Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T01:33:59.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vote Expectations Versus Vote Intentions: Rival Forecasting Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Andreas E. Murr
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, UK
Mary Stegmaier*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, USA
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: stegmaierm@missouri.edu

Abstract

Are ordinary citizens better at predicting election results than conventional voter intention polls? The authors address this question by comparing eight forecasting models for British general elections: one based on voters' expectations of who will win and seven based on who voters themselves intend to vote for (including ‘uniform national swing model’ and ‘cube rule’ models). The data come from ComRes and Gallup polls as well as the Essex Continuous Monitoring Surveys, 1950–2017, yielding 449 months with both expectation and intention polls. The large sample size permits comparisons of the models' prediction accuracy not just in the months prior to the election, but in the years leading up to it. Vote expectation models outperform vote intention models in predicting both the winning party and parties' seat shares.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: Link

Murr et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Murr et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Murr et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 114.7 KB