Tables and Figures
Tables
2.1Organizational characteristics in Bristol and Glasgow (percentages)
2.4Descriptive statistics for the variables included in the analysis
3.3QAP regression predictors of alliances (adjacency matrices and Jaccard similarity matrices)
4.2Distribution of ties across structurally equivalent blocks
4.4Distribution of important partners across structurally equivalent blocks
4.5Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks, all alliance ties
4.6Densities in the joint involvement in 2-cliques, all alliances network
4.7Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks
4.8Distribution of social bonds across structurally equivalent blocks (ratio of ties observed/expected in brackets)
4.10Densities in the joint involvement in 2-cliques, social bonds
4.11Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks, joint involvement in 2-cliques, social bonds
4.12Densities in solidarity ties attached to alliance ties, joint 2-clique memberships
4.13Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks, solidarity ties attached to alliance ties, joint 2-clique memberships
5.1Opponents and social movement identification in different structural positions within civic networks
5.2Claims to represent specific social groups by incumbents of different structural positions within civic networks
5.3Issue interests among actors in different structural positions within civic networks (1–100 scales; see Table 2.2)
5.4Properties of actors in different structural positions within civic networks
5.5Action repertoires among interest organizations in different structural positions within civic networks (1–100 scales)
5.6Participation in public events among interest organizations in different structural positions within civic networks (1–100 scale, corresponding to the percentage of events attended out of total)
5.7Significant (p < 0.05) differences between incumbents of social movement structural positions and other organizations
5.8Binary logistic estimates of location in different structural positions (B coefficients)
5.9Factors summarizing main predictors of structural location (only factor loadings > 0.5)
6.3Share of events attended in the two cities (twenty-six in Glasgow, seventeen in Bristol)
6.4Involvement in civic and protest events across structural positions (percentages)
6.5Frequency of dyads and densities for interorganizational networks created by joint participation in events
6.6Properties of civic networks, based on different criteria
6.7Predictors of the structure of the ties based on joint participation in public events in the early 2000s (QAP regression)
6.8Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks (ties based on joint participation in protest events)
6.9Test of homophily tendencies within structurally equivalent positions in civic networks (ties based on joint participation in any type of civic events)
7.2Ties to core umbrella organizations, by mode of coordination
7.3Predictors of centrality scores (in-degree; zero-inflated Poisson regression)
8.1Civic associations’ relations to institutional actors (politicians and civil servants)
8.2Poisson predictors of amount of ties to politicians and civil servants (range 0–6; B coefficients)
8.3Ties to council departments and involvement in public-private partnerships
8.4Relations to council departments and involvement in partnerships by structural position within civic networks
8.5Poisson predictors of ties to city council departments (range 0–6; B coefficients)
8.6Logistic coefficients predicting involvement in public-private partnerships
8.7Opinions on the situation of the civic sector in the United Kingdom
8.8Opinions about the overall situation of the voluntary sector and own group’s relations with institutions
8.9OLS predictors of support for partnerships and professionalization (range 0–6; B coefficients)
8.10OLS predictors of concern about fall in participation (range 0–6; B coefficients)
8.11Explanatory factors of different measures of representation
Figures
4.3Structural equivalence: The ego-network of CND Glasgow in 2001
6.1Glasgow, relations between all events (events connected by at least thirteen organizations)
6.2Glasgow, relations between all events (events connected by at least eight organizations)
6.3Public events in Glasgow before 1996 (events connected by at least seven organizations)
6.4Public events in Glasgow in the late 1990s (events connected by at least eight organizations)
6.5Public events in Glasgow in the early 2000s (events connected by at least twelve organizations)
6.6Bristol, relations between all events (events connected by at least eleven organizations)
6.7Bristol, relations between all events (events connected by at least six organizations)
6.8Bristol, relations between events before 1996 (events connected by at least twelve organizations)
6.9Bristol, relations between events in the late 1990s (events connected by at least ten organizations)
6.10Bristol, relations between events, early 2000s (events connected by at least fourteen organizations)
6.12Glasgow, event-based network (fifty-five nodes connected by joint participation in at least four events)
6.13Glasgow, event-based network (thirty-three nodes connected by joint participation in at least six events)
