Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T12:22:48.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal Expansion Coefficients For Sea Ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jerome Β. Johnson  and
Ronald C. Metzner
Jerome Β. Johnson
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Fort Wainwright, Alaska 99703–7860, U.S.A.
Ronald C. Metzner
Affiliation:
Chugiak High School, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coefficients of thermal linear expansion were determined for sea ice using a Michelson interferometer. Over a temperature range of −4 °to −15 °C, the coefficients varied from 45 ×10−6 to 54×10−6 °C−1 for ice with a salinity of 2 ppt, and from 33 ×10−6 to 53 ×10−6 °C−1 for ice with a salinity of 4 ppt. Initially, warming the sea ice resulted in coefficients that were the same as those for fresh-water ice, within the limits of experimental error. Subsequent sea-ice cooling resulted in coefficients that were initially lower than those for fresh-water ice, but that asymptotically approached the coefficient values for fresh-water ice at colder temperatures. On the second warming and cooling cycle, the coefficients of thermal linear expansion exhibited hysteresis and a decrease in magnitudes. We have also shown that Pettersson’s (1883) and Malmgren’s (1927) measurements of the thermal volume expansion of sea ice were the result of phase transitions that caused brine expulsion, when air-free sea ice was cooled, and internal porosity increases, when sea ice was warmed.

Our results indicate that Petterson’s (1883) and Malmgren’s (1927) measurements of the thermal volume expansion of sea ice are in error. Consequently, theoretical descriptions based on their results are incorrect (Anderson, 1960; Zubov and Savelyev (given in Doronin and Kheisin (1977)); Doronin and Kheisin, 1977). Our results for the initial sea-ice warming cycle do agree with Cox’s (1983) analysis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 36 , Issue 124 , 1990 , pp. 343 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1990

Introduction

Understanding how sea ice changes volume in response to temperature changes is important in solving a number of ice-engineering and sea-ice geophysics problems. These can include estimating thermal ice movement, thermal ice pressures against offshore structures and internal ice stresses, and thermal cracking of ice sheets. Thermal expansion-related ice movements of 0.5 and 0.9 m d−1 and thermal structural loads of 150 MN have been recorded in sea ice (Reference StrilchuckStrilchuck, 1977; Reference Johnson, Cox and TuckerJohnson and others, 1985). Thermal cracking can reduce the bearing capacity of an ice sheet and increase the probability of its break-up during storms. In addition, thermal cracking in ice covers generate high-frequency Arctic ambient noise, >300 Hz (Reference Lewis and DennerLewis and Denner, 1988), that can interfere with acoustic monitoring programs in the Arctic.

Coefficients for the thermal volume expansion of sea ice were first determined from measurements in the laboratory by Reference PetterssonPettersson (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren (1927) (their methods are discussed in the following section). Field measurements of ice deformation were used to determine the coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice by Legenkov and Uglev (reported by Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin (1977)) using invar wire and by Reference Ono and TanumaOno and Tanuma (1973) using infra-red distance measurements.

Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) measurements indicate that the range of values for the thermal volume expansion coefficients for sea ice is large, compared to fresh-water ice, and can be either negative or positive depending on ice temperature and salinity (Fig. 1). Legenkov and Uglev’s measurements indicated that the thermal expansion coefficients for sea ice were several times smaller than those determined under laboratory conditions. They concluded that their measurements were not representative because of the narrow variations in ice temperature, the time lag in temperature change, and salinity differences with depth for the ice flow used in their experiment. These phenomena were thought to cause the lower ice layers to resist the thermal deformation of the upper layers and vice versa (Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin, 1977). Reference Ono and TanumaOno and Tanuma (1973) estimated that the coefficient of thermal linear expansion for sea ice was 30 ×10−6 °C−1. Their data, however, have a large amount of scatter and cannot be used to determine reliably the coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice.

Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) results were used by Reference AndersonAnderson (1960), Zubov and Savelyev (as reported by Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin (1977)), and Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin (1977) to develop analytical descriptions of thermal expansion in sea ice. Reference CoxCox (1983) presented an analytical description, using the phase-change relationships for sea ice, that contradicted the previous results. He concluded that the internal air and brine in sea ice have no effect on thermal expansion. He further concluded that the coefficients of thermal volume expansion for sea ice must be the same as those for fresh-water ice on both warming and cooling.

Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) values for the thermal volume expansion coefficients for sea ice are widely quoted and are generally considered to be correct (Reference AndersonAnderson, 1960; Reference Neumann and PiersonNeumann and Pierson, 1965; Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin, 1977). Reference CoxCox’s (1983) analytical results, while intuitively reasonable, do not have the supporting experimental measurements needed to demonstrate that his findings are correct and that Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experimental results are incorrect. In this paper we examine Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experimental method and explain their results using the phase relations for sea ice. We then report on our preliminary experiments determining the thermal linear expansion and contraction behavior of sea ice upon warming and cooling. Our results are used to calculate thermal linear expansion coefficients for sea ice and to test Reference CoxCox’s (1983) analysis.

Pettersson’s And Malmgren’s Experimental Method And Results

Both Reference PetterssonPettersson (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren (1927) were careful and thorough experimentalists. Yet, it is evident that their experiments to determine coefficients of thermal volume expansion for sea ice were flawed. Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) measurements were made by immersing a sea-ice sample in fluid and then measuring the change in fluid volume as the sample temperature was changed. Fluid-volume changes were then used to calculate thermal volume expansion coefficients for the sample. This procedure assumes that the porosity of the sample remains constant during temperature changes and that no additional fluid is added to the volume of the immersion fluid. Neither of these assumptions is valid when sea ice is the immersed sample. The porosity of sea ice increases when it is warmed and when air-free sea ice is cooled brine will be expelled into the immersion fluid due to phase transitions (Reference BenningtonBennington, 1963; Reference UntersteinerUntersteiner, 1968; Cox and Weeks, Reference Cox and Weeks1975, Reference Cox and Weeks1983, 1986).

Fig. 1.

Comparison of the calculated apparent coefficients of thermal volume expansion for sea ice with the values from (a) Reference PetterssonPettersson (1883), and (b) Reference MalmgrenMalmgren (1927).

When sea ice is warmed, brine in cavities is diluted by melting the surrounding ice to maintain phase equilibrium.

The phase change and the difference in density between pure ice and brine cause an increase in ice porosity. This porosity increase produces a negative pressure in the internal pore spaces that can draw in fluid surrounding the ice through the interconnected brine-channel system. In the case of Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experiments, it is the immersion fluid that will be drawn into the sea-ice sample, giving an apparent decrease in volume expansion for the sea ice. This phenomenon will be particularly noticeable at warm temperatures where the brine volume is large. The change in porosity for the sea ice on warming can be determined from

(1)

where vp is the pore-space volume, Τ is temperature, vs = (v p + vi + Vb ) is the bulk volume of the sea ice, βi is the coefficient of thermal volume expansion for fresh-water ice, vi is the volume of the ice matrix, and vb , is the volume of brine. Equation (1) can be written using the phase relations for sea ice as

(2)

where ρi is the ice density, ρb, is the density of the brine, mb is the mass of the brine, and Sb is the brine salinity (Reference CoxCox, 1983). The change in pore volume is dominated by the phase-change process so that the contribution of thermal volume change by the brine and ice can be neglected giving

(3)

To examine Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experiments, we assume that the coefficient of thermal volume expansion of sea ice, βs, is the same as that of fresh-water ice, βi, where

(4a)

and

(4b)

The apparent coefficient of thermal volume expansion for sea ice, βa, as determined by both Reference PetterssonPettersson (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren (1927) from their experiments, is the difference between the relative volume change due to thermal expansion of the sea ice and the apparent relative volume change caused by drawing immersion fluid into the pore space of the sea ice

(5)

where δ is the percentage of the created porosity that is filled with immersion fluid.

When air-free sea ice is cooled, the change in the volume of expelled brine as a function of temperature is analogous to the change in porosity of air-free sea ice on warming such that

(6)

where

is the volume of expelled brine (Reference CoxCox, 1983). The apparent coefficient of thermal volume expansion on cooling is the sum of the relative volume change of the sea ice and the relative volume of expelled brine added to the immersion fluid
(7)

Using Equations (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7), and setting δ=1, we see that the βa for air-free sea ice is approximately the same for both warming and cooling in 3 Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experiments

(8)

where ρb V b has been substituted for mb The variables for Equation (8) are determined from the literature and are given in the Appendix.

