We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Rachel Thomasson, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences,Elspeth Guthrie, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences,Allan House, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences
Patients presenting with acute behavioural disturbance pose a significant challenge in terms of management of risk to the patient (particularly when there is potentially life-threatening illness and/or injury) and to others. The consultation-liaison (CL) team offers acute advice and expertise across the general hospital setting and has a key role in policy development in collaboration with medical colleagues to ensure timely and effective intervention for patients presenting with acute behavioural disturbance. This chapter explores aetiological factors contributing to presentations of acute behavioural disturbance and approach to assessment. Behavioural and pharmacological interventions are outlined along with guides for optimising assessment and management of patients with acute behavioural disturbance in the emergency department (ED).
To investigate, through a semi-qualitative survey at three geographical sites, health professionals' and service users' opinion about the impact of providing separate consultants for in-patient and community settings. It looked at the perceived affect on various issues such as the course of the illness, service delivery, patients' satisfaction as well as the skills and training of psychiatrists.
Results
Opinion was divided about the level of satisfaction, advantages, consultants' skills and success of this model. The most consistent theme related to the problems with the continuation of care and therapeutic relationship. Most of the respondents were not fully informed about this change. An overwhelming majority believed that in-patient psychiatry is not a separate specialty.
Clinical implications
Communication and the sharing of information between the two consultants is the key to success in this model.
To determine the point prevalence of mental incapacity and the ‘Bournewood gap’ in general adult and old age mental health in-patients. The correlation of mental capacity assessment between doctors and nurses was investigated. Data were gathered on one census day for all general adult and old age psychiatric in-patients at three hospital sites.
Results
Half the sample lacked capacity and one third fell into the ‘Bournewood gap’. The capacity assessment by nurses and doctors correlated highly (κ=0.719, P=0.0001).
Clinical Implications
‘Bournewood gap’ patients should have their needs assessed in order to identify and protect their rights. Appropriately trained mental health nursing staff can undertake this assessment.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.