Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 3
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      11 July 2009
      06 June 2005
      ISBN:
      9780511511080
      9780521838924
      9781107402553
      Dimensions:
      (228 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.515kg, 290 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.43kg, 290 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    This text explores the implications of a bargaining perspective for institutional governance and public law in deregulated industries such as electric power and telecommunications. Leading media accounts blame deregulated markets for failures in competitive restructuring policies. However, the author argues that governmental institutions, often influenced by private stakeholders, share blame for the defects in deregulated markets. The first part of the book explores the minimal role that judicial intervention played for much of the twentieth century in public utility industries and how deregulation presents fresh opportunities and challenges for public law. The second part of the book explores the role of public law in a deregulatory environment, focusing on the positive and negative incentives it creates for the behavior of private stakeholders and public institutions in a bargaining-focused political process.

    Reviews

    "The Strength of Regulatory Bargaining and Public Law resides in Professor Rossi's expert analysis of how existing public law doctrine must be assessed during this period of regulatory transition or deregulation. [It] will prove beneficial to scholars and practitioners of law, economics, and political science because it provides a valuable approach to understanding administrative law generally and economic regulation more generally." - Joseph Tomain, Dean Emeritus and Ziegler Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    References
    References
    Adams, Henry Carter. 1887 (January). “Relation of the State to Industrial Action.” Publications of the American Economics Association. 1: 55
    Ahdieh, Robert B. 2004. “Law's Signal: A Cueing Theory of Law in Market Transition.” Southern California Law Review. 77: 215
    Alexander, Barbara & The National Consumer Law Center. 1996. Consumer Protection Proposals for Retail Electric Competition: Model Legislation and RegulationsBoston: National Consumer Law Center
    Alexander, Gregory S. 1996. “Ten Years of Takings.” Journal of Legal Education. 46: 586
    Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & North, Douglas C., eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional ChangeCambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Areeda, Phillip E. & Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2000. IA Antitrust Law, Second edition. Boston: Little, Brown
    Arteburn, Norman F. 1927. “The Origin and First Test of Public Callings.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 75: 411
    Austin, Regina. 1983. “The Insurance Classification Controversy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 131: 517
    Averch, Harvey & Johnson, Leland L. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review. 52: 1052
    Aviram, Amitai. 2003. “Regulation by Networks.” Brigham Young University Law Review. 2003: 1179
    Ayres, Ian & Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press
    Ayres, Ian & Gertner, Robert. 1992. “Strategic Contractual Inefficiency and the Optimal Choice of Legal Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 101: 729
    Baer, William J. 1997. “FTC Perspectives on Competition Policy and Enforcement Initiatives in Electric Power.” Presented at the Conference on the New Rules of the Game for Electric Power: Antitrust and Anticompetitive Behavior, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., December 4. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/elec1204.htm
    Baker, Scott and Krawiec, Kimberly. 2004. “The Penalty Default Canon.” George Washington Law Review. 72: 663
    Baron, David & Ferejohn, John. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review. 83: 1181
    Baumol, William J. & Merrill, Thomas W. 1996. “Deregulatory Takings, Breach of the Regulatory Contract, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996.” New York University Law Review. 72: 1037
    Becker, Gary. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 98: 371
    Beer, Samuel H. 1977. “Political Overload and Federalism.” Polity. 10: 5
    Berg, Jessica Wilen. 2003. “Understanding Waiver.” Houston Law Review. 40: 281
    Bernheim, B. Douglas & Whinston, Michael D.. 1998. “Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity.” American Economic Review. 88: 902
    Bernstein, David E. 2003. “Lochner's Legacy's Legacy.” Texas Law Review. 82: 1
    Bernstein, Lisa. 1992. “Opting Out of the Legal System: Extra Legal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry.” Journal of Legal Studies. 21: 115
    Bernstein, Lisa. 2001. “Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms and Institutions.” Michigan Law Review. 99: 1724
    Bolze, Ray S., Pierce, John C. & Walsh, Linda L., 2000. “Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry.” Energy Law Journal. 21: 79
    Borenstein, Severin. 2002. “The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16(1): 191
    Borenstein, Severin & Bushnell, James D.. 2000. “Electricity Restructuring: Deregulation or Reregulation?Regulation 23(2): 46
