Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T01:28:36.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Being unequal and seeing inequality: Explaining the political significance of social inequality in new market democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2026

Matthew Loveless*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Mississippi, USA;
Stephen Whitefield
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Matthew Loveless, Department of Political Science, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA. Tel.: (+001) 662 915 7415; Fax: (+001) 662 915 7808; E‐mail: pmlovele@olemiss.edu

Abstract

Market economies inevitably generate social inequalities, of which the new democracies of Central and East European (CEE) societies have seen dramatic – though widely diverging – levels of growth. Do CEE citizens believe that inequality is excessive and, if so, why? And what is the connection between perceptions of social inequality and citizens' views of new markets and democracy? These questions are addressed using new data from mass surveys conducted in 2007 in 12 post‐communist CEE states. Surprisingly weak links are found between social inequality perceptions and national‐level measures of inequality as well economic, social and political conditions. Perceptions of social inequality are mainly driven by individual‐level assessments of market and democratic performance, but not by market or democratic ideals.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). European Journal of Political Research © 2010 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achen, C.H. (2005). Two‐step hierarchical estimation: Beyond regression analysis. Political Analysis 13(4): 447456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R. & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics 88(9–10): 20092042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G.A. & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C.J. & Guillory, C.A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross‐national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review 91(1): 6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, H.‐P., Mills, M. & Bernardi, F. (eds) (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and men's careers: An international comparison. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bollen, K.A. & Jackman, R.W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review 50(4): 438457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böröcz, J. & Róna‐Tas, A. (1995). Small leap forward: Emergence of economic elites. Theory and Society 24(5): 571581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, S. et al. (2009). Life courses in the globalization process: The development of social inequalities in modern societies. European Sociological Review 25(1): 5371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, V. (2003). Rethinking recent democratization: Lessons from the postcommunist experience. World Politics 55(2): 167192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, R.E. (1997). Comparative democracy and income distribution: Shape and direction of the causal arrow. Journal of Politics 59(10): 148164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, V. & Grime, K. (1997). Inequality in post‐communism. Regional Studies 31(9): 883890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1998). Congruence theory explained. In Eckstein, H.et al. (eds), Can democracy take root in post‐Soviet Russia? Explorations in state–society relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1997). Class inequality and the formation of political interests in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Sociology 38: 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. & Anderson, R. (2006). The political conditioning of economic perceptions. Journal of Politics 68(1): 194207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, M., Jesuit, D. & Smeeding, T. (2003). Regional disparities and income inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (Discussion Paper 2003/65). Tokyo: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. & Johansson, M. (1999). In search of smoking guns: What makes income inequality vary over time in different countries? American Sociological Review 64(4): 585605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, J. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics 50: 203234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, R.W. (1975). Political and social inequality: A comparative analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kaltenhaler, K., Ceccoli, S. & Gellneny, R. (2008). Attitudes toward eliminating income inequality in Europe. European Union Politics 9(2): 217241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedar, O. (2005). Introduction to the special issue. Political Analysis 13(4): 297300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, J. & Zagorski, K. (2004). Economic change and the legitimation of inequality: The transition from socialism to the free market in Poland and Hungary, 1987–1994. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 22: 319364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1992). The formation of party systems in East Central Europe. Politics & Society 20(1): 750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreidl, M. (2000). Perceptions of poverty and wealth in Western and post‐communist countries. Social Justice Research 13(2): 151176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53(1): 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmot, J. (2001). Income inequality, social environment and inequalities in health. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(1): 156159.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milanovic, B. (1998). Income, inequality and poverty during the transition from planned to market economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mungiu‐Pippidi, A. (2006). Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Democracy 17(3): 8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, V. (1989). A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review 54: 663681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örkeny, A. & Székelyi, M. (2000). Views on social inequality and the role of the state: Posttransformation trends in Eastern and Central Europe. Social Justice Research 13(2): 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuveny, R. & Li, Q. (2003). Economic openness, democracy and income inequality: An empirical analysis. Comparative Political Studies 36(5): 575601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, R. & Whitefield, S. (2004). Support for foreign ownership and integration in Eastern Europe: Economic interests, ideological commitments and democratic context. Comparative Political Studies 37(3): 313339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, P., Brody, R. & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelenyi, I. & Kostello, E. (1996). The market transition debate: Toward a synthesis? American Journal of Sociology 101(4): 10821096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwiebe, R. & Wegener, B. (2000). Social inequality and the perceived income justice gap. Social Justice Research 13(2): 123149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitefield, S. (2002). Political cleavages and post‐communist politics. Annual Review of Politics 5: 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar