Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-6jg5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T13:32:31.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Money or mental health: the cost of alleviating psychological distress with monetary compensation versus psychological therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2010

Christopher J. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Alex M. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Christopher J. Boyce, Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. Email: c.j.boyce@warwick.ac.uk

Abstract

Money is the default way in which intangible losses, such as pain and suffering, are currently valued and compensated in law courts. Economists have suggested that subjective well-being regressions can be used to guide compensation payouts for psychological distress following traumatic life events. We bring together studies from law, economic, psychology and medical journals to show that alleviating psychological distress through psychological therapy could be at least 32 times more cost effective than financial compensation. This result is not only important for law courts but has important implications for public health. Mental health is deteriorating across the world – improvements to mental health care might be a more efficient way to increase the health and happiness of our nations than pure income growth.

Information

Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable