Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T07:50:22.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid recovery of an island population of the threatened South Island Saddleback Philesturnus c. carunculatus after a pathogen outbreak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2009

KATRINA A. HALE*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
JAMES V. BRISKIE
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: kthale@wildmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The small size of many island populations of endangered birds, together with their high density, low genetic diversity and naivety to introduced pathogens, may render them vulnerable to disease epidemics. Such an outbreak occurred in an isolated population of threatened South Island Saddleback Philesturnus c. carunculatus on Motuara Island, New Zealand. In 2002, the population dropped from ~130 birds to ~60 birds, apparently from an outbreak of systemic coccidiosis. However, within three years the population had recovered to > 130 individuals. This appears to be the carrying capacity of the island as areas left vacant after the crash were re-occupied by the end of the third year. Reproductive success of saddlebacks was similar across the three years following the crash and there were no significant differences in clutch size, nesting success or fledgling mass as the population increased. In contrast, feather mite loads increased and leucocyte counts changed significantly in both adult and nestling saddlebacks as the population recovered, suggesting higher population densities may reduce immunocompetence. Although reproductive success did not appear directly affected by population size, our observations indicate increased levels of stress at high densities could render saddlebacks susceptible to recurring disease outbreaks.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © BirdLife International 2009
Figure 0

Figure 1. Population growth of the Motuara Island saddleback population from the year of reintroduction to present (closed circle solid line). The arrow indicates the period in which the population crash occurred. The dashed line represents the period over which no population density estimates were made although it was known the population was growing. The dotted line with open circles illustrates the number of juveniles produced each year following the crash.

Figure 1

Table 1. Measures of reproductive success in the Motuara Island saddleback population in the three years following a population crash. ARS is annual reproductive success with ARS(b) the number of broods successfully reared per female, and ARS(k) the number of young successfully reared per female. First and second broods are listed separately except for the 2002/03 breeding season in which no second broods were found. The data from 2001/02 were taken from Hooson and Jamieson (2004) and were collected before the population crash.

Figure 2

Table 2. Body mass of saddleback nestlings near fledging and body mass of male and female juvenile saddlebacks approximately three months after fledging over the three years following the population crash in 2002.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Difference in average loads of (A) hippoboscid flies, n = 104; (B) feather mites, n = 101; and (C) coccidia, n = 60, for the population over the three years following the 2002 population crash. The error bars denote standard error and the numbers above the bar refer to the sample size.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Nestling blood profiles showing differences between nestlings from the three breeding seasons following the population crash in mean counts of (A) total leucocytes, n = 57; (B) lymphocytes, n = 57; (C) heterophils, n = 57; (D) eosinophils, n = 57; (E) basophils, n = 58 and (F) H/L ratio, n = 56 for the population. The error bars denote standard error and the numbers above the bars refer to the sample size.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Mean adult blood profiles for the Motuara saddleback population showing seasonal differences (autumn/winter [AW: open bars] and spring/summer [SS: closed bars]) for the three years following the 2002 population crash for (A) total leucocyte count; (B) lymphocytes; (C) heterophils; (D) eosinophils; (E) basophils; and (F) H/L ratio. The error bars denote standard error and the numbers above the bars refer to the sample size.