6.1 Introduction
The Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region is a distinct geographic, economic and cultural area with a place in the climate change landscape. With an area of 30 million square kilometers,Footnote 1 LAC possesses a population of 650 million people and 46% of forested land area.Footnote 2 According to Statista, the LAC gross domestic product (GDP) is approximately 4.8 trillion U.S. dollars,Footnote 3 with Brazil and Mexico, respectively, the largest Portuguese- and Spanish-speaking countries in the world, accounting for 54% of the population and 59% of GDP.Footnote 4 According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL), LAC has a population of around 660 million people,Footnote 5 a GDP of $5.2 trillion,Footnote 6 and a GDP per capita of $7,931.Footnote 7
Latin America and the Caribbean comprehends countries located in four geographical areas: North America (Mexico), the Caribbean (with 21 countries), Central America (7 countries) and South America (13 countries).Footnote 8 That adds up to 42 countries, which coincides with the World Bank’s definition.Footnote 9
The most comprehensive definition results from the United Nations (UN) Department of Economic and Social Affairs ‘regional groupings’ used for the Sustainable Development Goals Indicators. It divides LAC into three sub-regions with 49 States or territories, some of them contested:Footnote 10 the Caribbean (with 26),Footnote 11 Central America (with 8),Footnote 12 and South America (with 15).Footnote 13
A more restrictive definition of LAC comes from considering the 33 members of the Latin American and Caribbean Community of States (or CELAC: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil,Footnote 14 Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Dominica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Dominican Republic, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay and Venezuela.Footnote 15
Here, CELAC is preferred as the best proxy for LAC for several reasons. First, because it is a formal grouping with a commitment to unity and integration, both economic and political, based on shared historical and cultural similarities and common challenges. Second, because its reach is comprehensive of all LAC countries. Third, because it pursues coordinated strategies to tackle common problems in the region (and beyond) such as threats to democracy, corruption, organized crime, violence, poverty, inequality, and climate change. And finally, because it provides a platform for its Member States to advance common interests at the UN and in other multilateral fora,Footnote 16 including the CELAC–EU summits.Footnote 17
Latin America and the Caribbean is a highly unequal region with low economic growth.Footnote 18 Although income inequality has decreased in the past 30 years, LAC remains one of the most unequal regions in the world,Footnote 19 the highest, indeed, except for Sub-Saharan Africa.Footnote 20 This situation was exacerbated by COVID-19 and LAC suffered from the most significant economic setbacks (as against the world’s other regional groupings),Footnote 21 with a 6.7% decrease in GDP in 2020, although in 2021 it grew again by 6.8%. At any rate, GDP per person in real terms has barely grown for the past 30 years.
Furthermore, the problem of low economic growth per capita seems even more serious when seen in conjunction with the situation of high inequality alluded to above. As of 2020, LAC’s Gini coefficient sat at 0.50.Footnote 22 Its poverty rate reached 33%, with just over 13% of the population living in circumstances of extreme poverty.Footnote 23
Unfortunately, income inequality in a region rich in resources, youth, territory, and economic activity is only one of several symptoms that reveal a greater problem. Organized crime, violence, corruption, the gray economy, nepotism, and lack of opportunities are also signs of a region yet to mature politically. Fundamental freedoms, democratic representation, an open public sphere, the balance of powers, and the rule of law need to become prevalent so that those symptoms may recede and the new environmental challenges affecting the region can be mitigated through successful climate policies. Against this background, this chapter assesses the impact of climate change on LAC and countries’ nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in the region in order to determine LAC’s potential to tackle global climate change.
6.2 The Impact of Climate Change on Latin America and the Caribbean
Latin America and the Caribbean has suffered the impacts of climate change at a level disproportionate to the amount of emissions it produces. Figure 6.1 shows that in the past 30 years only Sub-Saharan Africa has emitted less carbon. Data from the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean,Footnote 24 the United States Environmental Protection Agency,Footnote 25 and Climate Watch indicate that LAC produces less than 10% of global greenhouse emissions.Footnote 26 This is corroborated by the sixth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report.Footnote 27
Global emissions by geographical region.
