We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recently developed direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) are groundbreaking in their high efficacy across disease genotypes and lack of severe side effects. This study used a cost-of-illness (COI) approach to estimate the net value conferred by one of these novel drug combinations, sofosbuvir and velpatasir (SOF/VEL), recently licensed for generic manufacture in India.
Methods:
This study considered COI from lifetime earnings lost due to disability and premature death from HCV infection. Risk of death and disability in future years was calculated using a Markov state-transition model with parameters determined from the literature. The future earnings of sampled patients were predicted using an empirical earnings model, with coefficients determined from India Human Development Survey data. Costs to both the patient and secondarily infected individuals were considered.
Results:
Preliminary results suggested that curing individuals diagnosed with chronic HCV in India would preserve INR 3.7 million (USD 55,750) in earnings per person. For non-cirrhotic (NC) and compensated cirrhotic (CC) individuals, the expected benefits associated with preventing secondary infections were worth between one and forty-one percent of the value of benefits conferred to the diagnosed individuals (depending on sex and extent of liver damage). Treating decompensated cirrhotic (DC) individuals with DAAs alone offered minimal earnings benefits because these individuals will likely remain disabled and unable to work without a liver transplant. Expected net benefits of treatment were substantial for NC and CC patients, ranging from INR 640,349 (USD 9,531) for NC women to INR 10.7 million (USD 158,968) for CC men. The cost of treatment for DC individuals exceeded the expected earnings benefits.
Conclusions:
For average NC and CC individuals, the cost of treatment with SOF/VEL is offset by the benefits of increased future productivity. Increased earnings are not sufficient to offset the cost of treatment for DC individuals, but treatment may still be justified on the basis of the intrinsic value of health improvements and other treatment benefits.
Europe's population is aging rapidly. Europeans aged 60 years and over formed only 16 percent of Europe's total population in 1980, but they now constitute 24 percent and will grow to 34 percent by 2050 (1). These challenges may be expected in the form of tighter labor markets, lower savings rates, and slower economic growth, as well as fiscal stress from lower earnings and tax revenue and increased pension and healthcare spending.
We may, however, overestimate the magnitude of these challenges and make poorer policy choices if we underestimate the productive contributions that older adults make to society. The literature measuring these productive contributions is regrettably underdeveloped, as is the literature on what policies can enhance such contributions.
This study focuses on the market and non-market productive contributions of older adults in Europe and addresses three questions:
(i) What is the nature and magnitude of the contributions made by older adults in Europe?
(ii) How do those contributions vary by country, time, and age, and how are they likely to evolve as the relative size of older cohorts swells?
(iii) How might changes in policy, institutions, behavior, and health likely influence the economic effects of population aging in Europe?
METHODS:
These research questions are explored using multivariate statistical tools to analyze rich data from multiple countries and waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).
RESULTS:
Older adults in Europe make significant productive contributions in the form of labor force participation, caregiving for family and friends, and volunteering. These contributions vary widely by country and are correlated with age, health status, official retirement age, and population age structure.
CONCLUSIONS:
The economic effects of population aging in Europe can be significantly moderated by effective retirement and healthcare policy.