Figures
1.1.Decrease in for (as conjunction in COHA), 1810s–2000s
1.2.Decrease in for (as conjunction in COCA), 1990s–2012
3.1.Hypothetical and actual frequencies of the forms of give in the ICE-GB and their relative entropies (Hrel)
3.3.Cluster-analytic results for English consonant phonemes (from Gries Reference Gries2013a)
5.1.A keyword dispersion plot of Romeo and Juliet generated by WordSmith Tools (reproduced from Scott and Tribble Reference Scott and Tribble2006: 65)
7.1.Number of distinct four-word combinations occurring at least once (with no dispersion restriction)
7.2.Number of distinct four-word pattern types occurring at two frequency levels (range = 5 texts)
7.3.Relationship between variability and predictability for 12*4 frames occurring more than 200 times per million words in academic prose
10.1.Possible results for analyses of the Brown family of corpora
10.2.The decline of the modal auxiliaries (based on Leech Reference Leech, Facchinetti, Krug and Palmer2003: 228, table 3)
10.3.Absolute and normalized frequencies of new types with -ment in the OED
10.4.Changes in the expanding productivity of -ment in the OED (Hilpert Reference Hilpert2013: 131)
12.1.How the briefings participants refer to the Libyan administration in the first three months of 2011
13.1.Concordance lines for mam in SettCorp (sorted 2R then 3R)
13.2.Functions of vocatives in Liveline and SettCorp (normalized to 10,000 words)
14.1.General references in the text categories of EMEMT 1500–1700 (according to Taavitsainen Reference Taavitsainen, Jucker, Schreier and Hundt2009)
15.1.Overall trends for stance features across phases and speaker groups
15.2.Frequency of modals used across phases and speaker groups
15.3.Frequency of stance adverbs used across phases and speaker groups
15.4.Frequency of stance complement clauses used across phases and speaker groups
17.1.Linguistic feature and text category emphases in register variation studies
17.2.Register comparison along two dimensions
Dimension 1: involved vs. informational production
Dimension 5: abstract/impersonal vs. non-impersonal style
21.1.Categorization of PP contexts (Davydova Reference Davydova2011: 124)
21.2a.Relative frequency of PP and SP in the press section of ICE corpora (parsed)
21.2b.PPs (frequency pmw) in the press sections of ICE corpora (parsed)
23.1.Relative frequency per 100,000 words of sort of in the different subcorpora
23.2.Relative frequency per 100,000 words of in fact in the different subcorpora
24.1.Entry for game in the West (Reference West1953) General Service List
24.3.Example of initial data deletion phase (faded n-grams are deleted ones)
24.6.Example of integrated list of phrasal expressions and single words
24.7.Sample of the PHRASE List with numerical genre-sensitive frequency information
24.8.Genre-sensitive frequency information represented by system of symbols
28.4.Box plot for Noun–(Preposition OR Conjunction)–Noun (LOG FQ)
