Book contents
- Human Rights in the Digital Domain
- Human Rights in the Digital Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Adapting Human Rights to a Digital World
- Part II Freedom of Expression in the Digital Domain
- Part III Challenges Posed by Digital Technologies
- Part IV Challenges Faced by Vulnerable Groups
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2025
Edited by
Book contents
- Human Rights in the Digital Domain
- Human Rights in the Digital Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Adapting Human Rights to a Digital World
- Part II Freedom of Expression in the Digital Domain
- Part III Challenges Posed by Digital Technologies
- Part IV Challenges Faced by Vulnerable Groups
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Rights in the Digital DomainCore Questions, pp. 439 - 460Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Primary Sources
Alexander, L., and Sherwin, E., Demystifying Legal Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)10.1017/CBO9781139167420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. E., International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., and Susi, M., (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Banciu, D., Rӑdulescu, S. M., and Voicu, M., Introduction to the Sociology of Deviance (Bucharest: Științificӑ și enciclopedicӑ, 1985)Google Scholar
Bantekas, I., and Oette, L., International Human Rights Law and Practice, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)10.1017/9781009306409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudenbacher, C., and Planzer, S. (eds.), International Dispute Resolution. The Role of Precedent (Stuttgart: German Law Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar
Belmessous, S., (ed.), Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire, 1500–1920 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Belov, M., Rule of Law at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar
Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C., Freedom of Expression and the Internet, 2nd ed. (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020)Google Scholar
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., and Roberts, H., Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, T. W., Munro, A., and Jacobs, P. J., Ubuntu: An African Jurisprudence (Cape Town: Juta, 2018)Google Scholar
Bently, L., Sherman, B., Gangjee, D., and Johnson, P., Intellectual Property Law, 6th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022)Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution, II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Bonfils, H., and Fauchille, P., Manuel de Droit International public (Droit Des Gens), 3rd ed. (Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1901)Google Scholar
Borges, G., and Sorge, C. (eds.), Law and Technology in a Global Digital Society: Autonomous Systems, Big Data, IT Security and Legal Tech (Cham: Springer Nature, 2022)10.1007/978-3-030-90513-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A., The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, S., and Spaeth, H. J., Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, R., Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme (Carlsbad: Hay House, Inc, 2009)Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., and Toope, S., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustamante, T., and Pulido, C. B., On the Philosophy of Precedent: Proceedings of the 24th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Beijing, 2009 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bychawska-Siniarska, D., Protection the Right to Freedom of Expression under the Convention on Human Rights: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners’ (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2017)Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P., Drones and Journalism – How the Media is Making Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (London: Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar
Citron, D. K., Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citron, D. K., The Fight for Privacy: Protecting Dignity, Identity, and Love in the Digital Age (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2022)Google Scholar
Cortez, E. K. (ed.), Data Protection Around the World: Privacy Laws in Action (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R., and Harris, J. W., Precedent in English Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Dagnino, R., Tecnologia Social: Contribuições Conceituais e Metodológicas (Campina Grande, PB: EDUEPB, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnino, R., Tecnociência Solidária: Um Manual Estratégico (Marília, SP: Lutas Anticapital, 2019).Google Scholar
Davis, K. E., et al. (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S., and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. G., Contested Paternity: Constructing Families in Modern France (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L., The Morality of Law: Revised Edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Goldstein, P., and Hugenholtz, B., International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, G., Digital Constitutionalism in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022)10.1017/9781009071215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, R. (ed.), Os Laboratórios do Trabalho Digital: Entrevistas (São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2021)Google Scholar
Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Harlow, C., and Rawlings, R., Law and Administration, 2nd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar
Harvey, D., Collisions in the Digital Paradigm: Law and Rule-making in the Internet Age (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar
Holmes, S., Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Horty, J. F., Rules and Reasons in the Theory of Precedent (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)10.1017/S1352325211000036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V., and Tushnet, M. (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)10.1017/9781316691724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, M., Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, translated by Andreas Wedberg. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthi, R., Nayyar, A., and Hassanien, A. E. (eds.), Development and Future of Internet of Drones (IoD): Insights, Trends and Road Ahead (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar
Leite Lopes, J. S., A Ambientalização Dos Conflitos Sociais: Participação e Controle Público da Poluição Industrial (Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 2004)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K. N., Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K. N., The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (New York: Oceana Publications, 1991)Google Scholar
Lyon, D., Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Magrani, E., Hacking the Electorate: On the Use of Personal Data in Political Campaigning (Berlin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2020)Google Scholar
Manovich, L., Software Takes Command: Extending the Language of New Media (New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantelero, A., Beyond Data: Human Rights, Ethical and Social Impact Assessment in AI (New York: Springer, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megele, C., and Longfield, A., Safeguarding Children and Young People Online: A Guide for Practitioners (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., The Visible and the Invisible, edited by Lefort, C., translated by A. Lingis, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Pajuste, T. (ed.), Specific Threats to Human Rights Protection from the Digital Reality: International Responses and Recommendations to Core Threats from the Digitalized World (Tallinn: Tallinn University, 2022)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A., and Wouters, J. (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollicino, O., Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., Le dynamisme du droit international public contemporain et la transdisciplinarité (Paris: L’Harmattan Paris, 2023)Google Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., Legal Treatment Standards for International Investments: Heuristic Aspects (Bucharest: Adjuris International Academic Publisher, 2021)Google Scholar
Raz, J., The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, J., The Liability of Internet Intermediaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivoir, A. L., and Morales, M. J., Tecnologías Digitales: Miradas Críticas de la Apropiación en América Latina (Buenos Aires: CLACSO & RIAT, 2019)10.2307/j.ctvt6rmh6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, H., Alienação e Aceleração: Por Uma Teoria Crítica da Temporalidade Tardo-Moderna (São Paulo: Editora Vozes, 2022)Google Scholar
Sajó, A., and Uitz, R., The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos-D’Amorim, K., and Fernandes de Oliveira Miranda, M. K., ‘Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation: Clarifying the definitions and examples in disinfodemic times’ (2021) 26 Revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, e76900, 7Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P., Existentialism and Human Emotions (New York: Philosophical Library Book, 1957)Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scolari, C., Las Leyes de la Interfaz: Diseño, Ecología, Evolución, Tecnología (Barcelona: Gedisa, 2018)Google Scholar
Singh, R., Profiling Humans from their Voice (Singapore: Springer, 2019)10.1007/978-981-13-8403-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, B. C., Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies (Cham: Springer, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I., No Tempo Das Catástrofes: Resistir à Barbárie que Se Aproxima (São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2015)Google Scholar
Stone, J., Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth (Sydney: Butterworths, 1985)Google Scholar
Sullivan, C., Digital Identity: An Emergent Legal Concept. The Role and Legal Nature of Digital Identity in Commercial Transactions (Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C., Liars: Falsehoods and Free Speech in an Age of Deception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Susi, M., et al., Governing Information Flows during War: A Comparative Study of Content Governance and Media Policy Responses after Russia’s Attack on Ukraine (Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, 2022)Google Scholar
