Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:55:05.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Norman Empire and the Secular Clergy, 1066-1204

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

David S. Spear
David S. Spear*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several recent studies dealing with the English church during the Norman period add immeasurably to our understanding of the era, but nonetheless represent a lost opportunity to recreate the actual ecclesiastical milieu, an English church unsevered from its Norman counterpart. Institutional differences surely existed between the two churches, yet much is lost in treating them separately. Indeed, few historians would attempt to study the great eleventh and twelfth-century cathedrals and abbey churches in England detached from those in Normandy. It is therefore the purpose of this paper to examine the customs, ideas, and especially the individuals which the two churches shared.

A concerted effort to reexamine political institutions as they once functioned, rather than as a necessary condition for the states which they later became, has already begun. In 1976 John Le Patourel produced an impressive synthesis, The Norman Empire, and asserted that following the Norman Conquest, England and Normandy formed one dominion. It was united by a ruler who was at the same time King of the English and Duke of the Normans, and by a baronial class which had extensive holdings on both sides of the Channel. This supposedly came to an end in 1144 when Geoffrey of Anjou conquered Normandy. A recent review of the The Norman Empire, which like most reviews speaks of its sterling qualities, nevertheless points out that the sections dealing with the church are, “not given much space … (and) are probably the most derivative in the book.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Spring 1982 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A useful summary may be found in Kealey, Edward J., “Recent Writing about Anglo-Norman England,” British Studies Monitor 9 (1979), 3–22Google Scholar. An earlier version of this paper was read at the 6 April 1979 meeting of the Pacific Coast Conference on British Studies. The author would like to thank Professors C. Warren Hollister, Thomas K. Keefe, Joe W. Leedom, and William W. Wootten for their helpful comments.

2 Le Patourel, John, The Norman Empire, (Oxford, 1976)Google Scholar. See also on the same topic, Hollister, C. Warren, “Normandy, France and the Anglo-Norman Regnum,” Speculum 51 (1976), 202–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Barlow, Frank, “Review of The Norman Empire,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 29 (1978), 101–02CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Brett, Martin, The English Church under Henry I, (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar.

5 Brett, , The English Church, p. 10Google Scholar.

6 In 1140 King Stephen offered the archbishopric of York to his son Henry Abbot of Fécamp, but the pope refused to let Henry hold in plurality. See Poole, R. L., “The Appointment and Deprivation of St. William, Archbishop of York” English Historical Review 45 (1930), 276Google Scholar. On Theobald's election see Le Neve, John, Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae, 1066-1300, (Monastic Cathedrals), ed. Greenway, D. (London, 1971), 2, p. 4Google Scholar (hereafter Fasti, 2). On Philip of Harcourt see Gleason, Sarell E., An Ecclesiastical Barony of the Middle Ages: The Bishopric of Bayeux, 1066-1204, (Cambridge, Mass., 1936), pp. 26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar. All episcopal tenures are based on Powicke, F. M. and Fryde, E. B., eds., Handbook of British Chronology, 2nd. ed., (London, 1961)Google Scholar, and with some modifications on Gams, B., Series Episcoporum Ecclesiae Catholicae, (Ratisbone, 1873)Google Scholar.

7 Gleason, , Bayeux, p. 27Google Scholar.

8 Barlow, Frank, The English Church, 1066-1154, (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

9 Barlow, 1066-1154, p. 78.

10 Fourteen of forty-one bishops. The information is derived from Crosby, Everett U., “The Organization of the English Episcopate under Henry I,” Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History 4 (1967)Google Scholar, Appendix III.

11 Ibid., pp. 73-74.

12 Seven of nineteen bishops. The information is derived from Spear, David S., “The Norman Episcopate under Henry I, King of England and Duke of Normandy (1106-1135),” (Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1982)Google Scholar, Appendix I.

13 For Geoffrey, see Johnson, Charles and Cronne, H. A., (eds.) Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, 1066-1154, (Oxford, 1956), 2Google Scholar, nos. 1091, 1244, 1474 (hereafter Regesta, 2). For Hugh see Ibid., nos. 1721, 1736, 1830.

14 For Richard Bishop of Bayeux (1135-1142) in England see Cronne, H. A. and Davis, R.H.C. (eds.) Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, 1066-1154, (Oxford, 1968) 3Google Scholar, no. 681. For Richard Bishop of Avranches (1135-1142) see Ibid., no. 46.