    Boudin, Michael. 1986. “Antitrust Doctrine and the Sway of Metaphor.” Georgetown Law Journal. 75: 395
    Bouknight, J. A. & Raskin, David B.. 1987. “Planning for Wholesale Customer Loads in a Competitive Environment: The Obligation to Provide Wholesale Service under the Federal Power Act.” Energy Law Journal. 8: 237
    Boyes, William J. 1976. “An Empirical Examination of the Averch-Johnson Effect.” Economic Inquiry. 14: 25
    Bradley, Robert L., Jr. 2003. “The Origins and Development of Electric Power Regulation.” In Grossman, Peter Z. & Cole, Daniel H., eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power IndustryAmsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAI Imprint)
    Brennan, Timothy J. & Boyd, James. 1997. “Stranded Costs, Takings, and the Law and Economics of Implicit Contracts.” Journal of Regulatory Economics. 11: 41
    Breyer, Stephen. 1982. Regulation and its Reform. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Brown, Stephen J. & Sibley, David S.. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Burdick, Charles K. 1911. “The Origin of the Peculiar Duties of Public Service Companies.” Columbia Law Review. 11: 514
    Buzbee, William W. 2003. “Recognizing the Regulatory Commons: A Theory of Regulatory Gaps.” Iowa Law Review. 89: 1
    Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John & Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Calabresi, Guido & Douglas, A. Melamed. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral.” Harvard Law Review. 85: 1089
    Candeub, Adam. 2004. “Network Interconnection and Takings.” Syracuse Law Review. 54: 369
    Carron, Andrew S. & Paul, W. MacAvoy. 1981. The Decline of Service in Regulated IndustriesWashington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute
    Casson, Mark. 1997. Information and Organization: A New Perspective on the Theory of the FirmNew York: Clarendon Press
    Chen, Jim. 1999. “The Second Coming of Smyth v. Ames.” Texas Law Review. 77: 1535
    Chen, Jim. 2000. “Standing in the Shadows of Giants: The Role of Intergenerational Equity in Telecommunications Reform.” University of Colorado Law Review. 71: 921
    Chen, Jim. 2003a. “The Vertical Dimension of Cooperative Competition Policy.” Antitrust Bulletin. 48: 1005
    Chen, Jim. 2003b. “Subsidized Rural Telephony and the Public Interest: A Case Study in Cooperative Federalism and Its Pitfalls.” Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law. 2: 307
    Chen, Jim. 2003c. “A Vision Softly Creeping: Congressional Acquiesence and the Dormant Commerce Clause.” Minnesota Law Review. 88: 1764
    Chen, Jim. 2004. “The Nature of the Public Utility: Infrastructure, the Market, and the Law.” Northwestern University Law Review. 98: 1617
    Cirace, John. 1982. “An Economic Analysis of the ‘State-Municipal Action’ Antitrust Cases.” Texas Law Review. 61: 481
    Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica. 4: 386
    Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Costs.” Journal of Law and Economics. 3: 1
    Coenen, Dan T. 1989. “Untangling the Market-Participant Exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause.” Michigan Law Review. 88: 395
    Cohen, George M. 1994. “The Fault Lines in Contract Damages.” Virginia Law Review. 80: 1225
    Cole, Daniel H. 2003. “The Regulatory Contract.” in Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole, eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power IndustryAmsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAI Imprint)
    Colton, Roger. 1991. “A Cost-Based Response to Low-Income Energy Problems.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. March 1: 31
    Colton, Roger. 1997. The ‘Obligation to Serve’ and a Competitive Electric Industry. Report of DOE Office of Economic, Electricity and Natural Gas Analysis, May
    Costello, Kenneth W. & Robert, J. Graniere. 1997. Deregulation-Restructuring: Evidence from Individual IndustriesColumbus, Ohio: National Regulatory Research Institute
    Costello, Kenneth W. & , J. Rodney Lemon. 1996. Unbundling the Retail Natural Gas Market: Current Activities and Guidance for Serving Residential and Small Consumers. Columbus, Ohio: National Regulatory Research Institute
    Courville, Leon. 1974. “Regulation and Efficiency in the Electric Utility Industry.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 5: 53
    Cramton, Roger C. 1986. “Demystifying Legal Scholarship.” Georgetown Law Journal. 75: 1
    Cudahy, Richard D. 2002a. “Electric Deregulation after California: Down But Not Out.” Administrative Law Review. 54: 333
    Cudahy, Richard D. 2002b. “Full Circle in the Formerly Regulated Industries?Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal. 33: 767
    Davis, Mary J. 2002. “Unmasking the Presumption in Favor of Preemption.” Southern California Law Review. 53: 967
    Figueiredo, John M. & Figueiredo, Rui J. P. Jr. 2002. “The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation and Administrative Regulation.” Business and Politics. 4(2): 161
    Dechert, W. Davis. 1984. “Has the Averch-Johnson Effect Been Theoretically Justified?Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 8: 1
    Deisinger, Chris. 2000. “The Backlash Against Merchant Plants and the Need for a New Regulatory Model.” Electricity Journal. 13: 51
    Demsetz, Harold. 1968. “Why Regulate Utilities?Journal of Law & Economics. 11: 55
