Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-11T00:46:27.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Change Across the Lifespan: Three Trajectory Types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Gillian Sankoff
Gillian Sankoff*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
2048 Rittenhouse Sq., Philadelphia, PA 19103 [gsankoff@comcast.net]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that an enhanced understanding of the dynamics of language change can be gained by uniting two perspectives whose intimate relationship has not previously been subject to linguists' attention: language change as a historical process, and language change as experienced by individual speakers. It makes the case that during language change in progress, there are three possible trajectory types that can be manifested across speakers' lifespans. I review one example of each, as analyzed in a longitudinal corpus of Québécois French. First, people may acquire patterns of variation reflecting the stage of the change at the time of childhood language acquisition and retain that pattern thereafter. Second, older speakers, continuing to receive input from the younger generations that form an increasingly large proportion of their speech community, may also change in that direction. Third, aging speakers may become more conservative, showing retrograde lifespan change in the face of community change in the opposite direction. In conclusion, I examine the likely etiology of each trajectory type and evaluate its consequences for language change.

Keywords

sociolinguisticschangevariationFrenchlifespan

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 197 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrahamsson, Niclas, and Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59. 249–306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elijah. 1978. A place on the corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen, and Lightfoot, David. 2002. The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, René. 1998. The development of the progressive in 19th century English: A quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change 10. 123-52. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394500001265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben; and Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, David. 2005. Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, ed. by Kroll, Judith F. and de Groot, Annette M. B., 109-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birdsong, David, and Vanhove, Jan. 2016. Age of second-language acquisition: Critical periods and social concerns. Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency, ed. by Nicoladis, Elena and Montanari, Simona, 163-81. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Blondeau, Hélène. 2001. Real-time changes in the paradigm of personal pronouns in Montreal French. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5. 453-74. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondeau, Hélène. 2017. Longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics and SLA: Bridging two parallel routes. In Wagner & Buchstaller, 256-77.Google Scholar
Blondeau, Hélène, Sankoff, Gillian; and Charity, Anne. 2003. Parcours individuels dans deux changements linguistiques en cours en français montréalais. Revue québécoise de linguistique 31. 13–38. DOI: 10.7202/006843ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44. 199–229. DOI: 10.1177/0075424216639645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2017. Introduction: Using panel data in the sociolinguistic study of variation and change. In Wagner & Buchstaller, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. 1988. The spread of language change: Verifying inferences of linguistic diffusion. Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications and case studies, ed. by Lowenberg, Peter H., 45–60. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clermont, Jean, and Cedergren, Henrietta J.. 1979. Les ‘R’ de ma mère sont perdus dans l'air. Le français parlé: Études sociolinguistiques, ed. by Thibault, Pierrette, 13–28. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86. 85–97. DOI: 10.1215/00031283-1277528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirkanian, Louisette, and Sankoff, David. 1985. Le futur simple et le futur périphrastique. Les tendances dynamiques du francais parlé à Montréal, ed. by Lemieux, Monique and Cedergren, Henrietta, 189–204. Québec: Office de la langue française, Gouvernement du Québec.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Frans, and Barner-Rasmussen, Michael. 2011. The logic of comparability: On genres and phonetic variation in a project on language change in real time. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7. 7–36. DOI: 10.1515/cllt.2011.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans, Maegaard, Marie; and Pharao, Nicolai. 2009. The long and short of (æ)-variation in Danish—A panel study of short (æ)-variants in Danish in real time. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 64–82. DOI: 10.1080/03740460903364086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. Rick. 2010. A real-time study of future temporal reference in spoken Ontarian French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2). 83–92. Online: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol16/iss2/11.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne; and Watson, Catherine. 2000. Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30. 63–78. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100300006666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Stability and change along a dialect boundary: The low vowels of southeastern New England. (Publications of the American Dialect Society 95.) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
King, Ruth, and Nadasdi, Terry. 2003. Back to the future in Acadian French. Journal of French Language Studies 13. 323-37. DOI: 10.1017/S0959269503001157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans, Hanley, Miles L., Bloch, Bernard, Lowman, Guy S. Jr.; and Hansen, Marcus L.. 1941. Linguistic atlas of New England. Providence, RI: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972 [1963]. The social motivation of a sound change. Sociolinguistic patterns, 1–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Revision of original article published in Word 19. 273–309, 1963.].Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1975. On the use of the present to explain the past. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, vol. 2, ed. by Heilmann, Luigi, 825-51. Bologna: Il Mulino. [Reprinted in Linguistics at the crossroads, ed. by A. Makkai et al., 226–61. Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter, 1977.].Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2006 [1966]. The social stratification of English in New York City. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1st edn., Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1966.].Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83. 344-87. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2007.0082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesage, René. 1991. Notes sur l'emploi du présent à valeur de futur dans les quotidiens Québécois. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliquée 10. 117-31.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Laurel, and Sankoff, Gillian. 2010. A quantitative analysis of diphthongization in Montreal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2). 92–100. Online: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/11.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie, Jensen, Torben Juel, Kristiansen, Tore; and Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2013. Diffusion of language change: Accommodation to a moving target. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17. 3–36. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 2001. The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. Trends in bilingual acquisition, ed. by Cenoz, Jasone and Genesee, Fred, 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 2002. Les premiers immigrants et la prononciation du français au Québec. Revue québécoise de linguistique 31. 39–78. DOI: 10.7202/006844ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond S. 2016. Le changement linguistique dans le parler de la minorité francophone de Welland (Ontario): De 1975 à 2015. Talk given at Glendon College, York University, April 19, 2016.Google Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre; and Barbu, Stéphanie. 2014. Sociolinguistic convergence and social interactions within a group of preschoolers: A longitudinal study. Language Variation and Change 26. 273–301. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394514000131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naro, Anthony Julius, and Marta, Maria Scherre, Pereira. 2013. Remodeling the age variable: Number concord in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 25. 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394512000269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14. 11–28. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, Iona, and Opie, Peter. 1959. The lore and language of schoolchildren. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Dion, Nathalie. 2009. Prescription vs. praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language 85. 557-87. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie, and Labov, William. 1995. Learning to talk Philadelphian: Acquisition of short a by preschool children. Language Variation and Change 7. 101-12. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394500000910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Nicholas S. 2012. Future temporal reference in hexagonal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2). 97–106. Online: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol18/iss2/12.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sankoff, Gillian, Laberge, Suzanne; and Topham, Marjorie Dawn. 1976. Méthodes d‘échantillonnage et utilisation de l'ordinateur dans l‘étude de la variation grammaticale. Cahier de linguistique 6. 85–125. DOI: 10.7202/800043ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A.; and Smith, Eric. 2005. Goldvarb X. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. Online: http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.html.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1980. The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2017. Before there were corpora: The evolution of the Montreal French project as a longitudinal study. In Wagner & Buchstaller, 21–52.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2019a. Transmission revisited. Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, ed. by Lightfoot, David and Havenhill, Jonathan, 155-65. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2019b. Individual and community change in real time. New directions for historical linguistics, ed. by Boas, Hans and Pierce, Marc. Leiden: Brill, to appear.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Blondeau, Hélène. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83. 560-88. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2007.0106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Blondeau, Hélène. 2013. Instability of the [r] ~ [R] alternation in Montreal French: An exploration of stylistic conditioning of a sound change in progress. Rhotics: New data and perspectives, ed. by Spreafico, Lorenzo and Vietti, Alessandro, 249-65. Bozen-Bolzano: Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Blondeau, Hélène; and Charity, Anne. 2001. Individual roles in a real-time change: Montreal (r→R) 1947–1995. 'R-atics: Sociolinguistic, phonetic and phonological characteristics of /r/ (Special issue of Etudes & Travaux 4), ed. by Van, Hans Velde, de and Hout, Roeland van, 141-58.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Thibault, Pierrette. 1977. L'alternance entre les auxiliaires avoir et être en français parlé à Montréal. Langue française 34. 81–108. DOI: 10.3406/lfr.1977.4818. [English translation published as Ch. 15 in Sankoff 1980, 311–45.].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Thibault, Pierrette; and Wagner, Suzanne. 2004. An apparent time paradox: Change in Montréal French auxiliary selection, 1971–1995. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 33, Ann Arbor, MI, October 2, 2004.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Vincent, Diane. 1977. L'emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Le français moderne 45. 243-56. [English translation published as Ch. 14 in Sankoff 1980, 295–310.].Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Wagner, Suzanne Evans; and Jensen, Laura. 2012. The long tail of language change: Québécois French futures in real time. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2). 106-16. Online: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol18/iss2/13.Google Scholar
Santerre, Laurent. 1978. Les /R/ montréalais en régression rapide. Protée 7. 117-30.Google Scholar
Silvestre de Sacy, Antoine-Isaac. 1799. Principes de grammaire générale, mis à la portée des enfans, et propres à servir d'introduction à l'étude de toutes les langues. Paris: A. A. Lottin.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76. 859-90. DOI: 10.2307/417202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85. 58–108. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Molfenter, Sonja. 2007. How'd you get that accent?: Acquiring a second dialect of the same language. Language in Society 36. 649-75. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404507070911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette, and Vincent, Diane. 1990. Un corpus de Français parlé. Montréal: Recherches Sociolinguistiques.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide 9. 33–49. DOI: 10.1075/eww.9.1.03tru.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke, and Wolfram, Walt. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14. 427-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaugelas, Claude-Favre. 1647. Remarques sur la langue francoise utile à ceux qui veulent bien parler et bien éscrire. Paris: A. Courbe.Google Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul. 1950. Bout de la langue ou fond de la gorge? French Review 23. 489-98. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/382662.Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane, Laforest, Marty; and Martel, Guylaine. 1995. Le corpus de Montréal 1995: Adaptation de la méthode d'enquête sociolinguistique pour l'analyse conversationnelle. Dialangue 6. 29–46. Online: http://linglang.uqac.ca/dialangue/volume06/6_29_vincent_al.pdf.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2008. Linguistic change and stabilization in the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, and Buchstaller, Isabelle (eds.) 2017. Panel studies of language variation and change. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, and Sankoff, Gillian. 2011. Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future. Language Variation and Change 23. 275–313. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394511000111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William; and Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Directions for historical linguistics, ed. by Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Werker, Janet F., and Tees, Richard C.. 2005. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46. 233-51. DOI: 10.1002/dev.20060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Charles. 2009. Population structure and language change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, ms. Online: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~ycharles/pop-merger.pdf.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilles, Ana Maria S. 2005. The development of a new pronoun: The linguistic and social embedding of a gente in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 17. 19–53. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394505050027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar