Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-qmkzp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-28T09:02:48.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Portable Health Care Facilities in Disaster and Rescue Zones: Characteristics and Future Suggestions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2018

Noemi Bitterman  and
Yoni Zimmer
Noemi Bitterman*
Affiliation:
Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Yoni Zimmer
Affiliation:
Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Haifa, Israel
*
Correspondence: Noemi Bitterman, PhD Associate Professor, Industrial Design Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel E-mail: noemib@technion.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Natural and man-made disasters are becoming global concerns. Natural disasters appear to be growing in number and intensity due to global warming, population explosion, increased travel, and overcrowding of cities. In addition, man-made disasters do not seem to be diminishing.

At disaster sites, an immediate response is needed. National and international organizations; nongovernmental, military, and commercial organizations; and even private donors enlist to provide humanitarian and medical support and to send supplies, shelters, and temporary health care facilities to disaster zones.

Problem

The literature is sparse regarding the design of portable health care facilities intended for disaster zones and their adaptability to the tasks required and site areas.

Methods

Data were collected from peer-reviewed literature, scientific reports, magazines, and websites regarding health care facilities at rescue and salvage situations. Information was grouped according to categories of structure and properties, and relative strengths and weaknesses. Next, suggestions were made for future directions.

Results

Permanent structures and temporary constructed facilities were the two primary categories of health care facilities functioning at disaster zones. Permanent hospitals were independent functioning medical units that were moved or transported to and from disaster zones as complete units, as needed. These facilities included floating hospitals, flying (airborne) hospitals, or terrestrial mobile facilities. Thus, these hospitals self-powered and contained mobility aids within their structure using water, air, or land as transporting media.

Temporary health care facilities were transported to disaster zones as separate, nonfunctioning elements that were constructed or assembled on site and were subsequently taken apart. These facilities included the classical soft-type tents and solid containers that were organized later as hospitals in camp configurations. The strengths and weaknesses of the diverse hospital options are discussed.

Conclusions

Future directions include the use of innovative materials, advanced working methods, and integrated transportation systems. In addition, a holistic approach should be developed to improve the performance, accessibility, time required to function, sustainability, flexibility, and modularity of portable health care facilities.

Bitterman N, Zimmer Y. Portable health care facilities in disaster and rescue zones: characteristics and future suggestions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):411–417

Keywords

disasteremergencyhealth care facilitiestemporary hospitaltransportable hospital

Information

Type
Comprehensive Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 411 - 417
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none