    Denning, Brannon P. 1999. “Justice Thomas, the Import-Export Clause, and Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison.” University of Colorado Law Review. 70: 155
    Denning, Brannon P. 2003. “Why the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV Cannot Replace the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine.” Minnesota Law Review. 84: 284
    Derthick, Martha & Paul, J. Quirk. 1985. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings
    Dibadj, Reza. 2004. “Saving Antitrust.” University of Colorado Law Review. 75: 745
    Diver, Colin. 1983. “The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 93: 65
    Dorf, Michael H. & Charles, F. Sabel. 1998. “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism.” Columbia Law Review. 98: 267
    Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. “The Limits of Antitrust.” Texas Law Review. 63: 1
    Easterbrook, Frank H. 1988. “The Role of Original Intent in Statutory Construction.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 11: 59
    Eaton, Jade Alice. 1994. “Recent United States Department of Justice Actions in the Electric Utility Industry.” Connecticut Journal of International Law. 9: 857
    Economides, Nicholas. 2003. “The Tragic Inefficiency of the M-ECPR.” in Shampine, Allan L., ed. Down to the Wire: Studies in the Diffusion and Regulation of Telecommunications TechnologiesHauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers
    Eggertsson, Thráinn. 1996. “A Note on the Economics of Institutions.” in Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & Douglas, C. North, eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional ChangeCambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Elhauge, Einer. 2002. “Preference-Eliciting Statutory Default Rules.” Columbia Law Review. 102: 2163
    Ellickson, Robert. 1994. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial ReviewCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Ely, Richard T. 1887. “The Nature and Significance of the Corporation.” Harper's Magazine. 75: 71
    Engel, Kristen H. 1999. “The Dormant Commerce Clause Threat to Market-Based Regulation: The Case of Electricity Deregulation.” Ecology Law Quarterly. 26: 243
    Epstein, Richard A. 1984. “Toward a Revitalization of the Contract Clause.” University of Chicago Law Review. 51: 703
    Epstein, Richard A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Epstein, Richard A. 1995. “The Permit Power Meets the Constitution.” Iowa Law Review 81: 407
    Epstein, Richard A. 1997a. “A Clear View from The Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 106: 2091, 2128
    Epstein, Richard A. 1997b. “Takings, Exclusivity and Speech: The Legacy of Prune Yard v. Robins.” University of Chicago Law Review. 64: 21
    Eskridge, William N. Jr. & Philip, P. Frickey. 1992. “Quasi-Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 45: 593
    Eule, Julian N. 1982. “Laying the Dormant Commerce Clause to Rest.” Yale Law Journal. 91: 425
    Farber, Daniel A. 1991. Legislative Deals and Statutory Bequests. Minnesota Law Review. 75: 667
    Farber, Daniel A. & Philip, Frickey. 1991. Law and Public Choice: A Critical IntroductionChicago: University of Chicago Press
    Ferrey, Steven. 1997. “Renewable Subsidies in the Age of Deregulation: State-Imposed Preferences May Have Come to the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time.” Fortnightly. December: 22
    Fisch, Jill E. 1997. “Retroactivity and Legal Change: An Equilibrium Approach.” Harvard Law Review. 110: 1055
    Fox-Penner, Peter. 1997. Electric Utility Restructuring: A Guide to the Competitive Era. Vienna, Virginia: Public Utility Reports
    Frankfurter, Felix & Landis, James. 1925. “The Compact Clause of the Constitution – A Study in Interstate Adjustments.” Yale Law Journal. 34: 685
    Freeman, Jody. 1997. “Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State.” UCLA Law Review. 45: 1
    Freeman, Jody. 2000. “The Contracting State.” Florida State University Law Review. 28: 155
    Friendly, Henry J. 1964. “In Praise of Erie – And of the New Federal Common Law.” New York University Law Review. 39: 383
    Furubotn, Eirik G. & Rudolf, Richter. 1998. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michig an Press
    Garbaum, Stephen A. 1994. “The Nature of Preemption.” Cornell Law Review. 79: 767
    Garland, Merrick B. 1987. “Antitrust and State Action: Economic Efficiency and the Political Process.” Yale Law Journal. 96: 486
    Gey, Steven G. 1989–90. “The Political Economy of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” NYU Review of Law & Social Change. 17: 1
    Gifford, Daniel J. 1995. “Federalism, Efficiency, the Commerce Clause, and the Sherman Act: Why We Should Follow a Consistent Free Market Policy.” Emory Law Journal. 44: 1227
    Gillette, Clayton. 1991. “In Partial Praise of Dillon's Rule, or, Can Public Choice Theory Justify Local Government Law?Chicago-Kent Law Review. 67: 959
    Gilliam, Thomas J. Jr. 1997. “Contracting with the United States in its Role as Regulator: Striking a Bargain with an Equitable Sovereign or Capricious Siren.” Mississippi College Law Review. 18: 247
    Glazer, Craig A. & , M. Bryan Little. 1999. “The Rolesof Antitrust Law and Regulatory Oversight in the Restructured Electricity Industry.” Electricity Journal. 12: 21
