We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The environmental footprint of the healthcare sector is widely acknowledged and increasingly impacting decision-making in health policy. This study aims to explore what methods and metrics have been proposed to measure environmental impact of health technologies, and to investigate the feasibility and consequences of its inclusion in economic evaluations. This study is part of a larger Horizon Europe project, HI-PRIX.
Methods
We conducted a PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review of the scientific publications in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus between 2013 and November 2023. For the grey literature, the international HTA database and HTA agencies websites were searched to identify ongoing or published HTA dossiers. The search strategy was developed around two concepts: environment and health technology assessment. Any study or report that described a conceptual framework, methodology, or approach used or theorized to integrate environmental impacts of health technologies in an HTA was considered eligible for inclusion.
Results
Starting from 12,336 records, 16 scientific publications and 6 HTA dossiers were included for analysis. One-third of the contributions were published in 2023 and were mostly opinions, editorials, reviews, or economic evaluations. Lifecycle assessment was considered the preferred approach to investigate environmental impacts, yet difficulties exist; for example, methodologies for measuring greenhouse gas emissions are established, while for other dimensions are under development. Nevertheless, methods to incorporate environmental impact into economic models appear viable. About half of the papers analyzed cost–utility analysis, multiple-criteria decision analysis, and cost–benefit analysis as potential approaches. Fewer papers addressed budget impact, cost-effectiveness analysis, or other approaches.
Conclusions
Incorporating the environmental impact of health technologies in economic evaluations is under development, but consensus is still lacking on appropriate, feasible methodologies for its uptake. Before considering it in pricing or reimbursement-related decisions, the preferred method to maximize utility levels of different stakeholders (e.g., HTA agencies, industry) needs clarification.