Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-f6s65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T03:58:36.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel Deletion as Grammatically Controlled Gestural Overlap in Uspanteko

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Ryan Bennett*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Robert Henderson*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Meg Harvey*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
*
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)

Abstract

Uspanteko is an endangered Mayan language spoken in Guatemala. Unstressed vowels in Uspanteko often delete, though deletion is variable within and across speakers. Deletion appears to be phonological: it is sensitive to foot structure, morphology, and certain phonotactics, and it occurs in slow, careful speech. But deletion also has characteristics more typical of a phonetic process: it is intertwined with a pattern of gradient vowel reduction and is insensitive to most phonotactics. Electroglottography data shows that even ‘deleted’ vowels may contribute voicing to intervals when flanked by voiceless consonants. This suggests that ‘deleted’ vowels are represented in the input to speech production, even when they are acoustically masked by articulatory overlap with adjacent segments. We conclude that vowel deletion is grammatically controlled gestural overlap, consistent with the claim that phonological representations encode information about the relative timing and coordination of articulatory gestures (e.g. Browman & Goldstein 1986, Gafos 2002). At a minimum, language-specific phonetic processes must have access to more fine-grained, abstract grammatical information than is usually assumed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Bennett et al. supplementary material

Bennett et al. supplementary material
Download Bennett et al. supplementary material(File)
File 59 MB