15 Foreville, Raymonde, “The Synod of the Province of Rouen in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries,” Church and Government in the Middle Ages. Essays Presented to C.R. Cheney on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Brooke, C. N. L., et al., (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 34–35Google Scholar.

16 Chibnall, Marjorie (ed. and tr.) The Ecclesiastical History ofOrderic Vitalis, (Oxford, 1969–1981)Google Scholar, (hereafter, Orderic), 6:202, n. 1; and Regesta,2, nos. 1182-83.

17 Regesta, 2, no. 1908.

18 Thus, for example, the long and intimate relationship between Gundulf and Lanfranc probably assured the subordination of the see of Rochester to Canterbury. Smith, R. A. L., “The Place of Gundulf in the Anglo-Norman Church,” Collected Papers, ed. Knowles, David (London, 1947), pp. 88–89Google Scholar.

19 Patourel, Le, The Norman Empire, pp. 335–39Google Scholar. Crosby, , “The English Episcopate,” pp. 18–24Google Scholar, who like Brett focuses exclusively on Henry I's English church.

20 On the Bohun family see Knowles, David, The Episcopal Colleagues of Thomas Becket, (Cambridge, 1951), pp. 17–22Google Scholar, and Appendix II.

21 Nicholae nepote episcopi is among the attestors in Round, J. H., Calendar of Documents Preserved in France, (London, 1899)Google Scholar (hereafter, CDF), no. 964.

22 On Robinson, Richard see Robinson, J. A. “Early Somerset Archdeacons,” Somerset Historical Essays, (London, 1921), pp. 87–88Google Scholar. For Savaric see CDF, nos. 911, 964, 1217. Cf. Jones, W.H. Rich (ed.) Register of St. Osmund, (Rolls Series, 1883–1884), 1:268Google Scholar.

23 An uncatalogued grant of Mathilda of Bohun. Archives Départementales de la Seine-Maritime 20 H (carton 5). The appearance of Walter the Precentor dates the document to 1189 x 1202.

24 For Roger see Fasti, 2:99–100Google Scholar. For Richard, see Gleason, , Bayeaux, pp. 24–25Google Scholar.

25 On Walchelin see Fasti, 2:85Google Scholar, and the Dictionary of National Biography (hereafter DNB), s.v. Walkelin. On Simeon see Fasti, 2:88Google Scholar, and Knowles, Davidet al. (eds.) The Heads of Religious Houses in England and Wales, 940-1216, (Cambridge, 1972), p. 45Google Scholar. On Gerard see Galbraith, V. H., “Girard the Chancellor,” English Historical Review 46 (1931), 77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Robert of Torigny in Chronicles of the Reigns of Stephen, Henry II and Richard I, ed. Howlett, R. (Rolls Series, 1884), 4:81Google Scholar, on Gerard's Precentorship.

26 On Ranulf, see Southern, R. W., “Ranulf Flambard and Early Anglo-Norman Administration,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 4th ser. 16 (1933), 95–128Google Scholar. Most of the information about Lisieux comes from Orderic, 5:320-22, and notes 3 and 4.

27 On Anger see Le Neve, John, Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae, (St. Paul's, London), ed., Greenway, D. (London, 1968), 1, p. 36Google Scholar (hereafter Fasti 1). On Ouen see Ibid., and Thurstan see Ibid., p. 43.

28 On Arnulf see Barlow, Frank (ed.) The Letters of Arnulf of Lisieux, (London, 1939), introduction, pp. i–lxGoogle Scholar. On Hugh see the DNB.

29 Fasti, 2:67Google Scholar.

30 Foreville, Raymonde and Leclercq, Jean, “Un Débat sur le sacerdoce des moines au Xlle siècle,” Analecta Monastica 4th ser. (Rome, 1957), p. 21Google Scholar and n. 59.

31 Hollister, C. Warren, “Review of R. H. C. Davis, The Normans and Their Myth,” Speculum 53 (1978), 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Patourel, Le, The Norman Empire, p. 50Google Scholar.

33 On Nigel see Fasti, 2:45Google Scholar. He also held a prebend at London, Fasti 1:41Google Scholar. See also Kealey, Edward J., Roger of Salisbury, Viceroy of England (Berkeley, 1972), p. 49Google Scholar.

34 Bethell, Denis, “William of Corbeil and the Canterbury-York Dispute,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 19 (1968), 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Gallia Christiana, 11:41Google Scholar.

