Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T22:14:41.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Do Observers Assess Resolve?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

Joshua D Kertzer ,
Jonathan Renshon  and
Keren Yarhi-Milo
Joshua D Kertzer*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Harvard University
Jonathan Renshon
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Keren Yarhi-Milo
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, Princeton University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jkertzer@gov.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite a plethora of theoretical frameworks, IR scholars have struggled with the question of how observers assess resolve. We make two important contributions in this direction. Conceptually, we develop an integrative framework that unites otherwise disconnected theories, viewing them as a set of heuristics actors use to simplify information-rich environments. Methodologically, we employ a conjoint experiment that provides empirical traction impossible to obtain using alternative research designs. We find that ordinary citizens are ‘intuitive deterrence theorists’ who focus to a great extent on capabilities, stakes, signals and past actions in judging resolve. We also find that observers see democracies as less resolved than autocracies (not more), casting doubt on key propositions of democratic credibility theory. Finally, a conceptual replication shows that a group of elite decision makers converge with the US public in how they interpret costly signals, and in viewing democracies as less resolved than autocracies.

Keywords

resolveheuristicsreputationdeterrence theorycostly signals

Information

Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 308 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anzia, SF Berry, CR (2011) Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science 55 (3), 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arreguín-Toft, I (2001) How the weak win wars: a theory of asymmetric conflict. International Security 26 (1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, D Palmer, G (2010) Leader tenure, age, and international conflict. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (3), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M Mullainathan, S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94 (4), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, B (1959) The anatomy of deterrence. World Politics 11 (2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutger, R Kertzer, JD (2018) A dispositional theory of reputation costs. International Organization 72 (3), 693–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, M Boyer, MA (2001) Gender, violence, and international crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4), 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, J Danilovic, V (2012) Reputation for resolve, interests, and conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 29 (1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH Albon, SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69 (3/4), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, DC (1997) Do reputations matter? Security Studies 7 (1), 33–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L Tooby, J (1994) Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand. American Economic Review 84 (2), 327–332.Google Scholar
Dafoe, A, Renshon, J Huth, P (2014) Reputation and status as motives for war. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge Aegeria): the resident always wins. Animal Behavior 26, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desch, MC (2008) Power and Military Effectiveness: The Fallacy of Democratic Triumphalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Downes, A Sechser, T (2012) The illusion of democratic credibility. International Organization 66 (3), 457–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, DM (2002) Managing uncertainty: beliefs about intentions and the rise of great powers. Security Studies 12 (1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J (1997) Tying hands versus sinking costs: signaling foreign policy interests. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, JD (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foyle, DC (1999) Counting the Public in: Presidents, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M Sechser, TS (2014) Signaling alliance commitments: hand-tying and sunk costs in extended nuclear deterrence. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4), 919–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganswindt, A et al. (2005) The sexually active states of free-ranging male African elephants (Loxodonta Africana): defining musth and non-musth using endocrinology, physical signals, and behavior. Hormones and Behavior 47 (1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelpi, C Grieco, JM (2001) Attracting trouble: democracy, leadership tenure, and the targeting of militarized challenges, 1918–1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (6), 794–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, C Grieco, JM (2015) Competency costs in foreign affairs: presidential performance in international conflicts and domestic legislative success, 1953–2001. American Journal of Political Science 59 (2), 440–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J McDermott, R (2007) An experimental template for case study research. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3), 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G (2008) Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G Gaissmaier, W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 451–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, LA Mehr, DR (1997) What alters physicians’ decisions to admit to the coronary care unit? Journal of Family Practice 45 (3), 219–226.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, EM et al. (2014) Decision maker preferences for international legal cooperation. International Organization 68 (4), 845–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J, Hangartner, D Yamamoto, T (2015) Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (8), 2395–2400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, DJ Yamamoto, T (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22 (1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C (1990) Replications, strict replications, and conceptual replications: are they important? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 5 (4), 41–49.Google Scholar
Holbrook, C Fessler, DMT (2013) Sizing up the threat: the envisioned physical formidability of terrorists tracks their leaders’ failures and successes. Cognition 127, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, M (2013) Mirror neurons and the problem of intentions. International Organization 67 (4), 829–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, T (1994) Peripheral Visions: Deterrence Theory and American Foreign Policy in the Third World, 1965-1990. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, MC Stam, AC (2012) How prior military experience influences the future militarized behavior of leaders. International Organization 68 (3), 527–559.Google Scholar