    Goldberg, Victor. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts.” Bell Journal of Economics. 7: 444
    Goldsmith, Richard. 1989. “Utility Rates and ‘Takings’.” Energy Law Journal. 10: 241
    Gómez-Ibáñez, José A. 2003. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly Contracts and DiscretionCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Goodin, Robert E. 1982. Political Theory and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    Goodman, James. 2003. BlackoutNew York: North Point Press
    Gormley, William T. Jr. 1983. The Politics of Public Utility Regulation. Pittsburgh: University of Pitts burgh Press
    Grossman, Peter Z. 2003. “Is Anything Naturally aMonopoly?” in Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole, eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAIImprint)
    Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole. 2003. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAIImprint)
    Haar, Charles M. & Daniel, W. Fessler. 1986. The Wrong Side of the Tracks: A Revolutionary Rediscovery of the Common Law Tradition of Fairness in the Struggle Against Inequality. New York: Simon & Schuster
    Hadfield, Gillian. 1999. “Of Sovereignty and Contract: Damages for Breach of Contract by the Government.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal. 8: 467
    Hale, G. E. & Hale, Rosemary. 1962. “Competition or Control VI: Application of Antitrust Laws to Regulated Industries.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 111: 46
    Hall, Gus & Pierce, Richard., 1997. “Retail Gas Reform: Learning from the Georgia Model.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. April 15: 22
    Hart, Oliver & Moore, John. 1999. “Foundations of Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies. 66: 115
    Hart, Oliver D. 1988. “Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 4: 119
    Hart, Oliver D. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Hills, Roderick M. Jr. 1999. “Dissecting the State:The Use of Federal Law to Free State and Local Officials from State Legislatures'Control.” Michigan Law Review. 97: 1201
    Hills, Roderick M., Jr. 2003. “Against Preemption:How Federalism Can Improve the National Lawmaking Process.” Working paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=412000
    Hirsh, Richard F. 1999. Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility IndustryCambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
    Hirst, Eric & Baxter, Lester. 1995. “How Stranded Will Electric Utilities Be?Public Utilities Fortnightly Feb. 15: 30–32
    Hoke, S. Candice. 1991. “Preemption Pathologies and Civic Republican Values.” Boston University Law Review. 71: 685
    Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1920. Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt, Brace &Co
    Horwich, Allan. 2000. “The Neglected Relationship of Materiality and Recklessness in Actions under Rule 10b-5.” Business Lawyer. 55: 1023
    Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1991. Enterpriseand American Law, 1836–1937. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1999a. Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its PracticeSt. Paul, Minnesota: West Group
    Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1999b. “The Takings Clause and Improvident Regulatory Bargains.” Yale Law Journal. 108: 801
    Humphrey, Andrew G. 1985. “Antitrust Jurisdiction and Remedies in an Electric Utility Price Squeeze.” University of Chicago Law Review. 52: 1090
    Inman, Robert P. & Daniel, L. Rubinfeld. 1997. “Making Sense of the Antitrust State-Action Doctrine: Balancing Political Participation and Economic Efficiency in Regulatory Federalism.” Texas Law Review. 75: 1203
    Isser, Steve & Steven, A. Mitnick. 1998. “Enron's Battle with PECO.” Public Utilities Fortnightly Mar. 1: 38
    Jaffe, Louis L. 1964. “Primary Jurisdiction.” Harvard Law Review. 77: 1037
    Joskow, Paul. 1977. “Commercial Impossibility, the Uranium Market, and the Westinghouse Case.” Journal of Legal Studies. 6: 119
    Joskow, Paul J. 2001. “California's Electricity Crisis.” Oxford Journal of Economic Policy. 17: 365
    Joskow, Paul & Roger G. Noll. 1981. “Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview.” in Fromm, Gary, ed. Studies in Public Utility RegulationCambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
    Joskow, Paul & Schmalensee, Richard. 1983. Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electrical Utility Deregulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
    Kalt, Joseph P. & Mark, A. Zupan. 1984. “Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics.” American Economic Review. 74: 279
    Kaplow, Louis. 1985. “Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage.” Columbia Law Review. 85: 515
    Kaplow, Louis. 1986. “An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions.” Harvard Law Review. 99: 509
    Kearney, Joseph D. & Thomas, W. Merrill. 1998. The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law. Columbia Law Review. 98: 1323
    Kelly, Kevin. 1997. “New Rules for the New Economy.” Wired Sept.: 140, 142–43
    Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public PoliciesBoston: Addison Wesley
    Kolasky, William J. 1999. “Network Effects: AContrarian View.” George Mason Law Review. 7: 577
