Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Reputation and Judicial Tactics
  • Cited by 21
      • Show more authors
      • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      05 October 2014
      09 October 2014
      ISBN:
      9781139381260
      9781107031135
      9781316621141
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381260
      Dimensions:
      (228 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.61kg, 348 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.52kg, 352 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Constitutional and Administrative Law, Law, Comparative Law, Comparative Politics
      Series:
      Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Constitutional and Administrative Law, Law, Comparative Law, Comparative Politics
    Series:
    Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
    Information

    Book description

    This book argues that national and international courts seek to enhance their reputations through the strategic exercise of judicial power. Courts often cannot enforce their judgments and must rely on reputational sanctions to ensure compliance. One way to do this is for courts to improve their reputation for generating compliance with their judgments. When the court's reputation is increased, parties will be expected to comply with its judgments and the reputational sanction on a party that fails to comply will be higher. This strategy allows national and international courts, which cannot enforce their judgments against states and executives, to improve the likelihood that their judgments will be complied with over time. This book describes the judicial tactics that courts use to shape their judgments in ways that maximize their reputational gains.

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    Cancel
    ×

    Contents

    Contents
    References

    Bibliography

    Books

    Arian, Asher et al., Auditing Israeli Democracy: 2010 Democratic Values in Practice (Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute), 2010 (Hebrew).
    Atiyah, P. S., and Summers, Roberts, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory and Legal Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon), 1987.
    Barak, Aharon, Judicial Discretion (Tel Aviv: Papyrus), 1987 (Hebrew).
    Barak, Aharon, The Judge in a Democracy (Jerusalem: Keter), 2004 (Hebrew).
    Bendor, Ariel L., and Segal, Zeev, The Hat Maker: Discussions with Justice Aharon Barak (Kinneret, Zmora-Bitan, Dvir: Or Yehuda), 2009 (Hebrew).
    Boller, Paul F., Jr., and George, John, They Never Said It: A Book of Fake Quotes, Misquotes & Misleading Attributions (New York: Oxford University Press), 1989.
    Cardozo, Benjamin N., The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven: Yale University Press), 1921.
    Castberg, Frede, The European Convention on Human Rights (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications), 1974.
    Dershowitz, Alan M., Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000 (New York: Oxford University Press), 2001.
    Dijk, P. Van, and Hoof, G. J. H. Van, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (The Hague: Kluwer Law International), 3rd ed., 1998.
    Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1978.
    Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1980.
    Friedmann, Daniel, The Purse and the Sword: The Trials of the Israeli Legal Revolution (Tel Aviv: Miskal – Yedioth Ahronoth Books and Chemed Books), 2013 (Hebrew).
    Gavison, Ruth, Kremnitzer, Mordechai, and Dotan, Yoav, Judicial Activism: For and Against: The Role of the High Court of Justice in Israeli Society (Jerusalem: Magnes Press), 2000 (Hebrew).
    Guzman, Andrew, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press), 2008.
    Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (London: Oxford, Clarendon Press), 1961.
    Hirschl, Ran, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 2004.
    Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1970.
    Janis, Mark W., Kay, Richard S., and Bradley, Anthony W., European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials (New York: Oxford University Press), 3rd ed., 2008.
    Lahav, Pnina, Judgment in Jerusalem: Chief Justice Simon Agranat and the Zionist Century (Tel Aviv: Am Oved Publishers Ltd), 1999 (Hebrew).
    Levitsky, Nomi, Your Honor (Jerusalem: Keter), 2001 (Hebrew).
    Mautner, Menachem, The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv: Ma’agalay Da’at Publishing House), 1993 (Hebrew).
    Merrills, G., The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press), 2nd ed., 1993.
    Murphy, Walter F., Elements of Judicial Strategy (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 1964.
    Ovey, Clare, and White, Robin C. A., Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press), 4th ed., 2006.
    Paul, Prucha Francis, The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press), 1984.
    Popper, Karl, Conjectures and Refutations (London and New York: Routledge Classics), Reprinted, 2006.
    Posner, Eric A., The Perils of Global Legalism (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 2009.
    Posner, Richard A., How Judges Think (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 2008.
    Rattner, Arye, Legal Culture: Law and the Legal System in the Eyes of the Israeli Public 2000–2009 (Jerusalem: Sasa Center for Strategic Research) (Hebrew), 2009.
    Reisman, W. Michael, Nullity and Revision: The Review and Enforcement of International Judgments and Awards 641–642 (New Haven: Yale University Press), 1971.
    Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 2nd edn., 2008.
    Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1960.
    Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J., The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 2002.
    Shapiro, Martin, The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies (New York: Free Press), 1968.
    Smith, Jean Edward, John Marshall: Definer of a Nation (New York: Henry Holt and Company), 1996.
    Spence, Michael, Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1974.
    Staton, Jeffrey K., Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico (New York: Cambridge University Press), 2010.
    Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1999.
    Walker, Thomas G., and Epstein, Lee, The Supreme Court of the United States: An Introduction (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 1993.
    Zahavi, Amotz, and Zahavi, Avishag, The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle (New York: Oxford University Press), 1997.

    Articles

    Aolain, Fionnuala Ni, The Emergence of Diversity: Differences in Human Rights Jurisprudence, 19 Fordham International Law Journal101 (1995).
    Bassok, Or, Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968–1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image, 42 Israel Law Review306, 307 (2009).
    Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicially Sponsored Checks and Balances, 31 Hebrew University Law Review797 (2001) (Hebrew).
    Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Review and Democratic Failures: Minimizing Asymmetric Information Through Adjudication, 32 Tel Aviv University Law Review277 (2010) (Hebrew).
    Benvenisti, Eyal, Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts, 102 American Journal of International Law241 (2008).
    Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W., The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stanford Law Review595 (2007).
    Berutti, Ronald A., The Cherokee Cases: The Fight to Save the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Indians, 17 American Indian Law Review291 (1992).
    Brewster, Rachel, Unpacking the State’s Reputation, 50 Harvard International Law Journal231 (2009).
    Cavallaro, James L., and Brewer, Stephanie Erin, Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court, 102 American Journal of International Law768 (2008).
    Cohen, Amichai, The Supreme Court and the Israel-Arab Conflict: An International Law Perspective 6 Ono Academic College Law Journal263 (2006) (Hebrew).
    Cooter, Robert D., The Objectives of Private and Public Judges, 41 Public Choice107 (1983).
    Cross, Frank B., and Nelson, Blake J., Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decisionmaking, 95 Northwestern University Law Review1437 (2001).
    Cross, Frank B., and Tiller, Emerson H., Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 107 Yale Law Journal2155 (1998).
    Dagan, Hanoch, The Realist Conception of Law, 57 University of Toronto Law Journal607 (2007).
    Delahunty, Robert J., and Yoo, John, Executive Power v. International Law, 30 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy73 (2006–2007).
    Dotan, Yoav, Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers, and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada, 33 Law & Society Review319 (1999).
    Dotan, Yoav, Pre-petitions and Constitutional Dilemmas Regarding the Role of Government Lawyers, 7 Mishpat Umimshal159 (2004) (Hebrew).
    Dothan, Shai, Elasticizing the Remedy of Voidness Due to Flawed Administrative Action – Relative Voidness (Hebrew) (unpublished LLM thesis, Tel Aviv University 2003, on file with author).
    Dothan, Shai, In Defence of Expansive Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights, 3 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 508 (2014).
    Dothan, Shai, How International Courts Enhance their Legitimacy, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law455 (2013).
    Dothan, Shai, Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights, 12 Chicago Journal of International Law115 (2011).
    Dothan, Shai, Luring NGOs to International Courts (unpublished draft).
    Dothan, Shai, The Optimal Use of Comparative Law, forthcoming Denver Journal of International Law and Policy.
    Eskridge Jr., William N., Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, 101 Yale Law Journal331 (1991).
    Eskridge, Jr., William N., Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game, 79 California Law Review613 (1991).
    Farber, Daniel A., Rights as Signals, 31 Journal of Legal Studies83 (2002).
    Fuld, Stanley H., The Voices of Dissent, 62 Columbia Law Review923 (1962).
    Garoupa, Nuno, and Ginsburg, Tom, Reputation, Information and the Organization of the Judiciary, 4 Journal of Comparative Law228 (2009).
    Garrett, Geoffrey, R. Kelemen, Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner, The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union, 52 International Organization149 (1998).
    Gearty, Conor, Unravelling Osman, 64 Modern Law Review159 (2001).
    Geisinger, Alex, and Stein, Michael Ashley, A Theory of Expressive International Law, 60 Vanderbilt Law Review77 (2007).
    Gibson, James, L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta, Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment, 58 Political Research Quarterly187 (2005).
