In this case-study, an educational psychologist trained three primaryteachers to give feedback to three 11-12 year-old low progress readers whowere each tutoring one low progress classmate, with the Pause, Prompt andPraise procedures. After themselves learning the Pause, Prompt and Praiseprocedures the teachers were provided with written instructions, and thentrainer feedback on how to provide feedback for the peer tutors. Results ofthe eight week program indicated substantial gains for both tutees andtutors on the Dunedin Teachers College Informal Prose Inventory, and on thenumber of successive book levels read to criterion. With the writteninstructions alone, teachers use very intrusive prompts when giving feedbackto peer tutors. However, when teachers also received feedback on their ownperformance they used far less intrusive forms of prompts, encouragingtutors to remember and explain their own tutoring behaviours and implementthe procedures accurately without becoming dependent on teacher support orsupervision.