Susi, M., The Non-Coherence Theory of Digital Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)10.1017/9781009407717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., Public Rights, Private Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677733.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titi, C., The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, J. A. H., Medios y Mediación en la Cultura Digital: Cambios Estructurales y Construcciones Teóricas para la Comprensión de la Cultura Digital (Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2018)Google Scholar
Veiga, P., Direito Constitucional e Direito Internacional no Contexto do Constitucionalismo Global: Um Roteiro Pedagógico (Lisbon: Petrony, 2020)Google Scholar
Vermeule, A., Common Good Constitutionalism: Recovering the Classical Legal Tradition (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022)Google Scholar
Wardle, C., and Derakhshan, H., Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar
Wylie, C., Mindf*ck: Inside Cambridge Analytica’s Plot to Break the World (London: Profile Books, 2019)Google Scholar
Žaltauskaitė-Žalimienė, S., et al., Europos Sąjungos Pagrindinių teisių chartijos taikymas supra- ir nacionaliniu lygmenimis (Vilnius: Vilnius University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Zuboff, S., In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (New York: Basic Books, 1988)Google Scholar
Zuboff, S., The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (New York: Public Affairs, 2019)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abílio, L. C., ‘Uberização: manicures, motoboys e a gestão da sobrevivência’, in Marques, L. (ed.), Trajetórias da Informalidade no Brasil Contemporâneo (São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2021) 173–91Google Scholar
Antunes, R., ‘Capitalismo de plataforma e desantropomorfização do trabalho’, in Grohmann, R. (ed.), Os Laboratórios do Trabalho Digital: Entrevistas (São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2021) 33–8Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J., ‘Liberal neutrality on the good: An autopsy’, in Wall, S., and Klosko, G. (eds.), Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003) 191–208Google Scholar
Benedek, W., ‘International organizations and digital human rights’, in Wagner, B., Kettemann, M. C., and Veith, K. (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology: Global Politics, Law and International Relations, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2024) 311–26Google Scholar
Benedek, W. ‘Internet Governance and Human Rights’, in Benedek, W., Bauer, V., and Kettemann, M. C. (eds.), Internet Governance and the Information Society (The Hague: Eleven, 2008) 31–50Google Scholar
Benedek, W., ‘Multi-stakeholderism in the development of international law’, in Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., and Khan, D.-E., et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) 201–10Google Scholar
Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C., ‘The Council of Europe and the Information Society’, in Kicker, R. (ed.), The Council of Europe, Pioneer and Guarantor for Human Rights and Democracy (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2010) 88–93Google Scholar
Beširević, V., ‘The constitution in the European Union: The state of affairs’, in Dupeyrix, A., and Raulet, G. (eds.), European Constitutionalism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2014) 15–35Google Scholar
Beširević, V., ‘Introduction’, in Beširević, V. (ed.), Public Law in Serbia: Twenty Years After (London: European Public Law Organization & Esperia Publications Ltd, 2012) 15–19Google Scholar
Beširević, V., ‘A short guide to militant democracy: Some remarks on the Strasbourg jurisprudence’, in Benedek, W., Benoît-Rohmer, F., Karl, W., and Nowak, M. (eds.), European Yearbook of Human Rights 2012 (Antwerp: Intersentia, Vienna: NW Verlag, 2012) 243–58Google Scholar
Bigo, D., Isin, E. F., and Ruppert, E., ‘Data politics’, in Bigo, D., Isin, E. F., and Ruppert, E. (eds.), Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018) 1–17Google Scholar
Bix, B., ‘Law as an autonomous discipline’, in Cane, P., and Tushnet, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) 975–87Google Scholar
Cali, B., ‘The right to meaningful access to the internet’, in von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) 276–84Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Theory and values in public law’, in Craig, P., and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘Liberalism’, in Hampshire, S. (ed.), Public and Private Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978) 113–43Google Scholar
Edwards, L., ‘Introduction’, in Edwards, L. (ed.), Law, Policy and the Internet (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019) 49–50Google Scholar
Epstein, B., ‘Why it is so difficult to regulate disinformation online’, in Bennett, W. L., and Livingston, S. (eds.), The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) 190–210Google Scholar
Finn, R. L., Wright, D., and Friedewald, M., ‘Seven types of privacy’, in Gutwirth, D., Leenes, R., de Hert, P., et al. (eds.), European Data Protection: Coming of Age (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013) 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S., ‘The structure and scope of constitutional rights’, in Dixon, R., and Ginsburg, T. (eds.), Research Handbook in Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011) 387–403Google Scholar
Gillespie, J., and Nicholson, P., ‘Taking the interpretation of legal transfers seriously: The challenge for law and development’, in Gillespie, J., and Nicholson, P. (eds.), Law and Development and the Global Discourses of Legal Transfers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) 1–2610.1017/CBO9781139093576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, F., and Artigot i Golobardes, M., ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to comply with legal rules: Comment on B. Deffains and D. Demougin, “Class Actions, Compliance, and Moral Cost”’, in Grundmann, S., Möslein, F., and Riesenhuber, K. (eds.), Contract Governance: Dimensions in Law and Interdisciplinary Research (Oxford: Oxford Academic, online ed., 2015) 241–8Google Scholar
Hargittai, E., and Hsieh, Y. P., ‘Digital inequality’, in Dutton, W. H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) 129–50Google Scholar
Hunter-Henin, M., ‘Horizontal application of human rights in France: The triumph of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Dawn, O., and Fedtke, J. (eds.), Human Rights and the Private Sphere – a Comparative Study (Cavendish, London and New York: Routledge, 2007) 98–124Google Scholar
Kadelbach, S., ‘From public international law to international public law’, in von Bogdandy, A., et al. (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Berlin: Springer, 2010) 33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katselli, E., ‘The rule of law and the role of human rights in contemporary international law’, in Dickinson, R., Katselli, E., Murray, C., and Pedersen, O. W. (eds.), The Rule of Law and the Role of Human Rights in Contemporary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) 131–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettemann, M., and Peukert, A., ‘Conclusion’, in Kettemann, M., Peukert, A., and Spiecker gen. Döhmann, I. (eds.), The Law of Global Digitality (London: Routledge, 2022) 250–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, E., Sperotto, A., van der Ham, J., and van Rijswijk-Deij, R., ‘Stranger VPNs: Investigating the geo-unblocking capabilities of commercial VPN providers’, in Brunstrom, A., Flores, M., and Fiore, M. (eds.), Passive and Active Measurement: PAM 2023 (Cham: Springer, 2023) 46–68Google Scholar
King, D. L., and Delfabbro, P. H., ‘The natural history of problematic Internet use and gaming: Recent findings, challenges, and future directions’, in Potenza, M. N., Faust, K. A., and Faust, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technologies and Mental Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 65–74Google Scholar
Kulesza, J., ‘Multistakeholderism – meaning and implications’, in Susi, M. (ed.), Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law: A Research Companion (London: Routledge, 2019) 117–31Google Scholar
Kumm, M., and Ferreres Comella, V., ‘What is so special about constitutional rights in private litigation? A comparative analysis of the function of state action requirements and indirect horizontal effect’, in Sajó, A., and Uitz, R., The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) 241–86Google Scholar
Lauk, E., Uskali, T., Kuutti, H., and Hirvinen, H., ‘Drone journalism: The newest global test of press freedom’, in Carlsson, U. (ed.), Freedom of Expression and Media in Transition: Studies and Reflections in the Digital Age (Gothenburg: Nordicom, 2016) 117–25Google Scholar
Lee, H. K., and Chung, S., ‘Conceptualization of Internet addiction based on the public health perspective’, in Potenza, M. N., Faust, K. A., and Faust, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technologies and Mental Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 87–96Google Scholar
Lievens, E., ‘The rights of the child in the digital environment: from empowerment to de-responsibilisation’, in 5 Rights Foundation, Freedom, Security and Privacy: The Future of Childhood in the Digital World (2020) 152–7Google Scholar
Lievens, E., ‘Is self-regulation failing children and young people? Assessing the use of alternative regulatory instruments in the area of social networks’, in Simpson, S., Puppis, M., and van den Bulck, H. (eds.), European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future (New York, Abingdon: Routledge, 2016) 77–94Google Scholar
Limantė, A., and Tereškinas, A., ‘Definition of vulnerable groups’, in Limantė, A., and Pūraitė-Andrikienė, D. (eds.), Legal Protection of Vulnerable Groups in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland (New York: Springer, 2022) 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looschelders, D., and Makowsky, M., ‘The impact of human rights and basic rights in German private law’, in Trstenjak, V., and Weingerl, P. (eds.), The Influence of Human Rights and Basic Rights in Private Law (Cham, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2016) 295–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macioce, F., ‘The vulnerable groups and their legal value’, in Macioce, F., The Politics of Vulnerable Groups: Implications for Philosophy, Law, and Political Theory (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022) 31–60Google Scholar
Magarin, G. P., ‘The Internet and social media’, in Stone, A., and Schauer, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) 350–70Google Scholar
Maroni, M., ‘The liability of Internet intermediaries and the European Court of Human Rights’, in Petkova, B., and Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020) 255–78Google Scholar
Mawby, R. I., ‘Comparing police systems across the world’, in Bruinsma, G., and Weisburd, D. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (New York: Springer, 2014) 478–88Google Scholar
Miller, J., ‘The influence of human rights and basic rights in private law in the United States’, in Trstenjak, V., and Weingerl, P. (eds.), The Influence of Human Rights and Basic Rights in Private Law (Cham, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2016) 473–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, T. A. C., ‘Gestão algorítmica’, in Oliveira, A. S. P., and Jerónimo, P. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Benedita Mac Crorie. Volume II (Braga: UMinho Editora, 2022) 551–68Google Scholar
Nayyar, A., Nguyen, B.-L., and Nguyen, N. G., ‘The Internet of drone things (IoDT): Future envision of smart drones’, in Luhach, A., Kosa, J., Poonia, R., et al. (eds.), First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Singapore: Springer, 2020) 563–80Google Scholar
Pajuste, T., ‘The protection of personal data in the digital society: The role of the GDPR’, in Susi, M. (ed.), Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law: A Research Companion (London: Routledge, 2019) 303−15Google Scholar
Pasquier, F., Galeffi, D., and Collado-Runao, J., ‘Educação transdisciplinar para um mundo complexo’, in Letellier, B., et al., IIIe Congrès Mondial de la Transdisciplinarité – Adopter un Langage Transdisciplinaire Commun Face à la Complexité du Monde (Paris: Rencontres Transdisciplinaires-PlasticitéS, 2024), Vol. IV, 53−97Google Scholar
Postema, G., ‘Implicit law’, in Witteveen, W. J., and van der Burg, W. (eds.), Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1999) 253−75Google Scholar
Powell, C. H., and Schonwetter, T., ‘Africa, the Internet and human rights’, in Susi, M. (ed.), Human Rights, the Digital Society and Law: A Research Companion (New York: Routledge Publishing, 2019) 316−34Google Scholar
Preuß, U., ‘The German Drittwirkung doctrine and its socio-political background’, in Sajó, A., and Uitz, R. (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2005) 23−32Google Scholar
Puccinelli, O., ‘The right to be forgotten 2.0’, in von Arnauld, von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) 300−10Google Scholar
Rumpf, H.-J., ‘General population-based studies of problematic Internet use: Data from Europe’, in Potenza, M. N., Faust, K. A., and Faust, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technologies and Mental Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 57−64Google Scholar
Saunders, C., ‘Constitutional rights and the common law’, in Sajó, A., and Uitz, R. (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2005) 183−216Google Scholar
Sawada, M., and Pasquier, F., ‘Discourses of Japanese history textbooks: From Doxa to critical thinking’, in Sawada, M., and Andres, F. (eds.), Impacts of Museums on Global Communication (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2024) 45−86Google Scholar
Siddappaji, B., and Akhilesh, K. B., ‘Role of cyber security in drone technology’, in Akhilesh, K. B., and Möller, D. P. F. (eds.), Smart Technologies (Singapore: Springer, 2020) 169–78Google Scholar
Stalla-Bourdillon, S., and Thorburn, R., ‘The scandal of intermediary: Acknowledging the both/and dispensation for regulating hybrid actors’, in Petkova, B., and Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020) 141–74Google Scholar
Susi, M., ‘Novelty in new human rights: The decrease in universality and abstractness thesis’, in von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) 21−33Google Scholar
Susi, M., ‘The right to be forgotten’, in von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) 287−99Google Scholar
Sweeney, J. A., ‘Freedom of religion and democratic transition’, in Buyse, A., and Hamilton, M. (eds.), Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR, Justice, Politics and Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) 103−30Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Societal constitutionalism: Alternatives to state-centred constitutional theory?’, in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J., and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004) 3−28Google Scholar
Thornberry, P., ‘Article 12. Education’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Rights of Minorities in Europe: A Commentary on the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) 397–412Google Scholar
Troper, M., ‘Who needs a third party effect doctrine? – The case of France’, in Sajó, A., and Uitz, R. (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2005) 115−28Google Scholar
De Varennes, F., and Kuzborska, E., ‘Minority language rights and standards: Definitions and applications at the supranational level’, in Hogan-Brun, G., and O’Rourke, B. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019) 21−72Google Scholar
Veiga, P., ‘Uma lição da pandemia: Renúncia à globalização ou limites a essa renúncia? Ressignificação do Estado’, in Pinto Oliveira, A. S., and Jerónimo, P. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Benedita Mac Crorie, II vol (Braga: UMinho Editora, 2022) 381−90Google Scholar
Verma, V., Rohilla, M., Sharma, A., and Gupta, M., ‘Fake news detection on Twitter’, in Tiwari, S., et al. (eds.), Advances in Data and Information Sciences: Proceedings of ICDIS 2022 (New York: Springer, 2022) 141–9Google Scholar
Wagner, B., ‘Ethics as an escape from regulation. From “ethics-washing” to ethics-shopping?’, in Bayamlioğlu, E., Baraliuc, I., and Janssens, L. (eds.), Being Profiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum. 10 Years of Profiling the European Citizen (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018) 84−8Google Scholar
Weingerl, P., ‘The influence of fundamental rights in Slovene private law’, in Trstenjak, V., and Weingerl, P. (eds.), The Influence of Human Rights and Basic Rights in Private Law (Cham, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2016) 535−58Google Scholar
Wischmeyer, T., ‘What is illegal offline is also illegal online: the German Network Enforcement Act 2017’, in Petkova, B., and Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020) 28−56Google Scholar
Abílio, L. C., Amorim, H., and Grohmann, R., ‘Uberização e plataformização do trabalho no Brasil: conceitos, processos e formas’ (2021) 23 Sociologias 57, 26–5610.1590/15174522-116484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abílio, L. C., ‘Uberização: a era do trabalhador just-in-time?’ (2020) 34 Revista Estudos Avançados – IEA – USP 98, 111–26Google Scholar
Abílio, L. C., ‘Uberização e juventude periférica. Desigualdades, autogerenciamento e novas formas de controle do trabalho’ (2020) 39 Novos Estudos. CEBRAP 3, 579–97Google Scholar
Abiri, G., and Buchheim, J., ‘Beyond true and false: Fake news and the digital epistemic divide’ (2022) 29 Michigan Technology Law Review 59–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Shanab, E., and Al-Jamal, N., ‘Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan’ (2015) 19 Gender, Technology and Development 1, 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acselrad, H., ‘Os desastres e a ambientalidade crítica do capitalismo’ (2021) 45 Ciência & Trópico 2, 89–103Google Scholar
Alexander, L., and Sherwin, E., ‘Judges as rulemakers’ (2004) 15 University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 1–36Google Scholar
Allam, H., et al., ‘Prevalence of problematic social media use among residents and teaching assistants in Ain Shams University Hospitals and faculty of medicine and its relationship to emotional distress’ (2021) 114 (Supplement 1) QJM: An International Journal of Medicine i21610.1093/qjmed/hcab102.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., ‘Conjuring up new human rights: A proposal for quality control’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law 3, 607–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altawy, R., and Youssef, A. M., ‘Security, privacy, and safety aspects of civilian drones: A survey’ (2016) 1 ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 2, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvear, C. A., Neder, R., and Santini, D., ‘Economia solidário 2.0: por um cooperativismo de plataforma solidário’ (2023) 9 P2P e Inovação 2, 42–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim, F. V., Pinheiro, S. L., and Calloni, H., ‘Uma ressonância do tempo: os desafios contemporâneos da educação ambiental’ (2019) 14 Revista Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental 1, 48–5710.18675/2177-580X.vol14.n1.p48-57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonio, A., and Tuffley, D., ‘The gender digital divide in developing countries’ (2014) 6 Future Internet 4, 673–8710.3390/fi6040673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonova, S., ‘Internet and the emerging global community of rights: The human-rights debate at the internet governance forum’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Law 1, 84–98Google Scholar
Augner, C., et al., ‘The association between problematic smartphone use and symptoms of anxiety and depression – a meta-analysis’ (2023) 45 Journal of Public Health 1, 193–201Google ScholarPubMed
Backe, E. L., Lilleston, P., and McCleary-Sills, J., ‘Networked individuals, gendered violence: A literature review’ (2018) 5 Violence and Gender 3, 135–4610.1089/vio.2017.0056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, K., ‘Factors contributing to global digital divide: some empirical results’ (2005) 8 Journal of Global Information Technology Management 3, 47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. E., ‘Scope of the First Amendment freedom of speech’ (1977) 25 UCLA Law Review 5, 964–1040Google Scholar
Banerjee, P., ‘Gender digital divide – examining the reality’ (2019) 8 International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 11S, 214–19.Google Scholar
Baraka, K., ‘Digital divide and social inequality’ (2024) 3 International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences 3, 30–4510.47941/ijhss.2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J. C., ‘The politics of international law-making: Constructing security in response to global terrorism’ (2007) 3 Journal of International Law and International Relations 1, 5–24Google Scholar
Barnett, S. R., ‘The right to one’s own image: Publicity and privacy rights in the United States and Spain’ (1999) 47 The American Journal of Comparative Law 4, 555–8110.2307/841069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashyakarla, V., ‘Towards a holistic perspective on personal data and the data-driven election paradigm’ (2019) 8 Internet Policy Review 4, Article 1445Google Scholar
