale is 20 µs/div.

From Figure 3, A ₃/A ₁ = 0.611, T = 30 µs, so for a capacitance of 30 µF and a voltage of 15 kV, a maximum current of 84 kA is developed. Under these conditions, a pressure in excess of 5000 kPa can be produced for a specimen with a 10 cm × 2.5 cm cross-section.

Currently testing is proceeding in a very satisfactory manner on low-intensity shock waves, involving pressures ranging from 50 kPa to 2 MPa. The stress wave in the snow specimens are monitored by a piezoresistive pressure transducer which has a flat frequency response from d.c. to 140 kHz. Figure 4 shows a typical oscilloscope output from the transducer for a test involving 260 kg/m³ snow. The transducer shows a peak pressure of about 30 kPa, whereas the peak pressure generated by the stress-wave generator was 150 kPa at a distance of 5 cm from the transducer. To date, the specimen cross-sectional areas as large as 15 cm×10 cm have been tested. However, larger pressures can be obtained with smaller cross-sectional areas, since peak pressure is proportional to (i/w)², where i is the total current and w the specimen width.

Fig. 4.

Typical output from pressure transducer placed at end of test specimen. Horizontal scale is 0.2 ms/div, vertical scale is approximately 10 kPa/div.

The test procedure is relatively simple. While the capacitor banks are uncharged, the specimen is cut and shaped and mounted on the load strips, and the pressure transducer is then positioned at the top end of the specimen. Then the capacitor bank is charged, which generally takes less than 5 min. When the desired voltage is reached, the spark gap is pulsed, thereby completing the test. The Rogowski coil and transducer output are recorded on trace oscilloscopes. Repeatability of the system is excellent, with generator output scatter being less than 5%.

Conclusions

The stress-wave generator described in this paper is a flexible and easily used system for studying stress-wave propagation in snow and ice. In its current configuration, the system can produce peak pressures ranging from as low as 5 kPa to in excess of 5000 kPa. Pressures with rise times as short as 2 µs can easily be achieved, and the rise time (and therefore wave frequency) may be changed by increasing the inductance of the circuit. There is also considerable flexibility with the size and shape of the test specimens which may be used, although specimens with rectangular cross-sections would be easier to work with.