Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T10:56:42.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hear Today, Not gone Tomorrow? An Exploratory Longitudinal Study of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (Hearing Voices)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2013

Nicky Hartigan ,
Simon McCarthy-Jones  and
Mark Hayward
Nicky Hartigan
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Simon McCarthy-Jones*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Mark Hayward
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, and Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
*
Reprint requests to Simon McCarthy-Jones, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia. E-mail: s.mccarthyjones@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Despite an increasing volume of cross-sectional work on auditory verbal hallucinations (hearing voices), there remains a paucity of work on how the experience may change over time. Aims: The first aim of this study was to attempt replication of a previous finding that beliefs about voices are enduring and stable, irrespective of changes in the severity of voices, and do not change without a specific intervention. The second aim was to examine whether voice-hearers’ interrelations with their voices change over time, without a specific intervention. Method: A 12-month longitudinal examination of these aspects of voices was undertaken with hearers in routine clinical treatment (N = 18). Results: We found beliefs about voices’ omnipotence and malevolence were stable over a 12-month period, as were styles of interrelating between voice and hearer, despite trends towards reductions in voice-related distress and disruption. However, there was a trend for beliefs about the benevolence of voices to decrease over time. Conclusions: Styles of interrelating between voice and hearer appear relatively stable and enduring, as are beliefs about the voices’ malevolent intent and power. Although there was some evidence that beliefs about benevolence may reduce over time, the reasons for this were not clear. Our exploratory study was limited by only being powered to detect large effect sizes. Implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.

Keywords

Voice-hearingschizophreniapsychosis

Information

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 117 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birtchnell, J. (1996). How Humans Relate: a new interpersonal theory. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P., Lees, S. and Birchwood, M. (2000). The revised beliefs about voices questionnaire (BAVQ-R). British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, J., Hayward, M. and Drinnan, A. (2009). Relating to voices: exploring the relevance of this concept to people who hear voices. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 82, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csipke, E. and Kinderman, P. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of beliefs about voices. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddock, G., McCarron, J., Tarrier, N. and Faragher, E. B. (1999). Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: the psychotic symptom rating scales (PSYRATS). Psychological Medicine, 29, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, M., Denney, J., Vaughan, S. and Fowler, D. (2008). The voice and you: development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of relationships with voices. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, M., Overton, J., Dorey, T. and Denney, J. (2009). Relating therapy for people who hear voices: a case series. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16, 216–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longden, E., Corstens, D., Escher, S. and Romme, M. (2012). Voice hearing in a biographical context: a model for formulating the relationship between voices and life history, Psychosis, 4, 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy-Jones, S. (2012). Hearing Voices: the histories, meanings and causes of auditory verbal hallucinations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narum, S. R. (2006). Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics, 7, 783–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayani, T. H. and David, A. S. (1996). The auditory hallucination: a phenomenological survey. Psychological Medicine, 26, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, E. R., Williams, S. L., Cooke, M. A. and Kuipers, E. (2012). It's not what you hear, it's the way you think about it: appraisals as determinants of affect and behaviour in voice hearers. Psychological Medicine. doi:10.1017 /S0033291711002650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddle, A., Livingstone, S., Huddy, V., Johns, L., Stahl, D. and Wykes, T. (2012). A case series exploring possible predictors and mechanisms of change in hearing voices groups. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8341.2012.02074.x Google ScholarPubMed
Sorrell, E., Hayward, M. and Meddings, S. (2010). Interpersonal processes and hearing voices: a study of the association between relating to voices and distress in clinical and non-clinical hearers. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trower, P., Birchwood, M., Meaden, A., Byrne, S., Nelson, A. and Ross, K. (2004). Cognitive therapy for command hallucinations: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughan, S. and Fowler, D. (2004). The distress experienced by voice hearers is associated with the perceived relationship between the voice hearer and the voice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.