Bayat, Z., Kircher, R., and Van de Velde, H., ‘Minority language rights to education in international, regional, and domestic regulations and practices: The case of Frisian in the Netherlands’ (2023) 24 Current Issues in Language Planning 1, 81–101Google Scholar
Bayer, J., ‘Double harm to voters: Data-driven micro-targeting and democratic public discourse’ (2020) 9 Internet Policy Review 1, 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckers, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Human–algorithm hybrids as (quasi-)organizations? On the accountability of digital collective actors’ (2023) 50 Journal of Law and Society 1, 100–19Google Scholar
Bénabou, R., and Tirole, J., ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation’ (2003) 70 Review of Economic Studies 3, 489–52010.1111/1467-937X.00253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, W., ‘Digital human rights and artificial intelligence’ (2023) 14 Pravni Zapisi 2, 227–37Google Scholar
Benka, J., Orosova, O., and Hricova, L., ‘Risk and protective factors of problematic internet use in the context of prevention: Jozef Benka’ (2016) 26 (Supplement 1) European Journal of Public Health 367–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benka, J., et al., ‘Internalization of rules and risk-behavior among early adolescents and relevance for public health’ (2019) 29 European Journal of Public Health Issue Supplement 4, 485–610.1093/eurpub/ckz186.485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. J., and Lyon, D., ‘Data-driven elections: Implications and challenges for democratic societies’ (2019) 8 Internet Policy Review 4, Article No. 1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beširević’, V., ‘“Uhvati me ako možeš”: o (ne)odgovornosti transnacionalnih korporacija zbog kršenja ljudskih prava’ [“Catch me if you can”: reflections on legal (un)accountability of transnational corporations for human rights violations] (2018) 9 Pravni zapisi 1, 22–45Google Scholar
Bigliardi, R. V., and Cruz, R. G., ‘As (im)possibilidades de uma sociedade sustentável e o inextricável embricamento entre educação ambiental e direitos humanos’ (2013) 23 Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental 1, 22–35Google Scholar
Bjola, C., ‘Legitimating the use of force in international politics: A communicative action perspective’ (2005) 11 European Journal of International Relations 2, 266–30310.1177/1354066105052968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, P., Kirrane, S., and Spiekermann, S., ‘Privacy-aware restricted areas for unmanned aerial systems’ (2018) 16 IEEE Security and Privacy 2, 70–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi Casagran, C., and Vermeulen, M., ‘Reflections on the murky legal practices of political micro-targeting from a GDPR perspective’ (2021) 11 International Data Privacy Law 4, 348–59Google Scholar
Blum, A. W., and Grant, J. E., ‘Legal aspects of problematic Internet usage’ (2022) 45 Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 101142Google Scholar
Bodo, B., Helberger, N., and de Vreese, C. H., ‘Political micro-targeting: A Manchurian candidate or just a dark horse?’ (2017) 6 Internet Policy Review 4, 1–13Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A. ‘Globalization and Europe: How to square democracy, globalization and international law’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 5, 885–90610.1093/ejil/15.5.885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M., and Venzke, I., ‘From public international to international public law: Translating world public opinion into international public authority’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 1, 115–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, G., ‘Liability for AI systems under current and future law: An overview of the key changes envisioned by the Proposal of an EU Directive on Liability for AI’ (2023) 24 Computer Law Review International 1, 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxler, H., ‘Quest for the grail? Searching for critical thinking in adult education’ (2002) 43rd Annual Adult Education Research Conference, Conference Proceedings, North Carolina University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
Bradford, L., Aboy, M., and Liddell, K., ‘COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes’ (2020) 7 Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1, 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broeck, A., et al., ‘Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation’ (2021) 11 Organizational Psychology Review 3, 240–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunée, J., and Toope, S., ‘International law and constructivism: Elements of an interactional theory of international law’ (2000) 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1, 19–74Google Scholar
Campo, L., et al., ‘Methodologies for fostering critical thinking skills from university students’ points of view’ (2023) 13 Education Sciences 2, Article 13210.3390/educsci13020132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannie, H., and Voorhof, D., ‘The abuse clause and the freedom of expression in the European Convention on Human Rights – an added value for democracy and human rights protection’ (2011) 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 1, 54–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carballo Piñeiro, L., and Kramer, X., ‘The role of private international law in contemporary society: Global governance as a challenge’ (2014) 7 Erasmus Law Review 3, 109–12Google Scholar
Carvalho, I. C. M., ‘A perspectiva das pedras: considerações sobre os novos materialismos e as epistemologias ecológicas’ (2014) 9 Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental 1, 69–7910.18675/2177-580X.vol9.n1.p69-79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, I. C. M., and Ortega, M. A. A., ‘Aprendizagens em tempos de fim de um mundo e de abertura de múltiplos mundos. Reflexões desde a educação ambiental’ (2024) 23 Revista Cocar 1–23Google Scholar
Casey, C., and Vermeule, A., ‘Myths of common good constitutionalism’ (2022) 45 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 1, 103–46Google Scholar
Cassese, S., ‘Administrative law without the state? The challenge of global regulation’ (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 4, 663–94Google Scholar
Ceccato, V., ‘Special issue: Crime and control in the digital era’ (2019) 20 Criminal Justice Review 10, 1–6Google Scholar
Celeste, E., ‘Digital constitutionalism: A new systematic theorization’ (2019) 33 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 1, 76–9910.1080/13600869.2019.1562604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celso, J., ‘Droning on about the Fourth Amendment: Adopting a reasonable Fourth Amendment jurisprudence to prevent unreasonable searches by unmanned aircraft systems’ (2014) 43 University of Baltimore Law Review 3, 461–94Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E., ‘Rethinking state action doctrine’ (1985) 80 Northwestern University Law Review 503–57Google Scholar
Cheng, H. H. L., ‘Beyond forms, functions and limits: The interactionism of Lon L. Fuller and its implications for alternative dispute resolution’ (2013) 26 The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 2, 257–9210.1017/S084182090000607XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiarella, M. L., ‘Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA): New rules for the EU digital environment’ (2023) 9 Athens Journal of Law 1, 33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘International institutions today: An imperial global state in the making’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 1, 1–3710.1093/ejil/15.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D. W., et al., ‘The association between parental depression and adolescent’s Internet addiction in South Korea’ (2018) 17 Annals of General Psychiatry, Article 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, C., Joensen, J. S., and Rangvid, J., ‘Understanding the effects of marriage and divorce on financial investments: The role of background risk sharing’ (2015) 53 Economic Inquiry 1, 431–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciacchi, A. C., ‘The direct horizontal effect of EU fundamental rights: ECJ 17 April 2018, Case C-414/16, Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V. and ECJ 11 September 2018, Case C-68/17, IR v JQ’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 2, 294–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citron, D. K., and Chesney, R., ‘Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security’ (2019) 107 California Law Review 6, 1753–819Google Scholar
Clarke, R., ‘The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on behavioural privacy’ (2014) 30 Computer Law and Security Review 3, 286–30510.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, G., ‘Safeguarding the world’s new currency’ (2002) 36 Information Management Journal 3, 18–24Google Scholar
Columb, D., Griffiths, M. D., and O’Gara, C., ‘Fantasy football (soccer) playing and Internet addiction among online fantasy football participants: A descriptive survey study’ (2022) 20 International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2, 1200–1110.1007/s11469-020-00436-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congiu, L., and Moscati, I., ‘A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness’ (2022) 36 Journal of Economic Surveys 1, 188–213Google Scholar
Cooper, M. N., ‘Inequality in the digital society: Why the digital divide deserves all the attention it gets’ (2002) 20 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 1, 73–134Google Scholar
Cremer, F., et al., ‘Cyber risk and cybersecurity: A systematic review of data availability’ (2022) 47 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice 3, 698–73610.1057/s41288-022-00266-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cristani, F., Trunk-Fedorova, M., and Popa Tache, C. E., ‘Editorial: The workshop ‘pursuing fairness in times of crisis: reflections on the future of international economic law’ held within the 2023 ESIL Annual Conference’ (2024) 4 International Investment Law Journal 2, 131–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, R., ‘Addressing the digital divide’ (2001) 25 Online Information Review 5, 311–20Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F., ‘The discourse of modernity: Hegel and Habermas’ (1987) 84 The Journal of Philosophy 11, 682–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, E., ‘Full count? Crime rate swings, cybercrime misses and why we don’t really know the score’ (2020) 10 Journal of National Security, Law and Policy 583–604Google Scholar
