Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T17:28:00.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effective stress profiles and seepage flows beneath glaciers and ice sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Alan W. Rempel*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272, USA E-mail: rempel@uoregon.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The resistance to sliding and the extent of till deformation beneath soft-bedded glaciers depend on the spatially averaged level of effective stress , which is controlled by the distribution of water pressure at the bed. Major subglacial conduits that facilitate large-scale water transport are expected to be predominantly aligned with the direction of maximum hydraulic gradient, which is normally parallel to the slope of the glacier surface. When the basal heat flow promotes net melting or freezing, seepage transport can enable water exchange between these conduits and the rest of the basal surface area. For a simple glacier geometry with subglacial conduits that are aligned parallel to a uniform slope, the seepage transport is driven primarily by gradients in effective stress. Balance equations determine how varies with conduit spacing and the heat-flow regime. Considerations of thermodynamic equilibrium require that ice penetrates the pore space at high effective stress. Even when the glacier base experiences net melting, for a given heat-flow regime there are limits on the conduit spacing that can be attained before a finite till layer becomes partially frozen throughout. During net freezing, the resistance to flow through partially frozen sediments limits the steady-state conduit spacing. The partially frozen zone can actually be restricted to smaller thicknesses when the freezing rate is greater.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of the region near a glacier base above water-saturated sediments. (a) A macroscopic conduit is present; the glacier base is at Tl = Tm and the fluid pressure immediately adjacent to ice is p = σn. (b) Sediment particles support part of the glacier weight; p < σn and Tl < Tm, but Tl still exceeds the level Tf needed for ice to extend through pore throats of radius Rp (i.e. K ≈ 2/R < 2/Rp). (c) A partially frozen fringe of thickness h and ice saturation Si extends beneath the glacier base; at z = l, Tl < Tf and the temperature rises to Tf only at z = lh, where the fluid pressure p < σnpf.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of a glacier that sits upon a layer of till cut by subglacial conduits.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Possible hydrological networks: (a) net melting takes place at the glacier base and (b) net freezing takes place and ice is accreted to the glacier base.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Profiles of (a) scaled effective stress N/pf and (b) scaled fringe thickness h/(lb) when D = 2(lb), Qg = 60 mW m−2 and for the values of Qb given in the legend.

Figure 4

Table 1. Equations describing the steady-state behavior with N(x = 0) = NC and N(x = D) = ND

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) as a function of Qb with Qg = 60 mW m−2. The solid line shows the predictions of Equation (13) (where Ws = 10 m a−1) and the dashed lines depict the predictions of Equation (14). Between the vertical dotted lines, and freezing takes place with Dd. (b) The drainage divide distance D/(lb) as a function of Qb for the same conditions as in (a).

Figure 6

Table 2. Nominal parameters used for the calculations presented here. Values of TmTf , k0, α and β are for Chena silt (Andersland and Ladanyi, 2004). These parameter values imply that the pressure scale pf ≈ 35 kPa, the velocity scale W0 ≈ 130 m a −1 and the distance scale d ≈ 11 m. With the nominal value of Qg, NQ ranges from NQ≈ 24 kPa when Qb =0 to NQ≈ −24 kPa when Qb = 120 mW m −2

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Effective stress profiles for several values of ND/pf in the transitional region with QbQg + μNDWs. For the calculations shown here, ranges from a minimum of approximately 0.435 (bottom curve) to a maximum of 0.565 (top curve).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Approximate steady-state fringe thickness h as a function of effective stress N, with Qg = 60 mW m−2 and the values of Qb noted in the legend. Dissipative heating is modeled with Qf = μNWs, and the temperature gradient is approximated as uniform and equal to (Qg + Qf )/Ke.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Variation in with D/(lb) for Qg = 60 mW m−2 with the values of Qb listed in the legend. The calculations involving net freezing at the glacier base (i.e. Qb = 90 and 120 mW m−2) were made with N(0) = NC = 0.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. as a function of D/(l − b) calculated while treating the seepage flow as 2-D and for the depth-integrated 1-D model (dashed). Decreasing values with D/(l − b) are for melting conditions with Qb = 30 mW m −2 and NC = pf . Increasing values are for freezing conditions with Qg = 90 mW m −2 and NC = 0. Calculations were terminated for the melting cases once D was sufficiently large that ND ≈ 0 and for freezing cases when NDpf .