We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) can cause serious healthcare-associated infections. Patients can become colonized and infected through contact with healthcare workers, hospital surfaces, equipment, and other patients. We evaluated the utility of broadly applied whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) for detection of hospital-based transmission.
Design:
Retrospective genomic and epidemiologic analysis of clinical VREfm isolates
Setting:
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, an 800-bed tertiary care center in Boston, MA, USA
Methods:
VREfm was isolated from patient screening and diagnostic specimens. We sequenced the genomes of 156 VREfm isolates, 12 at the request of infection control and 144 as a convenience sample, and used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences to assess relatedness. For isolate pairs separated by 15 or fewer SNPs by two orthogonal comparison methods, we mapped epidemiologic connections to identify putative transmission clusters.
Results:
We found evidence for 16 putative transmission clusters comprising between two and four isolates each and involving 41/156 isolates (26.3%). Our analysis discovered 14 clusters that were missed by traditional surveillance methods and additional members of two clusters that were detected by traditional methods. Patients in four transmission clusters were linked only by exposure to the postanesthesia care unit.
Conclusions:
We show that WGS surveillance for VREfm can support infection control investigations and detect transmission events missed by routine surveillance methods. We identify the postanesthesia care unit as a locus for VREfm transmission, which demonstrates how WGS surveillance could inform targeted interventions to prevent the spread of VREfm.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.