Dias Oliva, T., ‘Content moderation technologies: Applying human rights standards to protect freedom of expression’ (2020) 20 Human Rights Law Review 4, 607–4010.1093/hrlr/ngaa032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, P., ‘Covid-19 vaccines. A global common good’ (2020) 1 The Lancet Healthy Longevity 1, e6–e8Google Scholar
Dror-Shpoliansky, D., and Shany, Y., ‘It’s the end of the (offline) world as we know it: From human rights to digital human rights – a proposed typology’ (2021) 32 The European Journal of International Law 4, 1249–8210.1093/ejil/chab087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., and Marshall, S. E., ‘“Abstract endangerment”, two harm principles, and two routes to criminalisation’ (2015) 3 Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2, 131–6110.15845/bjclcj.v3i2.905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enciso, O. L. U., et al., ‘Critical thinking and its importance in education: Some reflections’ (2017) 19 Rastros Rostros 34, 78–88Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F., and Celeste, E., ‘The right to be forgotten in the digital age: The challenges of data protection beyond borders’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal S1, 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineberg, N. A., et al., ‘Manifesto for a European research network into problematic usage of the Internet’ (2018) 28 European Neuropsychopharmacology 11, 1232–4610.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L., ‘The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU’ (2020) 33 Philosophy & Technology 3, 369–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foran, M., ‘Rights, common good, and the separation of powers’ (2023) 86 The Modern Law Review 3, 599–62810.1111/1468-2230.12769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosch-Villaronga, E., van der Hof, S., Lutz, C., and Tamò-Larrieux, A., ‘Toy story or children story? Putting children and their rights at the forefront of the artificial intelligence revolution’ (2021) 38 AI and Society 1, 133–52Google ScholarPubMed
Frantziou, E., ‘The horizontal effect of the Charter: Towards an understanding of horizontality as a structural constitutional principle?’ (2020) 22 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 208–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantziou, E., ‘The horizontal effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU: Rediscovering the reasons for horizontality’ (2015) 21 European Law Journal 5, 657–79Google Scholar
Friemel, T. N., ‘The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors’ (2016) 18 New Media and Society 2, 313–3110.1177/1461444814538648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frosio, G., ‘Why keep a dog and bark yourself? From intermediary liability to responsibility’ (2018) 26 Oxford International Journal of Law and Information Technology 1, 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S., ‘The “horizontal effect” of constitutional rights’ (2003) 102 Michigan Law Review 2, 387–45910.2307/3595366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, D. R., ‘Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners’ (1991) 10 International Journal of Lifelong Education 4, 287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, C., and Matthews, P., ‘Data Is the New Currency’ (2014) Proceedings of the 2014 New Security Paradigms Workshop 105–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaysynsky, A., Heley, K., and Chou, W. Y. S., ‘An overview of innovative approaches to support timely and agile health communication research and practice’ (2022) 19 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, Article 15073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glowacka, M., ‘A little less autonomy? The future of working time flexibility and its limits’ (2021) 12 European Labour Law Journal 2, 113–3310.1177/2031952520922246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golda, T., et al., ‘Perception of risks and usefulness of smart video surveillance systems’ (2022) 12 Applied Sciences 20, Article 10435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, A. L., ‘Determining the ratio decidendi of a case’ (1930) 40 Yale Law Review 2, 161–8310.2307/790205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, A. L., ‘The ratio decidendi of a case’ (1959) 22 Modern Law Review 2, 117–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J., ‘John Stuart Mill and the “marketplace of ideas”’ (1997) 23 Social Theory and Practice 2, 235–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D. C., and Citron, K. D., ‘A shattered looking glass: The pitfalls and potential of the mosaic theory of Fourth Amendment privacy’ (2013) 14 North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 2, 381–429Google Scholar
Greenstein, S., ‘Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence’ (2022) 30 Artificial Intelligence and Law 3, 291–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, G., ‘Digital constitutionalism across the Atlantic’ (2022) 11 Global Constitutionalism 2, 297–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, G., and Radu, R., ‘Digital constitutionalism in the new era of internet governance’ (2022) 30 International Journal of Law and Technology 1, 68–87Google Scholar
Grohmann, R., ‘Plataformização do trabalho: entre dataficação, financeirização e racionalidade neoliberal’ (2020) 22 Revista EPTIC 1, 106–22Google Scholar
Guo, C., Wang, X., and Yuan, G., ‘Digital finance and the efficiency of household investment portfolios’ (2022) 58 Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 10, 2895–90910.1080/1540496X.2021.2013197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘The crisis of the European Union in the light of a constitutionalization of international law’, (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 2, 335–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggart, B., and Keller, C. I., ‘Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance’ (2021) 45 Telecommunications Policy 6, Article 102152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Public law and popular justice’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 1, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, R. K., and Nasu, H., ‘Regulatory responses to “fake news” and freedom of expression: Normative and empirical evaluation’ (2020) 21 Human Rights Law Review 2, 322–5Google Scholar
Henry, N., and Powell, A., ‘Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research’ (2016) 19 Trauma, Violence and Abuse 2, 195–20810.1177/1524838016650189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesselberth, P., ‘Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect’ (2018) 20 New Media & Society 5, 1994–201010.1177/1461444817711449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilbert, M., ‘Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies and statistics’ (2011) 34 Women’s Studies International Forum 34, 479–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiniker, A., Heung, S., Hong, S., and Kientz, J., ‘Coco’s videos: An empirical investigation of video-player design features and children’s media use’ (2018) Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper No. 254, pp. 1–13Google Scholar
Van der Hof, S., et al., ‘The child’s right to protection against economic exploitation in the digital world’ (2020) 28 The International Journal of Children’s Rights 4, 833–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Lazanski, D., and Taylor, E., ‘Standardising the splinternet: How China’s technical standards could fragment the internet’ (2020) 5 Journal of Cyber Policy 2, 239–6410.1080/23738871.2020.1805482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J., and Sang, G., ‘Conceptualising critical thinking and its research in teacher education: A systematic review’ (2022) 29 Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 6, 638–60Google Scholar
Huhn, W. R., ‘The state action doctrine and the principle of democratic choice’ (2005) 34 Hofstra Law Review 4, 1379–460Google Scholar
Ibáñez, D. B., da Cunha, M. R., and Toledo, J. H., ‘Comunicación digital, redes sociales y procesos en línea: estudios en una perspectiva comparada entre América Latina y la península ibérica’ (2020) 26 Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 3, 275–83Google Scholar
Ingber, S., ‘The marketplace of ideas: A legitimizing myth’ (1984) 33 Duke Law Journal 1, 1–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, K., Yamada, H., and Otani, T., et al., ‘Introducing Face Express, A new boarding procedure using face recognition (One ID at Narita Airport)’ (2021) 16 NEC Technical Journal 1, 49–53Google Scholar
Ivanov, A., Gorelik, D., and Prokofiev, K., ‘Law enforcement in the context of digitalization: problems and prospects for improving efficiency’ (2020) 171 Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume, Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Conference “Legal Regulation of the Digital Economy and Digital Relations: Problems and Prospects of Development” (LARDER 2020)Google Scholar
Jæger, B., ‘Trapped in the digital divide? old people in the information society’ (2004) 17 Science Studies 2, 5–22Google Scholar
Jansen, A. M., et al., ‘The influence of the presentation of camera surveillance on cheating and pro-social behavior’ (2018) 9 Frontiers in Psychology, Article 1937CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, B., Yang, J., and Song, H., ‘Protecting privacy from aerial photography: state of the art, opportunities, and challenges’ (2020) IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops 799–804Google Scholar
Johnson, D. R., and Post, D., ‘Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review 5, 1367–40210.2307/1229390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, I., ‘Legislation and adjudication in the Security Council: Bringing down the deliberative deficit’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 2, 275–308Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F., ‘Data and rights in the digital welfare state: The case of Denmark’ (2021) 26 Information, Communication & Society 1, 123–38Google Scholar
Karaoglu, G., Hargittai, E., and Nguyen, M. H., ‘Inequality in online job searching in the age of social media’ (2021) 25 Information, Communication and Society 12, 1679–97Google Scholar
Kaufmann, C., ‘Responsible business in a digital world – what’s international law got to do with it?’ (2021) 81 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 3, 781–815Google Scholar
