We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Children are often disproportionately impacted by disasters, and yet pediatric specific considerations are not properly emphasized during disaster planning and training, resulting in the desperate needs of children falling through the cracks during disasters. Children differ from adults developmentally, physiologically, and psychologically, and are more vulnerable to negative long-term medical, social, and behavioral outcomes. Additionally, children lack autonomy and rely on adults to gain access to the healthcare system and other resources. Despite the distinctions between adults and children, time and curricula for pediatric disaster training is insufficient, and workforce capacity and competency to plan for and respond to the disaster related needs of children are inadequate; this is especially true for both physicians and other healthcare responders who do not complete a specific pediatric residency. Our study seeks to determine the key core competencies of pediatric disaster medicine that should be included in the training of responders.
Method:
A systematic gray literature review of existing pediatric disaster medicine curricula was performed, from which a list of the most commonly present key core competencies was created.
Results:
Data collection and analysis is expected to be completed by April 2023 and will yield a ranked list of core competencies.
Conclusion:
There is a need for improved pediatric disaster training that addresses the specific considerations of children; this is especially true for non-pediatricians who may be treating children following a disaster. The gray literature review will identify key components of pediatric disaster medicine, which should be applied to all such training curricula to ensure that the care of children who suffer during and after disasters is equitable across the globe.
Children differ from adults, developmentally, physiologically, and psychologically. Additionally, children lack legal agency, and thus rely on adults to gain access to the healthcare system and other resources. Though children are often the face of disaster relief, the desparate needs of children can fall through the cracks during disaster response. Many training programs for disaster responders do not give pediatric concerns and issues the appropriate attention they deserve. Pediatric disaster medicine is often minimally addressed in emergency medicine residencies and prehospital provider training. Furthermore, pediatric disaster supplies and protocols are often lacking and insufficient to meet the needs of children during and after disasters.
Method:
This is a modified Delphi study. An initial set of pediatric disaster medicine competencies from a systematic review of PubMed, EMBase and the gray literature will be presented to an initial group of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) comment, additions, and edits. This modified set of competencies will then be distributed to a large group of providers with experience in the field. Through a series of surveys, each competency in the curriculum will be rated. Those competencies which achieve a high overall rating will be reported.
Results:
Data collection and analysis expected to be completed by April 2023.
Conclusion:
This modified Delphi study will establish and prioritize a set of core competencies for pediatric disaster response based on expert recommendations. The use of such gold standard core competencies to develop discipline-role-specific pediatric disaster training can increase pediatric disaster workforce capacity and competency critically needed to improve pediatric disaster response.
The American civic canon holds that the Constitution creates three branches of government that are both separate and “equal.” Publius’s essays on Congress cast serious doubt on this supposition, at least with respect to the extent of each branch’s influence on the workings of the national regime. It is no mistake that both the Constitution and The Federalist treat Congress as the first branch of government. It is “justly regarded” as such, Louis Fisher says, primarily because of the appropriations power elucidated in Federalist 58. The Federalist understands Congress, George W. Carey writes, “to be the heart of the proposed system.” Even the doubts and concerns that Publius expresses about Congress reflect regard for its authority. Federalist 51, for example, acknowledges that the legislature “necessarily predominates” (Fed. 51, 350) in a republic, but it also seeks a remedy for the “inconveniency” this poses to the separation of powers. Institutionally, Congress has the power both to constitute and discipline the other branches, which have no comparable authority over it. Even when defending executive energy, Publius describes it as secondary to legislative deliberation. The centrality of the legislative branch is demonstrable not only institutionally but also theoretically, for it is here that Publius places his greatest hopes for solving one of his most fundamental problems: the reconciliation of a government with sufficient authority and energy on the one hand, with the preservation of both public and personal liberty, on the other – a concern that Hamilton and Madison respectively expressed in Federalist 1 and 37.