References

1. Guha-Sapir, D, Hargitt, D, Hoyois, P. Thirty Years of Natural Disasters 1974-2003: The Numbers. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Univeritaires de Louvain; 2004.Google Scholar
2. Alexander, D. Globalization of disaster: trends, problems, and dilemmas. Journal of International Affairs. 2006;59(2):1-22.Google Scholar
3. Abolghasemi, H, Radfar, MH, Khatami, M, Nia, MS, Amid, A, Briggs, SM. International medical response to a natural disaster: lessons learned from the Bam earthquake experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(3):141-147.Google Scholar
4. Dara, SI, Ashton, RW, Farmer, JC, Carlton, PK Jr. Worldwide disaster medical response: an historical perspective. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1):S2-S6.Google Scholar
5. Franco, C, Toner, E, Waldhorn, R, Inglesby, TV, O’Toole, T. The national disaster medical system: past, present, and suggestions for the future. Biosecur Bioterror. 2007;5(4):319-326.Google Scholar
6. Webb, NJ, Richter, A. Strategy at the crossroads: medical humanitarian assistance missions for navy hospital ships. Defence & Security Analysis. 2010;26(2):161-179.Google Scholar
7. Bremer, R. Policy development in disaster preparedness and management: lessons learned from the January 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(4):372-384.Google Scholar
8. Heyman, SN, Eldad, A, Wiener, M. Airborne field hospital in disaster area: lessons from Armenia (1988) and Rwanda (1994). Prehosp Disaster Med. 1998;13(1):14-21.Google Scholar
9. Bricknell, MCM. Organization and design of regular field hospitals. JR Army Med Corps. 2001;147(2):161-167.Google Scholar
10. Owens, PJ, Forgione, A, Briggs, S. Challenges of international disaster relief: use of a deployable rapid assembly shelter and surgical hospital. Disaster Manag Response. 2005;3(1):11-16.Google Scholar
11. Kearns, RD, Skarote, MB, Peterson, J, et al. Deployable, portable, and temporary hospitals; one state’s experiences through the years. Am J Disaster Medicine. 2013;9(3):195-210.Google Scholar
12. Licina, D. Hospital ships adrift? Part 1: a systematic literature review characterizing US Navy hospital ship humanitarian and disaster response, 2004-2012. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):230-238.Google Scholar
13. Hooper, RR. United States hospital ships: a proposal for their use in humanitarian missions. JAMA. 1993;270(5):621-623.Google Scholar
14. Llewellyn, M. Perspectives from MTF USNS Mercy. Mil Med. 2006;171(10):30.Google Scholar
15. Harwood, JL, Pothula, V. The USS George Washington medical department: medicine in motion. Bul Am Coll Surg. 2011;96(4):20.Google Scholar
16. Center for Health Market Innovations. http://healthmarketinnovations.org/program/lifebuoy-friendship-hospital. Lifebuoy Friendship Hospital. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
17. Lam, DM. The Aerochir: the first “flying hospital.” Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(12):1174-1179.Google Scholar
18. Sneed, A. The flying hospital that rushes wounded soldiers to safety. https://www.wired.com/2015/01/military-airplane-hospital/. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
19. North, D. Mercy-medical-airlift charts 8-ease operation. Aviation Week & Space Technology. 1995;142(3):35-39.Google Scholar
20. Bruce, DL. “Evacuation and Transportation.” In: Ryan J, Mahoney PF, Greaves I, Bowyer G, (eds). Conflict and Catastrophe Medicine. London, UK: Springer London; 2014: 487-510.Google Scholar
21. Blackwell, T, Bosse, M. Use of an innovative design mobile hospital in the medical response to Hurricane Katrina. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(5):580-588.Google Scholar
22. Cheng, B, Shi, R, Du, D, et al. Mobile emergency (surgical) hospital: development and application in medical relief of “4.20” Lushan earthquake in Sichuan Province, China. Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(1):5-9.Google Scholar
23. Yaffa, J. Train for the forgotten. National Geographic. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2014/06/siberian-train/yaffa-text. Published June 2014. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
24. Boreham, A, Bricknell, MCM. The reconnaissance and siting of field hospitals. J Royal Army Med Corps. 2002;148(1):32-37.Google Scholar
25. Inside the Inflatable Hospital That’s Saving Lives in Nepal. https://www.wired.com/2015/05/inside-inflatable-hospital-thats-saving-lives-nepal. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
26. SYS Technologies. Clean Environment Systems. http://www.systechnologies.biz/medi-t. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
27. Case, T, Morrison, C, Vuylsteke, A. The clinical application of mobile technology to disaster medicine. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(5):473-480.Google Scholar
28. Leydecker, S. Nano Materials: In Architecture, Interior Architecture, and Design. Walter de Gruyter. Lifebuoy Friendship Hospital. http://healthmarketinnovations.org/program/lifebuoy-friendship-hospital. Published 2008. Accessed March 8, 2017.Google Scholar
29. McEvoy, MA, Correll, N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science. 2015;347(6228):1261689.Google Scholar
30 Kronenburg, R. Architecture in Motion: The History and Development of Portable Building. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2013.Google Scholar
31. Gosselin, C, Duballet, R, Roux, P, Gaudillière, N, Dirrenberger, J, Morel, P. Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high-performance concrete–a new processing route for architects and builders. Materials & Design. 2016;100:102-109.Google Scholar
32. Hager, I, Golonka, A, Putanowicz, R. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Engineering. 2016;151:292-299.Google Scholar
33. Wu, P, Wang, J, Wang, X. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automation in Construction. 2016;68:21-31.Google Scholar
34. Cesaretti, G, Dini, E, De Kestelier, X, Colla, V, Pambaguian, L. Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronautica. 2014;93:430-450.Google Scholar
35. Murphy, RR, Tadokoro, S, Kleiner, A. “Disaster robotics.” In: Springer Handbook of Robotics. New York USA: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 1577-1604.Google Scholar
36. Saidi, KS, Bock, T, Georgoulas, C. “Robotics in construction.” In. Springer Handbook of Robotics. New York USA: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 1493-1520.Google Scholar
37. Trevelyan, J, Hamel, WR, Kang, SC. “Robotics in hazardous applications.” In: Springer Handbook of Robotics. New York USA: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 1521-1548.Google Scholar
38. Calderon, CAA, Mohan, ER, Ng, BS. Development of a hospital mobile platform for logistics tasks. Digital Communications and Networks. 2015;1(2):102-111.Google Scholar
39. Levy, G, Blumberg, N, Kreiss, Y, Ash, N, Merin, O. Application of information technology within a field hospital deployment following the January 2010 Haiti earthquake disaster. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(6):626-630.Google Scholar