We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Cultural ecosystem services have proved a highly challenging area for undertaking ecosystem assessments and developing ecosystem services-based approaches that can be incorporated within decision-making. Cultural ecosystem services are clearly core to understanding how ecosystems relate to human well-being since they focus on the cultural and social processes by which humans and the non-human interact. This involves activities, such as recreation, and spaces, such as parks and gardens, that are at the centre of everyday life. The problematic dimension of cultural ecosystem services is that it brings the longstanding philosophical and social theory debates over the meaning of culture into an approach to understanding the natural environment that has largely emerged out of natural science and economics. Ecosystem services-based approaches encourage classification and measurement which is often highly problematic when considering cultural entities and practices that resist simple definitions. Furthermore, the cultural aspects of ecosystems are not just confined to cultural ecosystem services. For example, Holmlund and Hammer (1999) discuss food production as a cultural service, whereas the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) would define food as a provisioning service. As Fish (2011, pp.674–675) notes, it ‘is probably more accurate to think of “culture” less as a separate “box” within the services typology […]. In what sense, for instance, is the provision of “food” not also a cultural ecosystem service?’
The same arguments can be applied to water in that how water is treated and ‘mis-treated’ in any society will to a significant degree be influenced by cultural attitudes. There is a large literature on the cultural significance of water which highlights how different societies currently and historically have understood the significance of water and attached distinct political, cultural, and social meanings to water (Toussaint 2006). Strang (2006) argues that it is also important to recognise the crosscultural ‘flows’ relating to water and points out that in Western society and for some Australian Aboriginal peoples immersion in water can be a highly significant spiritual act.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.