    Tom Ginsburg, Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, 45 Virginia Journal of International Law631, 658 (2005).
    Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo, A Fine Is a Price, 29 Journal of Legal Studies1 (2000).
    Goutal, Jean Louis, Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the U.S.A, 24 American Journal of Comparative Law43 (1976).
    Gross, Miron, and Shachar, Yoram, Searching for Methods in Bench Selection in the Israeli Supreme Court: Quantitative Analysis, 29 Hebrew University Law Review567 (1998).
    Harel, Alon, The Courts and Homosexuality: Dignity or Tolerance? 4 Mishpat Umimshal785 (1998) (Hebrew).
    Hartman, Joan F., Derogation from Human Rights Treaties in Public Emergencies, 22 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1981).
    Hathaway, Oona A., Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?, 111 Yale Law Journal1935 (2002).
    Helfer, Laurence R., Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights, 26 Cornell International Law Journal133, 134 (1993).
    Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication, 107 Yale Law Journal273 (1997).
    Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Eric, International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe, Forthcoming 68 International Organization77 (2014)
    Holmes, Oliver Wendell, The Path of the Law, 10 Harvard Law Review457 (1897).
    Huneeus, Alexandra, Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights, 44 Cornell International Law Journal493 (2011).
    Jackson, Joshua L., Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court, 39 Connecticut Law Review759 (2006).
    Klarman, Michael J., Brown and Lawrence (and Goodridge), 104 Michigan Law Review431 (2005).
    Klarman, Michael J., Brown v. Board of Education: Law or Politics? (research paper No. 02–11 December 2002) available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=353361
    Law, David S., A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review, 97 Georgetown Law Journal723 (2009).
    Lindblom, Charles E., The Science of “Muddling Through,” 19 Public Administration Review79 (1959).
    Lupu, Yonatan, International Judicial Legitimacy: Lessons from National Courts, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law437 (2013).
    Lupu, Yonatan, and Voeten, Erik, Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights, 42 British Journal of Political Science413 (2011).
    Mahoney, Paul, Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin, 11 Human Rights Law Journal57 (1990).
    Mangan, Brendan, Protecting Human Rights in National Emergencies: Shortcomings in the European System and a Proposal for Reform, 10 Human Rights Quarterly372 (1988).
    McKaskle, Paul L., The European Court of Human Rights: What It Is, How It Works, and Its Future, 40 University of San Francisco Law Review1 (2005).
    McNollgast, Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law, 68 Southern California Law Review1631 (1995).
    Miller, Gregory D., Hypotheses on Reputation: Alliance Choices and the Shadow of the Past, 12 Security Studies40 (2003).
    Moravcsik, Andrew, Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe, 1 European Journal of International Relations157 (1995).
    Mowbray, Alastair, The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights, 5 Human Rights Law Review57 (2005).
    Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 14 European Journal of International Law529 (2003).
    Ost, François, The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights, in The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National Restrictions283 (Mireille Delmas-Marty, ed.). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 1992.
    Popovic, Dragoljub, Prevailing of Judicial Activism over Self-Restraint in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 42 Creighton Law Review361, 372 (2009).
    Posner, Eric A., and Figueiredo, Miguel F. P. de, Is the International Court of Justice Biased?, 34 Journal of Legal Studies599 (2005).
    Posner, Eric A., and Yoo, John C., Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, 93 California Law Review1 (2005).
    Post, Robert, The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court, 85 Minnesota Law Review1267 (2001).
    Priest, George L., and Klein, Benjamin, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 Journal of Legal Studies1 (1984).
