Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T01:01:31.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lateralized deficit of response inhibition in early-onset schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2005

MARK A. BELLGROVE
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
CHRISTOPHER D. CHAMBERS
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
ALASDAIR VANCE
Affiliation:
Academic Child Psychiatry Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia
NICOLE HALL
Affiliation:
Academic Child Psychiatry Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia
MARY KARAMITSIOS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Australia
JOHN L. BRADSHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Australia

Abstract

Background. The ability to inhibit inappropriate or unwanted actions is a key element of executive control. The existence of executive function deficits in schizophrenia is consistent with frontal lobe theories of the disorder. Relatively few studies have examined response inhibition in schizophrenia, and none in adolescent patients with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS).

Methods. Twenty-one adolescents with the onset of clinically impairing psychosis before 19 years of age and 16 matched controls performed a stop-signal task to assess response inhibition. The patients with EOS were categorized as paranoid (n=10) and undifferentiated subtypes (n=11). The undifferentiated group had higher levels of negative symptomatology. Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and go-signal reaction time (Go-RT) were analysed with respect to hand of response.

Results. The undifferentiated early-onset patients had significantly longer SSRTs, indicative of poor response inhibition, for the left hand compared to the paranoid early-onset patients and control participants. No differences existed for inhibitory control with the right hand. The three groups did not differ in Go-RT.

Conclusions. Our results indicate a specific lateralized impairment of response inhibition in patients with undifferentiated, but not paranoid, EOS. These findings are consistent with reports of immature frontostriatal networks in EOS and implicate areas such as the pre-motor cortex and supplementary motor area (SMA) that are thought to play a role in both voluntary initiation and inhibition of movement.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)