Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-h5th4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T17:25:59.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2025

Theresa Squatrito
Theresa Squatrito
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Judging under Constraint
The Politics of Deference by International Courts
 , pp. xi - xii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Tables

  1. 3.1Population of international courts, 1945–2015

  2. 3.2Measuring the formal independence of international courts

  3. 3.3Prevalence of rules that hamper independence over time

  4. 4.1Number of EACJ’s cases by respondent, First Instance only (2006–2020)

  5. 4.2Summary of EACJ’s case outcomes (2006–2020)

  6. 4.3Summary of EACJ’s remedies (2006–2020)

  7. 4.4Summary of EACJ’s consequential orders

  8. 4.5Legal counsel representing applicants at the EACJ

  9. 4.6Cross-tabulations of EACJ’s deference by support network

  10. 4.7Rules constituting the formal independence of the EACJ

  11. 4.8EACJ deference and EAC fragmentation on select issues

  12. 4.9Descriptive statistics on EACJ’s citation practices

  13. 4.10Cross-tabulation of EACJ’s citation practices by deference (merits only)

  14. 4.11Public legitimation narratives in EACJ’s Facebook posts

  15. 5.1Summary of CCJ’s case outcomes (2009–2020)

  16. 5.2Summary of CCJ’s remedies (2009–2020)

  17. 5.3Cross-tabulations of CCJ’s deference by support network

  18. 5.4Rules constituting the formal independence of the CCJ

  19. 5.5CCJ’s deference and CARICOM fragmentation related to Myrie and Tomlinson

  20. 5.6State implementation of CARICOM’s free movement requirements

  21. 5.7Descriptive statistics on CCJ’s citation practices

  22. 5.8Cross-tabulations of CCJ’s citation practices by deference

  23. 5.9Public legitimation narratives in CCJ’s Facebook posts

  24. 6.1Number of ACtHPR cases by respondent (2009–2020)

  25. 6.2Alleged and confirmed African Charter violations (2009–2020)

  26. 6.3Summary of ACtHPR’s case outcomes (2009–2020)

  27. 6.4Summary of ACtHPR’s remedies (2009–2020)

  28. 6.5Legal representation of applicants before ACtHPR, by type

  29. 6.6Cross-tabulations of ACtHPR’s deference by support network

  30. 6.7Rules constituting the formal independence of the ACtHPR

  31. 6.8Descriptive statistics on ACtHPR’s citation practices

  32. 6.9Cross-tabulation of ACtHPR’s citation practices by deference (merits only)

  33. 6.10Public legitimation narratives in ACtHPR’s Facebook posts

  34. 7.1Comparison of deference by the EACJ, CCJ, ACtHPR

  35. 7.2Descriptive statistics on citation practices by court

  36. 7.3Prominence of public legitimation narratives on courts’ Facebook pages

  37. 7.4Summary of findings on support networks by court

  38. A1.1Interviews

  39. A3.1Sources for coding of formal independence by international court

  40. A4.1Cross-tabulations of EACJ citation practices by deference (all cases)

  41. A4.2Annual percent of EACJ’s Facebook posts with at least one public legitimation narrative (people-centered or political purpose)

  42. A5.1Cross-tabulations of CCJ’s deference by support network (private or supranational actor)

  43. A5.2Cross-tabulation of CCJ citation practices by deference, including remedies (merits only)

  44. A6.1Cross-tabulation of ACtHPR’s unanimous decisions by deference

  45. A6.2Annual percent of ACtHPR’s Facebook posts with at least one public legitimation narrative (people-centered or political purpose)

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Tables
  • Theresa Squatrito, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Judging under Constraint
  • Online publication: 27 October 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Tables
  • Theresa Squatrito, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Judging under Constraint
  • Online publication: 27 October 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Tables
  • Theresa Squatrito, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Judging under Constraint
  • Online publication: 27 October 2025
Available formats
×