Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T09:39:59.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing of word-level stress by Mandarin-speaking second language learners of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2016

ZHEN QIN ,
YU-FU CHIEN  and
ANNIE TREMBLAY
ZHEN QIN*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
YU-FU CHIEN
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
ANNIE TREMBLAY
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Zhen Qin, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Lane, Blake Hall, Room 427, Lawrence, KS 66045-3129. E-mail: qinzhenquentin2@ku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates whether second language learners’ processing of stress can be explained by the degree to which suprasegmental cues contribute to lexical identity in the native language. It focuses on Standard Mandarin, Taiwan Mandarin, and American English listeners’ processing of stress in English nonwords. In Mandarin, fundamental frequency contributes to lexical identity by signaling lexical tones, but only in Standard Mandarin does duration distinguish stressed–unstressed and stressed–stressed words. Participants completed sequence-recall tasks containing English disyllabic nonwords contrasting in stress. Experiment 1 used natural stimuli; Experiment 2 used resynthesized stimuli that isolated fundamental frequency and duration cues. Experiment 1 revealed no difference among the groups; in Experiment 2, Standard Mandarin listeners used duration more than Taiwan Mandarin listeners did. These results are interpreted within a cue-weighting theory of speech perception.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 541 - 570
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoyama, K., Flege, J., Guion, S., Yamada, T., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /r/ and /l/. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 233–250.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realistic view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of nonnative consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775–794.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Braun, B., Lemhöfer, K., & Mani, N. (2011). Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 376–387.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 64, 311–317.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-R., & Xu, Y. (2006). Production of weak elements in speech: Evidence from F0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica, 63, 47–75.Google Scholar
Chládková, K., & Podlipský, V. J. (2011). Native dialect matters: Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, EL186–EL192.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Keating, P. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1468–1479.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second language speech: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207–228.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201–220.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. E. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 183–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Wales, R., Cooper, N., & Janssen, J. (2007). Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress for Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1913–1916). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (2007). The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1606–1618.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 266–275.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition. LOT dissertation series 113. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S. (Eds.), Phonology in perception (pp. 151–190). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H. (2012). The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 280–288.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2011). Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, EL1–EL7.Google Scholar
Fear, B. D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1893–1904.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Findings and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–273). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1986). Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and L2 learners speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 508–517.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & Fox, R. (1994). Auditory and categorical affects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3623–3641.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995). The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16, 1–26.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.Google Scholar
Fox, R., Flege, J., & Munro, M. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2540–2551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294.Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 349–366.Google ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 27, 765–768.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395–421.Google Scholar
Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3059–3071.Google Scholar
Howie, J. M. (1976). Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, K. (2011). On the perception of the neutral tone in Taiwan Mandarin. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Huang, K. (2012). A study of neutral-tone syllables in Taiwan Mandarin (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Ingvalson, E. M., Holt, L. L., & McClelland, J. L. (2011). Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate /r-l/ on the basis of F3 onset frequency? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 255–274.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for L2 learners phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A. (2005). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 201–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A., & Fougeron, C. (2002). Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus, 14, 147–172.Google Scholar
Kubler, C. (1985). The influence of Southern Min on the Mandarin of Taiwan. Anthropological Linguistics, 27, 156–176.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Sui, Y., & Yuan, J. (2010). A corpus study of the prosody of polysyllabic words in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1987). F0 pattern inference in the perceptual acquisition of second language tone. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 59–81). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S., & Zee, E. (2010). Articulatory characteristics of the coronal stop, affricate, and fricative in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 38, 336–372.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 527–542.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1961). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 32, 451–454.Google Scholar
Lin, C., Wang, M., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin–English and Korean–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 316–346.Google Scholar
Lin, M., & Yan, J. (1980). Beijinghua qingsheng de shengxue xingzhi [Acoustic characteristics of neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin]. Fangyan, 3, 166–178.Google Scholar
Lin, T. (1985). Tantao Beijinghua qingyin xingzhi de chubu shiyan [On neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin]. In Hu, S. (Ed.), Beijing yuyin shiyanlu (Working papers in experimental phonetics, pp. 1–26). Beijing: Beijing Daxue chubanshe [Peking University Press].Google Scholar
Liu, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47, 109–138.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255.Google Scholar
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., & Escudero, P. (2010). Explaining individual variation in L2 perception. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 279–297.Google Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of the L1 on the acquisition of Swedish vowel quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.Google Scholar
Nordenhake, M., & Svantesson, J. O. (1983). Duration of standard Chinese word tones in different sentence environments. Lund University Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 105–111.Google Scholar
Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Hong, G., & Fan, Y. (2013). English speakers' perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 186–197.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-H. (1997). Production and perception of Taiwanese tones in different tonal and prosodic contexts. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 371–400.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. (2004). Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language, 80, 98–126.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress “deafness.” In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N. (Eds.) Laboratory Phonology (Vol. 7, pp. 203–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Systems, Perception Research. (2007). Paradigm stimulus presentation. Retrieved from http://www.paradigmexperiments.com Google Scholar
Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New evidence for a phonetic mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81–110.Google Scholar
Shen, X. N. (1993). Relative duration as a perceptual cue to stress in Mandarin. Language and Speech, 36, 415–433.Google Scholar
Small, L. H., Simon, S. D., & Goldberg, J. S. (1988). Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 272–280.Google Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stagray, J. R., & Downs, D. (1993). Differential sensitivity for frequency among speakers of a tone and a nontone language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21, 143–163.Google Scholar
Swihart, D. A. W. (2003). The two Mandarins: Putonghua and Guoyu. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 38, 103–118.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 553–584.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian Listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 35–62.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation, and final lengthening in French. In Sundberg, J. & Carlson, R. (Eds.), Music, language, speech, and brain (pp. 108–120). New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2008). L2 stress perception: The reliance on different acoustic cues. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649–3658.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712.Google Scholar
Welby, P. (2006). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 343–371.Google Scholar
Yamada, R. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 305–320). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. L. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and L2 learners listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 260–271.Google Scholar