Numerically, the comparison between regions is laid out in Table 6.1. While the figures may be different when emissions beyond carbon dioxide are considered,Footnote 28 the basic assessment remains.
However, the effects of climate change are being and will continue to be strongly felt in the region. Recent reports by the World Meteorological Organization show how significantly LAC is being affected by climate change.Footnote 29
Sea levels in 2020 along LAC coastlines rose above the world average. Roughly a third of the population in LAC live by the coast, with an estimated 6–8% living in areas that are at high or very high risk of being affected by coastal hazards. Temperatures in the North Atlantic Ocean were warmer than usual. The sea level in the Caribbean has been rising at a slightly higher rate than the global average.Footnote 30
Glaciers in the Andes between Argentina and Chile continued to melt, with temperatures rising and rainfalls diminishing commensurately. In Guatemala, climate change contributed to the loss of nearly 80% of the corn harvest. In Haiti, some four million people faced food crises. Between 1998 and 2020, the impacts of climate change have cost more than 312,000 lives and affected over 277 million people in LAC.Footnote 31
The average temperature in the 30 years to 2021 increased by 0.2%, twice as much as in the previous three decades. Glaciers in the tropical Andes have lost at least 30% of the area they had in the 1980s, and the figure is closer to 50% for some glaciers in Peru. Chile’s central region faced its 13th consecutive year of drought, while parts of Brazil, Paraguay, and Bolivia faced their worst drought since 1944. Sea levels, flooding, and hurricanes all reached extraordinary increases. Deforestation of the Amazon grew by 22% compared to 2020 levels. Of the 175 natural disasters occurring between 2020 and 2022, 88% had a meteorological, climactic, or hydrological cause.Footnote 32
These effects, although caused only fractionally by LAC, constitute a strong motivation for the region to join efforts towards the achievement of Paris Agreement goals. Such efforts will have a greater impact the larger the emitters who undertake them.
Within the 33-country region, 90% of emissions can be attributed to just 10 Member States, and 77% of emissions to only 5 of them (see Table 6.2). Without trying to detract from or diminish the importance each country has in climate action in this region, due to space constraints, emphasis throughout this chapter falls on those States that pollute the most and which can therefore make the largest contribution towards the global goal.
Table 6.3 presents the latest available information and is therefore taken here as reference in singling out the biggest emitters in the region. Analysis on these 10 countries can provide an accurate approximation to the whole region’s situation, as they account for over 90% of emissions.
6.3 Laggards, Heroes, and Zombies
Climate policy implementation to meet Paris Agreement commitments is still incipient in LAC, with some of its countries serving as models, some as laggards and the rest positioned somewhere in between. As advanced above, experience of the effects of climate change has prompted countries to join the Paris Agreement efforts. Such efforts will be more impactful the larger emitters those countries are. At least some of the largest emitters are taking the challenge seriously.