    Komesar, Neil K. 2001. Law'sLimits: The Rule of Law and the Supply and Demand of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Kutler, Stanley. 1971. Privilege and Creative Destruction: The Charles River Bridge Case. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
    Kuttner, Robert. 1999. Everythingfor Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 1990. “Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in Procurement.” Review of Economic Studies. 57: 597–626
    Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
    Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
    Laswell, Harold. 1971. APre-View of the Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier
    Lemley, Mark & McGowan, David. 1998. “Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects.” California Law Review. 86: 479
    Lesser, Jonathon A. & Ainspan, Malcolm D.. 1994. “Retail Wheeling: Deja Vu All Over Again?The Electricity Journal. Apr.: 34
    Levinson, Daryl. 2000. “Making Government Pay:Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs.” University of Chicago Law Review. 67: 345
    Lewis, Tracy & Poitevin, Michael. 1997. “Disclosure of Information in Regulatory Proceedings.” Journal of Law, Economics &Organization. 13: 50
    Levy, Brian & Pablo, T. Spiller. 1996. Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Lichtman, Douglas, Baker, Scott & Krause, Kate. 2000. “Strategic Disclosure in the Patent System.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 53: 2175
    Lopatka, John E. 1984. “The Electric Utility Price Squeezeas an Antitrust Cause of Action.” UCLA Law Review. 31: 563
    MacAvoy, Paul W., Daniel, F. Spulber & Stangle, Bruce. 1989. “Is Competitive Entry Free? Bypass and Partial Deregulation in Natural Gas Markets.” Yale Journal on Regulation. 6: 209
    Macey, Jonathan R. 1986. “Promoting Public-Regarding Legislation Through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model.” Columbia Law Review. 86: 223
    Macey, Jonathan R. 1998. “Public Choice and the Law.” in Newman, Peter, ed. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the LawLondon: United Kingdom: Macmillan Reference Limited
    Macleod, W. Bentley. 1996. “Decision, Contract, and Emotion: Some Economics for a Complex and Confusing World.” Canadian Journal of Economics. 29: 788
    Macneil, Ian R. 1978. “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neo-Classical, and Relational Contract Law.” Northwestern University Law Review. 72: 854
    Mahoney, Paul G. & Sanchirico, Chris William. 2003. “Norms, Repeated Games and the Role of Law.” California Law Review. 91: 1281
    Malloy, Michael. 1998. “When You Wish Upon a Winstar: Contract Analysis and the Future of Regulatory Action.” Saint Louis University Law Journal. 42: 409
    Markell, David L. 2000. “The Role of Deterrence-Based Enforcement in a ‘Reinvented’ State/Federal Relationship: The Divide Between Theory and Reality.” Harvard Environmental Law Review. 24:1
    Martimort, David, Phillip De Donder & Etienne Billette de Villemeur. 2003. “An Incomplete Contract Perspective on Public Good Provision.”Toulouse Institut d'Economie Industrielle Working Paper, available at http://www.idei.fr/doc/wp/2003/public_good_provision.pdf
    Martin, Robert B. III. 2003. “Sherman Shorts Outs:The Dimming of Antitrust Enforcement in the California Electricity Crisis.” Hastings Law Journal. 55: 271
    Mashaw, Jerry. 1997. Greed, Chaos& Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press
    Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean. 1999. “Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies. 66: 83
    McArthur, John Burritt. 1997. “Anti-Trust in the New[De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry.” Energy Law Journal. 18: 1
    McGreal, Paul E. 1995. “Some Rice with Your Chevron?: Presumption and Deference in Regulatory Preemption.” Case Western Reserve Law Review. 45: 823
    McGreal, Paul E. 1998. “The Flawed Economics of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” William & Mary Law Review. 39: 1191
    McNollgast, . 1992. “Positive Canons: The Role of Legislative Bargains in Statutory Interpretation.” Georgetown Law Journal. 80: 705
    McUsic, Molly S. 1996. “The Ghost of Lochner: Modern Takings Doctrine and Its Impact on Economic Legislation.” Boston University Law Review. 76: 605
    Merrill, Thomas W. 1999. “Supplier of Last Resort: Who, What, Why?Public Utilities Fortnightly. July 15: 18
    Merrill, Thomas W. & Henry, E. Smith. 2002. “The Property/Contract Interface.” Columbia Law Review. 101: 773
    Michaels, Robert J. 1996. “Stranded Investments, Stranded Intellectuals.” Regulation. 47: 51
    Michelman, Frank. 1968. “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Harvard Law Review. 80: 1165
    Michelman, Frank. 1988. “Takings 1987.” Columbia Law Review. 88: 1600
    Mishkin, Paul J. 1957. “The Variousness of ‘Federal Law’: Competence and Discretion in the Choice of National and State Rules for Decision.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 105: 797
    Mitnick, Barry M. 1980. The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing, and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University Press
    Movsesian, Mark. 1998. “Are Statutes Really ‘Legislative Bargains?’ The Failure of the Contract Analogy in Statutory Interpretation.” North Carolina Law Review. 76: 1145
    Mueller, Milton J. Jr. 1997. Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone SystemWashington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute
    Nagle, John Copeland. 1995. “Waiving Sovereign Immunity inan Age of Clear Statement Rules.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1995: 771
    Nelson, Caleb. 2000. “Preemption.” Virginia Law Review. 86: 225
    Noam, Eli. 1997. “Will Universal Service and Common Carriage Survive the Telecommunications Act of 1996?Columbia Law Review. 97: 955
    Noll, Roger. 1971. Reforming Regulation: Studies in the Regulation of Economic Activity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings
    Norlander, Gerald A. 1998. “Retail Choice: A Race tothe Bottom.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. Jan.1: 8 (letter to the editor)
    North, Douglass C. 1996. “Epilogue: Economic Performance Through Time.” in Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & Douglas, C. North, eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Norton, Floyd & Spivak, Mark. 1985. “The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utilities.” Energy Law Journal. 6: 179
    Note. 1923. “The Sherman Act as Applied to Railroads Regulated Under the Interstate Commerce Act.” Harvard Law Review. 36: 456
    Note. 1953. “Recent Cases: Antitrust –Primary Jurisdiction Applied in Action Against Members of Regulated Industries.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 101: 678
    Pace, Joe D. 1987. “Wheeling and the Obligation to Serve.” Energy Law Journal. 8: 265
    Page, William H. 1981. “Antitrust, Federalism and the Regulatory Process.” Boston University Law Review. 61: 1099
    Page, William H. 1987. “Interest Groups, Antitrust, and State Regulation: Parker v. Brown in the Economic Theory of Legislation.” Duke Law Journal. 1987: 618
    Page, William H. & John, E. Lopatka. 1993. “State Regulation in the Shadow of Antitrust: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.” Supreme Court Economic Review. 3: 189
    Pechman, Carl. 1993. Regulating Power: The Economics of Electricity in the Information Age. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press
    Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics. 19: 211
    Peltzman, Sam. 1989. “The Economic Theory of Regulationafter a Decade of Deregulation.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. 1989: 1
    Percival, Robert V. 1995. “Environmental Federalism:Historical Roots and Contemporary Models.” Maryland Law Review. 54: 1141
    Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard & Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112: 1163
    Peterson, Andrea. 1989. “The Takings Clause: InSearch of Underlying Principles. Part I – A Critique of Current Takings Clause Doctrine.” California Law Review. 77: 1299
    Peterson, H. Craig. 1975. “An Empirical Test of Regulatory Effects.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 6: 111
    Phillips, Charles F. 1993. The Regulation of Public Utilities. Fairfax, Virginia: Public Utility Reports
    Picker, Randal C. 2002. “Understanding Statutory Bundles: Does the Sherman Act Come with the 1996 Telecommunications Act?”University of Chicago John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper No. 177, 2002. Available at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Picker/Papers/Manhattan200.pdf
    Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1984. “Regulatory Treatment of Mistakes in Retrospect: Cancelled Plants and Excess Capacity.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 132: 497
    Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1988. “Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip.” Energy Law Journal. 9: 1
    Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1989. “Public Utility Regulatory Takings: Should the Judiciary Attempt to Police the Political Institutions?Georgetown Law Journal. 77: 2031
    Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1991. “The Unintended Effects of Judicial Review of Agency Rules: How Federal Courts Have Contributed to the Electricity Crisis of the 1990s.” Administrative Law Review. 43: 7
    Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1994. “The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity.” Energy Law Journal. 15: 323
    Piraino, Thomas A. Jr. 1997. “A Proposed Antitrust Analysisof Telecommunications Joint Ventures.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1997: 639
    Pitofsky, Robert. 1997. “Competition Policy in Communications Industries: New Antitrust Approaches.” Remarks presented at Glasser Legal Works Seminar on Competitive Policy in Communications Industries: New Antitrust Approach es, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., March 10. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/pitofsky/newcomm.htm
    Platt, Harold. 1991. The Electric City: Energy and the Growth of the Chicago Area 880–1930Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    Pleatt, George R. 1998. “Should Metering Stay at the Stand-Alone Disco?Public Utilities Fortnightly. Feb. 1
    Poirier, Marc R. 2002. “The Virtue of Vagueness in Takings Doctrine.” Cardozo Law Review. 24: 93
    Posner, Eric. 1995. “Contract Law in the Welfare State: A Defense of the Unconscionability Doctrine, Usury Laws, and Related Limits on the Freedom to Contract.” Journal of Legal Studies. 24: 283
    Posner, Eric. 2003. “Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure?Yale Law Journal. 112: 829
    Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 5: 335
