We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Arguing that a comprehensive and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict depends on a resolution of the Jewish-Palestinian conflict within Israel as much as it does on resolving the conflict between Israel and Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, this timely book explores the causes and consequences of the growing conflict between Israel's Jewish majority and its Palestinian-Arab minority. It warns that if Jewish-Arab relations in Israel continue to deteriorate, this will pose a serious threat to the stability of Israel, to the quality of Israeli democracy and to the potential for peace in the Middle East. The book examines the views and attitudes of both the Palestinian minority and the Jewish majority, as well as the Israeli state's historic approach to its Arab citizens. Drawing upon the experience of other states with national minorities, the authors put forward specific proposals for safeguarding and enhancing the rights of the Palestinian minority while maintaining the country's Jewish identity.
It has been suggested that impairment of placental perfusion prior to delivery may manifest in early postnatal increase of creatinine values. We hypothesized that the smaller of a discordant set of twins would have a higher initial plasma creatinine value and decided to measure early plasma creatinine levels in discordant twins in order to evaluate whether this value may serve as an index of impaired placental perfusion. Plasma creatinine, urea nitrogen and blood hematocrit values were simultaneously measured in 35 sets of twins during the first day of life. The sets of twins were divided into 2 groups according to birth weight difference. Thus, 18 sets of discordant twins with birth weight difference greater than 15% comprised the GT group and 17 sets of twins with birth weight difference less than or equal to 15% comprised the LE group. The differences between the values obtained within each group were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. In the GT group the mean plasma creatinine level of the smaller twins was significantly higher than the level of the larger ones (p = 0.03), but there was no statistically significant difference between values obtained in twins of the LE group. The mean plasma urea level was higher in the larger twins of both groups, however only the difference in the GT group was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The mean hematocrit of the smaller twins was higher in both groups, but only the difference in the LE group was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Generally, there was a negative correlation between gestational age and early creatinine values. These results apparently support the notion that prenatal exposure to impaired placental perfusion may compromise the creatinine clearance of the fetus and result in higher early creatinine values. Since the creatinine values in our growth-retarded twins were within the normal range, no distinguishing line for evidence of a uterine-placental compromise could be drawn. Whether a certain early plasma creatinine value is suggestive or indicative of an intra-uterine hypoxic-ischemic insult, should be determined by documented instances of severe fetal compromise prior to delivery.
This state came here and was enforced on the ruins of my nation. I accepted citizenship to be able to live here, and I will not do anything, security-wise, against the state. I am not going to conspire against the state, but you cannot ask me every day if I am loyal to the state. Citizenship demands from me to be loyal to the law, but not to the values or ideologies of the state. It is enough to be loyal to the law.
Azmi Bishara, Palestinian Arab leader
The Palestinian Arab minority in Israel today is highly politicized. This was not always the case. It has undergone a gradual process of politicization over time, which has reached its zenith in recent years. As the previous chapter demonstrated, over the last six decades there has been a clear trend of greater political activism and self-assertion among Palestinian citizens of Israel. In stark contrast to their political quiescence during Israel's early years (1948–1967), members of the Palestinian minority (especially its younger members) have become increasingly mobilized and vocal in expressing their dissatisfaction with their “second-class” status within Israel. During the last four decades or so, they have staged countless protests, rallies, strikes, and demonstrations. They have cast off the co-opted, acquiescent, traditional leadership that once represented them in favor of younger, bolder leaders who are willing to openly challenge the Israeli-Jewish establishment.
Israel's Arabs are part of the same thing – together with the Palestinians – and there is no use solving the Palestinian problem without solving the Israeli Arab problem. Returning to the 1967 borders will bring neither peace nor security, but will transfer the conflict into Kfar Saba and Raanana [towns inside Israel]. So when you try to solve the problem, you must solve the whole thing.
Avigdor Lieberman, foreign minister and deputy prime minister, 2009-present
The main purpose of this book has been to draw attention to the escalating conflict within Israel between its Jewish majority and its Palestinian minority and to offer our ideas for how this conflict can be alleviated. This is not just an issue of domestic importance to Israel that threatens the country's internal stability and even its democratic regime. It is also an issue that is inextricably linked to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a conflict with massive regional and even global repercussions. We believe that the existence of a sizable Palestinian national minority within Israel has major implications for how the State of Israel should define itself and behave and for how the long-running conflict between Israel and the Palestinian nation should be resolved. Simply put, it means that it is highly problematic for the State of Israel to define itself as an exclusively Jewish state, and that it is wrong to believe that the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians can be solved by the two-state solution alone, that is a Jewish state and a Palestinian state.