Like most other countries who signed the Paris Agreement, LAC States have submitted their NDCs to the UN’s NDC Registry.Footnote 33 The complexity of comparing NDCs from different LAC countries can be appreciated in a recent study published by CEPAL.Footnote 34 Although comprehensive and a good overview of the situation in the region, it does not facilitate a clear comparison of NDCs between countries, as the way and perspective in which each of them presents their proposed courses of action to achieve Paris Agreement objectives may differ from one to the other. For instance, Brazil takes 2005 levels as a reference to measure the evolution of its emissions whereas Mexico uses 2000 as a benchmark. Similar considerations apply to the corresponding UN Registry.Footnote 35
Other sources such as Climate Action Tracker showcase countries’ commitments against the common goals of the Paris Agreement in general terms, but only for a selection of States and not always by reference to a volume of emissions. For LAC, for instance, the analysis leaves out Venezuela, Ecuador, the Dominican Republic, and Trinidad and Tobago, each of them in the list of the 10 largest emitters (see Table 6.3), while it includes Costa Rica,Footnote 36 whose CO2 emissions in 2019 represented less than 0.2% of the LAC’s total and just under 0.02% of the global figure.Footnote 37
The Joint Research Centre for Policy Report of the European Commission aggregates its own Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) and complements it with other sources such as the International Energy Agency. EDGAR ‘offers an alternative that complements national inventories and has advantages in terms of producing timely emissions estimates that are comparable across countries’ and provides a good basis for the analysis presented in Section 6.3.Footnote 38
Overall, few countries in LAC have taken climate action seriously, among them Colombia and Chile.Footnote 39 The most noticeable laggards have so far been Brazil and Mexico, the region’s two largest economies, with the largest populations and the highest amount of greenhouse emissions. Their situation can be explained in large part by the coming to power of two populist presidents (right wing in Brazil; left wing in Mexico) who have stalled any commitment and, in the case of Mexico, actually reversed progressive policies that had already been set in law under a previous president. The situation in Brazil might improve if the newly elected president can implement the environmental features of his election platform as of 2024, which includes protection of the Amazon, a halt on deforestation and the fulfilment of Paris Agreement goals.Footnote 40
The largest fossil fuel CO2 emitters in the LAC region in 2019 were Brazil and Mexico, with emissions of 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively (as a share of the world’s total). In the same year, Russia, India, United States, and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in order accounted for 4.6%, 7.8%, 14.5% and 27.9% of global emissions.Footnote 41
At a Leaders Summit on Climate convened by U.S. President Joe Biden in April 2021, Brazil’s president Jair Bolsonaro claimed that his country would achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.Footnote 42 True, this pledge may have been motivated by the international pressure to end deforestation that Brazil had been under.Footnote 43 However it was not clear how the goal would be achieved. President Sebastián Piñera committed to decarbonize Chile‘s energy matrix by 2040, achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and become the most efficient green hydrogen producer in the world. Colombian President Iván Duque reiterated commitments to a 51% emissions reduction by 2030 and a long-term target of carbon neutrality by 2050. He highlighted some of the measures that Colombia has taken to achieve its targets, including a clean energy transition that will achieve 14% clean electricity by August 2022, the largest fleet of urban and cargo transport in the region, and a reforestation effort that aims to plant 180 million trees by August of 2022. Mexico’s President Andrés López did not commit the country to any particular goal,Footnote 44 and only promised vague actions in reducing crude oil production (despite recent oil discoveries), to generate cleaner energy through hydroelectricity (even though the laws introduced by his government on electricity have actually reversed any progress made by previous governments), and to plant trees on a million hectares in the country.
With the election of Lula as a president, the situation for Brazil – and indeed for LAC, given Brail’s prominence in the whole region – will change. The Amazon (60% of which is located in Brazil) possesses half of the remaining tropical rainforests in the world. Years of unchecked deforestation under Bolsonaro cannot be undone. And Lula is receiving a divided country, a Congress dominated by the opposition and other challenges. Still, his track record as a former president and his post-victory speech point to ‘a strong commitment to preserving the Amazon, protecting Indigenous people’s rights and reaching a zero-deforestation target’.Footnote 45
Table 6.4 shows the 10 largest LAC emitters according to the European Commission. This is a result similar to the one for 2020 (Table 6.3) with small variations in the order,Footnote 46 but still the same countries in the list of the 10 largest emitters. As together they account for over 90% of emissions in the region, a brief analysis of their NDCs can provide a fairly good approximation to the situation of LAC as a whole.
Ahead of the Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26) in 2021 the UN calculated, based on the latest NDC pledges available from most of the 193 Parties to the Paris Agreement, that our planet was headed towards a 13.7% increase in global greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 in comparison with 2010. The IPCC estimated that, in order to keep the rise in temperature on Earth to only around 1.5°C, global emissions need to decrease 45% by 2030.Footnote 47 How then should we assess the performance of individual countries, and in particular the LAC’s 10 largest emitters, in that context?
A study from the Institute of the Americas reveals useful insights to answer the question. Unfortunately, the study leaves Venezuela out,Footnote 48 but includes the other nine. Table 6.5 presents a summary of findings relevant to this chapter, extracted mostly from the country ‘NDC Scorecards’ provided by Miranda.Footnote 49
Note: GHG, greenhouse gas; NDC, nationally determined contributions.
