Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-29T22:29:43.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judicial Selection and the Democratization of Justice

Lessons from the Bolivian Judicial Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Amanda Driscoll*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Michael J. Nelson
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
Contact the corresponding author, Amanda Driscoll, at adriscoll@fsu.edu.

Abstract

In 2011, Bolivia became the first modern country to directly elect national judges. Reformers heralded the adoption of judicial elections as a “democratization of justice,” by which institutional independence would be assured, public confidence in the judiciary might be expanded, and various maladies of the judicial system would find resolution. We evaluate the elections in light of these objectives. We show candidates were advantaged when voters shared their partisan and demographic traits, resulting in unprecedented diversity on the national courts. Also, public confidence in the judiciary increased among government supporters but declined overall. We offer preliminary reflections for would-be reformers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2015 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable