Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T00:21:12.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejecting nativeness to produce a more accurate and just Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Anne Birkeland ,
Adeli Block ,
Justin T. Craft ,
Yourdanis Sedarous ,
Sky Wang ,
Alexis Wu  and
Savithry Namboodiripad
Anne Birkeland*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Adeli Block*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Justin T. Craft*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Yourdanis Sedarous*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Sky Wang*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Alexis Wu*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Savithry Namboodiripad*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
*
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
[annebirk@umich.edu] (Birkeland), [avblock@umich.edu] (Block), [juscraft@umich.edu] (Craft), [sedarous@umich.edu] (Sedarous), [skywang@cs.columbia.edu] (Wang), [wugou@umich.edu] (Wu), [savithry@umich.edu] (Namboodiripad, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

native speakerstudy of linguisticsinclusion in linguisticslinguistic theorylinguistic anthropologygenerative syntax

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Language , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , September 2024 , pp. e156 - e194
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This article originated from a Fall 2020 seminar ‘Problematizing the native speaker in linguistic research’ at the University of Michigan. We benefited from discussions with Carrie Ann Morgan, Lauretta Cheng, Danielle Burgess, Natasha Vernooij, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, Ashley McDermott, Keri Zhang, Olivia Sedlacek, Felicia Bisnath, Barbra Meek, Anna Babel, Ethan Kutlu, Judith Irvine, and members of the ROLE Collective. The authors would like to thank Calle Borstell, Lina Hou, Ryan Lepic, and Michael Lipkin for comments on previous drafts. We are deeply grateful to our two anonymous referees and editors Lauren Hall-Lew and John Beavers for their constructive and thorough engagement with our work, as well as Mary Bucholtz for her exceptionally generous feedback.

References

Abo-Zena, Mona M., Jones, Keith; and Mattis, Jacqueline. 2022. Dismantling the master's house: Decolonizing ‘rigor’ in psychological scholarship. Journal of Social Issues 78(2). 298–319. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2006. Real descriptions: Reflections on native speaker and non-native speaker descriptions of a language. Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, ed. by Ameka, Felix K., Dench, Alan, and Evans, Nicholas, 69–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197693.69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, Pranav, Chung, Sandra; and Wagers, Matthew. 2011. Widening the net: Challenges for gathering linguistic data in the digital age. [Response to NSF SBE.] Online: https://people.ucsc.edu/~mwagers/papers/WideningtheNet.AnandChungWagers.pdf.Google Scholar
Aneja, Geeta A. 2016. Rethinking nativeness: Toward a dynamic paradigm of (non)native speakering. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 13(4). 351–79. DOI: 10.1080/15427587.2016.1185373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annamma, Subini Ancy, Connor, David; and Ferri, Beth. 2013. Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity and Education 16. 1–31. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2012.730511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anya, Uju. 2021. Critical race pedagogy for more effective and inclusive world language teaching. Applied Linguistics 42(6). 1055–69. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amab068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 2017. Darwinism tested by the science of language. On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, relations, analyses, ed. by Zanuttini, Raffaella, Horn, Laurence, and Bowern, Claire, 443–65. Berlin: Language Science. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.495459.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, Bill. 2001. Language and race. Social Identities 7(3). 311–28. DOI: 10.1080/13504630120087190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2007. The monolingual bias in bilingualism research, or: Why bilingual talk is (still) a challenge for linguistics. Bilingualism: A social approach, ed. by Heller, Monica, 319–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230596047_15.Google Scholar
Avineri, Netta, Johnson, Eric, Brice-Heath, Shirley, McCarty, Teresa, Ochs, Elinor, Kremer-Sadlik, Tamar, Blum, Susan, Zentella, Ana Celia, Rosa, Jonathan, Flores, Nelson, Alim, H. Samy; and Paris, Django. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the ‘language gap’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(1). 66–86. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backus, Ad. 1999. Mixed native languages: A challenge to the monolithic view of language. Topics in Language Disorders 19(4). 11–22. Online: https://journals.lww.com/topicsinlanguagedisorders/abstract/1999/08000/mixed_native_languages__a_challenge_to_the.5.aspx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balari, Sergio, and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2015. Should it stay or should it go? A critical reflection on the critical period for language. Biolinguistics 9. 8–42. DOI: 10.5964/bioling.9027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse. 2019. Variation and competing I-languages in Creole genesis: A synchronic and diachronic view. Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, ed. by Lightfoot, David W. and Havenhill, Jonathan, 141–54. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse. 2020. Competition, selection, and the role of congruence in Creole genesis and development. Language 96(1). 160–99. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0005.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L.. 2003. Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Emily M., and Friedman, Batya. 2018. Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6. 587–604. DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Lauren, Pyers, Jennie, Lieberman, Amy; and Caselli, Naomi. 2024. Parent American Sign Language skills correlate with child—but not toddler—ASL vocabulary size. Language Acquisition 31(2). 85–99. DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2023.2178312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhambra, Gurminder K., Nişancıoğlu, Kerem; and Gebrial, Dalia. 2018. Introduction: Decolonising the university? Decolonising the university, ed. by Bhambra, Gurminder K., Nişancıoğlu, Kerem, and Gebrial, Dalia, 129–44. London: Pluto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2). 173–88. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00044149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 2009. Adam's tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Birdsong, David, and Gertken, Libby M.. 2013. In faint praise of folly: A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4(2). 107–33. DOI: 10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2008. The post-transformational enterprise: Review of Simpler syntax, by Peter W. Culicover and Ray Jackendoff. Journal of Linguistics 44(3). 723–42. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226708005379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1927. Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech 2(10). 432–39. DOI: 10.2307/451863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1928. Anthropology and modern life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Boltokova, Daria. 2017. ‘Will the real semi-speaker please stand up?‘ Language vitality, semi-speakers, and problems of enumeration in the Canadian North. Anthropologica 59(1). 12–27. DOI: 10.3138/anth.591.T03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2010. Mother tongues and nations: The invention of the native speaker. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert, and Müller, Stefan. 2019. HPSG and minimalism. Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook, ed. by Müller, Stefan, Abeillé, Anne, Borsley, Robert D., and Koenig, Jean-Pierre, 1007–79. Berlin: Language Science. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5543318.Google Scholar
Bousquette, Joshua, and Putnam, Michael T.. 2020. Redefining language death: Evidence from moribund grammars. Language Learning 70(S1). 188–225. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Ben. 2020. Ideologies of linguistic research on small sign languages in the Global South: A Caribbean perspective. Language & Communication 74. 182–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brea-Spahn, María Rosa, and Bauler, Clara Vaz. 2023. Where do you anchor your beliefs? An invitation to interrogate dominant ideologies of language and languaging in speech-language pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 54. 675–87. DOI: 10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekhus, Wayne H. 1998. A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory 16(1). 34–51. DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekhus, Wayne H. 2023. Marked and unmarked: A semiotic distinction for concept-driven interpretive sociology. Interpretive sociology and the semiotic imagination, ed. by Cossu, Andrea and Fontdevila, Jorge, 31–51. Bristol: Bristol University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brøcker, Karen, Drożdżowicz, Anna; and Schindler, Samuel. 2020. Introduction. Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, ed. by Schindler, Samuel, Drożdżowicz, Anna, and Brøcker, Karen, 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Bianca, Tusmagambet, Botagoz, Rahming, Valentino, Tu, Chun-Ying, DeSalvo;, Michael B. and Wiener, Seth. 2023. Searching for the ‘native’ speaker: A preregistered conceptual replication and extension of Reid, Trofimovich, and O'Brien (2019). Applied Psycholinguistics 44(4). 475–94. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716423000127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2003. Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3). 398–416. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Hall, Kira. 2010. Locating identity in language. Language and identities, ed. by Watt, Dominic and Llamas, Carmen, 166–78. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Lopez, Qiuana. 2011. Performing blackness, forming whiteness: Linguistic minstrelsy in Hollywood films. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(5). 680–706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00513.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Brigitta, and Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2021. Indexical borders: The sociolinguistic scales of the shibboleth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 272. 127–52. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2020-0095.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Kendra, Charity Hudley, Anne H., Bucholtz, Mary, Exford, Jazmine; and Johnson, Brittney. 2021. Attracting Black students to linguistics through a Black-centered Introduction to Linguistics course. Language 97(1). e12–e38. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2021.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 1999. Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 2023. Adecolonial crip linguistics. Applied Linguistics 44(1). 1–21. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amac042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, Sofía, Wodniecka, Zofia; and Timmer, Kalinka. 2022. Am I truly monolingual? Exploring foreign language experiences in monolinguals. PLoS ONE 17:e0265563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cépeda, Paola, Kotek, Hadas, Pabst, Katharina; and Syrett, Kristen. 2021. Gender bias in linguistics textbooks: Has anything changed since Macaulay & Brice 1997? Language 97(4). 678–702. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2021.0061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K., and Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandras, Jessica. 2023. (Out) Caste language ideologies: Intersectional raciolinguistic stigma and assimilation from denotified tribal students' perspectives in rural India. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 33(2). 161–83. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., and Flores, Nelson. 2022. Social justice in applied linguistics: Not a conclusion, but a way forward. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 42. 144–54. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190522000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., and Mallinson, Christine. 2018. Dismantling ‘the master's tools’: Moving students' rights to their own language from theory to practice. American Speech 93(3–4). 513–37. DOI: 10.1215/00031283-7271305.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary. 2020. Toward racial justice in linguistics: Interdisciplinary insights into theorizing race in the discipline and diversifying the profession. Language 96(4). e200–e235. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary (eds.) 2024a. Decolonizing linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary (eds.) 2024b. Inclusion in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755303.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lauretta S. P., Burgess, Danielle, Vernooij, Natasha, Solís-Barroso, Cecilia, McDermott;, Ashley and Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2021. The problematic concept of native speaker in psycholinguistics: Replacing vague and harmful terminology with inclusive and accurate measures. Frontiers in Psychology 12:715843. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, Lauretta S. P., Kramer, Mathew A., Upreti, Ria; and Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2022. Moving past indirect proxies for language experience: ‘Native speaker’ and residential history are poor predictors of language behavior. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 44. 1682–89. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1p59b35f.Google Scholar
Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé, Williams Crenshaw; and McCall, Leslie. 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4). 785–810. DOI: 10.1086/669608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Explanatory models in linguistics. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 44. 528–50. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70617-2.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. 2014. Not like a native speaker: On languaging as a postcolonial experience. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cikara, Mina, Martinez, Joel E.; and Lewis, Neil A. Jr. 2022. Moving beyond social categories by incorporating context in social psychological theory. Nature Reviews Psychology 1. 537–49. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-022-00079-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Kathryn B. H., and Davis, Jenny L.. 2019. Soylent is people, and WEIRD is white: Biological anthropology, whiteness, and the limits of the WEIRD. Annual Review of Anthropology 48. 169–86. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemons, Aris Moreno. 2024. Apolitical linguistics doesn't exist, and it shouldn't. In Charity Hudley et al. 2024a, 101–19. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.003.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemons, Aris Moreno, and Grieser, Jessica A.. 2023. Black womanhood: Raciolinguistic intersections of gender, sexuality & social status in the aftermaths of colonization. Dædalus 152(3). 115–29. DOI: 10.1162/daed_a_02021.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 2016. Where is the native speaker now? TESOL Quarterly 50(1). 186–89. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, Brendan, Fernández, Javier; and Landa, Alazne. 2006. The non-(existent) native signer: Sign language research in a small deaf population. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) 9, ed. by de Quadros, Ronice Müller, 77–94. Petrópolis: Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. Introduction: The concept of native speaker. A festschrift for native speaker, ed. by Coulmas, Florian, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110822878-002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W., and Jackendoff, Ray. 2006. Turn over control to the semantics! Syntax 9(2). 131–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, Alexandra, and Bender, Emily M.. 2023. Ethics in linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics 9. 49–69. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette. 2019. Complicating categories: Personae mediate racialized expectations of non-native speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(4). 346–66. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette. 2020. Personae in sociolinguistic variation. WIREs Cognitive Science 11(6):e1543. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3). 219–53. DOI: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Rick, and Lupyan, Gary. 2012. Understanding the origins of morphological diversity: The linguistic niche hypothesis. Advances in Complex Systems 15:1150017. DOI: 10.1142/S0219525911500172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Alan. 2004. The native speaker in applied linguistics. The handbook of applied linguistics, ed. by Davies, Alan and Elder, Catherine, 431–50. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2017. Resisting rhetorics of language endangerment: Reclamation through Indigenous language survivance. Language Documentation and Description 14. 37–58. DOI: 10.25894/ldd147.Google Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2018. Talking Indian: Identity and language revitalization in the Chickasaw renaissance. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists' most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34(4). 533–91. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404505050207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc, Bak, Thomas H.; and Ortega, Lourdes. 2021. Why the mythical ‘native speaker’ has mud on its face. In Slavkov et al., 24–45. DOI: 10.1515/9781501512353-002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockum, Rikker, and Green, Caitlin M.. 2024. Toward a big tent linguistics: Inclusion and the myth of the lone genius. In Charity Hudley et al. 2024b, 95–125. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755303.003.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerr, Neriko. 2009. The native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110220957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Laura, Hicks, Glyn; and Slabakova, Roumyana. 2019. Terminology choice in generative acquisition research: The case of ‘incomplete acquisition’ in heritage language grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(2). 241–55. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263119000160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1977. The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. Linguistics 15. 23–32. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1977.15.191.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley-Marling, Curt, and Lucas, Krista. 2009. Pathologizing the language and culture of poor children. Language Arts 86(5). 362–70. DOI: 10.58680/la20097099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1). 25–42. DOI: 10.1177/13670069080120010301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellard, Donna Beth. 2019. Anglo-Saxon(ist) pasts, postSaxon futures. Brooklyn, NY: punctum books. Online: http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/37331.Google Scholar
Ellcessor, Elizabeth. 2015. Is there a sign for that? Media, American Sign Language interpretation, and the paradox of visibility. Perspectives 23(4). 586–98. DOI: 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1056814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faez, Farahnaz. 2011. Are you a native speaker of English? Moving beyond a simplistic dichotomy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 8(4). 378–99. DOI: 10.1080/15427587.2011.615708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A., and Gumperz, John Joseph. 1960. Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social, and functional variation. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Sabine. 2012. The Esperanto denaskulo: The status of the native speaker of Esperanto within and beyond the planned language community. Language Problems and Language Planning 36. 69–84. DOI: 10.1075/lplp.36.1.04fie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Nelson, Phuong, Jennifer; and Venegas, Karla M.. 2020. ‘Technically an EL’: The production of raciolinguistic categories in a dual language school. TESOL Quarterly 54(3). 629–51. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Nelson, and Rosa, Jonathan. 2022. Undoing competence: Coloniality, homogeneity, and the overrepresentation of whiteness in applied linguistics. Language Learning 73(S2). 268–95. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12528.Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. 2017. Language in our brain: The origins of a uniquely human capacity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaby, Alice, and Woods, Lesley. 2020. Toward linguistic justice for Indigenous people: A response to Charity Hudley, Mallinson, and Bucholtz. Language 96(4). e268–e280. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2006. Linguistic anthropology. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., ed. by Brown, Keith, 171–85. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Irvine, Judith T.. 2019. Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108649209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geer, Leah Caitrin, and Zarchy, Razi M.. 2023. The importance of teaching Deaf Community Cultural Wealth in family-centered sign language curricula. Diffractions 7. 82–107. DOI: 10.34632/diffractions.2023.12002.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Recontextualizing grammar: Underlying trends in thirty years of cognitive linguistics. Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back, ed. by Tabakowska, Elżbieta, Michał, Choiński, and Wiraszka, Łukasz, 71–102. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110226096.1.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Hannah, Jerro, Kyle, Namboodiripad, Savithry; and Reidel, Kristina. 2024. Towards a decolonial syntax: Research, teaching, publishing. In Charity Hudley et al. 2024a, 219–43. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.003.0012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goico, Sara A., and Horton, Laura. 2023. Homesign: Contested issues. Annual Review of Linguistics 9. 377–98. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-060001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A., and Laks, Bernard. 2019. Battle in the mind fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammon, Devin, and Babel, Anna. 2021. What does ‘native speaker’ mean anyway? Language Log, May 29, 2021. Online: https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=51108.Google Scholar
