Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-mhzq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T04:09:19.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

tDAR

A Cultural Heritage Archive for Twenty-First-Century Public Outreach, Research, and Resource Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Francis P. McManamon ,
Keith W. Kintigh ,
Leigh Anne Ellison  and
Adam Brin
Francis P. McManamon
Affiliation:
Center for Digital Antiquity, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA
Keith W. Kintigh
Affiliation:
Center for Digital Antiquity, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA
Leigh Anne Ellison
Affiliation:
Center for Digital Antiquity, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA
Adam Brin
Affiliation:
Center for Digital Antiquity, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hundreds of thousands of archaeological investigations in the United States conducted over the last several decades have documented a large portion of the recovered archaeological record in the United States. However, if we are to use this enormous corpus to achieve richer understandings of the past, it is essential that both CRM and academic archaeologists change how they manage their digital documents and data over the course of a project and how this information is preserved for future use. We explore the nature and scope of the problem and describe how it can be addressed. In particular, we argue that project workflows must ensure that the documents and data are fully documented and deposited in a publicly accessible, digital repository where they can be discovered, accessed, and reused to enable new insights and build cumulative knowledge.

Cientos de miles de investigaciones arqueológicas en los Estados Unidos realizado en las últimas décadas han documentado una gran parte del registro arqueológico recuperado en los Estados Unidos. Sin embargo, si vamos a utilizar este enorme corpus para lograr entendimientos más ricos del pasado, es esencial que CRM y los arqueólogos académicos cambian cómo administran sus documentos digitales y los datos en el transcurso de un proyecto y cómo se conserva esta información para uso en el futuro. Exploramos la naturaleza y el alcance del problema y describimos cómo se pueden abordarse. En particular, sostenemos que los flujos de trabajo de proyecto deben asegurarse que los documentos y datos son totalmente documentados y depositados en un repositorio digital de acceso público, donde puede ser descubiertos, acceder y reutilizados para activar nuevos conocimientos y construir conocimiento acumulativo.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 5 , Special Issue 3: FOR THE RECORD: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARCHIVES IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY , August 2017 , pp. 238 - 249
Copyright
Copyright 2017 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES CITED

Alexandria Archive Institute (AAI) 2017 About the Alexandria Archive Institute. Electronic document, https://alexandriaarchive.org/about/, accessed February 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H. 2016 The Role of Synthesis in American Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management as Seen through an Arizona Lens. Journal of Arizona Archaeology 4 (1):68–81.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H., and Patterson, Thomas 2010 Trends in Employment and Training in American Archaeology. In Voices in American Archaeology, edited by Ashmore, Wendy, Lippert, Dorothy T., and Mills, Barbara J., pp. 291–316. Society for American Archaeology Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American School for Classical Studies in Athens (ASCSA) 2016 ASCSA website. Electronic documents, http://agora.ascsa.net/research?v=default and http://corinth.ascsa.net/research?v=default, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, Benjamin S., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Kansa, Eric, Orton, David, Cakirlar, Canan, Gourichon, Lionel, Atici, Levent, Galik, Alfred, Marciniak, Arkadiusz, Mulville, Jacqui, Buitenhuis, Hijlke, Carruthers, Denise, De Cupere, Bea, Demiregi, Arzu, Frame, Sheelagh, Helmer, Daniel, Martin, Louis, Peters, Joris, Pollath, Nadja, Pawlowska, Kamilla, Russell, Nerissa, Twiss, Katheryn, and Wurthenberger, Doris 2014 Data Sharing Reveals Complexity in the Westward Spread of Domestic Animals across Neolithic Turkey. PLoS ONE 9 (6):e99845. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099845, accessed June 22, 2017.Google Scholar
Archaeology Data Service (ADS) 2017 Home page, ADS Website. Electronic document, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/, accessed February 17, 2017.Google Scholar
ADS and DA (Archaeology Data Service and the Center for Digital Antiquity) 2013 Caring for Digital Data in Archaeology: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxbow Books, Oxford, and Oakville, Connecticut.Google Scholar
ADS and DA (Archaeology Data Service and the Center for Digital Antiquity) 2016 Guides to Good Practice in Digital Archiving for Archaeology. Electronic document, http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/, accessed February 23, 2016.Google Scholar