    Putnam, Robert D., Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, 42 International Organization427 (1988).
    Ramseyer, J. Mark, The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach, 23 Journal of Legal Studies721 (1994).
    Rudolf, Beate, Constitutional Developments: European Court of Human Rights: Legal Status of Postoperative Transsexuals, 1.4 International Journal of Constitutional Law716 (2003).
    Ruth, Alexandra, and Trilsch, Mirja, Bankovic v. Belgium (Admissibility), 97 American Journal of International Law168 (2003).
    Ryssdal, R., The Enforcement System Set up under the European Convention on Human Rights, inCompliance with Judgments of International Courts, 49 (M.K. Bulterman and M. Kuijer eds.). (The Hague: Brill Academic Publishing), 1996.
    Sadurski, Wojciech, Partnering with Strasburg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, The Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe and the Idea of Pilot judgments, 9 Human Rights Law Review397 (2009).
    Schauer, Frederick, Forward: The Court’s Agenda and the Nation’s, 120 Harvard Law Review4 (2006).
    Schulz, Heiner, The Political Foundations of Decision Making by the European Court of Justice, 99 ASIL Proceedings132 (2005).
    Shachar, Yoram, Solidarity and Generational Sequencing in the Israeli Supreme Court, 16 Bar Ilan University Law Review161 (2000).
    Shachar, Yoram, The Citation Space of the Supreme Court 1950–2004, 50 Hapraklit29 (2008).
    Shachar, Yoram, Gross, Miron, and Harris, Ron, Anatomy of Discourse and Dissent in the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analyses, 20 Tel Aviv University Law Review749 (1997) (Hebrew).
    Shachar, Yoram, Harris, Ron, and Gross, Miron, Citation Practices of the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analyses, 27 Hebrew University Law Review119 (1996).
    Shamir, Ronen, “Landmark Cases” and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice, 24 Law & Society Review781 (1990).
    Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach, 106 American Journal of International Law225 (2012).
    Shany, Yuval, Bosnia, Serbia and the Politics of International Adjudication, 45 Justice21 (2008).
    Shany, Yuval, Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Cesare P.R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany, eds.) (New York: Oxford University Press), 2013.
    Shany, Yuval, The Entry into Force of the Rome Statute: What Are the Implications for the State of Israel? 9 Hamishpat51 (2004) (Hebrew).
    Shapiro, Martin, Judges as Liars, 17 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy155, 156 (1994).
    Spence, Michael, Job Market Signaling, 87 The Quarterly Journal of Economics355 (1973).
    Strauss, Peter L., One Hundred Fifty Cases per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court’s Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Columbia Law Review1093 (1987).
    Swindler, William F., Politics as Law: The Cherokee Cases, 3 American Indian Law Review7 (1975).
    Tamir, Michal, Sunk Cost and Stare Decisis, 1 Haifa Law Review211, 285–286 (2004) (Hebrew).
    Voeten, Erik, Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law411 (2013).
    Voeten, Erik, The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 102 American Political Science Review417 (2008).
    Voeten, Erik, The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 61 International Organization669 (2007).
    Weiler, J. H. H., The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale Law Journal2403 (1991).
    Wildhaber, Luzius, The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future, 22 American University International Law Review521 (2007).
    Wolfson, Yossi, Punitive House Demolitions: HCJ 1730/96 Sabih v. Major General Ilan Biran commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Region (judgment dated March 19, 1996) available at www.hamoked.org/Document.aspx?dID=Documents1272
    Wright, Jane, The Retreat from Osman: Z v. United Kingdom in the European Court of Human Rights and Beyond in Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective 55 (Duncan Fairgrieve, Mads Andenas, and John Bell, eds.). (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law), 2002.
    Yadlin, Omri, Judicial Activism and Judicial Discretion as a Strategic Game, 19 Bar Ilan University Law Review665 (2003) (Hebrew).
    Zamir, Itzhak, On Justice Zvi Berenson, 2 Mishpat Umimshal325 (1994) (Hebrew).

