The methods of economic evaluation and HTA should be based on best practices and standards, tailored to unique country contexts that can be systematically applied to inform decisions. This paper outlines standards for the conduct of economic evaluations for HTA in Ghana.

A five-step process was followed to develop the HTA reference case as a methodological and reporting benchmark. These include (a) a review of literature and evidence synthesis, (b) a review of country policies, (c) a review and adaption of international frameworks, (d) expert/stakeholder consultations, and (e) the development of a methodological framework. A series of stakeholder consultations were done to refine, finalize, and validate the outcomes of the processes to generate a finalized reference case.

The Ghana reference case is made up of 14 components comprising: evidence synthesis, evaluation type, perspectives on cost, perspectives of outcomes, choice of comparator, data sources, outcome measures, discount rate, uncertainty, equity considerations, time horizon, heterogeneity, transparency, and budget impact. These provide methodological considerations and reporting requirements for economic evaluations for HTA. It provides a framework to ensure the best research methods are adopted to harmonize the evidence-generation process with the expectations of policy and decision-makers and ensure that policy decisions are based on uniform evidence.

Recommendations set out in this reference case when followed can provide context-specific evidence to support a rigorous and transparent system for evaluating healthcare interventions and technologies. It will support decision-making, ultimately improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery in the country.

In Ghana, the reimbursement of iron polymaltose complex (IPC) for iron-deficiency anemia treatment raises concerns as a potential cost driver for the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Prioritizing value for money is crucial for NHIS sustainability. With Ghana’s established health technology assessment (HTA) framework, we provide insights and preliminary findings in this case study on anemia treatment.

To further support institutionalization, we follow the Ghana HTA process guidelines and Ghana HTA reference case. Simultaneously, to build wider capacity for HTA in Ghana, relatively new trained staff was engaged while anchoring the team at the HTA Secretariat from the Ministry of Health. We started a situational analysis, which includes desktop review and key-stakeholder interviews. An umbrella review was commenced simultaneously to identify systematic reviews assessing clinical effectiveness of IPC compared to other medicines on the essential medicine lists for all population groups. We will assess cost-effectiveness to ultimately inform coverage decisions and possible implications for organizational structures.

Anemia is a persistent public health issue in Ghana, impacting children under five, young women, and expectant mothers. The essential medicine list includes various treatments, but ambiguity exists in the standard treatment guidelines regarding when to administer IPC versus alternative medicines. Under the NHIS, the intravenous formulation of IPC stands out as the most expensive treatment. A systematic review identified three papers, focusing on infants, children, adults, and pregnant women. Preliminary findings suggest weak overall evidence supporting IPC’s superiority, although adults may exhibit higher tolerance for IPC compared to alternative treatments.

Conducting an HTA on anemia treatments, despite the low treatment costs, is still significant as technical efficiencies can be achieved with high-volume drugs by analyzing prescription patterns and generating evidence to support potential changes. Findings from this HTA can be used elsewhere, especially in resource-constrained settings. Next steps involve finalizing the HTA and disseminating results to stakeholders.