Atici, Levent, Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Lev-Tov, Justing, and Kansa, Eric C. 2013 Other People's Data: A Demonstration of the Imperative of Publishing Primary Data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20:663–681. DOI:10.1007/s10816-012-9132-9, accessed June 22, 2017.Google Scholar
Bureau of Reclamation 2016 USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office Collection. Electronic document, https://core.tdar.org/collection/17756/usdi-bureau-of-reclamation-phoenix-area-office-pxao, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Cambridge Concord Associates 2013 Sustaining Domain Repositories for Digital Data: A Call for Change from an Interdisciplinary Working Group of Domain Repositories. Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Electronic document, https://www.icsu-wds.org/files/Domain_Repositories_Call_to_Action_16_Sept_2013.pdf, accessed February 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Chaco Research Archive (CRA) 2017 About the Chaco Research Archive. Electronic document, http://www.chacoarchive.org/cra, accessed February 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry, and Kinsey, Karolyn 2004 A Survey of SHPO Archeological Reports Bibliographic Systems, 2002. Studies in Archeology and Ethnography #5. Archeology Program, National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. Electronic document, https://core.tdar.org/document/377011/a-survey-of-shpo-archeological-reports-bibliographic-systems-2002, accessed November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry, Kinsey, Karolyn, and Kagan, Seth 2010 Repository Fees for Archaeological Collections. Heritage Management 3 (2):189–212.Google Scholar
Clarke, Mary 2015 The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3 (4):313–330. DOI:10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.313, accessed April 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Cofield, Sara Rivers, and Eyre, Jodi Reeves 2014 Evaluating a Cooperative Approach to the Management of Digital Archaeological Records. Project No. 13–711. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program, Washington, DC. DOI:10.6067/XCV8WH2R30, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) 2012 Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Recommended Practice, Issue 2. CCSDS Secretariat, Space Communications and Navigation Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cultural Heritage Partners, PLLC (CHP) 2012 Federal Laws and Regulations Requiring Curation of Digital Archaeological Documents and Data. Report prepared for the Office of General Counsel, Arizona State University. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/wp-uploads/2013/05/2013-CHP-Legal-Analysis-of-Fed-Req-for-Curation-of-Dig-Arch-Docs-Data-.pdf, accessed August 10, 2014.Google Scholar
Cummings, Linda Scott 2016 PaleoResearch Institute Collection. Electronic document, https://core.tdar.org/collection/19627/paleoresearch-institute, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Departmental Consulting Archeologist (DCA) 2009 The Goals and Accomplishments of the Federal Archaeology Program. Archaeology Program, National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. DOI:10.6067/XCV81N7ZR4, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Departmental Consulting Archeologist (DCA) 2010 The Secretary of the Interior's Report to Congress on the Federal Archaeology Program. Archaeology Program, National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. DOI:10.6067/XCV8Q81DZV, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Department of Defense Legacy Program 2014 Evaluating a Cooperative Approach to the Management of Digital Archaeological Records (ECAMDAR), Project # 13–711. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/wp-uploads/2011/07/Evaluating-a-Cooperative-Approach-to-the-Management-of-Digital-Archaeologial-Records.pdf, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Antiquity 2013 Case Study: Using tDAR to Manage Legacy and New Archaeological Documents and Data, The Phoenix Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/wp-uploads/2011/07/Using-tDAR-to-Manage-Legacy-and-New-Archaeological-Documents-and-Data-the-Phoenix-Area-Office-of-the-Bureau-of-Reclamation-.pdf, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Antiquity 2016 Home page, tDAR (the Digital Archaeological Record). Electronic document, https://www.tdar.org, accessed 8 December 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Antiquity 2017 Help and Tutorials and Contribute Data web pages, tDAR (the Digital Archaeological Record). Electronic document, https://www.tdar.org/about/help/, accessed April 23, 2017.Google Scholar
Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery (DAACS) 2016 Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery website. Electronic document, http://www.daacs.org/, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Ellison, Leigh Anne 2017 Taking Good Care of Your Digital Data—Developing Good Digital Curation Habits for Students. Workshop given at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Ellison, Leigh Anne, and Brin, Adam 2015 Synthesizing Legacy Data: Using tDAR's Data Integration Tool. Poster presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, California. DOI:10.6067/XCV8W95B95, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