    Judgments

    Israeli Supreme Court

    • HCJ 9353/08 Abu Dheim v. GOC Home Front Command (not yet published, January 5, 2009).

    • HCJ 2150/07 Abu Safiya v. Minister of Defense (not yet published, December 29, 2009).

    • HCJ 7052/03 Adala v. The Minister of Interior [2006] IsrSC 61(2) 202.

    • HCJ 5699/07 Anonymous (a) v. The Attorney General [2008] IsrSC 62(3) 550.

    • CrimA 8823/07 Anonymous v. Israel (not yet published, February 11, 2010).

    • ADA 10/94 Anonymous v. Minister of Defense [1997] IsrSC 53(1) 97.

    • Cr.A. 7048/97 Anonymous v. Minister of Defense [2000] IsrSC 54(1) 721.

    • HCJ 5973/92 Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. Minister of Defense [1993] IsrSC 47(1) 267.

    • HCJ 8575/03 Azadin v. The Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank [2003] IsrSC 58(1) 210.

    • CA 6821/93 Bank Hamizrahi v. Migdal [1995] IsrSC 49(4) 221.

    • HCJ 2056/04 Beit Sourik Village Council v. The Government of Israel [2004] IsrSC 58(5) 807.

    • CrimA 347/88 Demjanjuk v. The State of Israel [1993] IsrSC 47(4) 221.

    • HCJ 8397/06 Eduardo v. Minister of Defense [2007] IsrSC 62(2) 198.

    • CrimFH 2316/95 Ganimat v. State of Israel, [1995] IsrSC 49(4) 589.

    • CA 7379/06 G.M.H.L Building Company 1992 limited v. Issai Taholian (not yet published September 10, 2009).

    • HCJ 118/80 Grinstein v. The Military Advocate General [1981] IsrSC 35(1) 239.

    • HCJ 6427/02 Hatnua Leeichut Hashilton v. The Knesset [2006] IsrSC 61(1) 619.

    • HCJ 2605/05 Human Rights Division v. The Minister of Finance (not yet published, November 19, 2009).

    • HCJ 1715/97 Israel Investments Directors Office v. Minister of Finance, [1997] IsrSC 51(4) 367.

    • HCJ 241/60 Kardosh v. Registrar of Companies [1961] IsrSC 15(2) 1151.

    • HCJ 4542/02 Kav Laoved Association v. The Government of Israel [2006] IsrSC 61(1) 346.

    • HCJ 2918/93 Kiryat Gat Municipality v. The State of Israel [1993] IsrSC 47(5) 832.

    • HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. The Prime Minister of Israel [2005] IsrSC 60(2) 477.

    • HCJ 1748/06 Mayor of Daharia v. IDF Commander in the West Bank (not yet published, December 14, 2006).

    • HCJ 7733/04 Nasser v. Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank (not yet published, June 20, 2005).

    • EA 2/84 Neiman v. Chairman of the Central Election Committeefor the 11th Knesset [1985] IsrSC 39 (2) 225.

    • EA 1/88 Neiman v. Chairman of the Central Election committee for the 12th Knesset [1988] IsrSC 42 (4) 177.

    • HCJ 6728/06 “Ometz” Association (Citizens for Good Governance and Social Justice) v. The Prime Minister of Israel (not yet published, November 30, 2006).

    • CA 183/69 Petah Tikva Municipality v. Tahan [1969] IsrSC 23(2) 398.

    • HCJ 2028/08 Public Committee Against Torture v. Israel (decision, March 24, 2009).

    • HCJ 1661/05 Regional Council, Coast of Gaza v. Knesset of Israel [2005] IsrSC 59(2) 481.

    • HCJ 910/86 Ressler v. Minister of Defense [1988] IsrSC 42(2) 441.

    • HCJ 6298/07 Ressler v. The Knesset (not yet published February 21, 2012).

    • HCJ 3267/97 Rubinstein v. Minister of Defense [1998] IsrSC 52(5) 481.

    • CrimA 866/95 Sosan v. the State of Israel [1996] IsrSC 50(1) 793, 817.

    • CA 311/57 The Attorney General v. Dizengoff and Partners (SIT) limited [1959] IsrSC 13 1026.

    • HCJ 4885/03 The Israeli Birds Breeders Organization Agricultural Cooperation Society Ltd v. The Israeli Government [2005] IsrSC 59(2) 14.

    • HCJ 2732/05 The Mayor of Azon, Hasin v. The Government of Israel (not yet published, June 15, 2006).

    • HCJ 6427/02 The Movement for Quality of Government in Israel v. Knesset [2006] IsrSC 61(1) 619.

    • HCJ 6055/95 Tzemah v. Minister of Defense [1999] IsrSC 53(5) 241.

    • Cr.A. 3660/03 Ubeid v. Israel (not published, September 8, 2005).

    • EA 1/65 Yardor v. The Chair of the Electoral Committee of the 6th Knesset [1965] IsrSC 19(3) 365.

    • HCJ 8414/05 Yasin v. The Government of Israel [2007] IsrSC 62(2) 822.

    • HCJ 466/07 Zahava Gal-On v. The Attorney General (not yet published January 11, 2012).

    European Court of Human Rights

    • A and Others v. The United Kingdom, judgment of February 19, 2009, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2009.

    • Airey case, judgment of October 9, 1979, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)32.

    • Al-Jedda v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 7, 2011 (Application No. 27021/08).

    • Al-Skeini and Others v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 7, 2011 (Application. No. 55721/07).

    • Artico v. Italy, judgment of May 13, 1980 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)37.

    • Assanidze v. Georgia, judgment of April 8, 2004, 2004-II EUR. Ct. H.R. 221.

    • Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and Others, decision of December 12, 2001, EUR. Ct. H.R. 2001-XII 333.

    • Broniowski v. Poland, judgment of June 22, 2004, 2004-V EUR. Ct. H.R. 1.

    • Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 11, 2002, 2002-VI EUR. Ct. H.R. 1.

    • Cossey case, judgment of September 27, 1990 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)184.

    • Dudgeon v. The United Kingdom, judgment of October 22, 1981 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)45.

    • Golder v. The United Kingdom, judgment of February 21, 1975 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)18.

    • “Greek case” [1969], Eur. Comm. on Human Rights (report) at Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 1969.

    • Greens and MT v. United Kingdom, judgment of November 23, 2010, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2010.

    • Hirst v. The United Kingdom (No. 2), judgment of October 6, 2005, 2005-IX EUR. Ct. H.R. 187.

    • Hutten-Czapska v. Poland, judgment of June 19, 2006, 2006-VIII EUR. Ct. H.R. 57.

    • Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, judgment of July 8, 2004, 2004-VII EUR. Ct. H.R. 179.

    • Case of Klass and Others, judgment of September 6, 1978 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)28.

    • Lawless v. Ireland (No. 3), judgment of July 1, 1961, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)3.

    • Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections), judgment of March 23, 1995, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)310.

    • Loizidou v. Turkey, judgment of December 18, 1996 (Merits), Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI.

    • Magomed Musayev and Others v. Russia, judgment of October 23, 2008 (application no. 8979/02).

    • Marckx case, judgment of June 13, 1979 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)31.

    • Mehemi v. France (No. 2), judgment of April 10, 2003, 2003-IV EUR. Ct. H.R. 311.

    • Minelli case, judgment of March 25, 1983, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)62.

    • Osman v. The United Kingdom, judgment of October 28, 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII 3124.

    • Rees v. The United Kingdom, judgment of October 17, 1986 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)106.

    • Scoppola v. Italy (No. 3), judgment of May 22, 2012, App. No. 126/05.

    • Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, 2000-VIII EUR. Ct. H.R. 471.

    • Sejdovic v. Italy, judgment of November 10, 2004.

    • Sejdovic v. Italy, judgment of March 1, 2006, 2006-II EUR. Ct. H.R. 241.

    • Sheffield and Horsham v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 30, 1998, 1998-V EUR. Ct. H.R. 2011.

    • Soering case, judgment of July 7, 1989, EUR. Ct. H.R (ser. A)161.

    • Tyrer case, judgment of April 25, 1978 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)26.

    • X and Y v. The Netherlands, judgment of March 26, 1985 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)91.

    • Z and Others v. The United Kingdom, judgment of May 10, 2001, EUR. Ct. H.R. 2001-V 1.

    U.S. Supreme Court

    • Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240 (1975).

    • Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).

    • Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

    • Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 (1955).

    • Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

    • Chevron U.S.A. INC v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).

    • Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958).

    • Fairfax’s Devisee v. Hunter’s Lessee, 11 U.S. 603 (1813).

    • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

    • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

    • Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816).

    • Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008).

    • United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974).

    • Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832).

    International Court of Justice

    • Case Concerning the Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Preliminary Objections), [1959] ICJ Rep. 127.

    • The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company Case (Preliminary Objections), [1952] ICJ Rep 93.

    • Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. US), [2004] ICJ Rep. 12.

    • Corfu Channel Case [1949] ICJ Rep 4.

    • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion (July 9, 2004).

    • Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (jurisdiction of the court and admissibility of the application) [1984] ICJ Rep. 392 (judgment of November 26, 1984).

    • Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Merits) 1986 ICJ Rep 14, 146–149 (Nicaragua v. US).

    • Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Iran v. US) [2003] ICJ Rep. 161.

    European Court of Justice

    • Case 48/74 Mr. Charmasson v. Minister for Economic Affairs and Finance, 1974 E.C.R II-1383.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.