Keats Citron, D. and Solove, D. J, ‘Privacy harms’ (2021) SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3782222, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3782222.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. D., ‘Challenging common good constitutionalism’ (2024) 15 Jurisprudence 1, 418–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A., ‘A tale of two algorithms: The appeal and repeal of calculated grades systems in England and Ireland in 2020’ (2021) 47 British Educational Research Journal 3, 725–41Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., ‘The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought’ (2014) 25 Law and Critique 2, 91–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, O. S., ‘The mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment’ (2012) 111 Michigan Law Review 3, 311–54Google Scholar
Kim, M., ‘Legalization and norm internalization: An empirical study of international human rights commitments eliciting public support for compliance’ (2019) 7 Journal of Law and International Affairs 2, 337–81Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., and Stewart, R. B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 3/4, 15–61Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., ‘Constitutionalism and the making of international law: Fuller’s procedural natural law’ (2008) 5 No Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law and Justice 84–112Google Scholar
Klar, M., ‘Binding effects of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on US companies’ (2020) 11 Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal 2, 101–54Google Scholar
Kleijssen, J., and Perri, P., ‘Cybercrime, evidence and territoriality: issues and options’ (2017) 47 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 147–73Google Scholar
Koloß, S., ‘Facebook and the rule of law’ (2020) 80 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 2, 509–31Google Scholar
Königs, P., ‘Government surveillance, privacy, and legitimacy’ (2022) 35 Philosophy & Technology 1, Article 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘The decay of consent: International law in an age of global public goods’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 1, 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczerawy, A., ‘The power of positive thinking: Intermediary liability and the effective enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression’ (2017) 8 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 3, 226–37Google Scholar
Kuczerawy, A., ‘Intermediary liability & freedom of expression: Recent developments in the EU notice & action initiative’ (2015) 31 Computer Law and Security Review 1, 46–5610.1016/j.clsr.2014.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kularski, C., and Moller, S., ‘The digital divide as a continuation of traditional systems of inequality’ (2012) 5151 Sociology 1–23Google Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘Who is afraid of the total constitution? Constitutional rights as principles and the constitutionalization of private law’ (2006) 7 German Law Journal 4, 341–69Google Scholar
Lambach, D., ‘The territorialization of cyberspace’ (2020) 22 International Studies Review 3, 482–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. M., and Posner, R. A., ‘Legal precedent: A theoretical and empirical analysis’ (1976) 19 Journal of Law and Economics 2, 249–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcom, S., et al., ‘Follow the leader? Testing for the internalization of law’ (2019) 48 The Journal of Legal Studies 1, 217–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, K., ‘Understanding and teaching critical thinking – a new approach’ (2017) 84 International Journal of Educational Research 32–42Google Scholar
Lareki, A., et al., ‘Fake digital identity and cyberbullying’ (2022) 45 Media, Culture & Society 2, 338–53Google Scholar
Layrargues, P. P., ‘Para onde vai a educação ambiental? O cenário político ideológico da educação ambiental brasileira e os desafios de uma agenda política crítica contra-hegemônica’ (2012) 7 Revista contemporânea de educação 14, 388–411Google Scholar
Leerssen, P., ‘An end to shadow banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation’ (2023) 48 Computer Law & Security Review 10579010.1016/j.clsr.2023.105790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, M., ‘Regulation, global governance and private international law: Squaring the triangle’ (2020) 16 Journal of Private International Law 1, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, E., ‘Growing up with digital technologies: How the precautionary principle might contribute to addressing potential serious harm to children’s rights’ (2021) 39 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 2, 128–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, S., and Ytre-Arne, B., ‘Advancing digital disconnection research: Introduction to the special issue’ (2021) 27 Convergence 6, 1529–3510.1177/13548565211057518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘Theory and values in public law: An interpretation’ (2005) Public Law 48–66Google Scholar
Lv, Z., ‘The security of Internet of drones’ (2019) 148 Computer Communications 208–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, C. R. S., Calloni, H., and Adomilli, G. K., ‘Pensares e fazeres sobre e na Educação Ambiental: reflexões sobre/desde os fundamentos ao campo atual Brasileiro’ (2016) 21 Ambiente e Educação 1, 3–25Google Scholar
MacLennan, J. F., ‘Facing the digital future: Public service broadcasters and state aid law in the European Union’ (2017) 2 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 159–20210.5235/152888712802815842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, I., et al., ‘Ageism in the discourse and practice of designing digital technology for older persons: A scoping review’ (2023) 63 The Gerontologist 7, 1188–20010.1093/geront/gnac144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannion, C., ‘Data imperialism: The GDPR’s disastrous impact on Africa’s e-commerce markets’ (2020) 53 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2, 685–711Google Scholar
Maras, M. H., and Alexandrou, A., ‘Determining authenticity of video evidence in the age of artificial intelligence and in the wake of Deepfake videos’ (2019) 23 The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 3, 255–6210.1177/1365712718807226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marengo, N., et al., ‘Cyberbullying and electronic media communication problematic use in Piedmont. Data from HBSC study’ (2020) 30 (Supplement 5) European Journal of Public Health v86910.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marique, E., and Marique, Y., ‘Sanctions on digital platforms: Beyond the public-private divide’ (2019) 8 Cambridge University Law Journal 2, 258–81Google Scholar
Mas’udah, S., et al., ‘Gender-based cyber violence: forms, impacts, and strategies to protect women victims’ (2024) 26 Journal of International Women’s Studies 4, Article 5Google Scholar
May, P. J., ‘Regulation and compliance motivations: Examining different approaches’ (2005) 65 Public Administration Review 1, 31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, P. J., ‘Compliance motivations: Affirmative and negative bases’ (2004) 38 Law and Society Review 1, 41–6810.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801002.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mboya, I. B., et al., ‘Internet addiction and associated factors among medical and allied health sciences students in northern Tanzania: A cross-sectional study’ (2020) 73 BMC Psychology 8, Article 73Google Scholar
McBride, P., ‘Beyond Orwell: The application of unmanned aircraft systems in domestic surveillance operations’ (2009) 74 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 3, 627–62Google Scholar
McClain, L. C., and Fleming, J. E., ‘Toward a liberal common good constitutionalism for polarized times’ (2023) 46 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 1123–48Google Scholar
McRae, J. N., Nielsen, B. M., Gay, C. J., et al., ‘Utilizing drones to restore and maintain radio communication during search and rescue operations’ (2021) 32 Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 1, 41–610.1016/j.wem.2020.11.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalkiewcz-Kadziela, E., and Milczarek, E., ‘Legal boundaries of digital identity creation’ (2022) 11 Internet Policy Review 1, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikołajczyk, B., ‘Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons’ (2022) 27 The International Journal of Human Rights 3, 403–24Google Scholar
Miller, M. L., and Vaccari, C., ‘Digital threats to democracy: Comparative lessons and possible remedies’ (2020) 25 The International Journal of Press/Politics 3, 333–5610.1177/1940161220922323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H., ‘The digital divide’ (2006) 39 Comparative Political Studies 2, 176–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikołajczyk, B., ‘Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons’ (2022) 27 The International Journal of Human Rights 3, 403–24Google Scholar
Mitrus, L., ‘Potential implications of the Matzak judgment (quality of rest time, right to disconnect)’ (2019) 10 European Labour Law Journal 4, 386–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, M. D., Sundar, S. S., Le, T., and Lee, D., ‘“Fake news” is not simply false information: A concept explication and taxonomy of online content’ (2021) 65 American Behavioral Scientist 2, 180–21210.1177/0002764219878224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrose, J. L., ‘Ratio decidendi and the House of Lords’ (1957) 20 Modern Law Review 2, 124-–30Google Scholar
Moore, K., ‘The three-part harmony of adult learning, critical thinking, and decision-making’ (2010) 39 Journal of Adult Education 1, 1–10Google Scholar
Morris, L. S., et al., ‘On what motivates us: A detailed review of intrinsic v. extrinsic motivation’ (2022) 52 Psychological Medicine 10, 1801–1610.1017/S0033291722001611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, L. B., ‘Adapting the law to technological change: a comparison of common law and legislation’ (2003) 26 UNSW Law Journal 2, 394–417Google Scholar
Moyn, S., ‘On human rights and majority politics’ (2019) 52 Vanderbilt Law Review 5, 1135–66Google Scholar
Van Mulligen, A., ‘Framing deformalisation in public international law’ (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 3–4, 635–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murawski, L. M., ‘Critical thinking in the classroom…and beyond’ (2014) 10 Journal of Learning in Higher Education 1, 25–30Google Scholar
Murphy, C., ‘Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law’ (2005) 24 Law and Philosophy 3, 239–6210.1007/s10982-004-7990-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenadić, I., ‘Unpacking the “European approach” to tackling challenges of disinformation and political manipulation’ (2019) 8 Internet Policy Review 4, 1–2210.14763/2019.4.1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, D., ‘A exploração do trabalho no Brasil contemporâneo’ (2022) 25 Revista Katálysis 1, 11–2110.1590/1982-0259.2022.e82561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, A., ‘Holding non-state actors to account for constitutional economic and social rights violations: Experiences and lessons from South Africa and Ireland’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1, 66–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C., ‘Animal rights: The need for a theoretical basis’ (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review 5, 1506–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olcott, D. Jr, et al., ‘Ethics and education in the digital age: Global perspectives and strategies for local transformation in Catalonia’ (2015) 12 RUSC 2 Special Issue, 59–72Google Scholar
Onyejekwe, C., ‘International investment law and the right to regulate: A human rights perspective’ (2019) 53 The Law Teacher 1, 125–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, T., and Tiozza, M., ‘Digital media ethics: Benefits and challenges in school education’ (2022) 14 International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 2, 1–810.4018/IJMBL.304459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padovan, P. H., Martins, C. M., and Reed, C., ‘Black is the new orange: How to determine AI liability’ (2023) 31 Artificial Intelligence and Law 1, 136–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladino, N., ‘The role of epistemic communities in the “constitutionalization” of Internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence’ (2021) 45 Telecommunications Policy 6, Article 102149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pansu, L., ‘Evaluation of “right to disconnect” legislation and its impact on employee’s productivity’ (2018) 5 International Journal of Management and Applied Research 3, 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, B., and Donovan, J., ‘Deepfakes and cheap fakes: The manipulation of audio and visual evidence’ (2019) Data & Society Research Institute, 18 September 2019Google Scholar
Park, A., and Youm, K. H., ‘Fake news from a legal perspective: The United States and South Korea compared’ (2019) 25 Southwestern Journal of International Law 1, 100–19Google Scholar
Paz, M., ‘The failed promise of language rights: A critique of the international language rights regime’ (2013) 54 Harvard International Law Journal 1, 157–218Google Scholar
Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Reyes, C. E. G., and Glasserman-Morales, L. D., ‘Gender digital divide in education 4.0: A systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion’ (2023) 1 Future in Educational Research 2, 129–4610.1002/fer3.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettrachin, A., ‘Towards a universal declaration on Internet rights and freedoms?’ (2018) 80 International Communication Gazette 4, 337–53Google Scholar
Pezoa-Jares, R., and Espinoza-Luna, I., ‘629 – neurobiological findings associated with Internet addiction: A literature review’ (2013) 28 (Supplement 1) European Psychiatry 110.1016/S0924-9338(13)75888-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, G., ‘The Human Rights Act, “horizontal effect” and the common law: A bang or a whimper?’ (1999) 62 The Modern Law Review 6, 824–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigatto, J. T., Datysgeld, M. W., and Silva, L. G. P. D., ‘Internet governance is what global stakeholders make of it: a tripolar approach’ (2021) 64 Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 2, e01110.1590/0034-7329202100211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, S. L., and Pasquier, F., ‘Consciousness and environmental education: transdisciplinary urgencies from the post-pandemic context’ (2023) 14 Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1–15Google Scholar
Pohle, J., and Thiel, T., ‘Digital sovereignty’ (2020) 9 Internet Policy Review 4, 1–1910.14763/2020.4.1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., Sӑraru, C.-S., and Kouroupis, K., ‘Different perspectives concerning the right not to use the internet and some analogies with education | Diverse prospettive sul diritto a non usare internet ed alcune analogie con l’istruzione’ (2024) 1 European Journal of Privacy Law and Technologies 179–93Google Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., and Sӑraru, C-S., ‘Evaluating today’s multi-dependencies in digital transformation, corporate governance and public international law triad’ (2024) 10 Cogent Social Sciences, 1, Article 2370945Google Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., ‘About the human rights and consumer protection in the digital age of Digital Services Act 2022 or what aspects interested investors should pay attention to’ (2023) 3 International Investment Law Journal 2, 121–32Google Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., ‘Public international law and FinTech challenge’ (2022) 11 Perspectives of Law and Public Administration 2, 11–15Google Scholar
Popa Tache, C. E., ‘Ranking of treatment standards in international investments’ (2021) 1 International Investment Law Journal 1, 79–87Google Scholar
Quach, S., et al., ‘Digital technologies: Tensions in privacy and data’ (2022) 50 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 6, 1299–323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, K. T., and Arif, Z. U., ‘Impact of binge-watching on Netflix during the Covid-19 pandemic’ (2017) 2 South Asian Journal of Marketing 1, 97–11210.1108/SAJM-05-2021-0070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajam, V., Bheemeshaw Reddy, A., and Banerjee, S., ‘Explaining caste-based digital divide in India’ (2021) 65 Telematics and Informatics 10171910.1016/j.tele.2021.101719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, M. H., ‘Human rights within a multilayered constitution: The example of freedom of expression and the WTO’ (2012) 16 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1, 183–280Google Scholar
Raposo, V. L., ‘The doctor just poked you: Os novos desafios da e-health’ (2014) 57 Boletim das Ciências Económicas 3, 2903–33Google Scholar
Ratner, S. R., ‘Corporations and human rights: A theory of legal responsibility (2001) 111 The Yale Law Journal 3, 468–910.2307/797542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, C., ‘When “sweetie” is not so sweet: Artificial intelligence and its implications for child pornography’ (2021) 59 Family Court Review 2, 386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebechi, C. N., et al., ‘Trabalho decente no contexto das plataformas digitais: uma pesquisa-ação do Projeto Fairwork no Brasil’ (2023) 74 Revista do Serviço Público 2, 370–89Google Scholar
Redeker, D., Gill, L., and Gasser, U., ‘Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights (2018) 80 International Communication Gazette 4, 302–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C., ‘Online and offline equivalence: Aspiration and achievement’ (2010) 18 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 3, 248–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, P. L., ‘Regime Change and Legal Change – The Legacy of Mexico’s Second Empire’ (2015) Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 1Google Scholar
Reiter, E. H., ‘Personality and patrimony: Comparative perspectives on the right to one’s image’ (2002) 76 Tulane Law Review 3, 673–726Google Scholar
Rivera-Perez, W., ‘What the constitution got to do with it: Expanding the scope of constitutional rights into the private sphere’ (2012) 3 Creighton International and Comparative Law Journal 1, 189–214Google Scholar
Robinson, K., ‘Corporate rights and individual interests: The corporate right to privacy as a bulwark against warrantless government surveillance’ (2015) 36 Cardozo Law Review 6, 2283–320Google Scholar
Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., and Alessie, R., ‘Financial literacy and stock market participation’ (2011) 101 Journal of Financial Economics 2, 449–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., ‘Rethinking the boundaries between public law and private law for the twenty-first century: An introduction’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1, 125–810.1093/icon/mos053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, I. S., ‘Voter privacy in the age of big data’ (2014) Wisconsin Law Review 4, 861–936Google Scholar
Rule, T. A., ‘Airspace in an Age of Drones’ (2015) 95 Boston University Law Review 1, 155–208Google Scholar
Rumpf, H.-J., Effertz, T., and Montag, C., ‘The cost burden of problematic internet usage’ (2022) 44 Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 101107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, K., ‘The impossibility of an exterminatory legality: Law and the Holocaust’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 1, 65–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R., and Deci, E. L., ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions’ (2000) 25 Contemporary Educational Psychology 1, 54–6710.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sànchez-Valle, M., ‘The perception of older adults regarding socio-political issues disseminated on social networks’ (2023) 11 Communication for Seniors’ Inclusion in Today’s Society 3, 112–23Google Scholar
Santos, C. F., Gonçalves, L. D., and Da Silva Machado, C. R., ‘Educação ambiental para justiça ambiental: dando mais uns passos’ (2015) 32 REMEA-Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental 1, 189–20810.14295/remea.v32i1.5016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Șaramet, O., and Spîrchez, G.-B., ‘Limits of the discretionary power established through enforcing the European principle of proportionality’ (2018) 7 Perspectives of Law and Public Administration 2, 260–9Google Scholar
Sartor, G., ‘The right to be forgotten: Balancing interests in the flux of time’ (2016) 24 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 1, 72–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savin, A., ‘Digital sovereignty and its impact on EU policymaking’, (2022) CBS LAW Research Paper, 22-02, Copenhagen Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
Savin, A., ‘The EU Digital Service Act: Toward a more responsible Internet’ (2021) 24 Journal of Internet Law 7, 15–25Google Scholar