Ellison, Leigh Anne, Eyre, Jodi Reeves, and Brin, Adam 2016 Curating and Preserving Digital Archaeological Data: A Guide to Good Practice. Poster presented at the 69th Northwest Anthropological Conference, Tacoma, WA. DOI:10.6067/XCV8HH6MTJ, accessed November 30, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ember, Carol, Hanisch, Robert, Alter, George, Berman, Helen, Hedstrom, Margaret, and Vardigan, Mary 2013 Sustaining Domain Repositories for Digital Data: A White Paper. Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Electronic document, http://datacommunity.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/WhitePaper_ICPSR_SDRDD_121113.pdf, accessed November 4, 2016.Google Scholar
Erway, Ricky 2012 Lasting Impact: Sustainability of Disciplinary Repositories. OCLC Research, Dublin, Ohio. Electronic document, http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2012/2012-03.pdf, accessed February 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Erway, Ricky, and Rinehart, Amanda 2016 If You Build It, Will They Fund? Making Research Data Management Sustainable. OCLC, Online Computer Library Center Inc., Dublin, Ohio. Electronic document, http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-making-research-data-management-sustainable-2016.pdf, accessed November 29, 2016.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel M., and Yakel, Elizabeth 2017 Practices Do Not Make Perfect: Disciplinary Data Sharing and Reuse Practices and Their Implications for Repository Data Curation. In Curating Research Data, Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, pp. 103–126. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic document, http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/2017/practices-do-not-make-perfect.html, accessed April 19, 2017.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel, Kansa, Eric, Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Barrera-Gomez, Julianna, and Yakel, Elizabeth 2013 The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, New York City.Google Scholar
Field Acquired Information Management Systems (FAIMS) 2017 FAIMS Project home page. Electronic document, https://www.fedarch.org/#Federated, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Kevin, Griffiths, Rebecca, and Maron, Nancy 2008 Sustainability and Revenue Models for Online Academic Resources: An Ithaka Report. Ithaka S+R, New York City. Electronic document, http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/sustainability-and-revenue-models-for-online-academic-resources/, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Hedstrom, Margaret 1998 Digital Preservation: A Time Bomb for Digital Libraries. Computers for the Humanities 31:189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegmon, Michelle, McGrath, James R., and Munson, Marit K. 2017 The Potential and Pitfalls of Large Multi-Source Collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5 (2):138–146. DOI:10.1017/aap.2017.2, accessed June 8, 2017.Google Scholar
Heitman, Carrie, Martin, Worthy, and Plog, Stephen 2016 Legacy Records and Digital Innovation: The Chaco Research Archive and Beyond. Presentation at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, Florida. DOI:10.6067/XCV85B04G2, accessed December 8, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, James L., Cramer, Tom, Korner, Sebastian, and Minor, David 2013 The Case for Building a Digital Preservation Network. Educause Review July/August:37–47. Electronic document, http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/8/the-case-for-building-a-digital-preservation-network, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard K. 2002 Institutional Repositories: Partnering with Faculty to Enhance Scholarly Communication. D-Lib Magazine 8 (11). Electronic document, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html, accessed February 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., and Kansa, Sarah Whitcher 2013 We All Know That a 14 Is a Sheep: Data Publication and Professionalism in Archaeological Communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1 (1):88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Arbuckle, Benjamin 2014 Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (1):57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 2006 The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71:567–578.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 2010 Sustaining Database Semantics. Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granda, Spain.