We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The principles for safety assessment of GM crops are reflected in the internationally binding Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. However, only in countries with a functional biosafety regulatory system will people be able to take full advantage of the bioeconomy. Based on experience and reviews of biosafety capacity building and training initiatives, some best practices are identified. Generally, countries with existing capacity for biotechnology R&D, and that have political support, have functioning regulatory systems and have benefited most from technical assistance programmes. The majority of developing countries are not yet able to implement their biosafety frameworks. Agencies implementing training initiatives need to balance them with commitment from governments. National frameworks can be tailored effectively for large, agricultural producing countries on one hand, and countries that primarily import agricultural commodities on the other. Regional collaboration would enable countries to share expertise and safety assessments. This chapter proposes that biosafety training should be linked to hands-on decision making to improve regulatory implementation in developing countries.