Savolainen, L., ‘The shadow banning controversy: Perceived governance and algorithmic folklore’ (2022) 44 Media, Culture & Society 6, 1091–10910.1177/01634437221077174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaap, D., and Scheeper, P., ‘Comparing citizens’ trust in the police across European countries: An assessment of cross-country measurement equivalence’ (2014) 24 International Criminal Justice Review 1, 82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schippers, B., ‘Artificial Intelligence and democratic politics’ (2020) 11 Political Insight 1, 32–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, A., Cotton, S. R., and Xie, B., ‘A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19’ (2021) 76 The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 3, e99–e103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, M., Kim, J.-H., and David, P., ‘Always connected or always distracted? ADHD symptoms and social assurance explain problematic use of mobile phone and multicommunicating’ (2015) 20 Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6, 667–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevignani, S., ‘Digital transformations and the ideological formation of the public sphere: Hegemonic, populist, or popular communication?’ (2022) 39 Theory, Culture and Society 4, 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y., ‘Digital rights and the outer limits of international human rights law’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 3, 461–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, G., ‘Implementation of information and communication technology for human rights awareness and promotion’ (2020) 1 HighTech and Innovation Journal 1, 1–610.28991/HIJ-2020-01-01-05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shattock, E., ‘Fake news in Strasbourg: Electoral disinformation and freedom of expression in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)’ (2022) 13 European Journal of Law and Technology 1Google Scholar
Sheehy, B., et al., ‘Shifting from soft to hard law: Motivating compliance when enacting mandatory corporate social responsibility’ (2023) 24 European Business Organization Law Review 4, 693–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N. E., ‘Constitutional rights, civility and artifice’ (2019) 78 The Cambridge Law Journal 1, 175–9910.1017/S000819731800096XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P., ‘Economia solidária versus economia capitalista’ (2001) 16 Sociedade e estado 1-2, 100–1210.1590/S0102-69922001000100005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P., ‘Economia solidária: geração de renda e alternativa ao liberalismo’ (1997) 26 Proposta 72, 7–13Google Scholar
Singh, S., ‘Bridging the gender digital divide in developing countries’ (2017) 11 Journal of Children and Media 2, 245–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuha, N. A., ‘Beyond the individual: governing AI’s societal harm’ (2021) 10 Internet Policy Review, 3, Article No. 1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuha, N. A., ‘The EU Approach to ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence’ (2019) SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3443537, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3443537Google Scholar
Smyrnaios, N., and Baisnée, O., ‘Critically understanding the platformization of the public sphere’ (2023) 38 European Journal of Communication 5, 435–4510.1177/02673231231189046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourbati, M., ‘“It could be useful, but not for me at the moment”: Older people, internet access and e-public service provision’ (2009) 11 New Media and Society 7, 1083–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohr, D., ‘Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media’ (2017) 34 Business Information Review 3, 150–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Stefano, V., ‘The rise of the 1“just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”’ (2016) 37 Comparative Labor Law Journal 3, 471–504Google Scholar
Stein, D. J., and Hartford, A., ‘Health-policy approaches for problematic Internet use: Lessons from substance use disorders’ (2022) 46 Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 101151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, D., ‘Lon Fuller’s multidimensional natural law theory’ (1965-1966) 18 Stanford Law Review 3, 612–39Google Scholar
Susi, M., ‘The internet balancing formula’ (2019) 25 European Law Journal 2, 198–21210.1111/eulj.12308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappen, R. M., et al., ‘Digital health information disparities in older adults: Amixed methods study’ (2021) 9 Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 1, 82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J., ‘Saving human rights from human rights law’ (2021) 52 Vanderbilt Law Review 5, 1167–207Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Horizontal effects of constitutional rights in the Internet: A legal case on the digital constitution’ (2017) 3 The Italian Law Journal 1, 193–205Google Scholar
Thurman, N., Sly, J., Wilczek, B., and Fletcher, R., ‘Forbidden fruit or soured grapes? Long-term effects of the temporary unavailability and rationing of US news websites on their consumption from the European Union’ (2022) 84 International Communication Gazette 7–8, 698–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, M., ‘The role of the WTO in limiting China’s censorship policies’ (2011) 41 Hong Kong Law Journal 285–310Google Scholar
Tinmaz, H., et al., ‘A systematic review on digital literacy’ (2022) 9 Smart Learning Environments, Article 21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tourkochoriti, I., ‘The Digital Services Act and the EU as the global regulator of the Internet’ (2023) 24 Chicago Journal of International Law 1, 129–47Google Scholar
Townsend, B., ‘Decoding the Proposed European Union Artificial Intelligence Act’ (2021) 25 American Society of International Law Insights 20Google Scholar
Treuthart, M. P., ‘Connectivity: The global gender digital divide and its implications for women’s human rights and equality’ (2019) 23 Gonzaga Journal of International Law 1, 1–53Google Scholar
Trouille, H., ‘Private life and public image: Privacy legislation in France’ (2000) 49 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1, 199–20810.1017/S0020589300064034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsatsou, P., ‘Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: Intersectionality patterns and associated lessons’ (2021) 25 Information, Communication & Society 10, 1475–94Google Scholar
Tsitsika, A. K., et al., ‘Association between problematic internet use, socio-demographic variables and obesity among European adolescents’ (2016) 26 European Journal of Public Health 4, 617–2210.1093/eurpub/ckw028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, A., ‘How does intrinsic and extrinsic motivation drive performance culture in organizations?’ (2017) 4 Cogent Education 1, Article 1337543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden Abeele, M. M., and Mohr, V., ‘Media addictions as Apparatgeist: What discourse on TV and smartphone addiction reveals about society’ (2021) 27 Convergence 6, 1536–5710.1177/13548565211038539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Varennes, F., ‘The right to education and minority language’ (2004), www.researchgate.net/publication/242595391_The_right_to_education_and_minority_languageGoogle Scholar
Varul, P., and Pisuke, H., ‘Louisiana’s Contribution to the Estonian Civil Code’ (1999) 73 Tulane Law Review 4, 1027–34Google Scholar
Veale, M., and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., ‘Demystifying the draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act’ (2021) 22 Computer Law Review International 4, 97–11210.9785/cri-2021-220402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vimalkumar, M., Singh, J. B., Gouda, S. K., ‘Contextualising the relationship between gender and computer self-efficacy: An empirical study from India’ (2021) 58 Information and Management 4, Article 10346410.1016/j.im.2021.103464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, D. A., ‘Balancing fundamental rights with economic freedoms according to the European Court of Justice’ (2013) 9 Utrecht Law Review 1, 169–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?’ (2002) 21 Law and Philosophy, 2, 137–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., et al., ‘Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: findings from five longitudinal studies’ (2024) 24 BMC Geriatrics, Article 406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, S. D., and Brandeis, L. D., ‘The right to privacy’ (1890) 4 Harvard Law Review 5, 193–22010.2307/1321160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M., ‘Private international law: Beyond the schism’ (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 3, 347–42710.5235/204140011800664120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, M., ‘China’s investment in digital technologies and the Digital Great Game’ (2020) 60 Adelphi Series 487–489, 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, D., and Floridi, L., ‘Meta’s Oversight Board: A review and critical assessment’ (2023) 33 Minds and Machines 2, 261–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wueste, D. E., ‘Fuller’s Processual philosophy of law’ (1986) 71 Cornell Law Review 6, 1205–30Google Scholar
Wulandari, E., and Triyanto, W., ‘Digital citizenship education: Shaping digital ethics in society 5.0’ (2021) 9 Universal Journal of Educational Research 5, 948–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, C. M., ‘The right to be forgotten in post-Google Spain case law: an example of legal interpretivism in action?’ (2020) 26 Comparative Law Review 1, 255–79Google Scholar
Xu, C., and Jin, B., ‘Digital currency in China: Pilot implementations, legal challenges and prospects’ (2022) 12 Juridical Tribune/ Tribuna Juridica 2, 177–94Google Scholar
Yu, P. K., ‘Bridging the digital divide: Equality in the information age’ (2002) 20 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 1, 1–52Google Scholar
Ziller, C., and Helbling, M., ‘Public support for state surveillance’ (2021) 60 European Journal of Political Research 4, 994–100610.1111/1475-6765.12424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorčič, S., ‘Dimensions of remote learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in minority language schools’ (2020) 85 Treatises and Documents Journal of Ethnic Studies 85, 223–52Google Scholar
Zufall, F., Kimura, R., and Peng, L., ‘A simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests’ ICAIL ’21: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, June 2021, 270–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., et al, ‘Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy’ (2018) 14 Utrecht Law Review 1, 82–9610.18352/ulr.420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuluaga, Y. E. L., et al., ‘A study of critical thinking in higher education students’ (2020) 16 Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos (Colombia), 2, 256–79Google Scholar
Zvereva, E., ‘Digital ethics in higher education: Modernizing moral values for effective communication in cyberspace’ (2023) 13 Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 2, e20231910.30935/ojcmt/13033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You have
Access
Open access