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Beaudry, Mary C., Drennan, Robert D., Kinzig, Ann P., Kohler, Timothy A., Fredrick Limp, W., Maschner, Herbert D.G., Michener, William K., Pauketat, Timothy R., Peregrine, Peter, Sabloff, Jeremy A., Wilkinson, Tony. J., Wright, Henry T., and Zeder, Melinda A. 2014a Grand Challenges for Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS) 111 (3):879–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintigh, Keith W., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Beaudry, Mary C., Drennan, Robert D., Kinzig, Ann P., Kohler, Timothy A., Fredrick Limp, W., Maschner, Herbert D.G., Michener, William K., Pauketat, Timothy R., Peregrine, Peter, Sabloff, Jeremy A., Wilkinson, Tony. J., Wright, Henry T., and Zeder, Melinda A. 2014b Grand Challenges for Archaeology. American Antiquity 79:5–24.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Kinzig, Ann P., Limp, W. Fredrick, Michener, William K., Sabloff, Jeremy A., Hackett, Edward J., Kohler, Timothy A., Ludäscher, Bertram, and Lynch, Clifford A. 2015 Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A., and Bocinsky, R. Kyle 2015 Compiled Tree-ring Dates from the Southwestern United States (Unrestricted). Electronic document, https://core.tdar.org/dataset/399315/compiled-tree-ring-dates-from-the-southwestern-united-states-unrestricted, accessed April 24, 2017.Google Scholar
Kuril Biocomplexity Research 2017 Kuril Biocomplexity Research tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/14832/kuril-biocomplexity-research, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Lord, Phillip, Macdonald, Alison, Lyon, Liz, and Giaretta, David 2004 From Data Deluge to Data Curation. In Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, 2004. Electronic document, http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/150.pdf, accessed December 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Lynch, Clifford L. 2003 Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. Libraries and the Academy 3 (2):327–336. Electronic document, http://muse.jhu.edu/article/42865, accessed February 17, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Clifford L. 2017 Updating the Agenda for Academic Libraries and Scholarly Communications. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. 40. Electronic document, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/40, accessed April 20, 2017.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P. 2014 Digital Archaeological Data: Ensuring Access, Use, and Preservation. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by Smith, Claire, pp. 2124–2127. Springer Science+Business Media, New York City.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P. 2017 On-line and In-person Professional Training for Archaeological Data Management and Digital Curation. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Flores, Jodi 2016 Heritage in the Digital Age: Guidelines for Preserving and Sharing Heritage with Digital Technologies. Poster presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, Florida. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/document/404347/heritage-in-the-digital-age-guidelines-for-preserving-and-sharing-heritage-with-digital-techniques, accessed April 20, 2017.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Kintigh, Keith W. 2010a Designing Digital Antiquity. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Amelia Island, Florida.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Kintigh, Keith W. 2010b Digital Antiquity: Transforming Archaeological Data into Knowledge. SAA Archaeological Record 10 (2):37–40.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Kintigh, Keith W. 2016 Making Archaeological Data and Information Discoverable, Accessible, and Usable for 21st Century Research: The Theodore Roosevelt Dam Archaeological Project, Tonto Basin, Arizona. Journal of Arizona Archaeology 4 (1):60–67.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Richards, Julian 2015 Best Practices for Good Digital Curation. Poster presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, California. DOI:10.6067/XCV8KW5H54, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Richards, Julian 2016 What Do We Mean by “Digital Curation”? Symposium presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, Florida. Electronic document, https://core.tdar.org/collection/58243/what-do-we-mean-by-digital-curation, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., Kintigh, Keith W., and Brin, Adam 2010 Digital Antiquity and the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR): Broadening Access and Ensuring Long-Term Preservation for Digital Archaeological Data. CSA Newsletter XXIII (2). Center for the Study of Architecture. Electronic document, http://csanet.org/newsletter/fall10/nlf1002.html, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Maron, Nancy L. 2014 A Guide to the Best Revenue Models and Funding Sources for your Digital Resources. Ithaka S+R, New York City. Electronic document, http://sr.ithaka.org/?p=22805, accessed February 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Maron, Nancy L., Smith, K. Kirby, and Loy, Matthew 2009 Sustaining Digital Repositories: An On-the-Ground View of Projects Today: Ithaka Case Studies in Sustainability. Ithaka S+R, New York City. DOI:10.18665/sr.22408, accessed November 29, 2016.Google Scholar