Huff, C Kertzer, JD (2018) How the public defines terrorism. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, PK (1999) Deterrence and international conflict: empirical findings and theoretical debates. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, P Russett, B (1984) What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics 36 (4), 496–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R (1970) The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R (1982) Deterrence and perception. International Security 7 (3), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R, Lebow, RN Stein, JG (1985) Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kennan, GF (1951) American Diplomacy, 1900–1950. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, J, Renshon, J Yarhi-Milo, K (2018) Replication Data for: How Do Observers Assess Resolve? https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VSVMY7, Harvard Dataverse, VI, UNF:6:YMew4eTz2Xkuhz/e6vDYhg==[fileUNF]Google Scholar
Kertzer, JD (2016) Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, JD Brutger, R (2016) Decomposing audience costs: bringing the audience back into audience cost theory. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1), 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, JD McGraw, KM (2012) Folk realism: testing the microfoundations of realism in ordinary citizens. International Studies Quarterly 56 (2), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, DA (1992) Powerful pacifists: democratic states and war. American Political Science Review 86 (1), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, DA Powell, R (1999) International relations: a strategic-choice approach. In Lake DA and Powell R (eds), Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, JS (1994) Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization 48 (2), 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, AC, McDermott, R Petersen, MB (2011) States in mind: evolution, coalitional psychology, and international politics. International Security 36 (2), 48–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 47 (1), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R et al. (2007) Testosterone and aggression in a simulated crisis game. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, MH et al. (2007) Finger length ratio (2D: 4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Personality and Individual Differences 42 (4), 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, J (1996) Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, JD (1989) Capabilities, uncertainty, and resolve: a limited information model of crisis bargaining. American Journal of Political Science 33 (4), 941–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, JD (1994) Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (2), 270–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 47 (1), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietraszewski, D Shaw, A (2015) Not by strength alone: children’s conflict expectations follow the logic of the asymmetric war of attrition. Human Nature 26 (1), 44–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Press, DG (2005) Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Quek, K (2016) Are costly signals more credible? Evidence of sender–receiver gaps. Journal of Politics 78 (3), 925–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlinski, JJ (2000) Heuristics and biases in the courts: ignorance or adaptation? Oregon Law Review 79 (1), 61–102.Google Scholar
Rathbun, BC (2009) It takes all types: social psychology, trust, and the international relations paradigm in our minds. International Theory 1 (3), 345–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, D Stam, AC (2002) Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, J (2015) Losing face and sinking costs: experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. International Organization 69 (3), 659–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, J, Dafoe, A Huth, PK (2018) Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics. American Journal of Political Science 62 (2), 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, J, Yarhi-Milo, K Kertzer, JD (2017) Democratic leaders, crises and war. Working Paper. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Riker, WH (1995) The political psychology of rational choice theory. Political Psychology 16 (1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, TC (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, KA (1999) Do democratic institutions constrain or inform? Contrasting two institutional perspectives on democracy and war. International Organization 53 (2), 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechser, TS Post, AS (2015) Hand-tying versus muscle-flexing in crisis bargaining. Presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, 5 September.Google Scholar
Sechser, TS Fuhrmann, M (2017) Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sell, A, Tooby, J Cosmides, L (2009) Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (35), 15073–15078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, VP Dennis, M (2007) Militant Islam and the futile fight for reputation. Security Studies 16 (2), 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffer, L et al. (2018) Nonrepresentative representatives: an experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. American Political Science Review 112 (2), 302–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slantchev, BL (2005) Military coercion in interstate crises. American Political Science Review 99 (4), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, G (1961) Deterrence and Defense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingley, DH Walter, BF (2011) The effect of repeated play on reputation building: an experimental approach. International Organization 65, 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M (2007) Domestic audience costs in international relations: an experimental approach. International Organization 61 (4), 821–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, MR Weeks, J (2013) Public opinion and the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 107 (4), 849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M, Weeks, J Yarhi-Milo, K (2017) How and why does public opinion affect foreign policy in democracies? Working paper. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Tversky, A Kahneman, D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157), 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, JF Post, TA (1988) On the solving of ill-structured problems. In Chi MH, Glaser R and Farr MJ (eds), The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 261–285.Google Scholar
Weeks, JL (2008) Autocratic audience costs: regime type and signaling resolve. International Organization 62 (1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisiger, A Yarhi-Milo, K (2015) Revisiting reputation: how past actions matter in international politics. International Organization 69 (2), 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, S (2007) The turnover trap: new leaders, reputation, and international conflict. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4), 772–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, K (2014) Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, K, Kertzer, JD Renshon, J (2018) Tying hands, sinking costs, and leader attributes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (10), 2150–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kertzer et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Kertzer et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 4.1 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Kertzer et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VSVMY7
Link