    Posner, Richard A. 1979. “The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 127: 925
    Posner, Richard & Rosenfield, Andrew. 1977. “Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Legal Studies. 6: 83
    Priest, George. 1992. “The Origins of Utility Regulation and the ‘Theories of Regulation’ Debate.” Journal of Law &Economics. 36: 289
    Quirk, Paul J. 1981. Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
    Robinson, Gustavus H. 1928. “The Public Utility Concept in American Law.” Harvard Law Review. 41: 277
    Rockefeller John, D. IV. 1991. “A Call for Action:The Pepper Commission's Blueprint for Health Care Reform.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 265: 2507
    Rodden, Jonathan & Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1997. “Does Federalism Preserve Markets?Virginia Law Review. 83: 1521
    Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1980. “Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation?Journal of Legal Studies. 9: 593
    Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1988. “Against AdHocery: A Comment on Michelman.” Columbia Law Review. 88: 1697
    Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1992. “Regulatory Takings: Policy Analysis and Democratic Principles.” in Merucro, Nicholas, ed. Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economic Perspectives of the Takings IssueDordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press
    Rose-Ackerman, Susan & Rossi, Jim. 2000. “Disentangling Deregulatory Takings.” Virginia Law Review. 86: 1435
    Rossi, Jim. 1994. “Redeeming Judicial Review: The Hard Look Doctrine and Federal Regulatory Efforts to Restructure the Electric Utility Industry.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1994: 763
    Rossi, Jim. 1997. “Participation Run Amok: The Costsof Mass Participation for Deliberative Agency Decisionmaking.” Northwestern University Law Review. 92: 173
    Rossi, Jim. 1998a. “The Common Law ‘Duty to Serve’ and Protection of Consumers in an Age of Competitive Retail Public Utility Restructuring.” Vanderbilt Law Review 51: 1233
    Rossi, Jim. 1998b. “The Irony of Deregulatory Takings.” Texas Law Review. 77: 297
    Rossi, Jim. 2002. “The Electric Power Deregulation Fiasco: Looking to Regulatory Federalism to Promote a Balance Between Markets and the Provision of Public Goods.” Michigan Law Review. 100: 1768
    Rossi, Jim. 2003. “Lowering the Filed Tariff Shield:Judicial Enforcement for a Deregulatory Era.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 56: 1591
    Rossi, Jim. 2004. “Debilitating Doctrine: How the Filed Rate Policy Wreaks Havoc – And What Courts Can Do About It.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, November: 16
    Rossi, Jim. Forthcoming 2005. “Dual Constitutions and Constitutional Duels.” William & Mary Law Review.
    Rouse, Michael A. 1990. “A Re-Evaluation of the “Filed Rate” Doctrine in Light of Revised Regulatory Policy and Carriers'Practices: INF, Ltd. v. Spectro Alloys Corp.” Creighton Law Review. 23: 669
    Rubin, Edward L. & Feeley, Malcolm. 1994. “Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis.” UCLA Law Review. 41: 903
    Rubin, Paul H., Curran, Christopher & Curran, John. 2001. “Litigation versus Legislation: Forum Shopping by Rent-Seekers.” Public Choice. 107: 295
    Ruhl, J. B. & Salzman, James. 2003. “Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State. Georgetown Law Journal. 91: 75
    Santa, Donald F. Jr. 2000. “Who Needs What, and Why?Reporting and Disclosure Obligations in Emerging Competitive Electricity Markets.” Energy Law Journal. 21: 1
    Savage, Leonard J. 1972. The Foundations of StatisticsNew York: Dover Publications
    Schelling, Thomas. 1980. Strategy of Conflict, Second edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Schwartz, Jeffrey D. 1999. “The Use of Antitrust State Action Doctrine in the Deregulated Electric Utility Industry.” American University Law Review. 48: 1449
    Schwartz, Joshua I. 1997. “Assembling Winstar: Triumpth of the Ideal of Congruence in Government Contracts Law?Public Contract Law Journal. 26: 481
    Seidenfeld, Mark. 2004. “Pyrrhic Political Penalties: Why the Public Would Lose Under the ‘Penalty Default Canon.’George Washington Law Review. 72: 724
    Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1992. “Congress is a ‘They,’ Not an ‘It’: Legislative Intent as an Oxymoron.” International Review of Law &Economics. 12: 239
    Sidak, J. Gregory & Spulber, Daniel. 1997. Deregulatory Takings and the Regulatory Contract: The Transformation of Network Industries in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Sillin, John O. 2003. “Why We Fell into the Heart of Darkness.” Public Utilities Fortnightly September 15: 30
    Silverstein, Eileen. 1991. “Against Preemption in Labor Law.” Connecticut Law Review. 24: 1
    Simon, Herbert. 1961. Administrative Behavior, Second edition. New York: Macmillan
    Simons, Kenneth W. 2002. “Reflections on Assumption of the Risk.” UCLA Law Review. 50: 481
    Simpson, James B. & Sarah, D. Strum. 1991. “How a Good Samaritan? Federal Income Tax Exemption for Charitable Hospitals Reconsidered.” University of Puget Sound Law Review. 14: 633
    Singer, Joseph. 1996. “No Right to Exclude: Public Accommodations and Private Property.” Northwestern University Law Review. 90: 1283