Midwest Archaeological Center (MWAC) 2017 Midwest Archeological Center Publications tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/14640/midwest-archeological-center-publications, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Mimbres Ceramic Database 2017 Mimbres Ceramic Database tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/22070/mimbres-ceramic-database, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
National Park Service (NPS) Archeology Program 2016 Secretary of the Interior's Report to Congress on Federal Archeology web page. Electronic document, https://www.nps.gov/archeology/SRC/index.htm, accessed November 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Nelson, Margaret, and Hegmon, Michelle 2016 Eastern Mimbres Archaeological Project (EMAP) collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/13541/eastern-mimbres-archaeological-project-emap, accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Neusius, Sarah 2017 Making Faunal Matter in Archaic Period Research: Exploring Adaptation, Population Growth, A Cultural Practice Through the Digital Integration of Eastern Archaic Faunal Datasets. Symposium at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
North Atlantic Ecodynamics 2017 North Atlantic Archaeology, Culture, History, and Human Ecodynamics tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/30654/north-atlantic-archaeology-culture-history-and-human-ecodynamics, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Office of Science and Technology Policy 2014 Improving the Management of and Access to Scientific Collections, Office of the President, Washington, DC. Electronic document, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_memo_scientific_collections_march_2014.pdf, accessed May 2, 2017.Google Scholar
PaleoResearch Institute 2017 PaleoResearch Institute tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/19627/paleoresearch-institute, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Permian Basin Program, Bureau of Land Management 2017 Digital Repository of the Bureau of Land Management, Carlsbad Field Office tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/24252/digital-repository-of-the-bureau-of-land-management-carlsbad-field-office, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian 2017 Twenty Years of Preserving Data: A View from the United Kingdom. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5 (3). DOI:10.1017/aap.2017.11.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Abby Smith 2016 The Risk of Digital Oblivion: What Knowledge Should We Save? Chronicle of Higher Education (4 May 2016). Electronic document, http://chronicle.com/article/The-Risk-of-Digital-Oblivian/236342/, accessed December 21, 2016.Google Scholar
Science 2011 Challenges and Opportunities. Science 331 (6018):692–693. DOI:10.1126/science.331.6018.692, accessed February 17, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for American Archaeology 1996 Ethics in Archaeology: Society for American Archaeology Principles of Archaeological Ethics. American Antiquity 61:451–452.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Katherine A., and Kintigh, Keith W. 2011 The Digital Archaeological Record: The Potentials of Archaeozoological Data Integration through tDAR. SAA Archaeological Record 11 (1):22–25.Google Scholar
SRI Press 2017 SRI Press tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/28812/sri-press, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Theodore Roosevelt Dam Archaeological Project 2017 Theodore Roosevelt Dam Archaeological Project tDAR collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/59352/theodore-roosevelt-dam-archaeological-project, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
University of Pennsylvania Museum 2017 University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology tDAR Collection. Electronic document, http://core.tdar.org/collection/14186/university-of-pennsylvania-museum-of-archaeology-and-anthropology?selectedResourceTypes=PROJECT&startRecord=0, accessed February 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Waters, Donald J. 2007 “Doing Much More Than We Have So Far Attempted.” EDUCAUSE Review (September/October):8–9.Google Scholar
Watts, Joshua 2011 Policies, Preservation, and Access to Digital Resources: The Digital Antiquity 2010 National Repositories Survey. Reports in Digital Archaeology, Number 2. Center for Digital Antiquity, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/wp-uploads/2011/07/20111215_Final.pdf, accessed November 30, 2016.Google Scholar
White House 2013 Executive Order: Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information. Electronic document, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/executive-order-making-open-and-machine-readable-new-default-government-, accessed August 28, 2014.Google Scholar
York, Jeremy, Gutmann, Myron, and Berman, Francine 2016 What Do We Know about the Stewardship Gap? University of Michigan Library, Deep Blue Repository, Ann Arbor. Electronic document, http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/122726, accessed February 21, 2017.Google Scholar