36 On Froger see Millor, W. J. and Butler, H. E. (eds.) The Letters of John of Salisbury, (Oxford, 1979), 2, p. 110Google Scholar, n. On Clay, Henry see Gleason, , Bayeux, p. 32Google Scholar. On Roger see Fasti, 2:4Google Scholar. On Waleran see Ibid., p. 76. On Hugh see the DNB. On William, see Fasti, 2:45Google Scholar. On Walter see the DNB. On Gilbert, see Fasti, 2:76Google Scholar. On Ralph and Geoffrey see Clay, C. T., “The Early Treasurers of York,” Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 35 (1940), 20–25Google Scholar.

37 The year 1204 is a convenient terminus, but cf. Holt, J. C., “The End of the Anglo-Norman Realm,” Proceedings of the British Academy 61 (1975) 223–65Google Scholar, esp. 263-65, for arguments against using even that date.

38 On John, and Mauger, see Fasti, 2:100Google Scholar. On William, See Gallia Christiana, 11:483Google Scholar.

39 On the Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae project see Greenway, Diana E., “Cathedral Clergy in England and Wales: Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae,” Medieval Prosopography 1 (1980), 15–22Google Scholar. For Giffard, William see Fasti, 2:85Google Scholar; and F. Schmitt (ed.) Epistolae Anselmi, no. 274 on William's Rouen deanship.

40 This gap will be filled in part with several articles by the author on the Rouen cathedral personnel in the Annales de Normandie, forthcoming.

41 On Jeremy see Clay, C. T., “Notes on the Early Archdeacons in the Church of York,” Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 36 (1945), 412–15Google Scholar. On Henry see Fasti, 2:14Google Scholar. On John and William of Verdun see Ibid., pp. 106 and 108. On Peter see Robinson, J. A., “Peter of Blois,” Somerset Historical Essays, pp. 100–40Google Scholar, esp. 129 and 136. On Ralph see Le Neve, John, Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae, 1066-1300, (Lincoln), ed. Greenway, D., (London, 1977), 3, p. 136Google Scholar (hereafter Fasti, 3 and Rouen MS Y44 (1193), no. 95, fols. 72-73. On Richard see Fasti, 3:137Google Scholar and Archives Nationales S-2106, confirmation of Archbishop Walter for St. Victor, Paris. On William of Coutances see Fasti, 3:148Google Scholar, where he is listed as the son of Reinfrei, Roger, and the Obituary, Rouen,Recueil des historiens des Gaules et de la France, vol. 23, p. 359Google Scholar, s.v. February 11, and note 15. On Richer, see Fasti 1:57Google Scholar.

42 For Walter of Coutances see the DNB; Delisle, Léopold and Berger, Elie, Recueil des actes de Henri II roi d'Angleterre, etc., introductory volume (Paris, 1909), pp. 106–13Google Scholar; Fasti, 3:2, 25, and 74Google Scholar.

43 For John at Lincoln see Fasti, 3:36Google Scholar; for William see Fasti, 3:148Google Scholar. John was dean at Rouen from 1190 to 1196 (CDF, no. 57). For William as archdeacon see Rouen MS Y44 (1193), no. 78, fol. 66, among others. For Richard as archdeacon see Archives Départementales de la Seine-Maritime G-4243, confirmation of Archbishop Walter to the church of Rouen. Ralph's earliest dated appearance at Rouen is found in Vernier, J. J., Chartes de l'abbaye de Jumièges, (Paris, 1916)Google Scholar, no. CLV. For Ralph as Rouen canon see de Glanville, L. , Histoire du prieuré de Saint-Lô de Rouen, volume 2, (Rouen, 1891)Google Scholar, no. XXXIX. For Peter at Rouen see Rouen MS Y44 (1193), no. 69, fols. 62-63.

44 Fasti, 2:99Google Scholar.

45 Hugh the Chantor, The History of the Church of York, trans., Johnson, Charles, (New York, 1961), p. 2Google Scholar. Nicholl, Donald, Thurstan, Archbishop of York, (York, 1964), p. 6Google Scholar. Nicholl writes, “the clerics from Bayeux were the most powerful ecclesiastical influence in the city of York itself”, p. 7. Cf. CDF, no. 1410.

46 Fasti, 2:3, 4, 8, 13, 75Google Scholar. For Ernulf at Bec see William of Malmesbury, Gesta Pontificum, ed. Hamilton, N.E.S.A. (Rolls Series, 1870), p. 138Google Scholar.

47 Only Philip of Poitou Bishop of Durham (1195-1208) seems to have come from the non-Norman dominions of the Angevin Empire.

48 Gallia Christiana, 14:570–72Google Scholar.