On the bright side, two ‘heroes’ among the region’s largest emitters are Colombia and Chile. Ahead of COP26, held in November 2021, Colombia updated its NDC to aim for a 51% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to its 2014 emissions level, a reduction of black carbon emissions by 40%, and a net-zero target of 2050. Its NDC is among the most ambitious in LAC and highly aligned with the country’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. Colombia is one of the few countries in the region on track to achieve its Paris Agreement pledges. Its NDC includes massive landscape reforestation and restoration projects, including an initiative to plant 180 million trees by 2022, an Active Transport and Travel Demand Management program to increase the share of trips made by bicycle above 5% in all Colombian cities by 2030, and a pilot Emissions Trading Scheme started in 2018 to be ready for implementation by 2025. It also envisages more stringent vehicle emission standards for road transport as well as reductions in agricultural burning, and switching to more efficient technologies for heating and cooking. Building Back Greener indicates a 26% recovery spending from the country’s total spending, of which just under 28% has been green recovery spending according to the UN Environment Programme’s COVID-19 Recovery Tracker for LAC.Footnote 50 In 2022, Colombia matched COP27, exceeding expectations. The goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 is accompanied by more than mitigation measures and adaptation targets which include limiting the gross annual deforestation rate to a maximum of 50,000 ha by 2030, and the commitment to generate carbon budgets in 2023. It also contains a commitment to strengthen and develop carbon pricing mechanisms, plus guidelines for the implementation of the NDCs at both sectoral and territorial levels.Footnote 51
Chile brought an updated NDC program to COP26, which included limiting its total annual greenhouse gas emissions at 95 megatons (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) by 2030; setting an ‘emissions budget’ limit of 1,100 Mt of CO2-e between 2020 and 2030, and reaching peak emissions by 2025. To achieve its NDC, the policy emissions pathway includes the Unconventional Renewable Energy Law; a carbon tax; an action plan to achieve electrification for 40% of the private vehicle fleet and 100% of public urban transport by 2050; and a National Green Hydrogen Strategy to provide clean fuel to decarbonize key sectors. Chile is also formulating a Climate Change Framework Law to engrain carbon neutrality commitments in domestic legislation by 2050, along with financing measures and economic instruments. The government also announced in 2020 that the retirement of coal-fired power plants would be achieved 15 years ahead of schedule.Footnote 52 In 2022 Chile’s commitment to the Paris Agreement ahead of COP27 remained. Its NDC contains a social pillar with commitments on which the implementation of the NDC must rest to guarantee a fair transition and sustainable development in the country. Comprehensive measures that integrate both adaptation and mitigation include circular economy, land use, land-use change and forestry, and ocean commitments. This NDC also stands out for having an ambitious unconditional goal in absolute terms, with Chile one of the few countries in LAC with a carbon emissions budget for the 2020–2030 period, in the light of its commitment to becoming carbon-neutral by 2050. Chile’s NDC is based on a comprehensive evaluation of mitigation measures and an analysis that provides clarity in terms of goals and the economic impact on society to facilitate acceptance and implementation.Footnote 53
In 2022 the UN Development Programme (UNDP) has undertaken initiatives such as the Regional Snapshot to explore NDCs of countries in the region, their ambition, progress, and feasibility,Footnote 54 in order to support progress towards the attainment of the Paris Agreement goals: containing the rise in global temperature to less than 2°C and as close as possible to 1.5°C in comparison with ‘pre-industrial’ levels.Footnote 55
6.4 A Flurry of Initiatives towards Common Goals
Latin America and the Caribbean faces serious challenges moving forward. On the one hand, it is already experiencing the impacts of the planet’s warming in a noticeable, and at times irreversible, way. Poor governance, weak rule of law and fragile democratic structures hold back its economic and social progress. The design, implementation, and upkeep of effective and sustained climate policies is in jeopardy too. There is no easy solution. On the other hand, there are reasons for hope. Current and future efforts by LAC countries have as a background the region’s large youth population, its increasing middle class, its vast natural resources, and its considerable economic growth potential.