Figure 1 shows a comparison of Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) values for the coefficients of thermal /volume expansion, βPMS, with calculated values for the βa Uising Equation (8). The agreement between the βPMS and :the βa values is quite good and is consistent with our interpretation that Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) measurements are due to phase transition-related porosity increases for sea-ice warming and brine expulsion for sea-Ice cooling. The results presented in Figure 1 and our nitial assumption that βs = δi also indicate that the :coefficients of thermal volume expansion for sea ice, βs, are similar to those of fresh-water ice.

Coefficients Of Thermal Linear Expansion For Sea Ice

Experimental methods

We have measured the thermal linear expansion of two congelation sea-ice samples using a Michelson interferometer and a helium-neon laser light source (632.8 nm wavelength). An interferometric technique was used because it is a highly accurate method for measuring mechanical displacements and is widely used to measure the thermal linear expansion of solids (Reference Peck and ObetzPeck and Obetz, 1953; Reference PattenPatten, 1971; Reference Keller, Salathé and TschudiKeller and others, 1972; ASTM Ε 289–70, 1979; Reference Bowles, Post, Herakovich and TenneyBowles and others, 1981). Interferometry has the added benefit of avoiding the problems associated with the fluid immersion technique used by Reference PetterssonPettersson (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren (1927) to determine the βs.

Our apparatus included the interferometer, cold stage/ sample holder, temperature-control unit, and computer-controlled data-acquisition unit (Fig. 2a). A sea-ice sample with a target mirror frozen to its front surface was housed in a cylindrical holder. The sample and holder were then placed in a urethane-insulated cold stage that constituted one leg of the interferometer. Plastic sheeting was placed under the sea-ice sample to insure that it was not restrained along its bottom edge (Fig. 2b). A few drops of water were used to freeze the bottom back edge of the sample to the holder, eliminating any possiblity of sample movement during a test. Sample temperatures were measured near the front and back faces of the sample using two thermistors (Fig. 2b). The optically flat, front-surfaced target mirror and sample holder were made from fused quartz, because its coefficient of thermal linear expansion is about two orders of magnitude lower than that of ice (0.37 ×10−6 °C−1 for fused quartz compared to about 50 ×10−6 °C−1 for ice). A fused-quartz mounting rod extending from the back of the sample holder through the rear of the cold stage was fixed in place with clamps. The front hole of the cold stage was covered with an optically flat glass window (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

(a). Michelson interferometer assembly (details of the cold stage are shown in Figure 2b). Vibrations from the bath’s compressor and pump motors, and fluid pressure pulses caused by the pump were attenuated using large damping masses on inlet and outlet cooling tubes and a surge chamber on the cold-stage inlet, (b). Cold stage and fused-quartz sample holder.

Sample temperatures were controlled to within ±0.03 °C by circulating a glycol-water mixture through a precision constant-temperature bath and tubing coil in the cold stage. The cold stage was protected from vibrations caused by the bath’s compressor and pump motors by passing the connecting tubes through two large damping masses. Fluid pressure pulses caused by the pump were attenuated using a long, air-filled, sealed coil of copper tubing connected to a Τ adaptor (surge chamber) on the input line of the cold stage.

An unventilated, insulated room was used to isolate the apparatus from external air-temperature fluctuations, and an oil-bath damping system was used to isolate the apparatus from possible external vibrations.

The two cylindrical sea-ice samples used in the tests were prepared from cores that had been taken from a first-year congelation sea-ice sheet at Harrison Bay, Alaska. Two adjacent ice plugs were removed from the core for each test sample. The first set of ice plugs was cut with their long axes oriented parallel to the ice-sheet surface (that is, perpendicular to the ice-growth direction and in the direction of random ice-crystal c-axis orientation. The second set of ice plugs was cut with their long axes in the direction of ice-sheet growth (parallel to the ice-crystal a-axes). The first plug from each sample set was used to determine sample salinity before conducting a test; the test sample was made from the second plug. After a test, the sample’s salinity was measured (Table I). The front and back faces of the samples were trimmed parallel with a microtome and their lengths determined to within ±0.03 mm using a dial caliper. Sample lengths were 71.25 mm for the 2 ppt sea ice and 69.33 mm for the 4 ppt sea ice. Sample diameters were nominally 38 mm.

