Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T23:35:09.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of crops and fertilizers on soil respiration in a long-term field experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2025

Olga Sukhoveeva*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow, Russia
Alexander Ryzhov
Affiliation:
Center of Forest Ecology and Productivity, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Alexander Pochikalov
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow, Russia
Tatiana Lebedeva
Affiliation:
Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia
Dmitry Karelin
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow, Russia
Igor Zavertkin
Affiliation:
Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Olga Sukhoveeva; Email: olgasukhoveeva@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments enable researchers to investigate the impacts of both natural and anthropogenic crop production factors on soil respiration (SR), the largest contributor of CO2 emissions from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere. The hypothesis of this study was that the influence of two key anthropogenic factors – applied fertilizers and cultivated crops – on the respiration rate of arable soils could be separated in a field experiment. The objective was therefore to quantify the influence of these factors on SR and assess its dependence on soil characteristics. The study was conducted on the territory of the long-term field experiment at the Timiryazev Academy (Moscow, Russia), where the use of plots of crop rotation involving rye, barley, potatoes and fallow, with liming and various fertilizer types applied, was considered. Measurements were taken using the closed chamber technique and a portable infrared gas analyser from May 2023 to November 2024. During the vegetation periods, SR varied significantly and was not statistically different for most plots (0.063–0.276 g C/(m2·h)), except for the NPK + manure variant (0.371–0.430 g C/(m2·h)). During the bare soil period, SR was similar between fertilizer variants and 10–20 times lower under snow cover than during the vegetation period (0.006–0.018 g C/(m2·h)). A direct dependence of respiration on soil organic carbon and particulate organic matter content was observed (R = 0.552–0.650). Two-way PERMANOVA revealed significant effects of fertilizers (17.2–24.0% of the variance) and crops (6.5–7.1%) on SR, although their interaction was insignificant. Our research could form the basis for developing carbon sequestration compensation measures in response to specific fertilizer doses.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Scheme of the long-term field experiment of the Timiryazev Academy with the location of the plots under study. Fertilizer options are shown on the right, and crop rotation is shown at the top. N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus; K, potassium.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Soil respiration during the vegetation period of 2023. NPK, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Soil respiration during the vegetation period of 2024. NPK, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Soil respiration from autumn 2023 to spring 2024. NPK, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium.

Figure 4

Table 1. Results of two-way PERMANOVA

Figure 5

Table 2. Results of pairwise comparison of soil respiration in the study plots during the 2023 growing season

Figure 6

Table 3. Results of pairwise comparison of soil respiration in the study plots during the 2024 growing season

Figure 7

Table 4. Correlations of soil respiration with hydrothermal parameters during the growing seasons

Figure 8

Figure 5. Carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) content in different pools of soil organic matter (mean ± standard error). C, carbon; POM, particulate organic matter; MAOM, mineral-associated organic matter; SOC, soil organic carbon; N, nitrogen.

Figure 9

Table 5. Correlation coefficients of growing season averages of soil respiration with the content of different pools of carbon and nitrogen