Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T07:38:01.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) in Ogun State, Nigeria: a pilot survey on genital symptoms and clinical findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

U. F. EKPO*
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
O. M. ODEYEMI
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
S. O. SAM-WOBO
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
O. B. ONUNKWOR
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria
H. O. MOGAJI
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria
A. S. OLUWOLE
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
H. O. ABDUSSALAM
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria
J. R. STOTHARD
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. E-mail: ufekpo@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Nigerian national control programme (NCP) for schistosomiasis does not have a specific action plan for female genital schistosomiasis (FGS), mainly due to gaps in epidemiological and clinical surveillance. To address this, we conducted a pilot investigation for FGS in girls (>5 and ≤15 years) and adult women (≥16 years) in four rural communities near Abeokuta, Ogun State. Urine samples were collected from 317 participants [children (n = 187), adults (n = 130)] and examined for ova of S chistosoma haematobium by microscopy. A total of 149 participants (47·0%) had egg-patent urogenital schistosomiasis [children (64·7%), adults (21·6%)], reported blood in urine was common (44·5%) as well as sign-post symptoms of FGS. To verify FGS directly, 20 adult women each underwent a gynaecological investigation by colposcopy with observed lesions classified according to the WHO FGS pocket atlas. Fourteen (70·0%) women presented with FGS as grainy-sandy patches (n = 10), homogenous yellow sandy patches (n = 6), nabothian cysts and rubbery papules (n = 1). Our study confirms FGS in Ogun State and calls for further appraisals of this disease in other areas where urogenital schistosomiasis is endemic. The Nigerian NCP should be encouraged to develop an appropriate response to FGS not only to detect it, but also to prevent it.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Standardized symptomologies using a vaginal discharge colour chart (Hegertun et al. 2013) for visual comparisons.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants

Figure 2

Table 2. Prevalence and Geometric Mean Intensities of urinary schistosomiasis across demographic characteristics of participants

Figure 3

Table 3. Self-reported symptoms and association with egg-patent urinary schistosomiasis

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Vaginal or cervical anomalies seen in FGS cases. Images of cervix taken using colposcopy. (A) Grainy sandy patches (1) and homogenous yellow sandy patches around the cervical wall; (B) Sandy patches: (1) and rubbery papules (2) and homogenous yellow sandy patches around the cervical wall (Scale bar indicates 1 cm).

Figure 5

Table 4. Occurrence and clinical presentation of FGS within the 20 women examined

Figure 6

Table 5. Reported symptoms in women presenting with FGS

Figure 7

Table 6. Profile and FGS pathology among the 20 women consenting to gynaecological examination