Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T20:03:32.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil elemental profiles and toxic element uptake by durum wheat varieties in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2026

Emilia Pucci
Affiliation:
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development for Sustainability - Department SSPT-AGROS and SSPT-EC-RMP, Rome, Italy
Laura Gazza*
Affiliation:
CREA Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing , Rome, Italy
Cesare Manetti
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Domenico Palumbo
Affiliation:
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development for Sustainability - Department SSPT-AGROS and SSPT-EC-RMP, Rome, Italy
Valeria Poscente
Affiliation:
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development for Sustainability - Department SSPT-AGROS and SSPT-EC-RMP, Rome, Italy
Giulia Puzo
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Alessandra Bernardini
Affiliation:
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development for Sustainability - Department SSPT-AGROS and SSPT-EC-RMP, Rome, Italy
Claudia Zoani
Affiliation:
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development for Sustainability - Department SSPT-AGROS and SSPT-EC-RMP, Rome, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Laura Gazza; Email: laura.gazza@crea.gov.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soil contamination due to toxic elements (TEs) and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) is a global environmental concern due to their toxicity in ecosystems and the potential risk of food chain contamination. This study aimed to examine the differences in the multielemental profile of two experimental fields in Central Italy and to assess the uptake and translocation of TEs (As, Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, Ti) and PTEs (Co, Cu, V, Zn) in three durum wheat, Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum varieties grown in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems. The biological absorption coefficient (BAC) and the translocation factor (TF) were evaluated to determine the absorption and translocation of elements from the soil to the aerial parts of the plants. The content of essential mineral nutrients such as Cu and Zn was higher in organically grown plants, whereas TEs and PTEs, such as Cd, Cr, Ni, and V, were more concentrated in conventionally cultivated plants. Among the three varieties, Simeto showed a greater ability to translocate Cd to the edible part (TF = 0.0341 for OFS and 0.7900 for CFS). Soil type, cultivation method, and durum wheat variety all affect the uptake and distribution of elements within the soil-plant system. Future research focusing on the edible parts could improve sustainable agricultural practices, optimise nutrient management, enhance crop quality, and reduce food security risks, ultimately supporting the development of safer farming systems that are resilient to climate and environmental changes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Main chemical-physical characteristics and texture of soils cultivated with durum wheat under organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 1

Table 2. Total concentration of elements in rhizosphere soil (mg kg−1 dry matter) in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 2

Figure 1. Pearson’s correlation matrix between chemical and physical soil properties and elemental concentrations in the OFS (organic farming system) (a) and CFS (conventional farming system) (b) experimental fields. The colour gradient represents the correlation coefficient, ranging from −1 (strong negative correlation, blue) to +1 (strong positive correlation, red). White cells indicate a weak or no correlation.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Correlations of variables (levels of various elements in rhizosphere soil relative to the two test fields (OFS, organic farming system and CFS, conventional farming system) for each statistical unit (variety) to the main components PC1 and PC2. suo = soil.

Figure 4

Table 3. Total element content in durum wheat grains (mg kg−1 dry matter) in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 5

Table 4. BAC (biological absorption coefficient) values for Cr, Cu, Ti, V, and Zn for each variety in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 6

Table 5. TF (translocation factor) values from roots to grains for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ti, V, and Zn for each variety in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 7

Table 6. TF (translocation factor) values from roots to stems for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ti, V, and Zn for each variety in organic (OFS) and conventional (CFS) farming systems

Figure 8

Figure 3. Correlations of variables (levels of various elements in the roots (a), stems (b), and grains (c) of durum wheat relative to the two experimental fields, OFS, organic farming system, and CFS, conventional farming system) for each statistical unit (variety) regarding the main components PC1 and PC2. Rad = root; aer = stem; car = grain.

Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 1

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 2.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 2

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 3

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 16.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 4

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 16.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 5

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 16.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pucci et al. supplementary material 6

Pucci et al. supplementary material
Download Pucci et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 17.4 KB