Thermal linear expansion of a sample was measured by counting the number of interference fringes that passed a fixed point during a known temperature change. Two photodetectors were placed side by side within the width of a fringe to determine sea-ice displacement magnitude and direction. Figure 3 shows the voltage measurements for each detector from our first test, in which 2 ppt salinity ice was warmed. Each voltage maximum indicates the passage of a fringe; displacement direction is determined from the phase shift between the detectors. For ice expansion, the fringes moved outward and channel 1 detected fringe passage before channel 2. Conversely, channel 1 detected fringe passage after channel 2 when the ice contracted. The passage of one fringe at a fixed point corresponds to a displacement of one-half the wavelength of He—Ne light. In our experiment, the resolution was about 1/2 wavelength (316.4 nm). However, under ideal conditions, it was possible to resolve displacements to about 1/8 wavelength (79.1 nm).

Fig. 3.

Output voltage from the two photodetectors and the temperature record for the first warming test on 2 ppt saline ice. The arrows show the start and end times for the test.

TABLE I.

Thermal linear expansion and coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice

Experiments were conducted by first establishing a reference state by maintaining a constant sample temperature until the interference fringes were stationary. Next, the sample temperature was changed to the desired final temperature and held constant until the fringes stopped moving (Fig. 3). For the tests on sea ice, temperatures were changed in steps to insure that the sample was at thermal equilibrium before starting the next temperature change. The number of fringes that passed the photodetectors was counted and the thermal linear expansion was calculated using

(9)

where ΔL is the change in sample length, L0 is the initial sample length, Ν is the number of interference fringes, and λ is the wavelength of the light source. The instantaneous coefficient of thermal linear expansion, α was calculated using

(10)

where ΔL = (L1 - L2 ), ΔT = (T2 - L2 ), and T1 and T2 are the beginning and ending sample temperatures (Reference Touloukian, Kirby, Taylor and DesaiTouloukian and others, 1975). The accuracy limits of calculating β were estimated by combining the uncertainties of the constituent measurements:

(11)

where σβ, σ∆L , σ L , and σ∆T the uncertainties in the coefficient of thermal linear expansion, change in sample length, sample length, and the change in sample temperature (Reference BeersBeers, 1957). Values for are given in Table I; σ∆T was nominally ±0.02 °C, was nominally ±0.03 mm, and 0.30 ¼m ό σ∆L < 0.65 μm

The interferometric apparatus was tested by using it to determine the coefficient of thermal linear expansion for Alcoa 6061T6 aluminum alloy bar stock, βA. A length of aluminum bar (70.05 ± 0.02 mm), with a target mirror frozen to the bar’s front surface, was placed in the sample holder and installed in the cold stage. The thermal linear expansion of the aluminum was determined over a temperature range of −16.9 ° to −7.52 °C and used to calculate the βA. The βA was 23.6 ± 0.3 ×10−6 °C−1 at —11.8 °C, which compares favorably with the interpolated value of 22.8 ± 0.7 ×10−6 °C−1 at −11.8°C determined from the table of recommended values for the βA (Reference Touloukian, Kirby, Taylor and DesaiTouloukian and others, 1975).

Results and discussion

Our results for ΔL/L0 and β are presented in Figures 4 and 5, and Table I. Table I gives values for the mean coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice, βls, and the instantaneous βls. The mean βls, for each warming and cooling test, is the slope of the best-fit line through the ΔL/L0 values (Fig. 4). There is no temperature-dependence for the mean βls, because of the manner of calculation. The instantaneous βls values are determined from Equation (10).

The mean and instantaneous βls determined for the initial warming of 2 and 4 ppt salinity ice are essentially the same as the values for fresh-water ice published by Reference ButkovichButkovich (1959) and Reference KheisinDoronin and Kheisin (1977), within the limits of uncertainty for our experiment (Fig. 5). The 4 ppt salinity ice exhibited hysteresis when it was cooled and rewarmed after the initial warming test. A general decrease in magnitude of the mean and instantaneous βls was associated with the hysteresis. Reference ButkovichButkovich (1959) observed a similar hysteretic behavior for fresh-water ice, in which the coefficients of thermal linear expansion, βi, decreased with succeeding runs.

Fig. 4.

Thermal linear expansion for sea ice. The arrows show the direction of temperature change during a test.

Fig. 5.

Instantaneous coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice determined in this study and coefficients of thermal linear expansion for fresh-water ice (0 ppt) determined by Reference ButkovichButkovich ( 1959).

