Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
    Show more authors
  • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Select format
  • Publisher:
    Cambridge University Press
    Publication date:
    07 August 2025
    21 August 2025
    ISBN:
    9781009651226
    9781009651233
    9781009651257
    Dimensions:
    (229 x 152 mm)
    Weight & Pages:
    0.57kg, 290 Pages
    Dimensions:
    (229 x 152 mm)
    Weight & Pages:
    0.43kg, 290 Pages
You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    The Constitution divides power between the government and We the People. It grants We the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over the government through our elected representatives. The Supreme Court has abused its power of judicial review and subverted popular control of the government. The Court's doctrine divides constitutional law into rights issues and structural issues. Structural constitutional doctrine ignores the Constitution's division of power between the government and We the People. The Court's rights doctrines fail to recognize that the Constitution grants the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over our government. People v. The Court presents an indictment of the Supreme Court's constitutional doctrine. It also provides a set of proposals for revolutionary changes in the practice of judicial review that are designed to enable We the People to reclaim our rightful place as sovereigns in a democratic, constitutional order.

    Reviews

    ‘Professor Sloss’s proposal for a new constitutional revolution is most intriguing in its suggestion that we can get the best of the worlds of constitutionalism and democracy by using expansive exercises of national power and international human rights law (override-able by subsequent national legislation) to protect individual rights from legislative and executive abuses.’

    Mark Tushnet - William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School

    ‘In an erudite and deeply researched book, David Sloss has blended empirical evidence, legal analysis, and democratic theory to mount a radical and welcome challenge to the rigid orthodoxies of American constitutional law. This is a terrific and much needed effort to reframe debates that are at risk of becoming stale or irrelevant.’

    Aziz Z. Huq - Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg Professor of Law, University of Chicago

    ‘David Sloss has given us a carefully documented but highly readable roadmap to counter the rise of autocratic abuse of our Constitution. As he says, it is time to respond with legitimate 'constitutional hardball'.’

    Russell Feingold - past President of the American Constitution Society and former U.S. Senator

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Missing or limited accessibility features

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    The HTML of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

    Content Navigation
    Table of contents navigation

    Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

    Index navigation

    Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

    Reading Order and Textual Equivalents
    Single logical reading order

    You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

    Short alternative textual descriptions

    You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

    Structural and Technical Features
    ARIA roles provided

    You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.