In 2020 the majority of the population in LAC was aged between 5 and 29 years old, with the largest age group being 20–24 years old.Footnote 56 Figure 6.2 provides some perspective: LAC’s proportion of youth vis-à-vis the general population is comparable to Central and Southern Asia’s and only inferior to Africa.Footnote 57 In 2021, LAC’s proportion of persons under 15 was 24%.Footnote 58
Between 20% and 30% of LAC’s population is 14 years old or less, making it a region with high youth potential. ‘Youth Index’ Percentage of Under-Fifteens (2018).
Latin America and the Caribbean possesses 57% of the primary forests in the world – storing some 104 gigatons of carbon and hosting between 40% and 50% of the world’s biodiversity, and a third of all plant species.Footnote 59 Not only are forests important to sequester atmospheric carbon, they also help to regulate hydrological cycles, stabilize landscapes, and contribute to soil and water conservation in fragile ecosystems.Footnote 60 The region holds 23% of the world’s total forested areas.
6.4.1 Regional Collaboration
Constructive collaboration with other regions can help. Springing from its cultural and historical affinities, the region has borne a flurry of polycentric initiatives promoting exchange, integration, and coordinated approaches to common problems starting as far back as 1826, with few other regions having a closer affinity to LAC than the EU. This background is important for climate policymaking, as coordinated approaches are more likely to succeed in the long run as they involve expertise, resources, communication, and solidarity across the whole region.
Noteworthy initiatives include (by year of creation):
1960: ALALC – The Free Trade Latin American Association.Footnote 61
1969: The Andean Community.Footnote 62
1975: SELA – Latin American and Caribbean Economic System.Footnote 63
1980: ALADI – The Latin American Association for [Economic] Integration.Footnote 64
1991: MERCOSUR – The Southern Common Market.Footnote 65
2004: ALBA – The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of our America – People’s Trade Agreement.Footnote 66
2008: UNASUR – The South American Nations Union.Footnote 67
2019: PROSUR – The Forum for the Progress and Integration of South America.Footnote 68
CELAC – The Latin American and Caribbean States Community.Footnote 69
The most representative of those organizations would appear to be CELAC. If Brazil returns to full participation it has a promising future, which both the EU and PRC have anticipated by establishing relations with this body. As already mentioned in the introduction to this chapter, the UN Environment Program lists for its LAC region virtually the same countries that are CELAC members.Footnote 70
The Latin American and Caribbean States Community faces many challenges, the first of which is to show its difference and relevance vis-à-vis the other existing integration initiatives described above. Self-defined as ‘an intergovernmental mechanism for dialogue and political accord [concertación]’, it constantly attempts to master contradictory forces. On the one hand, it aspires to gather, integrate, and represent all the States in the region; but, on the other hand, some of those States may disagree with one another over a variety of issues and in general be less reliable given the decline in political culture of the whole region,Footnote 71 and in the vigor of its respective democracies.Footnote 72
This is not a CELAC-specific problem. A fragile political culture is and has been a handicap for this region from the beginning of its independent existence in the nineteenth century. It is one of the reasons why the strong pull towards convergence and unity present in those then-newly independent States two centuries ago has not yet materialised, while similar efforts in other parts of the world – most eminently in Europe – have progressed more in less time. It is also a strong reason why previous integration initiatives have collapsed, the latest one being UNASUR.Footnote 73
These difficulties notwithstanding, CELAC has been a credible interlocutor between the EU and the United States and seems to be gathering viability because the biggest players in the region are investing time, resources, and political capital in it. Mexico just ended its pro tempore presidency in which CELAC was revitalised.Footnote 74 Argentina has been elected by consensus to hold the presidency as of 2024.Footnote 75 Unfortunately, Brazil suspended its participation in CELAC, most likely due to political differences with other members.Footnote 76 Mexico has for the time being exercised leadership and filled the vacuum left by Brazil, whose GDP represents 30% of the regional total,Footnote 77 but its return is highly desirable for the success of the initiative.
In fact, Brazil seems likely to rejoin CELAC, throwing all its weight behind it (as well as other regional initiatives) in an effort to present a common front of interaction and negotiation with China, the United States, the EU, and others,Footnote 78 with climate change ranking top of the agenda. In fact, during his post-victory speech, the newly elected President referred to ‘a longing’ expressed to him by contacts from different countries for:
that sovereign Brazil who spoke as a par to the wealthiest and most powerful countries … contributed to the development of the poorest … worked for the integration of South America and Latin America and the Caribbean, strengthened MERCOSUR and helped to create the G20, UNASUR, CELAC and the BRICS. Today we are telling the world that Brazil is back … that Brazil is too big to be relegated to the sad role of world pariah.Footnote 79
The Latin American and Caribbean States Community is still in development and faces many challenges, one of which was rightly pointed out by Colombia, as Argentina takes the baton for the 2022 pro tempore presidency: how to deal with Member States who are clearly not functioning democracies such as Nicaragua, Cuba, and Venezuela.Footnote 80 However, if strengthened, CELAC has the potential to serve as a platform for integration and climate governance for which there is already interest, as seen in the dialogue between Pacific Alliance and MERCOSUR.Footnote 81
6.4.2 Latin America and the Caribbean and the European Union ― A Natural Partnership?
Partnerships with regions that have advanced more in the implementation of climate policies can prove useful. The links between Europe and LAC go back centuries, and, although relations have not always been optimal and grievances remain, there is also a history of constructive and positive exchanges crossing the Atlantic in both directions.
Today, the EU and LAC share several languages (eminently Spanish and Portuguese, but also French, Dutch, and English) and a myriad of economic, academic, social, and cultural exchanges. In order to be strong and relevant in the twenty-first century, both face the challenge of fostering unity in diversity. For different reasons, the EU, albeit far from perfect, has managed to advance more in the realm of both integration and climate policy – in which it is a world leader. All these reasons make the EU a valuable climate partner for LAC.
Several exchanges and initiatives exist between the two regions to address climate change. The EU–CELAC summits and the Euroclima program are two examples. Mutual collaboration has benefited both regions and brought motivation and support to them in the achievement of Paris Agreement goals. For LAC, this partnership has also produced financial support and valuable know-how from Europe in the design, implementation, and follow-up of climate policies. The EU–CELAC relationship includes summits, roadmaps, and agreements. Euroclima focuses on cooperation and contains a funding mechanism to foster the implementation of sound climate policies.
Summits between the EU and LAC have existed since 1999, when the first was celebrated in Rio de Janeiro. However, after the foundation of CELAC in 2011, the summit with the EU gathers two regional organizations. The first EU–CELAC summit took place in 2013 in Santiago (Chile). The second one was celebrated in Brussels in 2015. In the Action Plan that followed the 2015 summit,Footnote 82 the second in a list of topics for action was ‘Sustainable development; environment; climate change; biodiversity; energy’ and proposed collaboration and exchange with the following outcomes in mind:
Improved knowledge on problems and consequences of climate change including vulnerability and risk assessment, biodiversity loss and environment issues in its widest meaning, and integration of these issues into sustainable development and climate adaptation strategies and other adaptation activities.
Strengthened capacities and emergency networks to prevent and address the effect of natural disasters.
Improved capacity for sustainable development, environmental and climate change-related challenges, and for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
Improved use and accessibility of renewable energies, increased energy efficiency and saving as these play an important role in the diversification and complementarity of the energy matrix.