Salinity decreased by 0.8 ppt for the 2 ppt salinity ice and 0.9 ppt for the 4 ppt salinity ice during the experiment. These salinity losses were probably caused by brine drainage during the temperature cycles. The amount of salinity change in the samples is too small to affect significantly the phase-change-related processes and are not considered to be important.

A comparison of the βls for the 2 and 4 ppt salinity ice, for the initial warming cycle, with the βi indicates that they are the same, within the limits of experimental uncertainty. Furthermore, the fact that c-axis orientations for the two sea-ice samples were different indicates that the βls has little or no dependence on ice-crystal-axis orientation. This means that coefficients for thermal volume expansion can be determined from the βls using

(12)

The observed hysteresis for the βls may be the result of our experimental technique or may be accounted for by the uncertainty limits of our measurements. However, another possibility is that thermal-history effects on the defect structure induced in the ice could produce the observed hysteresis. For example, dislocations moving under the influence of thermal stresses will have different equilibrium positions upon warming and cooling, thus affecting the microscopic strain to a slight degree (personal communication from D.M. Cole). Further experiments will be needed to examine the causes of hysteresis in the βls.

Conclusions

Our analysis of Reference PetterssonPettersson’s (1883) and Reference MalmgrenMalmgren’s (1927) experimental methods shows that their values for the βs are incorrect. Their measurements were affected by a phase-transition-related increase in ice porosity when their sea-ice samples were warmed and brine expulsion for sea-ice cooling. Our measurements of sea-ice thermal expansion show that during the initial warming cycle βls = βli within the limits of experimental error. Additional temperature cycling of the sea ice shows a slight hysteresis in the βls that may be caused by thermal ice-stress-related dislocation movement. This hysteresis does not affect our conclusion that βls = βli.

Additional experiments are needed to examine the hysteresis in the βls with temperature cycling, and to confirm the conclusion that βls = βi; for high-salinity congelation ice and frazil ice.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr Berger and the staff at U.S. Army CRREL-Alaska for their help with this project. We also thank Drs Osterkamp, Walker, and Perovich, Mr Ferrick, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments. The archivists at the rare-book section, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, helped us locate Pettersson’s original article. We give special thanks to Mr Matava for writing the data-acquisition and graphics programs, and for running the 4 ppt saline-ice experiments.

Funding for R.C. Metzner was provided by the U.S. Army Summer Fellowship Program for High School Science and Mathematics Faculty.

Appendix

Formulas Used In Calculating Equation (8)

Coefficients of thermal linear expansion and thermal volumetric expansion for fresh-water ice (Reference ButkovichButkovich, 1959):

where Τ is in °C. For α; we use

since the estimated difference between c-axis and a-axis thermal expansion is only 1.8% and was not detected by Reference ButkovichButkovich (1959).

Density of fresh-water ice (Reference PounderPounder, 1965):

>Brine salinity and dSydT (Reference Cox and WeeksCox and Weeks, 1986):

where = −3.9921, q1 = −22.700, a 2 = −1.0015, and a 3 = −0.019956 for —1.6 ≥ Τ > −22.9 °C; a0 = 206.24, a1 = −1.8907, a 2 = −0.060868, and a 3 = −0.0010247 for −22.9 ≥ Τ >; −44°C.

Brine density and

(Reference ZubovZubov, 1945): the approximate formula for brine density given by Reference ZubovZubov (1945) does not account for thermal volume expansion of the brine. It describes the brine density as a function of brine salinity at Τ = 0°C (Reference Neumann and PiersonNeumann and Pierson, 1965). This formulation is adequate for our needs as the phase-transition effects are much greater than are the thermal expansion effects.

Relative brine volume (Reference Cox and WeeksCox and Weeks, 1986):

where the initial relative brine volume of the sea ice is taken from Reference WeeksWeeks (1962):

