We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
T. M. L. Wigley, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado,D. S. Schimel, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
We place box models within the hierarchy of terrestrial biosphere models used to assess atmosphere–biosphere carbon fluxes, develop the mathematical formulation of biosphere box models, and examine how gross and net fluxes resulting from land-use changes and CO2 and temperature feedbacks can be separately and simultaneously incorporated into box models. We then summarize insights gained from sensitivity studies using a globally aggregated biosphere model, and close with a proposal for combining the box model approach with some of the simpler regionally disaggregated process models.
Introduction
Balancing the carbon cycle at the global scale requires that one account for the observed cumulative and year-to-year buildup in the amount of atmospheric CO2 as the difference between emissions of CO2 and its uptake by various sinks. It is widely assumed that the natural carbon cycle was sufficiently close to steady state prior to human influence that emissions were exactly balanced by removal processes. Hence, the task of balancing the carbon budget for the time interval since the beginning of human influence requires deriving estimates of the human-induced perturbation in both emission and sink terms such that the difference between total emission perturbations and total sink perturbations equals the observed buildup.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.