The genus Pseudo-nitzschia includes several species capable of producing domoic acid, the causative agent of Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning. Some of these species have been recorded frequently in the Gulf of Naples. For one of the species, P. multistriata, which has been recurrently found in our sampling area since 1995, this is the first report for European waters. Here we provide further details on the fine structure of this species. Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata was the only one found to produce domoic acid among all the Pseudo-nitzschia species from the Gulf of Naples, and this finding raises the number of potentially toxic species in this genus to nine. Phylogenetic relationships among several Pseudo-nitzschia species were assessed using the hypervariable domains (D1–D3) of the large subunit (LSU) rDNA. The match between the phylogeny obtained and important taxonomic characters used in this genus are discussed. Results show that P. multistriata clusters with wider species lacking a central larger interspace in the raphe. Close genetic relationships were determined between P. fraudulenta and P. subfraudulenta, and between P. pungens and P. multiseries. Genetic differences among these pairs of species are comparable to those among isolates of P. pseudodelicatissima from the Gulf of Naples, indicating high intraspecific genetic diversity of Pseudo-nitzschia species in the relatively conserved LSU region. This could explain the problematic results obtained when testing a match between species-specific Pseudo-nitzschia LSU probes and our sequences.

The identity of Dinophysis sacculus Stein has proved to be problematic in recent years, during which this species has been associated with diarrhoetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) events along European coasts. To complement the scarce and at times contradictory existing information, we provide details of morphological variation in D. sacculus throughout its geographical range, which includes the Mediterranean Sea and European Atlantic coasts. Our data clarify its relationship with D. pavillardii Schröder. This species differs from D. sacculus only by the presence of a concavity along the dorsal margin, but transitional morphotypes are frequent in almost all the samples examined. We therefore propose merging the two species and classifying morphotypes with a dorsal concavity as D. sacculus f. reniformis (Pavillard) comb. nov. Despite the high variability of Dinophysis sacculus, it was generally possible to separate it from D. acuminata Claparède & Lachmann. The only character distinguishing the two species is the shape of the large hypothecal plates, which in D. sacculus are elongate, almost rectangular or sac-like, whereas in D. acuminata they are shorter, more convex dorsally and often more slender towards the antapex. Thecal areolation and sulcal list ornamentation are more pronounced in D. acuminata, although these characters are somewhat variable. Other thecal details, such as the shape of sulcal platelets and the structure of the apical pore area, were not useful for circumscription of the two taxa. In a few samples from the Galician Rias and from the Spanish Mediterranean coast, we observed morphotypes intermediate between D. sacculus and D. acuminata, which indicates that the two species can have slightly overlapping ranges of variability.