where Si is the sea-ice salinity and the sea-ice density, ρ, is equal to

References

American Society for Testing and Materials. 1982 ASTM standard test method for linear thermal expansion of rigid solids with interferometry. Annu. Book ASTM Standards 41, 316–323.Google Scholar
Anderson, D.L. 1960 The physical constants of sea ice. Research, 13(8), 310–318.Google Scholar
Beers, Y. 1957 Theory of error. Reading, MA, Addison– Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bennington, K.O. 1963 Some crystal growth features of sea ice. J. Glaciol., 4(36), 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, D.E. Post, D. Herakovich, C.T. Tenney, D.R.. 1981 Moiré interferometry for thermal expansion of composites. Exp. Mech., 21(12), 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butkovich, T.R. 1959 Thermal expansion of ice. J. Appl. Phys., 30(3), 350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.F.N. 1983 Thermal expansion of saline ice. J. Glaciol., 29(103), 425–432.Google Scholar
Cox, G.F.N. Weeks, W.F.. 1975 Brine drainage and initial salt entrapment in sodium chloride ice. CRREL Res. Rep. 354.Google Scholar
Cox, G.F.N. Weeks, W.F.. 1983 Equations for determining the gas and brine volumes in sea–ice samples. J. Glaciol., 29(102), 306–316.Google Scholar
Cox, G.F.N. Weeks, W.F.. 1986 Changes in the salinity and porosity of sea–ice samples during shipping and storage. J. Glaciol., 32(112), 371–375.Google Scholar
Kheisin, D.E.. 1977 Sea ice. New Delhi, Amerind Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.B. Cox, G.F.N. Tucker, W.B.III. 1985 Kadluk ice stress measurement program. In POAC 85: the 8th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Narssarssuaq, Greenland, September 7–14, 1985 Proceedings. Vol. 1. Horsholm, Danish Hydraulic Institute, 88–100.Google Scholar
Keller, R. Salathé, R. Tschudi, T.. 1972 Interferometric measurement of the elongation of a pulsed diode laser. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., QE–8(10), 783–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.K. Denner, W.W.. 1988 Higher frequency ambient noise in the Arctic Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 84(4), 1444–1445.Google Scholar
Malmgren, F. 1927 On the properties of sea–ice. The Norwegian North Polar Expedition with the “Maud”, 1918–1925. Scientific Results, 1(5).Google Scholar
Neumann, G. Pierson, W.J. 1965 Principles of physical oceanography. Englewood Cliff, NJ, Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Ono, N. Tanuma, K.. 1973 Strain measurements on pack–ice floe with infra–red distancer. Low Temp. Sei., Ser. A 31 221–229.Google Scholar
Patten, R.A. 1971 Michelson interferometer as a remote gauge. Appl. Opt., 10(12), 2717–2721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, E.R. Obetz, S.W.. 1953 Wavelength or length measurement by reversible fringe counting. J. Opt. Soc. 43(6), 505–509.Google Scholar
Pettersson, O. 1883 On the properties of water and ice. In Nordenskiöld, Α.Ε., ed. Vega–expeditionens vetenskapliga iakttagelser. Bd. 2. Stockholm F. and G. Beijers Förlag, 247–323.Google Scholar
Pounder, E.R. 1965 The physics of ice. Oxford, etc., Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Strilchuck, A.R. 1977 Ice pressure measurements, Netserk F–40, 1975–75. APOA Project No. 105–1.Google Scholar
Touloukian, Y.S. Kirby, R.K. Taylor, R.E. Desai, P.D. 1975 Thermophysical properties of matter. Vol. 12. Thermal expansion of metallic elements and alloys. New York, Plenum Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, N. 1968 Natural desalination and equilibrium salinity profile of perennial sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 73(4), 1251–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, W.F. 1962 Tensile strength of NaCl ice. J. Glaciol., 4(31), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubov, N.N. 1945 L’dy Arktiki [Arctic ice]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Glavsevmorputi.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Comparison of the calculated apparent coefficients of thermal volume expansion for sea ice with the values from (a) Pettersson (1883), and (b) Malmgren (1927).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a). Michelson interferometer assembly (details of the cold stage are shown in Figure 2b). Vibrations from the bath’s compressor and pump motors, and fluid pressure pulses caused by the pump were attenuated using large damping masses on inlet and outlet cooling tubes and a surge chamber on the cold-stage inlet, (b). Cold stage and fused-quartz sample holder.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Output voltage from the two photodetectors and the temperature record for the first warming test on 2 ppt saline ice. The arrows show the start and end times for the test.

Figure 3

TABLE I. Thermal linear expansion and coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Thermal linear expansion for sea ice. The arrows show the direction of temperature change during a test.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Instantaneous coefficients of thermal linear expansion for sea ice determined in this study and coefficients of thermal linear expansion for fresh-water ice (0 ppt) determined by Butkovich ( 1959).