Although the 2017 summit was cancelled,Footnote 83 in 2018 the European External Action Service declared that CELAC is the EU’s official counterpart for the region-to-region summit process and strategic partnership. The EU’s ‘engagement with CELAC is complemented by strong bilateral relations with individual countries and does not exclude cooperation with sub-regional groups such as MERCOSUR, CARICOM/CARIFORUM, Pacific Alliance, SICA and UNASUR’.Footnote 84
Ministers of the EU and CELAC met in Berlin in December 2020 and agreed to work in the preparation of the next EU–CELAC summit. Among several areas of agreement for continued or future joint cooperation they concluded on the importance of climate change and the aspiration to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. An informal meeting took place at the end of 2021.Footnote 85 Another ministerial meeting between the two organizations took place in Buenos Aires on 27 October 2022 with the purpose of renewing the bi-regional partnership to strengthen peace and sustainable development.Footnote 86 The EU has planned a 2023 summit with CELAC,Footnote 87 coinciding with the presidencies of those blocs by Spain and Argentina, respectively.Footnote 88 This commitment has been publicly confirmed by the Spanish Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez.Footnote 89
Several initiatives of support from the EU to CELAC to this end were mentioned, in particular Euroclima+, a flagship program of the EU in LAC,Footnote 90 which aims at reducing the impact of climate change and its effects in the region. The program only includes 18 LAC countries at present and finances a broad range of activities, including technical assistance, capacity building, exchange of best practices, studies, events, seminars, workshops, peer-to-peer exchanges, and pilot projects.
Euroclima+ aims at reducing the impact of climate change and its effects in Latin America by fostering action towards the fulfilment of the Paris Agreement.Footnote 91 It is financed through a commitment of €144 million since 2010 by the governments of Germany, Spain, and France.Footnote 92 Euroclima+ comprehends six priority sectors – forests, biodiversity, and ecosystems; energy efficiency; disaster risk management; resilient food production; water management and urban resilience perspective; and urban mobility – and six strategic action lines – plans and policies; climate financing: transparency; intersectoral, multilevel, and multiple stakeholder coordination; action for climate empowerment; and gender and vulnerable groups.Footnote 93
6.5 Conclusion
Like other areas of the world, LAC is experiencing the impacts of climate change and, while Chile and Colombia have effectively implemented viable NDCs in line with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement, most LAC States have not. LAC response matters not so much for the size of its emissions but especially for its potential to act as a net carbon sink. Indeed, according to JP Morgan, the LAC’s sequestration potential places it as a leader in the carbon credit market.Footnote 94 LAC’s natural resources, young population, and economic capacity provide reasons for hope – ‘great expectations’ – about its future.
Due to cultural, geographical, and historical commonalities, LAC has sat at the juncture of an array of initiatives and networks pushing for integration at different levels and with diverse center points since the nineteenth century. The most comprehensive of those initiatives is CELAC, although others, such as MERCOSUR and Pacific Alliance, are more developed in their degree of cooperation.
The level of integration matters, as more of it will help the region tackle the big problems individual countries cannot face by themselves. This is evident in the case of climate policy. While due to space constraints only the largest emitters have been analyzed to a certain degree, action, motivation, solidarity, and best practices are needed from all 33 States. And there is much that large emitters lagging behind in meeting their Paris Agreement commitments can learn from low emitters who are exemplary in climate policy, such as Costa Rica.
Although the level of progress towards the achievement of Paris Agreement goals may be modest so far, recent changes in the political landscape in Brazil provide room for optimism,Footnote 95 as do the partnerships the region is establishing with parts of the world that are more advanced in climate policy such as Europe. However, the key takeaway is that the political atmosphere and framework under which LAC operates is as important as the policies themselves if the region is to progress in climate action terms (as well as in other aspects such as economic growth, income equality and regional integration). Due to its high levels of inequality and social unrest, the key challenge to implementing climate policies in LAC will be the strengthening of a political atmosphere where human rights, the rule of law, and democratic values prevail.
Climate policies need a cooperative legal framework where the law is created through transparent and democratic processes and enforced, once approved, through an independent judicial system and checks on the executive. Freedom of information and expression are also essential to promote debate in the public sphere, fostering respect for all citizens and their freedom and fair and free elections of representatives. A framework where democracy, the rule of law, balance of powers, and human rights prevail would provide stability, predictability, and a foundation for sound, clear, legitimate, and sustained climate action. This atmosphere is not a given in LAC and must be created, maintained and enhanced through deliberate and persistent cooperation.
Open access