    Smith, Vernon. 1993. “Can Electric Power – A ‘Natural Monopoly’ – Be Deregulated?” in Landsberg, Hans H., ed. Making National Energy PolicyWashington, D.C.: Resources for the Future
    Sosnov, Leonard N. 2000. “Separation of Powers Shell Game: The Federal Witness Immunity Act.” Temple Law Review. 73: 171
    Spann, Robert M. 1974. “Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 5: 38
    Speidel, Richard. 1981. “Court-Imposed Price Adjustments Under Long-Term Supply Contracts.” Northwestern University Law Review. 76: 369, 381–94
    Spence, David B. & Murray, Paula. 1999. “The Law, Economics, and Politics of Federal Preemption Analysis: A Quantitative Analysis.” California Law Review. 87: 1125
    Spitzer, Matthew. 1988. “Antitrust, Federalism, and the Rational Choice Political Economy: A Critique of Capture Theory.” Southern California Law Review. 61: 1293
    Spulber, Daniel F. & Christopher, S. Yoo. 2003. Access to Networks: Constitutional and Economic Connections. Cornell Law Review. 88: 885
    Stearns, Maxell L. 2003. “A Beautiful Mend: A Game Theoretical Analysis of the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine.” William & Mary Law Review. 45: 1
    Stewart, Richard B. 1990. “Madison'sNightmare.” University of Chicago Law Review. 57: 335
    Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 2: 3
    Stigler, George & Friedland, Claire. 1962. “What Can Regulators Regulate? The Case of Electricity.” Journal of Law &Economics. 5: 1
    Sugden, Robert. 1995. “A Theory of Focal Points.” Economic Journal. 105: 533
    Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1992. “Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Vertical Strategies by Dominant Firms.” Southwestern University Law Review. 21: 1227
    Sunstein, Cass. 1989. “Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State.” Harvard Law Review. 103: 405
    Sunstein, Cass. 1995. “Incompletely The orized Agreements.” Harvard Law Review. 108: 1733
    Symposium, . 2003. “Is There an Ideal Way to Deal with the Non-Ideal World of Legal Change?Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues. 13: 1
    Talley, Eric. 2001. “Disclosure Norms.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 149: 1955
    Tirole, Jean. 2002. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
    Tomain, Joseph P. & Shapiro, Sidney. 1997. “Analyzing Government Regulation.” Administrative Law Review. 39: 377
    U.S. Energy Information Administration. 1997. Electricity Prices in a Competitive Environment: Marginal Cost Pricing of Generation Services and Financial Status of Electric Utilities – A Preliminary Analysis Through 2015. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy
    Alstine, Michael P. 2002. “The Costs of Legal Change.” UCLA Law Review. 49: 789
    Doren, Peter & Taylor, Jerry. 2004. “Rethinking Restructuring.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. February: 12
    Mehren, Robert B. 1954. “The Antitrust Laws and Regulated Industries: The Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction.” Harvard Law Review. 67: 929
    Watts, Duncan J. 2003. Six Degreesof Separation: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton& Co
    Weaver, Jacqueline. 2004. “Can Energy Markets BeTrusted?Houston Business and Tax Law Journal. 4: 1
    Weiser, Philip J. 1999. “Chevron, Cooperative Federalism, and Tele communications Reform.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 52: 1
    Weiser, Philip J. 2001a. “Federal Common Law, Cooperative Federalism, and the Enforcement of the Telcom Act.” New York University Law Review. 76: 1692
    Weiser, Philip J. 2001b. “Towards a Constitutional Architecture for Cooperative Federalism.” North Carolina Law Review. 79: 663
    Weiser, Philip J. 2003. “Goldwasser, The Telecom Act, and Reflections on Antitrust Remedies.” Administrative Law Review. 55: 1
    White, Matthew W. 1996. “Power Struggles: Explaining Deregulatory Reforms in Electricity Markets.” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics. 1996: 201
    Wiley, John Shepard Jr. 1986. “A Capture Theory of Antitrust Federalism.” Harvard Law Review. 99: 713
    Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Marketsand Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust ImplicationsNew York: Free Press
    Williamson, Oliver. 1976. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies – In General and with Respect to CATV.”Bell Journal of Economics. 7: 73
    Williamson, Oliver. 1979. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law & Economics. 22: 233
    Williamson, Oliver. 1996a. The Mechanisms of GovernanceNew York: Oxford University Press
    Williamson, Oliver. 1996b. “Response: Deregulatory Takings and the Breach of the Regulatory Contract: Some Precautions.” New York University Law Review. 71: 1007
    Wright, Ronald. 1996. “When Do We Want Incomplete Agreements: A Comment on Sunstein's Holmes Devise Lecture.” Wake Forest Law Review. 31: 459
    Wyman, Bruce. 1903. “The Law of the Public Callings as aSolution of the Trust Problem.” Harvard Law Review. 17: 156, 161
    Young, Ernest A. 1999. “Preemption at Sea.” George Washington Law Review. 67: 273
    Yoo, John C. 1998. “Sounds of Sovereignty: Defining Federalism in the 1990s.” Indiana Law Review. 32: 27
    Zajac, Edward E. 1995. The Political Economy of Fairness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Metrics

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.