We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This book explores the multiplicity of ways in which the Charlemagne legend was recorded in Latin texts of the central and later Middle Ages, moving beyond some of the earlier canonical "raw materials", such as Einhard's Vita Karoli Magni, to focus on productions of the eleventh to fifteenth centuries. A distinctive feature of the volume's coverage is the diversity of Latin textual environments and genres that the contributors examine in their work, including chronicles, liturgy and pseudo-histories, as well as apologetical treatises and works of hagiography and literature. Perhaps most importantly, the book examines the "many lives" that Charlemagne was believed to have lived by successive generations of medieval Latin writers, for whom he was not only a king and an emperor but also a saint, a crusader, and, indeed, a necrophiliac.
Contributors: Matthew Gabriele, Jace Stuckey, Sebastián Salvadó, Miguel Dolan Gómez, Jeffrey Doolittle, James Williams, Andrew J. Romig, Oren J. Margolis.
By
Andrew J. Romig, New York University's Gallatin School of Individualized Study
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
The appellation of great has been often bestowed, and sometimes deserved; but Charlemagne is the only prince in whose favour the title has been indissolubly blended with the name. That name, with the addition of saint, is inserted in the Roman calendar; and the saint, by a rare felicity, is crowned with the praises of the historians and philosophers of an enlightened age. His real merit is doubtless enhanced by the barbarism of the nation and the times from which he emerged: but the apparent magnitude of an object is likewise enlarged by an unequal comparison; and the ruins of Palmyra derive a casual splendour from the nakedness of the surrounding desert. Without injustice to his fame, I may discern some blemishes in the sanctity and greatness of the restorer of the Western empire. Of his moral virtues, chastity is not the most conspicuous: but the public happiness could not be materially injured by his nine wives or concubines, the various indulgence of meaner or more transient amours, the multitude of his bastards whom he bestowed on the church, and the long celibacy and licentious manners of his daughters, whom the father was suspected of loving with too fond a passion.
Edward Gibbon, History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire 49.4 (1782)
They recount that King Charles, whom they dare equate to Pompey and Alexander by giving him the surname of ‘the Great’, loved a certain ordinary woman desperately and immoderately.
Francesco Petrarch, Letters on Familiar Matters 1.4 (written c. 1333, published 1364)
WHEN the esteemed eighteenth-century English historian Edward Gibbon wrote condescendingly of Charlemagne's legendary renown in his epic History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, he must have known that he was echoing opinions penned by the famous Italian poet and scholar Francis Petrarch some four and half centuries earlier. Gibbon wrote that Charlemagne may indeed have been the greatest of his era, but this was only because his era had itself been something of a wasteland. Charlemagne was rather like the ruins of ancient Palmyra, which obtained their lustre only by standing out in stark relief against the surrounding bleakness of the Syrian desert.
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech
Edited by
William J. Purkis, Senior Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Birmingham.,Matthew Gabriele, Associate Professor of Medieval Studies, Department of Religion & Culture, Virginia Tech