Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T07:17:15.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Device closure of an atrial septal defect from the upper caval vein: simplified technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Thomas Krasemann Open the ORCID record for Thomas Krasemann [Opens in a new window] ,
Ingrid van Beynum ,
Bas Rebel ,
Eva Papathanasiou Open the ORCID record for Eva Papathanasiou [Opens in a new window]  and
Gert van den Berg
Thomas Krasemann*
Affiliation:
ACAHA, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Ingrid van Beynum
Affiliation:
ACAHA, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Bas Rebel
Affiliation:
ACAHA, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Eva Papathanasiou
Affiliation:
ACAHA, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Gert van den Berg
Affiliation:
ACAHA, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Thomas Krasemann; Email: t.krasemann@erasmusmc.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interruption of the inferior caval vein complicates device closure of atrial septal defects. We present a case where a simplified technique was used: from right jugular access the delivery system was directly engaged into the left atrium, where the entire septal occluder was deployed. Both discs were aligned with the interatrial septum, after which the right disc was recaptured and re-deployed in the right atrium under tension. This technique will allow device closure of atrial septal defects from the upper caval vein in selected cases.

Keywords

atrial septal defectinterrupted inferior vena cavadevice closure

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 202 - 204
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Interruption of the inferior caval vein (sometimes referred to as azygos continuation) is a rare congenital variation found in 0.1–0.6% of the population. It occurs either isolated or in combination with CHDs. In itself, lower caval vein interruption does not cause clinical problems. The combination of inferior caval vein interruption with a secundum atrial septal defect-II has been described.Reference Lowry, Pignatelli and Justino1

Device closure is an established treatment of atrial septal defect-II and is usually performed from the lower caval vein through femoral vein access. Due to the shape of the delivery systems, closure from the upper caval vein through jugular access is deemed more difficult. Different techniques have been described, ranging from modification of the sheath to deployment of the device along a stiff guidewire placed in the left upper pulmonary vein.Reference Lowry, Pignatelli and Justino1–Reference Yarrabolu, Robinson and Qureshi7

We report a simplified approach, whereby the entire device was deployed from jugular access in the left atrium and aligned to the intra-atrial septum, after which the right disc was recaptured and re-deployed in the right atrium.

Case report

A 4-year-old girl (15 kg) was referred for closure of a secundum atrial septal defect, which was centrally located and on echocardiography measured 15 mm. There were adequate rims. Interrupted lower caval vein was suspected (Figure 1a). The procedure was carried out under general anaesthesia and heparin 100 IU/kg to achieve an activated partial-thromboplastin time (APTT) of > 200 s, which was monitored throughout the procedure. Through femoral venous access, interruption of the lower caval vein was confirmed by angiography (Figure 1b).

Figure 1. a) Echocardiography suggestive of a para-aortic ascending vessel. b) Angiography: confirmation of azygos continuation by contrast injection.

Due to the size of the child progression of a delivery sheath through the azygos vein into the superior caval vein was deemed unfavourable. Right internal jugular venous access was established, via which the defect was easily crossed with the MPA catheter. An exchange was made for an 8F Amplatzer Trevisio 45° delivery system (9-ATV08F45/80, Abbott, Plymouth, USA). It was not possible to reach a stable wire position in the left heart, therefore, the delivery system was carefully advanced directly into the left atrium. An 18 mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder (9-ASD-018, Abbott, Plymouth, USA) was then completely deployed within the left atrium paying meticulous attention to avoid interference with the mitral valve. With gentle pull on the delivery cable the entire device was fully aligned to the interatrial septum (Figure 2a). The right disc was then recaptured keeping the left disk in contact with the interatrial septum (Figure 2b). Keeping the tension on the Trevisio wire, the right disc was re-deployed in the right atrium (Figure 2c–d). With release of the tension, the device was configured nicely and adequate position was confirmed echocardiographically (Figure 2e). With release, tension on the interatrial septum was fully relieved and device position was excellent (Figure 2f). Transthoracic echocardiography confirmed good position the next day. The child was discharged in good clinical condition.

Figure 2. a–f) Fluoroscopic images of the deployment of the device. a) Alignment of the device to the interatrial septum; both discs within the left atrium. b) Right atrial disc recaptured into the sheath in the right atrium. c) Right atrial disc re-deployed in the right atrium. d) Right atrial disc positioned at the right side of the interatrial septum. e–f) Echocardiography of release of the device. a) Delivery cable coming from the superior caval vein with an acute angle generating tension on the device. f) After release the device configurates in normal shape and lines up with the interatrial septum.

Discussion

Device closure of secundum atrial septal defect’s from the superior caval vein can be challenging. Our simplified approach made use of the mechanical properties of the most recent delivery system (Trevisio) of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder.Reference Haddad, Khraiche, Bonnet, Meot and Malekzadeh-Milani8 Whilst deployment of the entire device within the left atrium could have been achieved with any delivery system, alignment with the interatrial septum requires a flexible delivery cable, as the angles of the septum differ between a jugular and a femoral access. Once the right disc was recaptured and re-deployed, it was important to be able to release some of the wire tension to allow the septum to configure more naturally, allowing echocardiographical assessment of device configuration. Devices from other manufacturers with flexible delivery systems can potentially also be used in the described manner, but we haven’t found any report in the literature yet. A stiffer delivery cable might have interfered with device configuration prior to release, independent from the type of connection of the cable to the device. A traditional wiggle manoeuvre is not feasible from the upper caval vein.

In previously reported techniques, it was attempted to reach the left upper pulmonary vein with the delivery sheath in order to deploy the device directly in line with the septum.Reference Truong, Dao, Do and Le2,Reference Ozbarlas, Kiziltas, Kucukosmanoglu and Erdem3 This requires substantial modifications of the delivery process and can result in tension on the device prior to release. The latter was also the case during a procedure reported by Flosdorff et al., who closed an atrial septal defect-II via femoral access, through the azygos vein, in a 3-year-old boy.Reference Flosdorff, Paech and Dähnert4 A venoarterial wire loop with over-the-wire technique to deploy the device has also been described.Reference Mansour, Shamseddin, Demitry and Gamal5 This again complicates the procedure as the alignment between device and septum is difficult to achieve. Partial device deployment within the left ventricle has been reported, too, in order to align the device against the septum, but this carries a risk of damage to the mitral valve apparatus.Reference Yerram, Aramalla and Bhyravavajhala6

Sheath modifications for both jugular and femoral approaches have been described.Reference Lowry, Pignatelli and Justino1,Reference Yarrabolu, Robinson and Qureshi7 Although sheaths can be shaped outside the patient, this can complicate the procedure. Furthermore, in our own experience, inserting the sheath over a stiff guidewire usually configures the sheath to the shape of the guidewire, and after removal of the wire, the sheath tends to regain its original shape.

In our patient, no sheath modifications were necessary, as the interatrial septum was directly crossed with the angled delivery sheath. Our approach of deploying the entire device within the left atrium and pulling it against the left side of the interatrial septum overcomes above described difficulties, but of course requires a left atrium big enough to accommodate the whole device. The described technique of deploying the whole device in the left atrium and aligning it with the septum, recapturing the right disk and re-deploying it in the right atrium, could also be performed in cases with difficult rims from femoral access.

Conclusion

We describe a simplified method for closure of atrial septal defect-II via jugular access with an Amplatzer Trevisio 45° delivery system. The delivery system is directly advanced over the interatrial septum defect, where entire device is deployed in the left atrium and aligned with the septum. Then, the right atrial disk is recaptured and re-deployed in the right atrium. This technique may be applicable for other selected cases of atrial septal defects without adequate inferior vena cava access.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest.

Consent statement

Parents gave consent to publish the data.

References

Lowry, AW, Pignatelli, RH, Justino, H. Percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in a child with interrupted inferior vena cava: successful femoral venous approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 590–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truong, QB, Dao, AQ, Do, NT, Le, MK. Percutaneous atrial septal defect closure through femoral and transjugular approaches in patients with interrupted inferior vena cava. J Cardiol Cases 2018; 18: 106–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozbarlas, N, Kiziltas, A, Kucukosmanoglu, O, Erdem, S. Transjugular approach to device closure of atrial septal defect in a child with heterotaxia and interrupted inferior vena cava. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39: 435–437.Google Scholar
Flosdorff, P, Paech, C, Dähnert, I. Secundum atrial septal defect with interrupted inferior vena cava and azygos continuation: transfemoral closure in a 3-year old boy. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34: 459–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansour, A, Shamseddin, H, Demitry, SR, Gamal, NM. Veno-arterial rail and over the wire technique for atrial septal defect closure in a patient with interrupted inferior venae cava. J Cardiol Cases 2021; 24: 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerram, S, Aramalla, S, Bhyravavajhala, S. Unconventional deployment of atrial septal occluder in a patient with atrial septal defect, dextrocardia, and interrupted inferior vena cava. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 1206–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarrabolu, TR, Robinson, A, Qureshi, AM. A novel technique for percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect in a patient with interrupted inferior vena cava using a “modified” short sheath from an internal jugular vein approach. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 10: 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, RN, Khraiche, D, Bonnet, D, Meot, M, Malekzadeh-Milani, S. Preliminary experience with the new amplatzerTM trevisioTM delivery system in transcatheter atrial septal defect closures in children. Front Pediatr 2021; 9: 641742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. a) Echocardiography suggestive of a para-aortic ascending vessel. b) Angiography: confirmation of azygos continuation by contrast injection.

Figure 1

Figure 2. a–f) Fluoroscopic images of the deployment of the device. a) Alignment of the device to the interatrial septum; both discs within the left atrium. b) Right atrial disc recaptured into the sheath in the right atrium. c) Right atrial disc re-deployed in the right atrium. d) Right atrial disc positioned at the right side of the interatrial septum. e–f) Echocardiography of release of the device. a) Delivery cable coming from the superior caval vein with an acute angle generating tension on the device. f) After release the device configurates in normal shape and lines up with the interatrial septum.