In our state there will be non-Jews as well – and all of them will be equal citizens; equal in everything without exception; that is: the state will be their state as well.
David Ben-Gurion, December 1947
For most people, in Israel and around the world, “Israelis” are Jews or, more precisely, Jews who live in Israel. Israel – the Jewish state – according to this widespread perception is populated by Jews who have resurrected Jewish sovereignty in their ancestral homeland after millennia of dispersal and statelessness. Whether or not one celebrates or condemns this historical development, the Jewishness of the country's population (however secular some may be) is generally taken for granted. The equation of Israeli with Jew is constantly repeated in the media and by politicians and activists, “pro-Israel” and “anti-Israel” alike.
This common discourse has given rise to a great deal of popular confusion. All too often, people are completely unaware of the large number of non-Jewish citizens of Israel – around 1.8 million people – who make up a quarter of the country's total population of 7.5 million. One in four Israelis, in other words, are not Jewish. The vast majority of this significant non-Jewish population are Arabs, who at the end of 2009 numbered 1,526,000, a little more than 20 percent of Israel's population.
For the first time we shall be the majority living with a minority, and we shall be called upon to provide an example and prove how Jews live with a minority.
Up until this point in the book, we have focused our attention on the Palestinian minority in Israel. We have done so because it is essential to understand the developments that have taken place within the Arab community over the past few decades and especially in recent years in order to accurately assess the current state and likely future of Jewish-Arab relations in Israel. In particular, we believe that the growing political assertiveness of the Palestinian minority and its increasing demands for recognition as a national minority and for collective rights, including cultural autonomy, represent a major challenge for Jewish-Arab relations.
In this chapter, we examine the other side of the majority-minority divide in Israel – Israeli-Jewish society. We will first discuss the perceptions, beliefs, and views of Israeli Jews concerning Arab citizens of Israel and explain what gives rise to them. We will then discuss the attitudinal and political trends among Israeli Jews since the events of October 2000, which we regard as a significant turning point in Israeli-Jewish attitudes.
Israel is going through a very complex period and its long term future depends not only on reaching peace and security with the Arab world on the basis of two states for two peoples, but also on being able to create a new domestic balance in which the Arab citizens of Israel feel part of the state, with the equality and partnership they have been seeking for years, but which has been denied them by successive Israeli governments.
Avishay Braverman, Labor Knesset member and minister for minority affairs in the Netanyahu government, July 2009
Perhaps the greatest challenge facing the State of Israel today is that of developing a significantly stronger, more inclusive democracy that can better balance the interests of the Jewish majority and the rights of the Palestinian minority. In the previous chapter, we outlined how Israel can successfully meet this challenge. The changes that we proposed entail a fundamental transformation of Israel's ethno-national regime. Many Israeli Jews will no doubt be strongly opposed to such a transformation and will therefore resist it. This is to be expected. Ethnic majorities in multi-ethnic states are bound to oppose changes that enhance the position of the minority, especially if those changes involve giving the minority not just equal individual rights but also collective rights. Dominance within the state is often perceived by the majority to be its right, part of the “natural order” of things. Indeed, the majority often regards its rights and privileges as guaranteeing its very survival as a group.
Our goal in writing this book is not only to provide a thorough scholarly analysis of Jewish-Arab relations in Israel but also to issue an urgent call for a major change in these relations. The book is intended to sound an alarm, to warn that, unless immediate and dramatic action is taken, the relationship between Israel's Jewish majority and its Palestinian-Arab minority will continue to deteriorate. This will put Arab-Jewish coexistence in Israel, the country's political stability, and the quality of its democracy seriously at risk. It will also undermine the prospects for a truly comprehensive and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Some may think that we are being overly alarmist and that majority-minority relations in Israel are not nearly as bad, or as unstable, as we suggest. It might even be argued that whatever the complaints and frustrations of Israel's Palestinian minority, they have never really posed a threat to the state and have always remained firmly under its control. According to this view, the predicament of the Palestinian minority in Israel today and the relationship between it and the Jewish majority – though far from ideal – is not a pressing issue or major concern, certainly not for a country that faces a host of internal challenges and external threats. We strongly disagree with this perspective.