Grammon, Devin, and Babel, Anna. 2024. Decentering the colonial native speaker. Language 100(3). 504–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Lisa J. 2010. Language and the African American child. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, John D. 2015. A conceptual history of psychology: Exploring the tangled web. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107414914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Edmonds, Amanda; and Metzger, Thomas. 2021. Moving beyond the native-speaker bias in the analysis of variable gender marking. Frontiers in Communication 6:723496. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.723496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie. 2012. The emergence of the English native speaker. Berlin: De GruyterMouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781614511052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Wyatte C., Levin, Leonard L.; and Anderson, Melissa L.. 2017. Language deprivation syndrome: A possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 52(6). 761–76. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1351-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haviland, John B. 2022. How and when to sign ‘Hey!‘: Socialization into grammar in Z, a 1st generation family sign language from Mexico. Languages 7(2):80. DOI: 10.3390/languages7020080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henner, Jon. 2024. How to train your abled linguist: A Crip linguistics perspective on pragmatic research. In Charity Hudley et al. 2024b, 21–36. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755303.003.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henner, Jon, and Robinson, Octavian. 2021. Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: Imaging a Crip linguistics. PsyArXiv preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7bzaw.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henner, Jon, and Robinson, Octavian. 2023. Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: A Crip linguistics manifesto. Journal of Critical Study of Communication & Disability 1(1). 7–37. DOI: 10.48516/jcscd_2023vol1iss1.4.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J.; and Norenzayan, Ara. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3). 61–83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, Arturo E., Bodet, Jean P. III, Gehm, Kevin; and Shen, Shutian. 2021. What does a critical period for second language acquisition mean?: Reflections on Hartshorne et al. (2018). Cognition 206:104478. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higby, Eve, Gámez, Evelyn; and Mendoza, Claudia Holguín. 2023. Challenging deficit frameworks in research on heritage language bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(4). 417–30. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716423000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2002. ‘Expert rhetorics’ in advocacy for endangered languages: Who is listening, and what do they hear? Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12(2). 119–33. DOI: 10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Joseph C. 2022. Overrepresentation of Whiteness is in sign language as well: A commentary on ‘Undoing competence: Coloniality, homogeneity, and the overrepresentation of whiteness in applied linguistics’. Language Learning 73(S2). 312–16. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12540.Google Scholar
Hill, Joseph, Hou, Lynn, Lim, Anna, Harrison, Dominic; and Player, David. 2020. Race, racism, and racialization in sign language research and Deaf studies: Introduction for the panel. Paper presented at the High Desert Linguistics Society 14, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Hochgesang, Julie A., Lepic, Ryan; and Shaw, Emily. 2023. W(h)ither the ASL corpus?: Considering trends in signed corpus development. Advances in sign language corpus linguistics, ed. by Wehrmeyer, Ella, 287–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höder, Steffen. 2012. Multilingual constructions: A diasystematic approach to common structures. Multilingual constructions, multilingual societies, ed. by Braunmüller, Kurt and Gabriel, Christoph, 241–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hoff, Erika. 2018. Bilingual development in children of immigrant families. Child Development Perspectives 12(2). 80–86. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, Adrian. 2006. Native-speakerism. English Language Teaching Journal 60(4). 385–87. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccl030.Google Scholar
Horsman, Reginald. 1976. Origins of racial Anglo-Saxonism in Great Britain before 1850. Journal of the History of Ideas 37(3). 387–410. DOI: 10.2307/2708805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Lynn. 2017. Negotiating language practices and language ideologies in fieldwork: A reflexive & meta-documentation. Innovations in Deaf studies: The role of Deaf scholars, ed. by Kusters, Annelies, De Meulder, Maartje, and O'Brien, Dai, 339–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hou, Lynn, and de Vos, Connie. 2022. Classifications and typologies: Labeling sign languages and signing communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26(1). 118–25. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Lynn, Lepic, Ryan; and Wilkinson, Erin. 2020. Working with ASL internet data. Sign Language Studies 21(1). 32–67. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2020.0028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Tom, Kushalnagar, Poorna, Mathur, Gaurav, Napoli, Donna Jo, Padden, Carol, Rathmann, Christian; and Smith, Scott R.. 2012. Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal 9:16. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Christopher. 2012. Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Naoko, and Anderson, Vivienne. 2023. Encountering and contesting native-speakerism in Japanese universities. Higher Education Research & Development 42(6). 1438–52. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2128073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, Georgette, Boustagui, Elizabeth, Tigi, Manal El; and Moselle, Martha. 1994. Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(1). 73–98. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100012596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1989. When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16. 248–67. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs-Huey, Lanita. 2002. The natives are gazing and talking back: Reviewing the problematics of positionality, voice, and accountability among ‘native’ anthropologists. American Anthropologist 104(3). 791–804. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1926. Growth and structure of the English language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 173–281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kauhanen, Henri, Einhaus, Sarah; and Walkden, George. 2023. Language structure is influenced by the proportion of non-native speakers: A reply to Koplenig (2019). Journal of Language Evolution 8(1). 90–101. DOI: 10.1093/jole/lzad005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemaloglu-Er, Elif, and Lowe, Robert J.. 2023. Language teacher identity, world Englishes, and ELF: A duoethnography between a ‘native speaker’ teacher and a ‘non-native speaker’ teacher. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22(5). 478–91. DOI: 10.1080/15348458.2022.2141244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, Ajna F., Alvarez, Joseph, Afraymovich, Maya; and Sullivan, Jessica. 2021. The role of accent and speaker certainty in children's selective trust. Cognitive Development 60:101114. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, Evan, Donnelly, Seamus; and Christiansen, Morten H.. 2018. Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(2). 154–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, Evan, and Garcia, Rowena. 2022. How diverse is child language acquisition research? First Language 42(6). 703–35. DOI: 10.1177/01427237211066405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2013. Constructing identity. The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn., ed. by Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie, 448–68. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118335598.ch21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killmister, Suzy. 2011. Group-differentiated rights and the problem of membership. Social Theory and Practice 37(2). 227–55. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23558542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Sharese. 2021. Rethinking race and place: The role of persona in sound change reversal. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25(2). 159–78. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander. 2019. Language structure is influenced by the number of speakers but seemingly not by the proportion of non-native speakers. Royal Society Open Science 6:181274. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova, Elena, and Pichler, Deborah Chen. 2021. Cripping the ‘delay’: Multilingualism-related consequences of re-labeling language deprivation systems. Frontiers in Communication 6:751457. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.751457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalik, Richard. 2023. Towards a grammar of spoken South Saami. Stockholm: Stockholm University dissertation. Online: https://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1731023.Google Scholar
Kroll, Judith F., Chan, Ariel, Cheng, Andrew; and Scontras, Gregory. 2023. How to frame bilingualism in context: Putting people and places in mind. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26(1). 17–19. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728922000074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2018. On recognizing persistence in the Indigenous language ideologies of multilingualism in two Native American communities. Language & Communication 62(B). 133–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, Ryuko. 2020. Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 41(5). 712–32. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amz033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Annelies. 2021. Introduction: The semiotic repertoire: Assemblages and evaluation of resources. International Journal of Multilingualism 18(2). 183–89. DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2021.1898616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Annelies, and Hou, Lynn. 2020. Linguistic ethnography and sign language studies. Sign Language Studies 20. 561–71. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2020.0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Annelies, De Meulder, Maartje; and O'Brien, Dai. 2017. Innovations in Deaf studies: Critically mapping the field. Innovations in Deaf studies: The role of Deaf scholars, ed. by Kusters, Annelies, De Meulder, Maartje, and O'Brien, Dai, 1–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kusters, Annelies, Spotti, Massimiliano, Swanwick, Ruth; and Tapio, Elina. 2017. Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism 14(3). 219–32. DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutlu, Ethan. 2020. Now you see me, now you mishear me: Raciolinguistic accounts of speech perception in different English varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 44. 511–25. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1835929.Google Scholar
Kutlu, Ethan, Chiu, Samantha; and McMurray, Bob. 2022. Moving away from deficiency models: Gradiency in bilingual speech categorization. Frontiers in Psychology 13:1033825. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1033825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutlu, Ethan, and Hayes-Harb, Rachel. 2023. Towards a just and equitable applied psycholinguistics. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(3). 293–300. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716423000280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–87. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2007.0082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2012. The emancipation of the language learner. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3. 297–309. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, and Lohndal, Terje. 2013. Brief overview of the history of generative syntax. The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, ed. by Dikken, Marcel den, 26–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804571.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leivada, Evelina, Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso, Carmen Parafita Couto, M.; and Perpiñán, Sílvia. 2023. Bilingualism with minority languages: Why searching for unicorn language users does not move us forward. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(3). 384–99. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716423000036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language’. Language Documentation and Description 14. 15–36. DOI: 10.25894/ldd146.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2021. Toward an anti-racist linguistic anthropology: An Indigenous response to white supremacy. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31(2). 218–37. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2023. Refusing ‘endangered languages’ narratives. Daedalus 152(3). 69–83. DOI: 10.1162/daed_a_02018.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane C., Gale, Elaine; and Pichler, Deborah Chen. 2023. Family ASL: An early start to equitable education for deaf children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 43(2). 156–66. DOI: 10.1177/02711214211031307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2006. Native Esperanto as a test case for natural language. SKY Journal of Linguistics 19. 47–55. Online: https://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2006_1/1FK60.1.5.LINDSTEDT.pdf.Google Scholar
Llurda, Enric. 2019. On speakers and users: A rejoinder to ‘Theorizing the speaker and speakerness in applied linguistics’. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 16(2). 246–51. DOI: 10.1558/jalpp.21091.Google Scholar
Long, Jeffrey C. 2004. Human genetic variation: The mechanisms and results of microevolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago, November 21. Online: https://understandingrace.org/pdf/myth_reality/long.pdf.Google Scholar
López-Beltrán, Priscila, and Carlson, Matthew T.. 2020. How usage-based approaches to language can contribute to a unified theory of heritage grammars. Linguistics Vanguard 6(1):20190072. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2019-0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Nigel, and Ansaldo, Umberto. 2010. The native speaker and the mother tongue. Language Sciences 32(6). 589–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Robert J., and Pinner, Richard. 2016. Finding the connections between native-speakerism and authenticity. Applied Linguistics Review 7(1). 27–52. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2016-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Christopher. 2012. Contact-induced grammatical change: Towards an explicit account. Diachronica 29. 275–300. DOI: 10.1075/dia.29.3.01luc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, Gigi. 2023. Justice and equity for whom? Reframing research on the ‘bilingual (dis)advantage’. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(3). 301–15. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716422000339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Molly. 1997. The monolingual native speaker: Not a norm, but still a necessity. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27(2). 113–46. Online: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/11629.Google Scholar
Maher, John C. 2001. The unbearable lightness of being a native speaker. Experimenting with uncertainty: Studies in honour of Alan Davies, ed. by Elder, Catherine, Brown, Annie, Grove, Elisabeth, Hill, Kathryn, Iwashita, Noriko, Lumley, Tom, McNamara, Tim, and O'Loughlin, Kieran, 292–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, George Perkins. 1859. An apology for the study of English. New York: Wynkoop, Hallenbeck & Thomas.Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav, and Rathmann, Christian. 2009. Variability in verbal agreement forms across four signed languages. Laboratory phonology 8, ed. by Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Doug H., and Best, Catherine T., 287–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197211.1.287.Google Scholar
Matthes, Erich Hatala. 2016. Cultural appropriation without cultural essentialism? Social Theory and Practice 42(2). 343–66. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24871347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthes, Erich Hatala. 2019. Cultural appropriation and oppression. Philosophical Studies 176(4). 1003–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1224-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter Hugoe. 1993. Grammatical theory in the United States: From Bloomfield to Chomsky. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I., and Kluender, Robert. 2018. Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(5). 886–905. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728917000724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElvenny, James. 2021. Language complexity in historical perspective: The enduring tropes of natural growth and abnormal contact. Frontiers in Communication 6:621712. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.621712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Janet. 2005. Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili. Journal of Pragmatics 37(12). 1919–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Tim. 2005. 21st century shibboleth: Language tests, identity and intergroup conflict. Language Policy 4(4). 351–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10993-005-2886-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Tim. 2012. Language assessments as shibboleths: A poststructuralist perspective. Applied Linguistics 33(5). 564–81. DOI: 10.1093/applin/ams052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2007. Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2022. Empiricism or imperialism: The science of Creole exceptionalism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 37(1). 189–203. DOI: 10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, Barbra A. 2011. We are our language: An ethnography of language revitalization in a northern Athabaskan community. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Meek, Barbra A. 2019. Language endangerment in childhood. Annual Review of Anthropology 48. 95–115. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2016. Sunt verba rerum: The pragmatic life of words. SpringerPlus 5:1653. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3269-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
miles-hercules, deandre. 2020. Scoping the scope: Revisiting the aims and paradigms of linguistics. Part of webinar ‘This IS Linguistics: Scope, Positionality, and Graduate Apprenticeship when Diversifying the Linguistics Curriculum’. (LSA webinar series on racial justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion in the linguistics curriculum.) Online: https://old.linguisticsociety.org/resource/webinar-linguistics-scope-positionality-and-graduate-apprenticeship-when-diversifying.Google Scholar
Miller, George. 2003. The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3). 141–44. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montrul, Silvina. 2022. Native speakers, interrupted: Differential object marking and language change in heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, Erin, and Hou, Lynn. 2023. Deaf communities: Constellations, entanglements, and defying classifications. A new companion to linguistic anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, George, Rachel, and Riner, Robin Conely, 122–38. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119780830.ch7.Google Scholar
Moutinho, Shannon. 2019. Reproducing whiteness in sign language interpreter education: A critical examination of curriculum. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1994. New Englishes and criteria for naming them. World Englishes 13(1). 21–31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1994.tb00280.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2000. Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. Creole Language Library 22. 65–84. DOI: 10.1075/cll.22.06muf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan. 2015. HPSG—A synopsis. Syntax—theory and analysis: An international handbook, vol. 2, ed. by Kiss, Tibor and Alexiadou, Artemis, 937–73. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110363708-004.Google Scholar
Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2017. An experimental approach to variation and variability in constituent order. San Diego: University of California, San Diego dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sv6z8bz.Google Scholar
Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2021. Non-Dravidian elements and (non) diasystematic change in Malayalam. Constructions in contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition, ed. by Höder, Steffan and Boas, Hans, 191–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namboodiripad, Savithry, and Henner, Jonathan. 2022. Rejecting competence—Essentialist constructs reproduce ableism and white supremacy in linguistic theory: A commentary on ‘Undoing competence: Coloniality, homogeneity, and the overrepresentation of whiteness in applied linguistics’. Language Learning 73(S2). 321–24. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12534.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin; and Lee, Robert G.. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nomura, Kazuyuki, and Mochizuki, Takako. 2018. Native-speakerism perceived by ‘non-native-speaking’ teachers of Japanese in Hong Kong. Towards post-native-speakerism: Dynamics and shifts, ed. by Houghton, Stephanie Ann and Hashimoto, Kayoko, 79–95. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7162-1_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2010. Genetic classification and language contact. The handbook of language contact, ed. by Hickey, Raymond, 48–65. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444318159.ch2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2006. Case and complementation in Nepali: Towards an HPSG analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, ms. Online: https://www.academia.edu/889064/Norcliffe_E_Case_and_Complementation_in_Nepali_Towards_an_HPSG_Analysis_Unpublished_manuscript.Google Scholar
ÓhIfearnáin, Tadhg. 2015. Sociolinguistic vitality of Manx after extreme language shift: Authenticity without traditional native speakers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231. 45–62. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2014-0031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Operstein, Natalie. 2015. Contact-genetic linguistics: Toward a contact-based theory of language change. Language Sciences 48. 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.10.001.Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2020. The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning 70(S1). 15–53. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12347.Google Scholar
Paap, Kenneth R., and Greenberg, Zachary I.. 2013. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 66(2). 232–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paikeday, Thomas M. 1985. May I kill the native speaker? TESOL Quarterly 19(2). 390–95. DOI: 10.2307/3586840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte, Dobrushina, Nina; and Khanina, Olesya. 2021. A typology of small-scale multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism 25(4). 835–59. DOI: 10.1177/13670069211023137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Natalie Obiko. 2022. Elite international schools have a racism problem. Bloomberg Businessweek, March 4, 2022. Online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-03-04/elite-international-school-education-runs-on-systemic-racism.Google Scholar
Pereplyotchik, David. 2017. Psychosyntax: The nature of grammar and its place in the mind. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60066-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfors, Andrew, Piantadosi, Steven T.; and Kidd, Celeste. 2023. Trans-inclusive gender categories are cognitively natural. Nature Human Behaviour 7. 1609–11. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01657-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piller, Ingrid, Torsh, Hanna; and Smith-Khan, Laura. 2021. Securing the borders of English and Whiteness. Ethnicities 23(5). 706–25. DOI: 10.1177/14687968211052610.Google Scholar
Piller, Ingrid, Zhang, Jie; and Li, Jia. 2022. Peripheral multilingual scholars confronting epistemic exclusion in global academic knowledge production: A positive case study. Multilingua 41(6). 639–62. DOI: 10.1515/multi-2022-0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirc, Anna Monika. 2013. Construction grammar and ‘non-native discourse’. Theory and Practice in English Studies 6(1). 55–73. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/129820.Google Scholar
Player, David. 2020. The power of White gaze: Erasure of Black signers. Medium, October 13, 2020. Online: https://dplayer84.medium.com/the-power-of-white-gaze-erasure-of-black-signers-77de766e71d8.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. The language of the gods in the world of men: Sanskrit, culture, and power in premodern India. Berkeley: University of California Press. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnqs7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prado, Erika, and Bucholtz, Mary. 2021. Getting dressed as a social activity: The interactional competence of an Autistic teenager who doesn't use speech. Research on Children and Social Interaction 5. 239–70. DOI: 10.1558/rcsi.17673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbi, Shakil, and Canagarajah, Suresh. 2021. Cosmopolitanism and plurilingual traditions: Learning from South Asian and Southern African practices of intercultural communication. The Routledge handbook of plurilingual language education, ed. by Piccardo, Enrica, Germain-Rutherford, Aline, and Lawrence, Geoff, 82–95. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil. 1997. Linguistics and the myth of nativity: Comments on the controversy over ‘new/non-native Englishes’. Journal of Pragmatics 27(2). 225–31. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00027-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambaran-Olm, Mary. 2021. A wrinkle in medieval time: Ironing out issues regarding race, temporality, and the early English. New Literary History 52(3–4). 385–406. DOI: 10.1353/nlh.2021.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramjattan, Vijay A. 2019. The white native speaker and inequality régimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education 30(2). 126–40. DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2018.1538043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remedios, Jessica D. 2022. Psychology must grapple with Whiteness. Nature Reviews Psychology 1. 125–26. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-022-00024-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges. 2020. A defense of the voice of competence. Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, ed. by Schindler, Samuel, Drożdżowicz, Anna, and Brøcker, Karen, 33–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198840558.003.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Catherine R. 2020. Dually authenticated and doubly modern: Institutionalizing jach maaya in the Yucatan today. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 30(3). 326–52. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Octavian. 2022. Puppets, jesters, memes, and benevolence porn: The spectacle of access. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy 53. 329–44. DOI: 10.4467/20843860PK.22.024.16613.Google Scholar
Robinson, Octavian E., Sheneman, Naomi; and Henner, Jonathan. 2020. Toxic ableism among interpreters: Impeding deaf people's linguistic rights through pathological posturing. Conferencing Proceedings of the 2019 WASLI Conference, 14–41. Online: http://wasli.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/WASLI-2019-Conference-Proceedings_July2020.pdf.Google Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2016. Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 26(2). 162–83. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2019. Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan, and Flores, Nelson. 2017. Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5). 621–47. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404517000562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason, and Treffers-Daller, Jeanine. 2014. A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics 35(1). 93–98. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amt049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason, Bayram, Fatih, DeLuca, Vincent, Pisa, Grazia Di, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Gharibi, Khadij, Hao, Jiuzhou, Kolb, Nadine, Kubota, Maki, Kupisch, Tanja; et al. 2023. Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of ‘control‘: Arguments and alternatives. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(3). 316–29. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716422000315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Nathan, Umbal, Pocholo; and Konnelly, Lex. 2020. Methods for increasing equity, diversity, and inclusion in linguistics pedagogy. Proceedings of the 2020 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Online: https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2020/Sanders_Umbal_Konnelly_CLA-ACL2020.pdf.Google Scholar
Saniei, Andisheh. 2011. Who is an ideal native speaker?! International Proceedings of Economics, Development and Research 26, Singapore, 74–78.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Lane. 2022. Primum non nocere: Before working with Indigenous data, the ACL must confront ongoing colonialism. Proceedings of the 60th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2. 724–31. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.82.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 2011. Linguistic evidence and grammatical theory. WIREs Cognitive Science 2(2). 206–21. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.102.Google ScholarPubMed
Sedarous, Yourdanis, and Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2020. Using audio stimuli in acceptability judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 14(8):e12377. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12377.Google Scholar
Settles, Isis H., Jones, Martinque K., Buchanan, NiCole T.; and Dotson, Kristie. 2021. Epistemic exclusion: Scholar(ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 14(4). 493–507. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, ed. by Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L., 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Singleton, Jenny L., and Meier, Richard P.. 2021. Sign language acquisition in context. Discussing bilingualism in deaf children: Essays in honor of Robert Hoffmeister, ed. by Enns, Charlotte, Henner, Jonathan, and McQuarrie, Lynn, 17–34. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavkov, Nikolay, Melo-Pfeifer, Sílvia; and Kerschhofer-Puhalo, Nadja (eds.) 2021. The changing face of the ‘native speaker’: Perspectives from multilingualism and globalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781501512353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, Arthur K. 2022. Shallow grammar and African American English: Evaluating the master's tools in linguistics. Southernizing sociolinguistics: Colonialism, racism, and patriarchy in language in the Global South, ed. by Antia, Bassey E. and Makoni, Sinfree, 32–46. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sugar, Alexander. 2014. Implementing a machine-readable grammar of Uyghur (UIG). Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics 1, 123–30.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Rupp, Laura. 2023. Legacies of syntactic change in a conservative dialect, York, England. Journal of Historical Syntax 7(6-19). DOI: 10.18148/hs/2023.v7i6-19.161.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520912793.Google Scholar
Tripp, Alayo, and Munson, Benjamin. 2022. Perceiving gender while perceiving language: Integrating psycholinguistics and gender theory. WIREs Cognitive Science 13(2):e1583. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsikewa, Adrienne. 2021. Reimagining the current praxis of field linguistics training: Decolonial considerations. Language 97(4). e293–e319. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2021.0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tupas, Ruanni. 2022. The coloniality of native speakerism. Asian Englishes 24. 147–59. DOI: 10.1080/13488678.2022.2056797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turits, Richard Lee. 2002. A world destroyed, a nation imposed: The 1937 Haitian massacre in the Dominican Republic. The Hispanic American Historical Review 83. 589–635. DOI: 10.1215/00182168-82-3-589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 2014. Trans-Himalayan. Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, ed. by Owen-Smith, Thomas and Hill, Nathan W., 11–40. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110310832.11.Google Scholar
Villavicencio, Aline, Sadler, Louisa; and Arnold, Doug. 2005. An HPSG account of closest conjunct agreement in NP coordination in Portuguese. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG 2005), 427–47. DOI: 10.21248/hpsg.2005.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila, Vulchanov, Valentin, Sorace, Antonella, Suarez-Gomez, Cristina; and Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro. 2022. The notion of the native speaker put to the test: Recent research advances. Frontiers in Psychology 13:875740. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Leiry K., and Sato, Masatoshi. 2024. Multilingualism and native speakerism in academic journals' language policies: Exploring a potential power of applied linguistics journals in promoting equitable publishing practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, First View. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263124000068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watumull, Jeffrey, Hauser, Marc D., Roberts, Ian G.; and Hornstein, Norbert. 2014. On recursion. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1017. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01017.Google ScholarPubMed
Waugh, Linda R. 1982. Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. Semiotica 38(3–4). 299–318. DOI: 10.1515/semi.1982.38.3-4.299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissler, Rachel Elizabeth, Drake, Shiloh, Kampf, Ksenia, Diantoro, Carissa, Foster, Kurtis, Kirkpatrick, Audrey, Preligera, Isabel, Wesson, Orion, Wood, Anna; and Baese-Berk, Melissa M.. 2023. Examining linguistic and experimenter biases through ‘non-native’ versus ‘native’ speech. Applied Psycholinguistics 44(4). 460–74. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716423000115.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay. 2003. The future of native languages. Futures 35(9). 961–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00052-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Kelly E., and Weissler, Rachel. 2021. Wright & Weissler response to Perspectives article: ‘Toward racial justice in linguistics’. Medium, February 12, 2021. Online: https://wrightweisslerwritings.medium.com/wright-weissler-response-to-perspectives-article-toward-racial-justice-in-linguistics-32242b1e9f34.Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1981. The struggle for a theory of native speaker. A festschrift for native speaker, ed. by Coulmas, Florian, 29–49. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110822878-003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorzi, Giorgia, Giustolisi, Beatrice, Aristodemo, Valentina, Cecchetto, Carlo, Hauser, Charlotte, Quer, Josep, Amat, Jordina Sánchez; and Donati, Caterina. 2022. On the reliability of the notion of native signer and its risks. Frontiers in Psychology 13:716554. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed