We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Coal mining, along with other extractive industries, is often presented by Colombian governments as one of the key sectors driving the country’s economic growth and sustaining regional development. Based on this justification, successive governments have offered various forms of subsidies to coal mining companies, from tax rebates to special security services. However, recent domestic debate about the institutional framework governing extractive industries has drawn some attention, albeit limited, to the special benefits provided to this sector, introducing questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of such subsidies. This chapter explores the political dynamics behind subsidies to large-scale coal extraction in Colombia. After a brief overview of the socio-economic importance and challenges associated with coal production in Colombia, it describes some of the key subsidies that support coal extraction. It then explores how discursive, instrumental and institutional forms of power have been used by different actors to introduce, maintain and, in some cases, remove these subsidies. Two case studies – the Plan Vallejo and a royalty rebate – are briefly analysed in more detail.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.