I am certain that the world will judge the Jewish state by what it will do with its Arab population, just as the Jewish people will be judged by what it does or fails to do in this state.
(Chaim Weizmann, Israel's first president)
The first part of this book dealt in detail with the internal conflict between Israel's Jewish majority and its Palestinian minority, and especially the escalation of this conflict over the past decade. The second part of this book now turns to the question of how to minimize or better manage this conflict. Eliminating the conflict entirely is not something we believe to be possible due to the depth of the cleavage between Jews and Palestinians in Israel. How, then, can Jewish-Palestinian relations in Israel be improved in any significant way? How can the State of Israel better meet the needs of its Palestinian minority and how can the sense of loyalty and belonging to the state on the part of the Palestinian citizens be enhanced? These are the central questions that will be addressed in the rest of the book.
In order to seriously tackle the contemporary internal Jewish-Palestinian conflict, it is essential to understand its underlying cause. It is our contention that the fundamental cause of the conflict lies in the character of the Israeli state itself.
Israel is liable in the end to doom its Arab citizens to fulfill its fears of them. How long can a relatively large minority be assumed by the majority to be an enemy without in the end actually turning into one? How long can the state exist as a stable political framework if this is how it treats a sixth of its citizens? Slowly and steadily, as if slumbering, Israel is missing its chance to rescue itself from a horrible mistake. It is creating for itself the enemy it will run up against after its other enemies have made their peace with it.
David Grossman, Israeli writer
No conflict in the world today receives more attention, attracts more controversy, and elicits more emotion than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Yet, for all the diplomatic interest, news coverage, and political passion it generates, the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is widely misunderstood. For some, the conflict is about the struggle of the Jewish state to survive in the Middle East and the unrelenting opposition it faces from Palestinians determined to prevent this. For others, the conflict is about the struggle of the Palestinians to end Israel's long-running occupation over them and achieve national self-determination.
We can only hope to “manage,” not to solve, conflicts arising from ethnocultural diversity. People who seek a “Solution” to ethnocultural conflicts are either hopelessly idealistic or murderously genocidal.
Will Kymlicka, Canadian political philosopher
Bringing about a significant improvement in Jewish-Palestinian relations in Israel will not be easy. What can we learn from the experience of other countries where ethnic conflict is prevalent? This is the central question addressed by this chapter. In gaining insight into the Jewish-Palestinian conflict inside Israel and ways of better managing it, it is important to look at it comparatively, that is, to analyze this conflict as part and parcel of a large class of ethno-national conflicts in today's world. Although the Jewish-Palestinian conflict inside Israel might be different from other ethnic conflicts in certain respects (as every conflict is), it is surely not unique. Some analysts have an inclination to describe Israel, including majority-minority relations within it, as entirely unique. Contrary to this view, we believe that it is useful to view majority-minority relations in Israel, and ways of improving them, through a comparative lens. We also believe that it is important to take a modest view with regard to the possibilities for improving inter-ethnic relations, realizing the limits of any possible “solution.”
It is inconceivable that we will continue the way we are going, because we are not only a Jewish state, we are also a democratic state. We can't run away from it. If we really mean to be democratic, then we have to be democratic. And that may create certain challenges to the Jewish nature of the State of Israel.
(Ehud Olmert, prime minister of Israel, 2006–2009)
The history of Arab-Jewish relations in Israel and majority-minority relations around the world leads us to conclude that Israel's future depends on how it treats its Palestinian minority and more generally on the type of majority-minority relations it develops. Whereas many analysts tend to concentrate on Israel's “external Palestinian problem” – its relationship with the Palestinian population in the territories taken in the 1967 war – we believe that its “internal Palestinian problem” is equally serious. The goal of this chapter is to offer a comprehensive agenda for improving the way in which the internal Palestinian problem is managed.
This chapter provides a systematic program for transforming the relationship between the Jewish majority and the Palestinian minority in Israel, and through this transformation enhancing the quality of Israel's democracy and its long-term political stability. It argues that in order to significantly repair the deteriorating majority-minority relations within it, Israel needs to create a political structure and establish patterns of political behavior that are significantly more congruent with the actual nature of its society.